I love it. A defence of gunsplaining from a gunsplainer.Deflection noted, loser. Just a piece of friendly advice, don't stay stupid your whole life.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I love it. A defence of gunsplaining from a gunsplainer.Deflection noted, loser. Just a piece of friendly advice, don't stay stupid your whole life.
And a lack of firearm homicides. Keep gunsplaining, that's what counts to America's school kids.No......Britain has increasing gun crime after they banned and confiscated guns.
The .223 semi-auto rifle I've hunted with fires a civilian version of the 5.56 cartridge, it's not a military weapon. Most of the hunting rifles I've fired use a more powerful cartridge than any small arms military weapon .I was in the Army and I fired a number of weapons from small arms all the way to heavy machine guns. There are no firearms at my local gun shop for sale that can be considered a "military grade weapon". My personal AR-15 is not a "military grade weapon"..
The Ar-15 fires the same rounds and has the same range as the M16. Yes, it is military grade.
Scary plastic and composite materials.I was in the Army and I fired a number of weapons from small arms all the way to heavy machine guns. There are no firearms at my local gun shop for sale that can be considered a "military grade weapon". My personal AR-15 is not a "military grade weapon"..There is a column in the Washington post this week where the anti gun weenie complains about 2nd Amendment supporters who correct anti gunners when they don't use the correct terminology for guns, or don't actually know what the hell they are talking about in the gun debate.....
No, when you have 17 dead kids shot by a military grade weapon attained by a mentally ill man, there really isn't much more to talk about.
"It wasn't a MACHINE GUN, it was an ASSAULT RIFLE", whines the guy with the tiny er... hands... when someone threatens to take away his gun.
33,000 dead, 70,000 injured, 270 Billion in economic losses... every year.
Not much more to discuss.
Well yeah.....but it looks like one!!
I love it. A defence of gunsplaining from a gunsplainer.Deflection noted, loser. Just a piece of friendly advice, don't stay stupid your whole life.
Gunsplained. Sweet.
Gunsplained. Sweet.
Yup, you have to gunsplain things to morons.
1. It’s not a military grade weapon. It falls far short of that. That’s why no military on earth uses it.
2. The tiny hand belong to the people who are scared and get triggered by them mention of guns.
3. All those people dead, all those people injured and the gun didn’t kill any of them.
You cannot be more wrong about every position you hold. An you are willfully stupid. There’s nothing more to talk about.
No......Britain has increasing gun crime after they banned and confiscated guns. Australia has increasing gun crime after they banned and confiscated guns.
You are the guys who don't want to put armed guards in schools or to arm the staff......and you guys created the democrat gun free zones that draw these shooters....and we know gun free zones draw these guys because they keep telling us they do....
The .223 semi-auto rifle I've hunted with fires a civilian version of the 5.56 cartridge, it's not a military weapon. Most of the hunting rifles I've fired use a more powerful cartridge than any small arms military weapon .
1. It’s not a military grade weapon. It falls far short of that. That’s why no military on earth uses it.
2. The tiny hand belong to the people who are scared and get triggered by them mention of guns.
No, I get triggered when 17 or 26 kids get wheeled out of schools because a crazy person was allowed to buy a military grade weapon and slaughter a lot of people.
We are the only country in the world that allows these kinds of weapons to be owned by civilians, and we are the only country where this happens on a regular basis.
No......Britain has increasing gun crime after they banned and confiscated guns. Australia has increasing gun crime after they banned and confiscated guns.
Gun Homicides in Britain- 48
Gun homicides in Australia - 42
Gun homicide in the US - 11,000
Yup, we certainly have figured this one out.
You are the guys who don't want to put armed guards in schools or to arm the staff......and you guys created the democrat gun free zones that draw these shooters....and we know gun free zones draw these guys because they keep telling us they do....
Yeah, because we realize that given the fact that trained cops can't seem to avoid shooting black children who scare them, some rent a cop or part time teacher is going to blow some kid away even faster.
1. It’s not a military grade weapon. It falls far short of that. That’s why no military on earth uses it.
2. The tiny hand belong to the people who are scared and get triggered by them mention of guns.
No, I get triggered when 17 or 26 kids get wheeled out of schools because a crazy person was allowed to buy a military grade weapon and slaughter a lot of people.
3. All those people dead, all those people injured and the gun didn’t kill any of them.
You cannot be more wrong about every position you hold. An you are willfully stupid. There’s nothing more to talk about.
I agree, there isn't. We are the only country in the world that allows these kinds of weapons to be owned by civilians, and we are the only country where this happens on a regular basis.
Any semiautomatic can fire more than 45 rounds a minute and you say you have experience with firearmsThe .223 semi-auto rifle I've hunted with fires a civilian version of the 5.56 cartridge, it's not a military weapon. Most of the hunting rifles I've fired use a more powerful cartridge than any small arms military weapon .
Can it fire 45 rounds a minute?
There is a column in the Washington post this week where the anti gun weenie complains about 2nd Amendment supporters who correct anti gunners when they don't use the correct terminology for guns, or don't actually know what the hell they are talking about in the gun debate.....
The author is trying to shame gun Rights supporters into being quiet by labeling this "gunsplaining,"as if actually talking about actual guns and the truth about the issues is a problem...
If You're Trying To Ban Guns, The Least You Can Do Is Learn The Basics
Can anyone imagine a major newspaper running an op-ed justifying public ignorance on public policy? Actually, not merely justifying the ignorance, but rather arguing that facts only help smother discourse rather than enhance it. It’s improbable. Then again, this is the gun debate. And one side benefits from policy illiteracy.
The Washington Post ran an op-ed by former Gawker writer Adam Weinstein arguing that Second Amendment advocates use “jargon” to bully gun-control supporters. “While debating the merits of various gun control proposals,” he contends, “Second Amendment enthusiasts often diminish, or outright dismiss their views if they use imprecise firearms terminology.”
-------
How dare Second Amendment advocates expect that those passionately arguing to limit their constitutional rights might have some rudimentary knowledge of the devices they want to ban? To point out the constant glaring technical and policy “faux pas” of gun controllers is to engage in “gunsplaining,” a bad-faith argument akin to intimidation.
“If you don’t know what the ‘AR’ in AR-15 stands for, you don’t get to talk” explains the sarcastic subhead. If you don’t know what the “AR” in AR-15 stands you still get to talk. But if you want to ban or confiscate AR-15s and you haven’t taken the time to learn what the AR stands for, then gun owners have every right to call you out.
Weinstein bemoans the unfairness of gun controllers “being forced to sweat the finest taxonomic distinctions between our nation’s unlimited variety of lethal weapons.” This statement is illustrative of the emotionalism and hyperbole of the debate (the notion that there’s an “unlimited variety” of firearms is absurd) but also, at the same time, it’s an exaggeration of the Second Amendment advocate’s expectations.
----
Then again, much of gun-control policy isdriven by the mechanics of a firearm. So while not knowing what a “barrel shroud” is should not prevent anyone from pondering gun policy (well, unless you’re a politician who goes on TV to advocate the banning of barrel shrouds without knowing what they are) but failing to understand the distinction between a semi-automatic and automatic weapon tells us you’re either dishonest, unserious or unprepared for the debate.
Well yeah its a semi-automatic that means every time I use my pointy finger to pull the trigger thingy it fires a round.The .223 semi-auto rifle I've hunted with fires a civilian version of the 5.56 cartridge, it's not a military weapon. Most of the hunting rifles I've fired use a more powerful cartridge than any small arms military weapon .
Can it fire 45 rounds a minute?
Well yeah its a semi-automatic that means every time I use my pointy finger to pull the trigger thingy it fires a round.The .223 semi-auto rifle I've hunted with fires a civilian version of the 5.56 cartridge, it's not a military weapon. Most of the hunting rifles I've fired use a more powerful cartridge than any small arms military weapon .
Can it fire 45 rounds a minute?