RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
the 50 and 100 round magazines do not work that is why the military does not use them.Should it be 10 rounds or 15 rounds?
I really don't care
But should you be able to go out and buy 50-100 round magazines?
No way
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the 50 and 100 round magazines do not work that is why the military does not use them.Should it be 10 rounds or 15 rounds?
I really don't care
But should you be able to go out and buy 50-100 round magazines?
No way
Now, suppose I want to shoot up a concert in Las Vegas
Ten rounds just doesn't cut it when I can get 45 rounds and a bump stock
Die suckers....Die
If it doesn't make a difference, why does the military ALWAYS use high capacity magazines in combat?
i oppose banning anything that you think should be banned because you are dishonest about your intentions.actually stupid, 100 round magazines are useless they are to heavy and jam too easy. you should hope some one tries to use them they will spend all their time unjamming the firearm.I never said I did.
But you missed the point that magazine size is irrelevant to anyone hell bent on killing people
But only people intent on killing lots of people want a 100 round magazine.
With a 100 round magazine you can look like a badass at the shooting range
But it serves you no practical purpose
It is highly desired by someone who wants to slaughter small children in an elementary school or shoot up a church
If that is the case, you should have no issue with banning them
Now, suppose I want to shoot up a concert in Las Vegas
Ten rounds just doesn't cut it when I can get 45 rounds and a bump stock
Die suckers....Die
If it doesn't make a difference, why does the military ALWAYS use high capacity magazines in combat?
30 round magazines have been the standard for years.
only recently have 30 round magazine been called high capacity.
Military assault rifles are also capable of fully automatic and burst firing
the 50 and 100 round magazines do not work that is why the military does not use them.Should it be 10 rounds or 15 rounds?
I really don't care
But should you be able to go out and buy 50-100 round magazines?
No way
i oppose banning anything that you think should be banned because you are dishonest about your intentions.actually stupid, 100 round magazines are useless they are to heavy and jam too easy. you should hope some one tries to use them they will spend all their time unjamming the firearm.I never said I did.
But you missed the point that magazine size is irrelevant to anyone hell bent on killing people
But only people intent on killing lots of people want a 100 round magazine.
With a 100 round magazine you can look like a badass at the shooting range
But it serves you no practical purpose
It is highly desired by someone who wants to slaughter small children in an elementary school or shoot up a church
If that is the case, you should have no issue with banning them
Now, suppose I want to shoot up a concert in Las Vegas
Ten rounds just doesn't cut it when I can get 45 rounds and a bump stock
Die suckers....Die
If it doesn't make a difference, why does the military ALWAYS use high capacity magazines in combat?
30 round magazines have been the standard for years.
only recently have 30 round magazine been called high capacity.
Military assault rifles are also capable of fully automatic and burst firing
Other than being being capable of fully automatic and burst firing, and the seer and bolt carrier differences that allow that, what is the difference between an M-16 and an AR-15?
i oppose banning anything that you think should be banned because you are dishonest about your intentions.actually stupid, 100 round magazines are useless they are to heavy and jam too easy. you should hope some one tries to use them they will spend all their time unjamming the firearm.But only people intent on killing lots of people want a 100 round magazine.
With a 100 round magazine you can look like a badass at the shooting range
But it serves you no practical purpose
It is highly desired by someone who wants to slaughter small children in an elementary school or shoot up a church
If that is the case, you should have no issue with banning them
My intentions are clear
I do not want evil sons of bitches who want to shoot up a church or a school to have access to weaponry that gives them military-like firepower. And that goes for body armor also
The left always says they just want common sense gun control....and one of those measures they always want is a limit on 10 bullets for all magazines
Now, keep in mind, this will not limit the deaths in mass shootings, as actual research shows. The killers, like the guy in Texas had plenty of magazines and changed them 14 times while he was murdering those people.
And Criminals won't care about a 10 round limit because they will just get theirs illegally, and they can rape a woman just as easily with a 10 round magazine, murder a rival or rob someone.
The only people a 10 round magazine limit effects is the law abiding gun owner, who does not commit any crime or murder. People who have guns that take 15-19 rounds in their pistols...will now be criminals if they don't do something with their guns.....dittos rifles that will take 30 round magazines.....
I have listed the points made by David Kopel on why law abiding people need more than 10 rounds, in other places and would happily do so again. I have also posted the ruling by the California judge placing a hold on the new California magazine ban where he accurately takes apart all of the arguments made against 10 round magazines.
The question, however, is this.........if the anti gunners get all the 15-30 round magazines....will they leave the 10 round magazines alone?
Keep in mind, the Santa Barbara shooter used 10 round magazines to murder 6 people.......
i oppose banning anything that you think should be banned because you are dishonest about your intentions.actually stupid, 100 round magazines are useless they are to heavy and jam too easy. you should hope some one tries to use them they will spend all their time unjamming the firearm.With a 100 round magazine you can look like a badass at the shooting range
But it serves you no practical purpose
It is highly desired by someone who wants to slaughter small children in an elementary school or shoot up a church
If that is the case, you should have no issue with banning them
My intentions are clear
I do not want evil sons of bitches who want to shoot up a church or a school to have access to weaponry that gives them military-like firepower. And that goes for body armor also
So then no one can right?
I don't want evil sons of bitches to drive drunk maybe we should ban alcohol.
Oh yeah we all know how that worked out
Are anti gunners serious when they say they will stop at 10 round magazines?
remind me again how Britain did it right but crimes involving the use of firearms skyrocketed after the ban and murder with firearms went up as well.
26 Gun murders (equiv. 130) in England vs. *11,004* in US Annually
26 Gun murders (equiv. 130) in England vs. *11,004* in US Annually
Published on
Tuesday, October 03, 2017
Then tell the government clerks to press "send" when they are updating criminal records....
Or actually do REAL background checks, and not rely on a database that is designed to be faulty.
Or better yet. Make the gun industry responsible, just like bars are when they serve drunks. No "checking a database". If the guy looks too drunk to drive, you don't serve him. If he looks too crazy to have a gun, you don't sell him one.
If you sell him one anyway, lawsuit time.
I promise you, the first time a gun manufacturer starts paying out big bucks from one of their "elite customer's" actions, they'll clean up their act.
The Heller decision was a gift to the anti-gun control crowd
They found that the DC restrictions on handguns were excessive and were not supported by a pressing government interest
But even Heller made it clear that the government had a right to ban certain firearms if they could prove a pressing societal reason for the ban
Given the preference of mass murderers to use assault type weapons with large capacity magazines and the lack of a pressing reason why private citizens need so much firepower...Even Heller would agree with the ban
remind me again how Britain did it right but crimes involving the use of firearms skyrocketed after the ban and murder with firearms went up as well.
26 Gun murders (equiv. 130) in England vs. *11,004* in US Annually
26 Gun murders (equiv. 130) in England vs. *11,004* in US Annually
Published on
Tuesday, October 03, 2017
Yes....we get it....even though British criminals now have more guns than they had before the gun ban, and they are using them more and more often...gun crime across England and Wales is up another 27%....and in London, it is up 42%.....their criminals do not murder their victims......we get it...but that isn't the point....the point is that they have more gun crime and murder after they banned guns....they are an island nation...........and now have more violent crime than we do...
Yeah...they did this......they had a guy who a co worker said was spouting jihadi sentiments...they did. 10 month detailed background check, including an under cover approach, talked to people who knew the guy, talked to him 3 different times using trained FBI agents....and on top of that the guy passed a background check for his security job, and passed a federally mandated background check for ecru gun he owned.....
After all of that....he was cleared.......and he would clear your idea for a background check too...
No, he wouldn't have. That's the point. The problem is, the standard for denying someone a gun is so high that even that level of crazy isn't enough to deny one.
This is the problem when you declare something a 'right'. Taking it away becomes REALLY DIFFICULT. All the stuff you list here should have been a reason to deny him a gun. But it wasn't.
More reason why we need to register gunsMoron...we told you over and over, they get their guns from straw buyers and they steal them. They stay away from private sellers because they think they could be police.
And if a straw buyer can pass a background check for a gun store, where they get their guns.....they will pass a background check for a private sale......making your universal background check pointless...
OK. We can add stealing them to their list of sources if you want to. Where is the proof that crooks ONLY get guns those two ways? Want to add more sources?
And more.....
How Criminals Get Guns: In Short, All Too Easily
When they cannot find them in the grass, gangs get guns by trickery and by theft, by bribery and by intimidation. They often pay or force men who are legally entitled to buy guns to buy weapons for them at gun stores or shows.
Such a transaction is called a "straw man" purchase, but girlfriends and other women, often desperate to feed their children or a drug habit, are also used to buy weapons over the counter.
"We've found people who do it as a kind of side business," said Stephen P. Sinnott, an assistant United States Attorney in Chicago.
One gun-running ring at the city's western limits paid off its buyers with guns. For every half-dozen guns or so a straw man bought, he was allowed to keep one. In about 16 months, Mr. Singer said, the ring put more than 110 illegal guns on the streets. More than 20 of the guns have been recovered in drive-by shootings and drug deals gone bad.
The gangs and other criminals also get weapons through barter, or "trade-ins." The gangs trade narcotics for the guns of drug-addicted burglars, who will sell a $500 pistol fo
Registering guns doesn't do anything.....it doesn't solve crimes it doesn't stop crimes...and mass shooters will register their guns all day long.
It shows where mass shooters and criminals are getting their guns
You will be more careful about who you sell your gun to if you realize the gun can be traced back to you
I never said I did.
But you missed the point that magazine size is irrelevant to anyone hell bent on killing people
But only people intent on killing lots of people want a 100 round magazine.