Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Apparently Democrats are allowed to kill infants and wear KKK hoods...
- Thread starter Blackrook
- Start date
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
...that you know of / that CNN is willing to report on...Infants are not being killed by anyone in a KKK hoodie...
Moonglow
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 220,073
- 52,112
He can't have an abortion he is a male...That's a lie!!! You forgot Governor Northam!!!Infants are not being killed by anyone in a KKK hoodie...
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
He completely supports it but has not actually worn the hood during an abortion yet ... That we know of....That's a lie!!! You forgot Governor Northam!!!Infants are not being killed by anyone in a KKK hoodie...
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
...or is he?He can't have an abortion he is a male...That's a lie!!! You forgot Governor Northam!!!Infants are not being killed by anyone in a KKK hoodie...
Moonglow
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 220,073
- 52,112
How will you hold all democrats accountable?Northam is a baby-killing Democrat and a KKK member to boot!!!
If Democrats don't get rid of this filth, they will be held accountable!!!
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
What are they going to do if he digs in like a tick & refuses to leave?
I read approx 80% of Virginia's black voter population voted for this charletain, too.
It's called 'THOROUGH VETTING'. THE democrats aren't too well known for that. Maybe they should start.
I read approx 80% of Virginia's black voter population voted for this charletain, too.
It's called 'THOROUGH VETTING'. THE democrats aren't too well known for that. Maybe they should start.
Oh goody, another abortion thread - wrapped in...KKK hoods.
Yeah, but because it's about democrats, just shut up because important reasons.
mamooth
Diamond Member
- Aug 17, 2012
- 34,827
- 18,023
Yeah, but because it's about democrats, just shut up because important reasons.
Pointing out how stupid and immoral your positions are is not telling you to shut up.
Tone down your PC victimhood whining just a little, will you? I know it's all you have, but give it at least a little rest. All belief systems are not equal. Yours is inferior. Deal with it.
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
The fact have been fixed around the talking point for the pseudo-conned.
What he was describing was what happens with a live birth of a fatally deformed baby. Apparently the child would be sedated to suppress the pain until he or she passes away, or if the parent(s) want the sedation can be removed and they can cherish their child as long as the want. I don't believe there was any language in the bill that would allow the euthanasia or infanticide, of the child.
The clip was edited and presented to the public to create fuel for the talking point. Just like the clip of Injun Joe banging his drum at the High School kid.
You're being played.
What he was describing was what happens with a live birth of a fatally deformed baby. Apparently the child would be sedated to suppress the pain until he or she passes away, or if the parent(s) want the sedation can be removed and they can cherish their child as long as the want. I don't believe there was any language in the bill that would allow the euthanasia or infanticide, of the child.
The clip was edited and presented to the public to create fuel for the talking point. Just like the clip of Injun Joe banging his drum at the High School kid.
You're being played.
Yeah, but because it's about democrats, just shut up because important reasons.
Pointing out how stupid and immoral your positions are is not telling you to shut up.
Tone down your PC victimhood whining just a little, will you? I know it's all you have, but give it at least a little rest. All belief systems are not equal. Yours is inferior. Deal with it.
It's fun watching the democrats desperately trying to figure out how to protect their own without being the blind partisan butt wipes they really are.
The fact have been fixed around the talking point for the pseudo-conned.
What he was describing was what happens with a live birth of a fatally deformed baby. Apparently the child would be sedated to suppress the pain until he or she passes away, or if the parent(s) want the sedation can be removed and they can cherish their child as long as the want. I don't believe there was any language in the bill that would allow the euthanasia or infanticide, of the child.
The clip was edited and presented to the public to create fuel for the talking point. Just like the clip of Injun Joe banging his drum at the High School kid.
You're being played.
He was supporting a bill whose author admitted would allow an infant ready to be delivered instead to be killed.
mamooth
Diamond Member
- Aug 17, 2012
- 34,827
- 18,023
It's fun watching the democrats desperately trying to figure out how to protect their own without being the blind partisan butt wipes they really are.
When I tell you "Whenever a Trumpflake cries, an angel gets his wings", that is not censoring you. Do you understand such a simple point, or will you continue to whine about being oppressed?
It's fun watching the democrats desperately trying to figure out how to protect their own without being the blind partisan butt wipes they really are.
When I tell you "Whenever a Trumpflake cries, an angel gets his wings", that is not censoring you. Do you understand such a simple point, or will you continue to whine about being oppressed?
Are you the poster to whom I was responding, or just a random keyboard jockey?
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
The fact have been fixed around the talking point for the pseudo-conned.
What he was describing was what happens with a live birth of a fatally deformed baby. Apparently the child would be sedated to suppress the pain until he or she passes away, or if the parent(s) want the sedation can be removed and they can cherish their child as long as the want. I don't believe there was any language in the bill that would allow the euthanasia or infanticide, of the child.
The clip was edited and presented to the public to create fuel for the talking point. Just like the clip of Injun Joe banging his drum at the High School kid.
You're being played.
He was supporting a bill whose author admitted would allow an infant ready to be delivered instead to be killed.
The bill changed some of the wording and reduced the requirement for a second and third doctor's note, to just one. His statement was chopped up and fed to their (Pro-Life SJWers) hysterical masses as evidence of Infanticide. They ate it up like the other SJWers did on the Injun Joe v Smirking kid crap.
Somebody is playing with ya.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 99
- Replies
- 516
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 276
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 16
- Replies
- 234
- Views
- 13K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8513
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-