🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Another officer lost his job.

so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted

Just think. Now you can cheer that there will be ten million more interactions between police and citizens before the next brutality event.
..and if it's a jackass criminal that fked over other people's lives--YES I will cheer

And the cop also committed a crime. So am I supposed to cheer too? If so. What exactly would I be cheering and why?
 
being an azz and got treated like one
Does an allegedly broken taillight qualify — on its own — as prima facie probable cause for a felony arrest without obtaining a warrant from a judge?

I do not like the harassment of motorists for minor traffic violations, speed traps, lane change etiquette and the like. These incidents have a nasty tendency to "escalate" to unnecessary officer violence and excessive use of force against black and other minority drivers, in situations where the violation is claimed to be a civil infraction rather than a crime, and therefore the use of force is not justifiable at all under such circumstances.
Yes, under US law---broken taillight is grounds to stop a vehicle and a cop can ask for anyone's id.
 
being an azz and got treated like one
Does an allegedly broken taillight qualify — on its own — as prima facie probable cause for a felony arrest without obtaining a warrant from a judge?

I do not like the harassment of motorists for minor traffic violations, speed traps, lane change etiquette and the like. These incidents have a nasty tendency to "escalate" to unnecessary officer violence and excessive use of force against black and other minority drivers, in situations where the violation is claimed to be a civil infraction rather than a crime, and therefore the use of force is not justifiable at all under such circumstances.
Yes, under US law---broken taillight is grounds to stop a vehicle and a cop can ask for anyone's id.
HUGE difference--usually the cops are RESPONDING to criminals =criminals are committing a crime of their own ''free will''' simple--but you people don't get it
 
being an azz and got treated like one
Does an allegedly broken taillight qualify — on its own — as prima facie probable cause for a felony arrest without obtaining a warrant from a judge?

I do not like the harassment of motorists for minor traffic violations, speed traps, lane change etiquette and the like. These incidents have a nasty tendency to "escalate" to unnecessary officer violence and excessive use of force against black and other minority drivers, in situations where the violation is claimed to be a civil infraction rather than a crime, and therefore the use of force is not justifiable at all under such circumstances.
Yes, under US law---broken taillight is grounds to stop a vehicle and a cop can ask for anyone's id.
HUGE difference--usually the cops are RESPONDING to criminals =criminals are committing a crime of their own ''free will''' simple--but you people don't get it
How do you mean exactly?
 
being an azz and got treated like one
Does an allegedly broken taillight qualify — on its own — as prima facie probable cause for a felony arrest without obtaining a warrant from a judge?

I do not like the harassment of motorists for minor traffic violations, speed traps, lane change etiquette and the like. These incidents have a nasty tendency to "escalate" to unnecessary officer violence and excessive use of force against black and other minority drivers, in situations where the violation is claimed to be a civil infraction rather than a crime, and therefore the use of force is not justifiable at all under such circumstances.
Yes, under US law---broken taillight is grounds to stop a vehicle and a cop can ask for anyone's id.
HUGE difference--usually the cops are RESPONDING to criminals =criminals are committing a crime of their own ''free will''' simple--but you people don't get it

OK. Let’s see if we get it. Criminals are people who break laws. When cops break laws they become criminals. Criminals deserve whatever happens to them. So cops who break laws deserve whatever happens. Is that about it?
 
being an azz and got treated like one
Does an allegedly broken taillight qualify — on its own — as prima facie probable cause for a felony arrest without obtaining a warrant from a judge?

I do not like the harassment of motorists for minor traffic violations, speed traps, lane change etiquette and the like. These incidents have a nasty tendency to "escalate" to unnecessary officer violence and excessive use of force against black and other minority drivers, in situations where the violation is claimed to be a civil infraction rather than a crime, and therefore the use of force is not justifiable at all under such circumstances.
Yes, under US law---broken taillight is grounds to stop a vehicle and a cop can ask for anyone's id.
HUGE difference--usually the cops are RESPONDING to criminals =criminals are committing a crime of their own ''free will''' simple--but you people don't get it

OK. Let’s see if we get it. Criminals are people who break laws. When cops break laws they become criminals. Criminals deserve whatever happens to them. So cops who break laws deserve whatever happens. Is that about it?
huge difference between manslaughter and murder--DUH
 
being an azz and got treated like one
Does an allegedly broken taillight qualify — on its own — as prima facie probable cause for a felony arrest without obtaining a warrant from a judge?

I do not like the harassment of motorists for minor traffic violations, speed traps, lane change etiquette and the like. These incidents have a nasty tendency to "escalate" to unnecessary officer violence and excessive use of force against black and other minority drivers, in situations where the violation is claimed to be a civil infraction rather than a crime, and therefore the use of force is not justifiable at all under such circumstances.
Yes, under US law---broken taillight is grounds to stop a vehicle and a cop can ask for anyone's id.

Yes they can ask. They can't pummel you when you either don't have one or say no.
 
being an azz and got treated like one
Does an allegedly broken taillight qualify — on its own — as prima facie probable cause for a felony arrest without obtaining a warrant from a judge?

I do not like the harassment of motorists for minor traffic violations, speed traps, lane change etiquette and the like. These incidents have a nasty tendency to "escalate" to unnecessary officer violence and excessive use of force against black and other minority drivers, in situations where the violation is claimed to be a civil infraction rather than a crime, and therefore the use of force is not justifiable at all under such circumstances.
Yes, under US law---broken taillight is grounds to stop a vehicle and a cop can ask for anyone's id.
HUGE difference--usually the cops are RESPONDING to criminals =criminals are committing a crime of their own ''free will''' simple--but you people don't get it

OK. Let’s see if we get it. Criminals are people who break laws. When cops break laws they become criminals. Criminals deserve whatever happens to them. So cops who break laws deserve whatever happens. Is that about it?
huge difference between manslaughter and murder--DUH

I can only assume that in your mind that answered the question.
 
Just think. Now you can cheer that there will be ten million more interactions between police and citizens before the next brutality event.

We are having a brutality event every couple of weeks. If the police are having ten million interactions with the public a week, that's kind of the problem. That's not freedom, that's a police state.

......sure--millions before the next event--UNDENIABLY not a problem...it will happen--lie the many other accidents/incidents involving death

If an Airline was involved in a fiery crash every month, would you take their excuse that they had "millions of safe landings"?

The problem here isn't that most cops are brutalizing black folks, it's that the good ones are way too tolerant of the ones who do. .
 
Just think. Now you can cheer that there will be ten million more interactions between police and citizens before the next brutality event.

We are having a brutality event every couple of weeks. If the police are having ten million interactions with the public a week, that's kind of the problem. That's not freedom, that's a police state.

......sure--millions before the next event--UNDENIABLY not a problem...it will happen--lie the many other accidents/incidents involving death

If an Airline was involved in a fiery crash every month, would you take their excuse that they had "millions of safe landings"?

The problem here isn't that most cops are brutalizing black folks, it's that the good ones are way too tolerant of the ones who do. .
1. most air crashes are human error
2. the analogy is ridiculous
3. excuse??!!!! huh?? would I take it????!!! what
4. you haven't refuted the statistics on police brutality
 
Just think. Now you can cheer that there will be ten million more interactions between police and citizens before the next brutality event.

We are having a brutality event every couple of weeks. If the police are having ten million interactions with the public a week, that's kind of the problem. That's not freedom, that's a police state.

......sure--millions before the next event--UNDENIABLY not a problem...it will happen--lie the many other accidents/incidents involving death

If an Airline was involved in a fiery crash every month, would you take their excuse that they had "millions of safe landings"?

The problem here isn't that most cops are brutalizing black folks, it's that the good ones are way too tolerant of the ones who do. .
.....no there is not a brutality event every couple of weeks....you are confusing justifiable use of force with brutality
....brutality is a black CRIMINAL beating a father and son to death with a bat--then beating a woman

....brutality is a pack of blacks STABBING a white girl to death

..what the police are doing is not brutality or even wrong
 
JONESBORO, Ga. (AP) — A sheriff’s office in Georgia said Sunday it fired a deputy seen on video repeatedly punching a Black man during a traffic stop.

The deputy was being let go for “excessive use of force,” the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement. It did not identify the deputy, but said a criminal investigation has been turned over to the district attorney’s office.

Roderick Walker, 26, was arrested and beaten after Clayton County sheriff’s deputies pulled over the vehicle he was riding in Friday with his girlfriend, their 5-month-old child and his stepson for an alleged broken taillight


A broken tail light.

Sheriff: Deputy on video punching Black man in Georgia fired
Refusing to cooperate should be an additional charge. No need to, get physical.

Biting a cop is assault. It opens up a whole can of worms these negros don't like.

Why didn't the officer have any bite Mark's or wounds on him?

The law states you don't have to show your ID to the cops if you are a passenger just because they ask for it. Funny how right wingers believe anytime someone white tells a black person to do something they are suppose to hop to it.
 
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
His department found him guilty and fired him accordingly.
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
LOL...employers don't need a trial to fire their employees, dope.
What do you gonna do when you can’t hire cops?
What do you gonna do when you can’t hire cops?
Nice strawman.
The officer was fired for gross misconduct.
Why should any department retain
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
His department found him guilty and fired him accordingly.
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
LOL...employers don't need a trial to fire their employees, dope.
1. thank you = no trial = not proven guilty
2. you DO prove to be an idiot/childish by initiating insults
1. thank you = no trial = not proven guilty
2. you DO prove to be an idiot/childish by initiating insults
You presented yourself as a dope. I simply pointed it out.
The officer's department confirmed his misconduct by firing him. Why do you argue against that?
1. you prove to be childish/etc
2. in 99% of these case the cops do nothing wrong--they just fire the cops to appease the VIOLENT blacks/etc
. you prove to be childish/etc
2. in 99% of these case the cops do nothing wrong--they just fire the cops to appease the VIOLENT blacks/etc
Except in this case we all watched the misconduct. His department agreed it was misconduct and fired him accordingly , dope.
yes, without a trial

When do you need a trial to fire someone?
 
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
His department found him guilty and fired him accordingly.
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
LOL...employers don't need a trial to fire their employees, dope.
What do you gonna do when you can’t hire cops?
What do you gonna do when you can’t hire cops?
Nice strawman.
The officer was fired for gross misconduct.
Why should any department retain
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
His department found him guilty and fired him accordingly.
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
LOL...employers don't need a trial to fire their employees, dope.
1. thank you = no trial = not proven guilty
2. you DO prove to be an idiot/childish by initiating insults
1. thank you = no trial = not proven guilty
2. you DO prove to be an idiot/childish by initiating insults
You presented yourself as a dope. I simply pointed it out.
The officer's department confirmed his misconduct by firing him. Why do you argue against that?
1. you prove to be childish/etc
2. in 99% of these case the cops do nothing wrong--they just fire the cops to appease the VIOLENT blacks/etc
. you prove to be childish/etc
2. in 99% of these case the cops do nothing wrong--they just fire the cops to appease the VIOLENT blacks/etc
Except in this case we all watched the misconduct. His department agreed it was misconduct and fired him accordingly , dope.
yes, without a trial

When do you need a trial to fire someone?
without a trial, you don't know if any wrong was committed
 
JONESBORO, Ga. (AP) — A sheriff’s office in Georgia said Sunday it fired a deputy seen on video repeatedly punching a Black man during a traffic stop.

The deputy was being let go for “excessive use of force,” the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement. It did not identify the deputy, but said a criminal investigation has been turned over to the district attorney’s office.

Roderick Walker, 26, was arrested and beaten after Clayton County sheriff’s deputies pulled over the vehicle he was riding in Friday with his girlfriend, their 5-month-old child and his stepson for an alleged broken taillight


A broken tail light.

Sheriff: Deputy on video punching Black man in Georgia fired
At least now he's less likely to get killed by a thug of color.
How is that??

He is white......and we all know being white is the most dangerous thing you can be in this country -- because of how Democrats have ordered the darkies to murder all whites

I am not trying to panic anyone, but it is what it is
Now that he's not a cop he won't have to deal with "people of color" all the live-long day. Stupid question.

Let's see how tough he is when he can't hide behind that badge.
 
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
His department found him guilty and fired him accordingly.
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
LOL...employers don't need a trial to fire their employees, dope.
What do you gonna do when you can’t hire cops?
What do you gonna do when you can’t hire cops?
Nice strawman.
The officer was fired for gross misconduct.
Why should any department retain
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
His department found him guilty and fired him accordingly.
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
LOL...employers don't need a trial to fire their employees, dope.
1. thank you = no trial = not proven guilty
2. you DO prove to be an idiot/childish by initiating insults
1. thank you = no trial = not proven guilty
2. you DO prove to be an idiot/childish by initiating insults
You presented yourself as a dope. I simply pointed it out.
The officer's department confirmed his misconduct by firing him. Why do you argue against that?
1. you prove to be childish/etc
2. in 99% of these case the cops do nothing wrong--they just fire the cops to appease the VIOLENT blacks/etc
. you prove to be childish/etc
2. in 99% of these case the cops do nothing wrong--they just fire the cops to appease the VIOLENT blacks/etc
Except in this case we all watched the misconduct. His department agreed it was misconduct and fired him accordingly , dope.
yes, without a trial

When do you need a trial to fire someone?
without a trial, you don't know if any wrong was committed

So everyone who is fired from their job needs to get a trial first? That's stupid.
 
JONESBORO, Ga. (AP) — A sheriff’s office in Georgia said Sunday it fired a deputy seen on video repeatedly punching a Black man during a traffic stop.

The deputy was being let go for “excessive use of force,” the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement. It did not identify the deputy, but said a criminal investigation has been turned over to the district attorney’s office.

Roderick Walker, 26, was arrested and beaten after Clayton County sheriff’s deputies pulled over the vehicle he was riding in Friday with his girlfriend, their 5-month-old child and his stepson for an alleged broken taillight


A broken tail light.

Sheriff: Deputy on video punching Black man in Georgia fired
At least now he's less likely to get killed by a thug of color.
How is that??

He is white......and we all know being white is the most dangerous thing you can be in this country -- because of how Democrats have ordered the darkies to murder all whites

I am not trying to panic anyone, but it is what it is
Now that he's not a cop he won't have to deal with "people of color" all the live-long day. Stupid question.

Let's see how tough he is when he can't hide behind that badge.
.......you people are the tough guys---you people wouldn't even talk to a jackass criminal --he deals with jackasses while you are on the internet
 
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
His department found him guilty and fired him accordingly.
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
LOL...employers don't need a trial to fire their employees, dope.
What do you gonna do when you can’t hire cops?
What do you gonna do when you can’t hire cops?
Nice strawman.
The officer was fired for gross misconduct.
Why should any department retain
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
so --guilty before proven innocent--just want the left wants and the nazis instituted
His department found him guilty and fired him accordingly.
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
WITHOUT a trial--just like the nazis
LOL...employers don't need a trial to fire their employees, dope.
1. thank you = no trial = not proven guilty
2. you DO prove to be an idiot/childish by initiating insults
1. thank you = no trial = not proven guilty
2. you DO prove to be an idiot/childish by initiating insults
You presented yourself as a dope. I simply pointed it out.
The officer's department confirmed his misconduct by firing him. Why do you argue against that?
1. you prove to be childish/etc
2. in 99% of these case the cops do nothing wrong--they just fire the cops to appease the VIOLENT blacks/etc
. you prove to be childish/etc
2. in 99% of these case the cops do nothing wrong--they just fire the cops to appease the VIOLENT blacks/etc
Except in this case we all watched the misconduct. His department agreed it was misconduct and fired him accordingly , dope.
yes, without a trial

When do you need a trial to fire someone?
without a trial, you don't know if any wrong was committed

So everyone who is fired from their job needs to get a trial first? That's stupid.
hahahhahahahah--doesn't matter if he is fired--so what? point is, it doesn't prove if he did anything wrong
 
Just think. Now you can cheer that there will be ten million more interactions between police and citizens before the next brutality event.

We are having a brutality event every couple of weeks. If the police are having ten million interactions with the public a week, that's kind of the problem. That's not freedom, that's a police state.

......sure--millions before the next event--UNDENIABLY not a problem...it will happen--lie the many other accidents/incidents involving death

If an Airline was involved in a fiery crash every month, would you take their excuse that they had "millions of safe landings"?

The problem here isn't that most cops are brutalizing black folks, it's that the good ones are way too tolerant of the ones who do. .
.....no there is not a brutality event every couple of weeks....you are confusing justifiable use of force with brutality
....brutality is a black CRIMINAL beating a father and son to death with a bat--then beating a woman

....brutality is a pack of blacks STABBING a white girl to death

..what the police are doing is not brutality or even wrong

So is it brutality when a white guy is cutting up folks and eating them for dinner.
 
JONESBORO, Ga. (AP) — A sheriff’s office in Georgia said Sunday it fired a deputy seen on video repeatedly punching a Black man during a traffic stop.

The deputy was being let go for “excessive use of force,” the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement. It did not identify the deputy, but said a criminal investigation has been turned over to the district attorney’s office.

Roderick Walker, 26, was arrested and beaten after Clayton County sheriff’s deputies pulled over the vehicle he was riding in Friday with his girlfriend, their 5-month-old child and his stepson for an alleged broken taillight


A broken tail light.

Sheriff: Deputy on video punching Black man in Georgia fired
At least now he's less likely to get killed by a thug of color.
How is that??

He is white......and we all know being white is the most dangerous thing you can be in this country -- because of how Democrats have ordered the darkies to murder all whites

I am not trying to panic anyone, but it is what it is
Now that he's not a cop he won't have to deal with "people of color" all the live-long day. Stupid question.

Let's see how tough he is when he can't hide behind that badge.
.......you people are the tough guys---you people wouldn't even talk to a jackass criminal --he deals with jackasses while you are on the internet

You claim they are MY people, so why wouldn't I talk to them. Snatching a man out of a car with a broken tail light and beating the shit out of him is a real sacrifice for humanity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top