Another Liberal Myth Exploded

[Marxist]

For those of you thinking CEO's earn too much, just remember, if you ever became the CEO of anything, you'll be the very thing you hate. Rich.

I'd rather not exploit others.

 

[SAYIT]

There's only one way to achieve your "worker's paradise" dream ... at the end of a gun. Like most "capitalists" I started out as an hourly wage earner but never whined about being "exploited." Like many I saved, looked for opportunities and when a good one came I borrowed what I could and jumped in with both feet. Making it work meant 80 hr work weeks but it created personal ownership of production and personal wealth ... something I wouldn't expect a socialist to understand or approve of.

Violent revolution, yes. The majority cannot become capitalists, no matter how hard they work, it's impossible.

Ah ... the eternal yet baseless whiny socialist lament. The Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance found that roughly half of all Americans owned stocks either directly or indirectly (pension funds, 401k, IRAs, etc.) in 2012.

No, literally, by definition, only a minority can be the capitalists, owning stocks, pensions? Oh come on, you know what I'm referring to, don't embarrass yourself. You show me one viable way capitalism can end poverty, one way capitalism can survive within the next 200 years.

Bullshit. Investing in America by investing in the machine (capitalism) is exactly how we create jobs. Whining about the "unfairness" of it all is the socialist's way of demanding we stop the train so he can get a better grip. Nobody here owes you anything, Princess. Grow up.

So you admit capitalism relies on systemic poverty, cannot sustain itself, and creates a massive wealth gap without regulation?...

Nope but taking the responsibility to help grow America's economy is clearly Kryptonite to every whiny socialist.

 

[Marxist]

Violent revolution, yes. The majority cannot become capitalists, no matter how hard they work, it's impossible.

Ah ... the eternal yet baseless whiny socialist lament. The Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance found that roughly half of all Americans owned stocks either directly or indirectly (pension funds, 401k, IRAs, etc.) in 2012.

No, literally, by definition, only a minority can be the capitalists, owning stocks, pensions? Oh come on, you know what I'm referring to, don't embarrass yourself. You show me one viable way capitalism can end poverty, one way capitalism can survive within the next 200 years.

Bullshit. Investing in America by investing in the machine (capitalism) is exactly how we create jobs. Whining about the "unfairness" of it all is the socialist's way of demanding we stop the train so he can get a better grip. Nobody here owes you anything, Princess. Grow up.

So you admit capitalism relies on systemic poverty, cannot sustain itself, and creates a massive wealth gap without regulation?...

Nope but taking the responsibility to help grow America's economy is clearly Kryptonite to every whiny socialist.

A capitalist economy to benefit the capitalists.

 

[SAYIT]

And at the end of the day that is why Marxist economies are doomed to fail. The "Worker's Paradise" is a fool's dream in which paying one's employees what the market dictates is "exploiting people's labor."
Frankly, too many of those who once worked for me were exploiting my capital.

Which ones are you referring to? A "marxist" economy wouldn't exist if communism was achieved, unless you count efficient use of surplus, guaranteed work, collective ownership of production. Workers paradise isn't a fools dream, it's something to strive for. Labor is exploited, constantly, although you don't follow the labor theory of value, so I wouldn't expect a capitalist to understand. They were exploiting your capital? Oh please. If a sweatshop worker produces $50 in products for the capitalist in an hour, leaving out where the base materials came from, and all of the labor used, the exploitation is real.

There's only one way to achieve your "worker's paradise" dream ... at the end of a gun. Like most "capitalists" I started out as an hourly wage earner but never whined about being "exploited." Like many I saved, looked for opportunities and when a good one came I borrowed what I could and jumped in with both feet. Making it work meant 80 hr work weeks but it created personal ownership of production and personal wealth ... something I wouldn't expect a socialist to understand or approve of.

Violent revolution, yes. The majority cannot become capitalists, no matter how hard they work, it's impossible.

Ah ... the eternal yet baseless whiny socialist lament. The Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance found that roughly half of all Americans owned stocks either directly or indirectly (pension funds, 401k, IRAs, etc.) in 2012.

Yep, and that's half the story. How many of this half of all Americans have little more than what they invested and how many have lost some of their principle?

Q. How do you spell insider trading?

A. W A L L - S T R E E T

Another whiny sniveling socialist waddles in. Do you people ever do anything but whine?

 

[Brain357]

So again what is better for the economy. 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?

Again, unless you are management or a shareholder it's none of your biz.

Really? So a slow economy is good for the country?

Paying people for their labor does not slow the economy.
What is good for the country is a noble cause.
What is best for an individual company is for ownership and management to determine and still none of your biz.
Get your mind off my wallet and your hand out of my pocket.

No but lots of inequality does slow the economy. So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?

Lotsa people making what they are worth and most already are.

Still dodging the question? How sad. If you truly believe lots of inequality doesn't slow the economy than answer the question.

 

[SAYIT]

Ah ... the eternal yet baseless whiny socialist lament. The Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance found that roughly half of all Americans owned stocks either directly or indirectly (pension funds, 401k, IRAs, etc.) in 2012.

No, literally, by definition, only a minority can be the capitalists, owning stocks, pensions? Oh come on, you know what I'm referring to, don't embarrass yourself. You show me one viable way capitalism can end poverty, one way capitalism can survive within the next 200 years.

Bullshit. Investing in America by investing in the machine (capitalism) is exactly how we create jobs. Whining about the "unfairness" of it all is the socialist's way of demanding we stop the train so he can get a better grip. Nobody here owes you anything, Princess. Grow up.

So you admit capitalism relies on systemic poverty, cannot sustain itself, and creates a massive wealth gap without regulation?...

Nope but taking the responsibility to help grow America's economy is clearly Kryptonite to every whiny socialist.

A capitalist economy to benefit the capitalists.

And when you grow the cojones to help pull the train you too can benefit from being a capitalist. Until then you'll just be a whiny sniveling crybaby.

 

[Marxist]

Which ones are you referring to? A "marxist" economy wouldn't exist if communism was achieved, unless you count efficient use of surplus, guaranteed work, collective ownership of production. Workers paradise isn't a fools dream, it's something to strive for. Labor is exploited, constantly, although you don't follow the labor theory of value, so I wouldn't expect a capitalist to understand. They were exploiting your capital? Oh please. If a sweatshop worker produces $50 in products for the capitalist in an hour, leaving out where the base materials came from, and all of the labor used, the exploitation is real.

There's only one way to achieve your "worker's paradise" dream ... at the end of a gun. Like most "capitalists" I started out as an hourly wage earner but never whined about being "exploited." Like many I saved, looked for opportunities and when a good one came I borrowed what I could and jumped in with both feet. Making it work meant 80 hr work weeks but it created personal ownership of production and personal wealth ... something I wouldn't expect a socialist to understand or approve of.

Violent revolution, yes. The majority cannot become capitalists, no matter how hard they work, it's impossible.

Ah ... the eternal yet baseless whiny socialist lament. The Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance found that roughly half of all Americans owned stocks either directly or indirectly (pension funds, 401k, IRAs, etc.) in 2012.

Yep, and that's half the story. How many of this half of all Americans have little more than what they invested and how many have lost some of their principle?

Q. How do you spell insider trading?

A. W A L L - S T R E E T

Another whiny sniveling socialist waddles in. Do you people ever do anything but whine?

Yeah, you love to tell others who oppose a horrible system they're whining, the damn anti-slavery folks need to stop whining. Fucking idiot.

 

[Marxist]

No, literally, by definition, only a minority can be the capitalists, owning stocks, pensions? Oh come on, you know what I'm referring to, don't embarrass yourself. You show me one viable way capitalism can end poverty, one way capitalism can survive within the next 200 years.

Bullshit. Investing in America by investing in the machine (capitalism) is exactly how we create jobs. Whining about the "unfairness" of it all is the socialist's way of demanding we stop the train so he can get a better grip. Nobody here owes you anything, Princess. Grow up.

So you admit capitalism relies on systemic poverty, cannot sustain itself, and creates a massive wealth gap without regulation?...

Nope but taking the responsibility to help grow America's economy is clearly Kryptonite to every whiny socialist.

A capitalist economy to benefit the capitalists.

And when you grow the cojones to help pull the train you too can benefit from being a capitalist. Until then you'll just be a whiny sniveling crybaby.

I couldn't bring myself to do that, knowing that millions starve to death due to capitalism.

 

[SAYIT]

Again, unless you are management or a shareholder it's none of your biz.

Really? So a slow economy is good for the country?

Paying people for their labor does not slow the economy.
What is good for the country is a noble cause.
What is best for an individual company is for ownership and management to determine and still none of your biz.
Get your mind off my wallet and your hand out of my pocket.

No but lots of inequality does slow the economy. So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?

Lotsa people making what they are worth and most already are.

Still dodging the question? How sad. If you truly believe lots of inequality doesn't slow the economy than answer the question.

I answered your question, Princess (So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?) and I don't take marching orders from whiny socialists.

 

[Marxist]

Really? So a slow economy is good for the country?

Paying people for their labor does not slow the economy.
What is good for the country is a noble cause.
What is best for an individual company is for ownership and management to determine and still none of your biz.
Get your mind off my wallet and your hand out of my pocket.

No but lots of inequality does slow the economy. So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?

Lotsa people making what they are worth and most already are.

Still dodging the question? How sad. If you truly believe lots of inequality doesn't slow the economy than answer the question.

I answered your question, Princess (So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?) and I don't take marching orders from whiny socialists.

I don't take whiny orders from idiotic supporters of a exploitative system

 

[SAYIT]

There's only one way to achieve your "worker's paradise" dream ... at the end of a gun. Like most "capitalists" I started out as an hourly wage earner but never whined about being "exploited." Like many I saved, looked for opportunities and when a good one came I borrowed what I could and jumped in with both feet. Making it work meant 80 hr work weeks but it created personal ownership of production and personal wealth ... something I wouldn't expect a socialist to understand or approve of.

Violent revolution, yes. The majority cannot become capitalists, no matter how hard they work, it's impossible.

Ah ... the eternal yet baseless whiny socialist lament. The Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance found that roughly half of all Americans owned stocks either directly or indirectly (pension funds, 401k, IRAs, etc.) in 2012.

Yep, and that's half the story. How many of this half of all Americans have little more than what they invested and how many have lost some of their principle?

Q. How do you spell insider trading?

A. W A L L - S T R E E T

Another whiny sniveling socialist waddles in. Do you people ever do anything but whine?

Yeah, you love to tell others who oppose a horrible system they're whining, the damn anti-slavery folks need to stop whining. Fucking idiot.

Yanno, despite our warts America seems to work just fine on this "horrible system" and if you had the cojones to stand for your "beliefs" you'd move to a country more to your liking. Greece is beautiful this time of year.

 

[SAYIT]

Paying people for their labor does not slow the economy.
What is good for the country is a noble cause.
What is best for an individual company is for ownership and management to determine and still none of your biz.
Get your mind off my wallet and your hand out of my pocket.

No but lots of inequality does slow the economy. So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?

Lotsa people making what they are worth and most already are.

Still dodging the question? How sad. If you truly believe lots of inequality doesn't slow the economy than answer the question.

I answered your question, Princess (So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?) and I don't take marching orders from whiny socialists.

I don't take whiny orders from idiotic supporters of a exploitative system

I haven't noticed anyone but you issuing orders here, Princess.

 

[SAYIT]

Bullshit. Investing in America by investing in the machine (capitalism) is exactly how we create jobs. Whining about the "unfairness" of it all is the socialist's way of demanding we stop the train so he can get a better grip. Nobody here owes you anything, Princess. Grow up.

So you admit capitalism relies on systemic poverty, cannot sustain itself, and creates a massive wealth gap without regulation?...

Nope but taking the responsibility to help grow America's economy is clearly Kryptonite to every whiny socialist.

A capitalist economy to benefit the capitalists.

And when you grow the cojones to help pull the train you too can benefit from being a capitalist. Until then you'll just be a whiny sniveling crybaby.

I couldn't bring myself to do that, knowing that millions starve to death due to capitalism.

Self-serving bullshit but remarkably typical of the Marxist POV.

 

[Marxist]

Violent revolution, yes. The majority cannot become capitalists, no matter how hard they work, it's impossible.

Ah ... the eternal yet baseless whiny socialist lament. The Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance found that roughly half of all Americans owned stocks either directly or indirectly (pension funds, 401k, IRAs, etc.) in 2012.

Yep, and that's half the story. How many of this half of all Americans have little more than what they invested and how many have lost some of their principle?

Q. How do you spell insider trading?

A. W A L L - S T R E E T

Another whiny sniveling socialist waddles in. Do you people ever do anything but whine?

Yeah, you love to tell others who oppose a horrible system they're whining, the damn anti-slavery folks need to stop whining. Fucking idiot.

Yanno, despite our warts America seems to work just fine on this "horrible system" and if you had the cojones to stand for your "beliefs" you'd move to a country more to your liking. Greece is beautiful this time of year.

Tell that to those in poverty, the rising cost of living worldwide when wages arent increasing, the working classes in china, india, the third world.

 

[BluesLegend]

HE IS NOT getting gross amounts of money!
He is getting RSUs... that he can't sell until things happen... so where is the "gross amount of money"???

284 million is a pretty gross amount in my book.

If you are not a stock holder its none of your business, sorry to burst your bubble.

So again what is better for the economy. 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?

Feel free to move to China, go live your communist dream working for the collective. What you bunch of dumb asses don't understand is that if you hire some dip shit retard CEO who is willing to work for peanuts the company is more likely to fail and then they will all be out of work. Secondly, any savings in CEO salary will go to stock holders not to the workers, they own the company its their property. The guy who mows your lawn isn't entitled to a share of the profits when you sell your house now is he. Well there you go.

If a Federal law was passed that said total compensation cannot be xx times greater than the average employee's compensation it would affect all equally.

What the fuck business is it of the Federal government, this is a private matter between the CEO, the board, and the stock holders. Neither you or the Federal government has any say in the matter, zero, its none of your damn business.

 

[BluesLegend]

Ah ... the eternal yet baseless whiny socialist lament. The Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance found that roughly half of all Americans owned stocks either directly or indirectly (pension funds, 401k, IRAs, etc.) in 2012.

Yep, and that's half the story. How many of this half of all Americans have little more than what they invested and how many have lost some of their principle?

Q. How do you spell insider trading?

A. W A L L - S T R E E T

Another whiny sniveling socialist waddles in. Do you people ever do anything but whine?

Yeah, you love to tell others who oppose a horrible system they're whining, the damn anti-slavery folks need to stop whining. Fucking idiot.

Yanno, despite our warts America seems to work just fine on this "horrible system" and if you had the cojones to stand for your "beliefs" you'd move to a country more to your liking. Greece is beautiful this time of year.

Tell that to those in poverty, the rising cost of living worldwide when wages arent increasing, the working classes in china, india, the third world.

Are you just going to whine and complain or propose a solution?

 

[Brain357]

Really? So a slow economy is good for the country?

Paying people for their labor does not slow the economy.
What is good for the country is a noble cause.
What is best for an individual company is for ownership and management to determine and still none of your biz.
Get your mind off my wallet and your hand out of my pocket.

No but lots of inequality does slow the economy. So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?

Lotsa people making what they are worth and most already are.

Still dodging the question? How sad. If you truly believe lots of inequality doesn't slow the economy than answer the question.

I answered your question, Princess (So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?) and I don't take marching orders from whiny socialists.

Actually I'm quite fiscally conservative. I want a strong economy, it is good for everyone. Have you noticed the economy has been slow as this inequality grows? I guess since you won't answer the question you don't even believe the crap you are saying.

 

[Marxist]

Yep, and that's half the story. How many of this half of all Americans have little more than what they invested and how many have lost some of their principle?

Q. How do you spell insider trading?

A. W A L L - S T R E E T

Another whiny sniveling socialist waddles in. Do you people ever do anything but whine?

Yeah, you love to tell others who oppose a horrible system they're whining, the damn anti-slavery folks need to stop whining. Fucking idiot.

Yanno, despite our warts America seems to work just fine on this "horrible system" and if you had the cojones to stand for your "beliefs" you'd move to a country more to your liking. Greece is beautiful this time of year.

Tell that to those in poverty, the rising cost of living worldwide when wages arent increasing, the working classes in china, india, the third world.

Are you just going to whine and complain or propose a solution?

You should know what my solution is.

 

[SAYIT]

Paying people for their labor does not slow the economy.
What is good for the country is a noble cause.
What is best for an individual company is for ownership and management to determine and still none of your biz.
Get your mind off my wallet and your hand out of my pocket.

No but lots of inequality does slow the economy. So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?

Lotsa people making what they are worth and most already are.

Still dodging the question? How sad. If you truly believe lots of inequality doesn't slow the economy than answer the question.

I answered your question, Princess (So again what is better for the economy? 500 people making good money or one person making gross amounts of money?) and I don't take marching orders from whiny socialists.

Actually I'm quite fiscally conservative. I want a strong economy, it is good for everyone. Have you noticed the economy has been slow as this inequality grows? I guess since you won't answer the question you don't even believe the crap you are saying.

I don't believe you know what you are and I answered your question ... you just can't do anything with the answer.

 

[BluesLegend]

Another whiny sniveling socialist waddles in. Do you people ever do anything but whine?

Yeah, you love to tell others who oppose a horrible system they're whining, the damn anti-slavery folks need to stop whining. Fucking idiot.

Yanno, despite our warts America seems to work just fine on this "horrible system" and if you had the cojones to stand for your "beliefs" you'd move to a country more to your liking. Greece is beautiful this time of year.

Tell that to those in poverty, the rising cost of living worldwide when wages arent increasing, the working classes in china, india, the third world.

Are you just going to whine and complain or propose a solution?

You should know what my solution is.

To troll message boards until your mom tells you its time for bed?