Anti-Klan Statute Nabs a New Generation of Violent Leftists

[The Sage of Main Street]

These authoritarian twits calling themselves anti-fascism is the only real doublethink going on.

Actually I just quoted a stark example from the OP article. Try reading it.

trying to rebrand the Klan as radical left is truly pathetic.

Why? The Klan's roots are strictly democrat.

Of course that's more history you fools would love to erase

WHO GIVES A SHIT? They are now all YOURS. Alt Right. NOT democrats.

Go bother someone else, Old Hag. You're another one clueless about the history of the democrats and the Klan.

Probably why you want Confederate monuments to vanish...erase your history

Talking Pointlessly

So the Democrats used to be for White people and secretly still are? And since it was the Republicans who imposed Reconstruction, by the same talking-point thinking they must want to re-introduce Black Supremacy.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

These authoritarian twits calling themselves anti-fascism is the only real doublethink going on.

Actually I just quoted a stark example from the OP article. Try reading it.

trying to rebrand the Klan as radical left is truly pathetic.

Why? The Klan's roots are strictly democrat.

Of course that's more history you fools would love to erase

Parties and ideologies arent the same. The left owns the commies and marxists, you own the klan and fascists. I doubt they vote Dem today.

Link? Show us how the Republican party was KKK.

.

GreedHeads Out on Parole

The Republican businessmen financed the KKK to send strikebreakers up North.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Least we forget that a racist started Planned Parenthood to kill as many blacks as possible.

A Vulture Flies on Two Wings

You believe dysgenics is humanitarian? The plutocracy encourages it in order to keep their strongest potential enemy preoccupied with being swamped by savages.

 

[Coyote]

What link are you asking for?

Playing dumbass because you can't back up your lies is natural for you

I replied to your one request. You asked for a link for something I did not claim because of your inability to understand the difference between ideology and party.

It is not my job to provide links to things I do not claim.

What a pathetic dumbass response. You make lies then dance around having to account for them.
Typical leftist - lies to attack others then runs away like a coward.

FOR ALL TO READ WHAT A PATHETIC CLOWN LIAR COYOTE IS:

Members of the KKK were conservative rightwing white Christians. That is simply fact. The werent leftists and they certainly were not liberals. Stop trying to rewrite history. You are as bad as the Soviets were with the white wash.

That is fact. You had to swear to being a white Christian who believes in white supremacy in order to join the Klan.

Look, you can sit here on the internets and play these childish games of "let's pretend" all you like but nobody's buying it because history knows better.

Let's pretend the KKK had nothing to do with Democrats!

No one is saying that.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Nice "objective" link there --- from the text once it finally worked:

>> Mathias quotes an Antifa member named Molly: "The irony of enforcing masking laws to prosecute leftists is just incredible. Those are anti-Klan statutes."

Yes, they are. But the Klan was the radical left wing of the Democratic Party. And this particular group of new-Nazis called themselves the National Socialist Movement, so ... more lefties. <<​

More history revisionism would be more accurate, since both the Klan and the Nazis were, and are, far-right fascists. The very name "Antifa(scist)" kind of locks down where each entity sits.

Yet another episode in desperate denialism. Doublethink has arrived.

These authoritarian twits calling themselves anti-fascism is the only real doublethink going on.

Actually I just quoted a stark example from the OP article. Try reading it.

trying to rebrand the Klan as radical left is truly pathetic.

. If the KKK are national socialists, then they are Left Wing. Own it. NAZIS are left wing like the Comunists and socialist.

Illiterate Language Lords

By the same confused logic, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the People's Republic of China must have been started by Republicans!

 

[Political Junky]

Members of the KKK were conservative rightwing white Christians. That is simply fact. The werent keftists and they certainly were not liberals. Stop trying to rewrite history. You are as bad as the Soviets were with the white wash.

They were democrats.....learn your history, hag

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Members of the KKK were conservative rightwing white Christians. That is simply fact. The werent keftists and they certainly were not liberals. Stop trying to rewrite history. You are as bad as the Soviets were with the white wash.

They were democrats.....learn your history, hag

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

Yeah they all magically switched parties in 1964....goddamn dope, you obviously were indoctrinated also

 

[Political Junky]

Members of the KKK were conservative rightwing white Christians. That is simply fact. The werent keftists and they certainly were not liberals. Stop trying to rewrite history. You are as bad as the Soviets were with the white wash.

They were democrats.....learn your history, hag

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

Yeah they all magically switched parties in 1964....goddamn dope

Exactly

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Members of the KKK were conservative rightwing white Christians. That is simply fact. The werent keftists and they certainly were not liberals. Stop trying to rewrite history. You are as bad as the Soviets were with the white wash.

They were democrats.....learn your history, hag

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

Yeah they all magically switched parties in 1964....goddamn dope

Exactly

And you really believe anyone believes that shit....LOL. You people are deluded ....and ignorant

 

[Political Junky]

Members of the KKK were conservative rightwing white Christians. That is simply fact. The werent keftists and they certainly were not liberals. Stop trying to rewrite history. You are as bad as the Soviets were with the white wash.

They were democrats.....learn your history, hag

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

Yeah they all magically switched parties in 1964....goddamn dope

Exactly

And you really believe anyone believes that shit....LOL. You people are deluded ....and ignorant

The monopoly that the Democratic Party held over most of the South first showed major signs of breaking apart in 1948, when many Southern Democrats, dissatisfied with the policies of desegregation enacted during the administration of Democratic President Harry Truman, created the States Rights Democratic Party, which nominated South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond for president and Mississippi Governor Fielding L. Wright for vice president. The “Dixiecrats” managed to win many Southern states, but collapsed as a party soon after the election, with effectively all members returning to the Democratic Party. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat from the Southern state of Texas, led many Southern Democrats to vote for Barry Goldwater at the national level. In the ensuing years, the increasing conservatism of the Republican Party compared to the liberalism of the Democratic Party (especially on social and cultural issues) led many more conservative white Democrats in the South to vote Republican. However, many continued to vote for Democrats at the state and local levels ,especially before 1994. After 2010, Republicans had gained a solid advantage over Democrats at all levels of politics in most Southern states.

Southern Democrats - Wikipedia

 

[SassyIrishLass]

They were democrats.....learn your history, hag

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

Yeah they all magically switched parties in 1964....goddamn dope

Exactly

And you really believe anyone believes that shit....LOL. You people are deluded ....and ignorant

The monopoly that the Democratic Party held over most of the South first showed major signs of breaking apart in 1948, when many Southern Democrats, dissatisfied with the policies of desegregation enacted during the administration of Democratic President Harry Truman, created the States Rights Democratic Party, which nominated South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond for president and Mississippi Governor Fielding L. Wright for vice president. The “Dixiecrats” managed to win many Southern states, but collapsed as a party soon after the election, with effectively all members returning to the Democratic Party. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat from the Southern state of Texas, led many Southern Democrats to vote for Barry Goldwater at the national level. In the ensuing years, the increasing conservatism of the Republican Party compared to the liberalism of the Democratic Party (especially on social and cultural issues) led many more conservative white Democrats in the South to vote Republican. However, many continued to vote for Democrats at the state and local levels ,especially before 1994. After 2010, Republicans had gained a solid advantage over Democrats at all levels of politics in most Southern states.

Southern Democrats - Wikipedia

Oooh Wikepedia....no wonder you're clueless

 

[Correll]

They were democrats.....learn your history, hag

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

Yeah they all magically switched parties in 1964....goddamn dope

Exactly

And you really believe anyone believes that shit....LOL. You people are deluded ....and ignorant

The monopoly that the Democratic Party held over most of the South first showed major signs of breaking apart in 1948, when many Southern Democrats, dissatisfied with the policies of desegregation enacted during the administration of Democratic President Harry Truman, created the States Rights Democratic Party, which nominated South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond for president and Mississippi Governor Fielding L. Wright for vice president. The “Dixiecrats” managed to win many Southern states, but collapsed as a party soon after the election, with effectively all members returning to the Democratic Party. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat from the Southern state of Texas, led many Southern Democrats to vote for Barry Goldwater at the national level. In the ensuing years, the increasing conservatism of the Republican Party compared to the liberalism of the Democratic Party (especially on social and cultural issues) led many more conservative white Democrats in the South to vote Republican. However, many continued to vote for Democrats at the state and local levels ,especially before 1994. After 2010, Republicans had gained a solid advantage over Democrats at all levels of politics in most Southern states.

Southern Democrats - Wikipedia

Jimmy Carter would like to have a word with you about that.

 

[Coyote]

They were democrats.....learn your history, hag

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

Yeah they all magically switched parties in 1964....goddamn dope

Exactly

And you really believe anyone believes that shit....LOL. You people are deluded ....and ignorant

The monopoly that the Democratic Party held over most of the South first showed major signs of breaking apart in 1948, when many Southern Democrats, dissatisfied with the policies of desegregation enacted during the administration of Democratic President Harry Truman, created the States Rights Democratic Party, which nominated South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond for president and Mississippi Governor Fielding L. Wright for vice president. The “Dixiecrats” managed to win many Southern states, but collapsed as a party soon after the election, with effectively all members returning to the Democratic Party. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat from the Southern state of Texas, led many Southern Democrats to vote for Barry Goldwater at the national level. In the ensuing years, the increasing conservatism of the Republican Party compared to the liberalism of the Democratic Party (especially on social and cultural issues) led many more conservative white Democrats in the South to vote Republican. However, many continued to vote for Democrats at the state and local levels ,especially before 1994. After 2010, Republicans had gained a solid advantage over Democrats at all levels of politics in most Southern states.

Southern Democrats - Wikipedia

People keep confusing Party with ideology and they aren’t the same. My state is a perfect example. It had long been Democrat, but conservative. It is a very very conservative and libertarian state. Registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans, yet the state voted overwhelmingly for Trump and conservative politicians. It was Democrat run for years, but it was never liberal.

 

[martybegan]

Nice "objective" link there --- from the text once it finally worked:

>> Mathias quotes an Antifa member named Molly: "The irony of enforcing masking laws to prosecute leftists is just incredible. Those are anti-Klan statutes."

Yes, they are. But the Klan was the radical left wing of the Democratic Party. And this particular group of new-Nazis called themselves the National Socialist Movement, so ... more lefties. <<​

More history revisionism would be more accurate, since both the Klan and the Nazis were, and are, far-right fascists. The very name "Antifa(scist)" kind of locks down where each entity sits.

Yet another episode in desperate denialism. Doublethink has arrived.

These authoritarian twits calling themselves anti-fascism is the only real doublethink going on.

Actually I just quoted a stark example from the OP article. Try reading it.

I am commenting on your comment, not the OP.

 

[martybegan]

Nice "objective" link there --- from the text once it finally worked:

>> Mathias quotes an Antifa member named Molly: "The irony of enforcing masking laws to prosecute leftists is just incredible. Those are anti-Klan statutes."

Yes, they are. But the Klan was the radical left wing of the Democratic Party. And this particular group of new-Nazis called themselves the National Socialist Movement, so ... more lefties. <<​

More history revisionism would be more accurate, since both the Klan and the Nazis were, and are, far-right fascists. The very name "Antifa(scist)" kind of locks down where each entity sits.

Yet another episode in desperate denialism. Doublethink has arrived.

This is how Americans protest:

You Klan lovers must be purged from our society.

Not only marching without masks, the real civil rights protesters would get arrested, go through the system, pay the fine/serve the time and then be RIGHT BACK OUT doing it over and over again. The idea was to shame the system by making it enforce the laws the protesters found unfair, unconstitutional and un-american.

Antifa are just imature thugs.

Yet they are the most obvious example of the "new new" left.

 

[Pogo]

Nice "objective" link there --- from the text once it finally worked:

>> Mathias quotes an Antifa member named Molly: "The irony of enforcing masking laws to prosecute leftists is just incredible. Those are anti-Klan statutes."

Yes, they are. But the Klan was the radical left wing of the Democratic Party. And this particular group of new-Nazis called themselves the National Socialist Movement, so ... more lefties. <<​

More history revisionism would be more accurate, since both the Klan and the Nazis were, and are, far-right fascists. The very name "Antifa(scist)" kind of locks down where each entity sits.

Yet another episode in desperate denialism. Doublethink has arrived.

These authoritarian twits calling themselves anti-fascism is the only real doublethink going on.

Actually I just quoted a stark example from the OP article. Try reading it.

I am commenting on your comment, not the OP.

Already got that. And in that comment you refer to "the only real doublethink gong on" --- immediately after I initiated the observation in the OP and documented it. Ergo your comment is basically the twin brother of Pee Wee Herman going "I know you are but what am I?".

 

[martybegan]

Nice "objective" link there --- from the text once it finally worked:

>> Mathias quotes an Antifa member named Molly: "The irony of enforcing masking laws to prosecute leftists is just incredible. Those are anti-Klan statutes."

Yes, they are. But the Klan was the radical left wing of the Democratic Party. And this particular group of new-Nazis called themselves the National Socialist Movement, so ... more lefties. <<​

More history revisionism would be more accurate, since both the Klan and the Nazis were, and are, far-right fascists. The very name "Antifa(scist)" kind of locks down where each entity sits.

Yet another episode in desperate denialism. Doublethink has arrived.

These authoritarian twits calling themselves anti-fascism is the only real doublethink going on.

Actually I just quoted a stark example from the OP article. Try reading it.

I am commenting on your comment, not the OP.

Already got that. And in that comment you refer to "the only real doublethink gong on" --- immediately after I initiated the observation in the OP and documented it. Ergo your comment is basically the twin brother of Pee Wee Herman going "I know you are but what am I?".

infinity.

 

[Pogo]

Yes, rightwing conservative Democrats. All that changed with LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater[R] carried the South in 1964, in protest of civil rights.
Read your history.

Yeah they all magically switched parties in 1964....goddamn dope

Exactly

And you really believe anyone believes that shit....LOL. You people are deluded ....and ignorant

The monopoly that the Democratic Party held over most of the South first showed major signs of breaking apart in 1948, when many Southern Democrats, dissatisfied with the policies of desegregation enacted during the administration of Democratic President Harry Truman, created the States Rights Democratic Party, which nominated South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond for president and Mississippi Governor Fielding L. Wright for vice president. The “Dixiecrats” managed to win many Southern states, but collapsed as a party soon after the election, with effectively all members returning to the Democratic Party. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat from the Southern state of Texas, led many Southern Democrats to vote for Barry Goldwater at the national level. In the ensuing years, the increasing conservatism of the Republican Party compared to the liberalism of the Democratic Party (especially on social and cultural issues) led many more conservative white Democrats in the South to vote Republican. However, many continued to vote for Democrats at the state and local levels ,especially before 1994. After 2010, Republicans had gained a solid advantage over Democrats at all levels of politics in most Southern states.

Southern Democrats - Wikipedia

Jimmy Carter would like to have a word with you about that.

See that year label -- "1976"?

Have any idea what was going on just prior to that --- say, August of 1974?

Tell ya what, if you want to see the pattern check the next election. And the one after that, and the one after that.

Fun facts: A dozen years prior to your map, George Wallace, a Democrat from right smack dab in the middle of that blue area, offered to switch parties to be Barry Goldwater's running mate. That was the same year Strom Thurmond did switch parties --- which at the time in the white South was unthinkable -- after his hissyfit about the Civil Rights Act didn't pan out. Those were a couple of the biggest final cracks, prior to which both Thurmond and Wallace had bolted the Democrats to run against them in previous years.

Thurmond's previous hissyfit/bolt on the same complaint goes back to 1948, and was itself an echo of a previous Southern walkout all the way back in 1860, when not even Thurmond was born yet. His Dixiecrats actually kicked Truman the Democratic nominee off the ballot in part of the South and replaced his name.

And then when Thurmond's 1948 POTUS bid also didn't pan out, which was the reference that doomed Trent Lott (another Democrat who switched), he ran for Senate and the Democratic Party kicked him off the ballot, and he had to run as a write-in, which he won.

Context, m'boy. Everything comes from somewhere. Southern conservatism simmered for well over a century, and occasionally bubbled over into political party schisms, eventual mass party migration, and at one point, civil war. The same conservatism that, when it lost that war, contrived the Klan (and at least two dozen similar vigilante groups) to continue that war socially after it was over militarily. The same conservatism that, to the same end, came up with Jim Crow and separate water fountains and the whole Lost Cause propaganda, the artifacts of which are only now coming under fire, and even now, after all of this, that same campaign continues to be waged with "leave that statue alone, you're erasing history" and mobs with Tiki torches crying "You will not replace us".

See the pattern. Political parties shift with the winds but geographical ideologies don't. Because they're rooted in culture, and those roots go far deeper. The Strom Thurmonds and Trent Lotts and Jesse Helmses can change parties all they like, but changing culture, that's a whole 'nother ball game.

 

[iceberg]

Nice "objective" link there --- from the text once it finally worked:

>> Mathias quotes an Antifa member named Molly: "The irony of enforcing masking laws to prosecute leftists is just incredible. Those are anti-Klan statutes."

Yes, they are. But the Klan was the radical left wing of the Democratic Party. And this particular group of new-Nazis called themselves the National Socialist Movement, so ... more lefties. <<​

More history revisionism would be more accurate, since both the Klan and the Nazis were, and are, far-right fascists. The very name "Antifa(scist)" kind of locks down where each entity sits.

Yet another episode in desperate denialism. Doublethink has arrived.

so if i say i'm "anti-asshole" and do nothing but be an asshole to you - i'm covered cause you're the asshole who deserved it and since my name is "anti" i can't be an asshole?

yea, didn't think you'd let that fly out of your pre-approved bullshit.

 

[iceberg]

Nice "objective" link there --- from the text once it finally worked:

>> Mathias quotes an Antifa member named Molly: "The irony of enforcing masking laws to prosecute leftists is just incredible. Those are anti-Klan statutes."

Yes, they are. But the Klan was the radical left wing of the Democratic Party. And this particular group of new-Nazis called themselves the National Socialist Movement, so ... more lefties. <<​

More history revisionism would be more accurate, since both the Klan and the Nazis were, and are, far-right fascists. The very name "Antifa(scist)" kind of locks down where each entity sits.

Yet another episode in desperate denialism. Doublethink has arrived.

These authoritarian twits calling themselves anti-fascism is the only real doublethink going on.

Actually I just quoted a stark example from the OP article. Try reading it.

trying to rebrand the Klan as radical left is truly pathetic.

so is trying to brand trump as a nazi or hitler.

now who did that?