AOC Says Being Required To Acually Have The Money A Dark Plan To Hamstring Extremist Health Care

It’s funny you think the border can be secured. We will have drugs as long as there is a demand. Cheap labor too!
It's more 'funny' how snowflakes continue to ignore the proven fact that everywhere a border / barrier is erected illegal immigration / crossing goes down 95%...

Can you provide the data to support this claim?
 
"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress". :p

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

I wanna know how many trillions of dollars is being spent on about 200 drug overdose deaths every day in the US.

I wanna know exactly how many hundreds of billions of dollars is being spent on illegal entitlements in general

Seems to me that $5 billion is a deal compared to the carnage of an unsecure border.
It’s funny you think the border can be secured. We will have drugs as long as there is a demand. Cheap labor too!

Hell man, why have any laws at all cuz people will break them?

The war on drugs can be won as countries like Singapore have proven. The problem is, there is no will to do so in the US.
 
Thank you for admitting you only care about deficit spending when it is done by a new elected Dem.
I didn't admit anything - you are just trying to spin the fact that I just spanked your ass by showing you are so determined to attack Trump, the GOP, and ME that you either did not even read the thread title and had no clue what the focus of this thread was / is about or you simply did not care.

I am sorry to have embarrassed you in public and bruised your ego, but you can stop falsely accusing me now.
 
Thank you for admitting you only care about deficit spending when it is done by a new elected Dem.
I didn't admit anything - you are just trying to spin the fact that I just spanked your ass by showing you are so determined to attack Trump, the GOP, and ME that you either did not even read the thread title and had no clue what the focus of this thread was / is about or you simply did not care.

I am sorry to have embarrassed you in public and bruised your ego, but you can stop falsely accusing me now.

The only embarrassment here is you.

For two years you kissed Trump's ass and never once said a word about deficit spending. Trump and the GOP congress added $1,481,349,159,597 to the debt in CY18 and you never said a word, never started a thread about it, never said it was bad.

And all of a sudden deficit spending is worth a thread from you...you are a fraud and a fake. You care only about your party, nothing else. You do not give a shit about the country, party always comes first for you.
 
"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress". :p

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

I wanna know how many trillions of dollars is being spent on about 200 drug overdose deaths every day in the US.

I wanna know exactly how many hundreds of billions of dollars is being spent on illegal entitlements in general

Seems to me that $5 billion is a deal compared to the carnage of an unsecure border.
It’s funny you think the border can be secured. We will have drugs as long as there is a demand. Cheap labor too!

Hell man, why have any laws at all cuz people will break them?

The war on drugs can be won as countries like Singapore have proven. The problem is, there is no will to do so in the US.
The problem is US demand for drugs, not mexico.
 
Can you provide the data to support this claim?
I have numerous times already...as someone recently just stated: 'There is this thing called 'the internet' - use it'. Great advice.

You are the one that made a claim, if you cannot support your claim, then it is assumed to be false since you are not an honest person.
 
Thank you for admitting you only care about deficit spending when it is done by a new elected Dem.
I didn't admit anything - you are just trying to spin the fact that I just spanked your ass by showing you are so determined to attack Trump, the GOP, and ME that you either did not even read the thread title and had no clue what the focus of this thread was / is about or you simply did not care.

I am sorry to have embarrassed you in public and bruised your ego, but you can stop falsely accusing me now.
You have quite an imagination...
 
"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress". :p

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

$2Trn is not the same as $40Trn but I get what you are saying.
 
"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress". :p

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

I wanna know how many trillions of dollars is being spent on about 200 drug overdose deaths every day in the US.

I wanna know exactly how many hundreds of billions of dollars is being spent on illegal entitlements in general

Seems to me that $5 billion is a deal compared to the carnage of an unsecure border.
It’s funny you think the border can be secured. We will have drugs as long as there is a demand. Cheap labor too!

Hell man, why have any laws at all cuz people will break them?

The war on drugs can be won as countries like Singapore have proven. The problem is, there is no will to do so in the US.

If people want to kill themselves with drugs, why the hell do you care? Let nature take its course and weed out the weak.
 
The only embarrassment here is you. For two years you kissed Trump's ass and never once said a word about deficit spending.
Doubling-down on your attempt to spin your ass-whoopin' and false accusations, I see. :p

So we are back to you admitting that you fully advocate bestiality and necrophilia since you have been a member of this board, as you have never come out and openly aggressively spoken out against them....
 
"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress". :p

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

$2Trn is not the same as $40Trn but I get what you are saying.

What is 40 trillion about?
 
Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.
Weird how you are LYING, falsely claiming I support deficit spending by anyone.

Seems like you are saying if someone does not openly speak out against every single thing they oppose it means they support it....which would mean you must support bestiality and necrophilia, since I have never heard you speak out against them.

:p

Why the thread about it today but zero threads about it during the two years your party and your god were in charge of the spending?

Why were you silent as a church mouse about it for 2 whole years but today is is not an issue?

Because AOC is brown and female. Apparently Republicans just can't let this stand.
 
The only embarrassment here is you. For two years you kissed Trump's ass and never once said a word about deficit spending.
Doubling-down on your attempt to spin your ass-whoopin' and false accusations, I see. :p

So we are back to you admitting that you fully advocate bestiality and necrophilia since you have been a member of this board, as you have never come out and openly aggressively spoken out against them....

Nice try, but you are too stupid to make a good counter argument.
 
"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress". :p
Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed could ensure every adult can afford basic healthcare coverage.
 
Thank you for admitting you only care about deficit spending when it is done by a new elected Dem.
I didn't admit anything - you are just trying to spin the fact that I just spanked your ass by showing you are so determined to attack Trump, the GOP, and ME that you either did not even read the thread title and had no clue what the focus of this thread was / is about or you simply did not care.

I am sorry to have embarrassed you in public and bruised your ego, but you can stop falsely accusing me now.

The only embarrassment here is you.

For two years you kissed Trump's ass and never once said a word about deficit spending. Trump and the GOP congress added $1,481,349,159,597 to the debt in CY18 and you never said a word, never started a thread about it, never said it was bad.

And all of a sudden deficit spending is worth a thread from you...you are a fraud and a fake. You care only about your party, nothing else. You do not give a shit about the country, party always comes first for you.

What?

United-States-National-Debt-1992-2016-President-Performance-Clinton-Bush-and-Obama.png
 
"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress". :p

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

I wanna know how many trillions of dollars is being spent on about 200 drug overdose deaths every day in the US.

I wanna know exactly how many hundreds of billions of dollars is being spent on illegal entitlements in general

Seems to me that $5 billion is a deal compared to the carnage of an unsecure border.
It’s funny you think the border can be secured. We will have drugs as long as there is a demand. Cheap labor too!

Hell man, why have any laws at all cuz people will break them?

The war on drugs can be won as countries like Singapore have proven. The problem is, there is no will to do so in the US.

If people want to kill themselves with drugs, why the hell do you care? Let nature take its course and weed out the weak.

Why do I care? Obviously you don't

Why not let the people who care about society help and go hide under a rock?

Why should we care? I think just not being a sociopath should qualify, but also I think most tend to get sick of seeing people we care about who are directly effected by illicit drugs as well as personally effected.

Naturally, this all has a direct effect on the economy and your precious retirement accounts as well, but more than likely you don't see that either.
 
Thank you for admitting you only care about deficit spending when it is done by a new elected Dem.
I didn't admit anything - you are just trying to spin the fact that I just spanked your ass by showing you are so determined to attack Trump, the GOP, and ME that you either did not even read the thread title and had no clue what the focus of this thread was / is about or you simply did not care.

I am sorry to have embarrassed you in public and bruised your ego, but you can stop falsely accusing me now.

The only embarrassment here is you.

For two years you kissed Trump's ass and never once said a word about deficit spending. Trump and the GOP congress added $1,481,349,159,597 to the debt in CY18 and you never said a word, never started a thread about it, never said it was bad.

And all of a sudden deficit spending is worth a thread from you...you are a fraud and a fake. You care only about your party, nothing else. You do not give a shit about the country, party always comes first for you.

What?

United-States-National-Debt-1992-2016-President-Performance-Clinton-Bush-and-Obama.png

how does your little graphic take away from the fact the GOP congress added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt last year in the middle of a booming economy.
 
Thank you for admitting you only care about deficit spending when it is done by a new elected Dem.
I didn't admit anything - you are just trying to spin the fact that I just spanked your ass by showing you are so determined to attack Trump, the GOP, and ME that you either did not even read the thread title and had no clue what the focus of this thread was / is about or you simply did not care.

I am sorry to have embarrassed you in public and bruised your ego, but you can stop falsely accusing me now.

The only embarrassment here is you.

For two years you kissed Trump's ass and never once said a word about deficit spending. Trump and the GOP congress added $1,481,349,159,597 to the debt in CY18 and you never said a word, never started a thread about it, never said it was bad.

And all of a sudden deficit spending is worth a thread from you...you are a fraud and a fake. You care only about your party, nothing else. You do not give a shit about the country, party always comes first for you.

What?

United-States-National-Debt-1992-2016-President-Performance-Clinton-Bush-and-Obama.png

how does your little graphic take away from the fact the GOP congress added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt last year in the middle of a booming economy.
That’s peanuts compared to what happened under nObama, dummy. Keep your selective research going cause it only sets up Trump to prove his point.
 

Forum List

Back
Top