Another Fine Whine About SCOTUS Vacancies

[MAGAman]

Yes, the Republican party under Trump has indeed adopted a totalitarian ideology not to mention a leader who fawns over dictators.

Totalitarian?
Like wiretapping the AP?
Intercepting allied leaders cell phone calls?
Spying on the opposition candidates campaign?
Using false terrorism claims to investigate a journalist?
Using the IRS to silence the opposition?

You mean that kind of Totalitarianism?

 

[MAGAman]

Huh... could you provide a link where this provision is listed when it comes to filling vacancies in the Supreme Court?

The link to the Biden Rule is in Biden's mouth.

 

[SAYIT]

We can expand the court to 11, as has happened before. Every Dem candidate should add that to their platform if the infantile moron in the White House gets a 3rd court pick before the election...

Every rational American hopes all the Dem 2020 hopefuls add that to their platform. Every STUPID idea they promote drives another nail in their 2020 coffin.

DNC Chief: ‘Our nominee won't stand a chance against Trump’
“These numbers are daunting," said Perez who added, “Our eventual nominee won't stand a chance against Trump and the GOP's fundraising machine ...”

Outside of fakenewsrooms and the ten largest ghettos, Americans would be kewl with it.

Outside of fakenewsrooms and the ten largest ghettos, Americans are kewl.

 

[SAYIT]

Why? It was a decision within the purview of the authority of the Majority Leader.

You think Democrats are deserving of some form of imagined fairness at this point? Fuck that.

The fact it was within the purview of the authority of the Majority Leader does not make the excuse used for doing it a valid one.

Really? Wherein lies the invalidity? Be specific.

No, I do not except you to act any differently than the Dems. I always say there is little difference between the two parties and shit like this proves it.

At this point in time, one party remains in the end American, the other has adopted a totalitarian ideology that killed nearly 100,000,000 people in the 20th Century, and one the Americans spent half that century defeating. There is indeed a difference.

Yes, the Republican party under Trump has indeed adopted a totalitarian ideology not to mention a leader who fawns over dictators.

Please explain in detail which totalitarian ideology, and also if you will your own expertise in dealing with recalcitrant foreign leaders, both financial and political.

Why? A lack of expertise doesn’t seem to hinder you in making comments on our presidents.

So you have no adult explanation as to why you claim "the Republican party under Trump has indeed adopted a totalitarian ideology" but rather just the same lame leftarded bitterness so typical of mindless zombies.

And to think you once almost seemed rational. Very sad.

 

[OKTexas]

"If there is a SCOTUS vacancy next year and @senatemajldr carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it-despite his own previous precedent in blocking Garland-it will tear this country apart," David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon.

Nonsense. The position will be filled, and there will be nothing the Democrats can do about it.

RBG scare: David Axelrod warns Supreme Court vacancy fight could 'tear this country apart'

Ah, sosomefinally admits the excuse not to allow it to be filled was completely bogus.

She's got time to kick or resign before the election year. I say under on 31 Oct, what's your guess?

.

 

[OKTexas]

"If there is a SCOTUS vacancy next year and @senatemajldr carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it-despite his own previous precedent in blocking Garland-it will tear this country apart," David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon.

Nonsense. The position will be filled, and there will be nothing the Democrats can do about it.

RBG scare: David Axelrod warns Supreme Court vacancy fight could 'tear this country apart'

Why would a senate and president of the same party leave a vacancy unfilled?

Yep, to use a commiecrat slogan, can't let a tragedy go to waste.

.

 

[WEATHER53]

They want to change the rules on this game too because they can’t win otherwise. No way to cheat so they want out and a new method of scoring.

 

[Jitss617]

"If there is a SCOTUS vacancy next year and @senatemajldr carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it-despite his own previous precedent in blocking Garland-it will tear this country apart," David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon.

Nonsense. The position will be filled, and there will be nothing the Democrats can do about it.

RBG scare: David Axelrod warns Supreme Court vacancy fight could 'tear this country apart'

Ah, sosomefinally admits the excuse not to allow it to be filled was completely bogus.

It was not, and was fully constitutional.

If it were not bogus, then the same reason should apply over the next year. Yet you yourself have admitted that it will not and should not.

Say good bye to abortions

 

[Harpy Eagle]

"If there is a SCOTUS vacancy next year and @senatemajldr carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it-despite his own previous precedent in blocking Garland-it will tear this country apart," David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon.

Nonsense. The position will be filled, and there will be nothing the Democrats can do about it.

RBG scare: David Axelrod warns Supreme Court vacancy fight could 'tear this country apart'

Ah, sosomefinally admits the excuse not to allow it to be filled was completely bogus.

It was not, and was fully constitutional.

If it were not bogus, then the same reason should apply over the next year. Yet you yourself have admitted that it will not and should not.

Say good bye to abortions

Right now there are maybe two justices that support the full overturn of RvW. Even if the new one does as well that will not give enough votes for it to happen.

 

[Jitss617]

"If there is a SCOTUS vacancy next year and @senatemajldr carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it-despite his own previous precedent in blocking Garland-it will tear this country apart," David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon.

Nonsense. The position will be filled, and there will be nothing the Democrats can do about it.

RBG scare: David Axelrod warns Supreme Court vacancy fight could 'tear this country apart'

Ah, sosomefinally admits the excuse not to allow it to be filled was completely bogus.

It was not, and was fully constitutional.

If it were not bogus, then the same reason should apply over the next year. Yet you yourself have admitted that it will not and should not.

Say good bye to abortions

Right now there are maybe two justices that support the full overturn of RvW. Even if the new one does as well that will not give enough votes for it to happen.

That’s easily over turned by 5 right now. It’s a flawed judgment even democrats admit that.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That’s easily over turned by 5 right now. It’s a flawed judgment even democrats admit that.

There are not 5 that support overturning it. Roberts does not, Gorsuch does not, Kavanaugh does not, Breyer does not, Sotomayor does not, Kagan does not.

 

[Weatherman2020]

"If there is a SCOTUS vacancy next year and @senatemajldr carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it-despite his own previous precedent in blocking Garland-it will tear this country apart," David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon.

Nonsense. The position will be filled, and there will be nothing the Democrats can do about it.

RBG scare: David Axelrod warns Supreme Court vacancy fight could 'tear this country apart'

What the Left admit to us they’ll tear this country apart over it.

Just as they did in 1860.

 

[Jitss617]

That’s easily over turned by 5 right now. It’s a flawed judgment even democrats admit that.

There are not 5 that support overturning it. Roberts does not, Gorsuch does not, Kavanaugh does not, Breyer does not, Sotomayor does not, Kagan does not.

Roberts, gorsuch Kavu, all do. Sorry that’s why they were hired

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Roberts, gorsuch Kavu, all do. Sorry that’s why they were hired

Nope, none of them do. The latter two were hired because they do not. Trump does not either, it is just a talking point to get your rubes to vote for him.

 

[skews13]

"If there is a SCOTUS vacancy next year and @senatemajldr carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it-despite his own previous precedent in blocking Garland-it will tear this country apart," David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon.

Nonsense. The position will be filled, and there will be nothing the Democrats can do about it.

RBG scare: David Axelrod warns Supreme Court vacancy fight could 'tear this country apart'

And abortion will still be legal, and states will pass even more gun laws, and there isn't anything Republicans can do about it.

 

[Jitss617]

Roberts, gorsuch Kavu, all do. Sorry that’s why they were hired

Nope, none of them do. The latter two were hired because they do not. Trump does not either, it is just a talking point to get your rubes to vote for him.

Any evidence on how they would vote?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Roberts, gorsuch Kavu, all do. Sorry that’s why they were hired

Nope, none of them do. The latter two were hired because they do not. Trump does not either, it is just a talking point to get your rubes to vote for him.

Any evidence on how they would vote?

just their judicial history.

 

[Jitss617]

Roberts, gorsuch Kavu, all do. Sorry that’s why they were hired

Nope, none of them do. The latter two were hired because they do not. Trump does not either, it is just a talking point to get your rubes to vote for him.

Any evidence on how they would vote?

just their judicial history.

I did they were hired by anti abortion presidents..

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Roberts, gorsuch Kavu, all do. Sorry that’s why they were hired

Nope, none of them do. The latter two were hired because they do not. Trump does not either, it is just a talking point to get your rubes to vote for him.

Any evidence on how they would vote?

just their judicial history.

I did they were hired by anti abortion presidents..

you are such a rube. Trump was pro-abortion till the day he choose to run as a Repub.

 

[Jitss617]

Roberts, gorsuch Kavu, all do. Sorry that’s why they were hired

Nope, none of them do. The latter two were hired because they do not. Trump does not either, it is just a talking point to get your rubes to vote for him.

Any evidence on how they would vote?

just their judicial history.

I did they were hired by anti abortion presidents..

you are such a rube. Trump was pro-abortion till the day he choose to run as a Repub.

Not sure what that means but ok