Anyone Still Believing in the Evolution Fraud Should Watch This

[Procrustes Stretched]

But in the end, they were still fruit flies.

Chicken and the egg. What came first?

How does evolution explain that as compared to something you believe in that is not objective?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

But in the end, they were still fruit flies.

Chicken or the Egg: You do know what came first, don't you?

Obviously, the egg. Science. Evolution. Over generations some bird like creature evolves. Genetic changes over a long time. The bird that lays the chicken egg, looks like a chicken, but many generations before would not have looked like a chicken.

The chicken does not spontaneously appear.

 

[frigidweirdo]

But in the end, they were still fruit flies.

This is the chicken and the egg story, isn't it?

Which came first?

The logical thing to say is the egg, because dinosaurs had eggs. But that's not the point of the whole the chicken and the egg thing.

The reality is we give labels to things that are constantly changing. At some point we see that this one a long time ago, and this one now, are different.

Homo Sapiens were not always Homo Sapiens, but some other Homo ******

At no point did a Homo Erectus give birth to a Homo Sapien. You can't see the changes in a small period of time, you see it by comparing this age, with that age....

So, before chickens there was something else, but at no point did a non-chicken give birth to a chicken.