AOC states we haven't seen Co2 levels like this since the Pliocene period

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It means the climate is always changing, and we can’t control it, you big dope

No it doesn't, ya moron..

 

[Wyatt earp]

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

It's not a proven fact you dumb fuck

 

[Wyatt earp]

It means the climate is always changing, and we can’t control it, you big dope

No it doesn't, ya moron..

So who controls Earth's thermostat?


.

 

[Flash]

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

It's not a proven fact you dumb fuck

The idiot thinks it is. That is the gullibility of believing that silly AGW scam.

 

[RealDave]

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

LOL

Epic fail...

I've done the research... Please enlighten me.. Show me your empirical evidence..

bullshit.
The greenhouse effect is proven science.

I seriously doubt your research extended beyond right wing denier sites.

I'm sure my doctoral work in Atmospheric Physics is subservient to your idiocy...



I see you went from providing a cognoscente and backed up with empirical evidence 'point of view' to attacking the person.. Thank you for admitting you have none and your blowing smoke out of your ass.

Your mythical doctoral work.

Name & university so I can verify?

So the greenhouse effect is a myth?

 

[RealDave]

Your a sock puppet that can blow out talking points but no facts.. Put out some real facts...

Here is a real fact:

As the suns fusion reaction burns its active area clouds with used materials and cools the reaction. This has been documented in the the plant life cycles of earths plants. It is also a potential cause of our 90 thousand year ice age and 11-16 thousand year interglacial cycles.

This cooling of the solar fusion cycle causes spectral changes in the suns output, primarily in the bands that affect ocean warming (0.2um to 0.8um - affects ocean warming to 700m). We have observed this decrease in the last three years and now we are looking at an 18% drop in energy in this band. A slight uptick in the 1.2um to 1.9um region (which is impeded in our atmosphere from hitting the ocean at depth) offsets the loss leaving the Total Solar Irradience nearly the same.

Without having an effect on the TSI, simple changes on the sun can have devastating impacts on earth. Below is the cooling of the oceans due to this change.

The oceans are cooling at a massive rate and its about to surface cooling our atmosphere massively.

Do you alarmist idiots really want to play the empirical evidence game with me?

Great.

None of that speaks to the effects of a 50% increase in atmospheric Co2.

It doesn't seem like it is harder to breathe with the increase of Co2..

Should it be?

If oxygen content is reduced..yes

Ask any Sub driver what they live with on a regular basis. CO2 averages about 4000-6000ppm and that is well within human toleration for long periods of time. As long as O2 stays at 22-25% of atmosphere you can sustain human life without ill effect. The US navy has been doing it for over 150 years.

What does that have to do with Climate Change?

 

[RealDave]

Is the greenhouse effect proven fact?

Let's ask NASA. In fact, lets ask NASA Kids so the Trumpettes can maybe get it

What Is the Greenhouse Effect? | NASA Climate Kids

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So who controls Earth's thermostat

What a mind numbingly stupid question.

 

[Lesh]

IF you have the scientific credentials to dispute the science here.

Please post them

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Certainly bacteria and viruses do exist in the fossil record.

Actually, viruses don't exist in the fossil record. Thank you for your ignorance.

 

[Ambivalent1]

It means the climate is always changing, and we can’t control it, you big dope

No it doesn't, ya moron..

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Certainly bacteria and viruses do exist in the fossil record.

Actually, viruses don't exist in the fossil record. Thank you for your ignorance.

Great.

Are you finished being irrelevant to the conversation or do you have something to add?

 

[daveman]

So who controls Earth's thermostat

What a mind numbingly stupid question.

What is the proper temperature of the planet?

 

[Ambivalent1]

Certainly bacteria and viruses do exist in the fossil record.

Actually, viruses don't exist in the fossil record. Thank you for your ignorance.

Great.

Are you finished being irrelevant to the conversation or do you have something to add?

You don't like being bitch slapped?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It means the climate is always changing, and we can’t control it, you big dope

No it doesn't, ya moron..

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

Yes, in response to changes in the environment. Changes are measurable. A 50% increase in atmospheric Co2 is a big change.

 

[Ambivalent1]

It means the climate is always changing, and we can’t control it, you big dope

No it doesn't, ya moron..

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

Yes, in response to changes in the environment. Changes are measurable. A 50% increase in atmospheric Co2 is a big change.

About the viruses?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Certainly bacteria and viruses do exist in the fossil record.

Actually, viruses don't exist in the fossil record. Thank you for your ignorance.

Great.

Are you finished being irrelevant to the conversation or do you have something to add?

You don't like being bitch slapped?

Truthfully, I don't give a shit.
She brought nothing to the conversation. Much like yourself.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It means the climate is always changing, and we can’t control it, you big dope

No it doesn't, ya moron..

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

Yes, in response to changes in the environment. Changes are measurable. A 50% increase in atmospheric Co2 is a big change.

About the viruses?

That's it, loser? That's your play?

 

[Ambivalent1]

It means the climate is always changing, and we can’t control it, you big dope

No it doesn't, ya moron..

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

Yes, in response to changes in the environment. Changes are measurable. A 50% increase in atmospheric Co2 is a big change.

About the viruses?

That's it, loser? That's your play?

You got bitch slapped boy. You'll be ok.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No it doesn't, ya moron..

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

The Climate has ALWAYS flucutuated and changed. Boy you need an edumacation.

Yes, in response to changes in the environment. Changes are measurable. A 50% increase in atmospheric Co2 is a big change.

About the viruses?

That's it, loser? That's your play?

You got bitch slapped boy. You'll be ok.

I'm fine. You're the one dancing like a crackhead monkey.