Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 37,474
- 22,311
- 2,945
So you don't have a clue. That gross ignorance, combined with the extreme hate you carry in your life is a toxic combinationIRONY ALERT!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you don't have a clue. That gross ignorance, combined with the extreme hate you carry in your life is a toxic combinationIRONY ALERT!
So what? The issue is he wasn’t a party to be case.The facts say he had a financial interest in a case before the Court. You lied.
Up until then the game was fixed for the Progressives, and they have had a huge advantage. Enough to get arrogant, obnoxious and ignorant as what people do when they control near everything. Except theirs was far different than the past. It is vicious dictator style government control that squashes everything. However, in the last couple of years a few Progs have been taken to task for it.This has been building since McTurtle stole the Scalia seat for Gorsuch
The recent ruling was the tipping point
It gives the appearance that you are beholden to someoneOf course they could. But going on vacation with a friend isn't a bribe....it's just going on vacation.
I don't live in the worlds of could haves, we live in a world of reality.,
Thus far, to my knowledge only one current justice set on a case involving a company that paid her millions....Justice Sotomayor....https://nypost.com/2023/05/04/supreme-court-justice-sonia-sotomayor-didnt-recuse-herself-from-cases-involving-book-publisher-that-paid-her-3m-report/
Justice Sonia Sotomayor didn’t recuse herself from cases involving publisher that paid her $3M: report
Ignorant and hatefilled. What a horrible way to go through life.So what? The issue is he wasn’t a party to be case.
I mean if a judge has to recuse themselves from any case that might have an impact on their friends or family they couldn’t sit for anything
Every time a court rules on a tax issue it impacts everyone finincally
You are just desperate and grasping…it’s telling though when one of Obama’s justice actually heard a case involving a company that paid her three million you said nothing
Reid changed the protocol.Did the Court get to this point because Republicans played by the rules?
No? They changed the rules to suit their ambitions and then ignored THOSE rules..
Thomas claims they are just gifts from “Friends”Hmmmmmmmmm. Seems like you purposely took an example with no context to the discussion. That being a wealthy businessman with a direct financial interest in a SC case giving lavish gifts and vacations to a justice who did not recuse himself. You aren't just disingenuous, you're dishonest.
what rules didn't they follow, explain for us? Not sure how to answer you. What is it you think they did off script?Did the Court get to this point because Republicans played by the rules?
No? They changed the rules to suit their ambitions and then ignored THOSE rules..
If trump wins.You'll get that new Soviet Union style constitution yet.
Clarence has made no secret of his dissatisfaction with the compensation he gets as a SC justice. Folks like Crow made sure his compensation was "enhanced" so he wouldn't resign.Thomas claims they are just gifts from “Friends”
But Thomas-is a millionaire who can’t show where he ever provided any lavish gifts to his friends in return
A much more important SCOTUS question is simple.Thomas claims they are just gifts from “Friends”
But Thomas-is a millionaire who can’t show where he ever provided any lavish gifts to his friends in return
First they nuked the filibuster rule for SCOTUS appointmentswhat rules didn't they follow, explain for us? Not sure how to answer you. What is it you think they did off script?
Does it get heavy moving those goal posts constantly?So what? The issue is he wasn’t a party to be case.
I mean if a judge has to recuse themselves from any case that might have an impact on their friends or family they couldn’t sit for anything
Every time a court rules on a tax issue it impacts everyone finincally
You are just desperate and grasping…it’s telling though when one of Obama’s justice actually heard a case involving a company that paid her three million you said nothing
What goal post did I move? He’s allowed to have friends, they are allowed to buy each other gifts, and be friendlyDoes it get heavy moving those goal posts constantly?
A judge on a lower court would be required to turn down those gifts and report themWhat goal post did I move? He’s allowed to have friends, they are allowed to buy each other gifts, and be friendly
Had he had a case before the judge that could be a issue to recuse
That didn’t happen
cite to where a judge on a lower court can't go on vacation or have dinner with their friends.A judge on a lower court would be required to turn down those gifts and report them
Why isn’t Thomas?
If someone else is footing the bill, they have to report the giftcite to where a judge on a lower court can't go on vacation or have dinner with their friends.
with that said, the SCOTUS, is the Judicial branch, they make the rules for themselves and the Courts.
They make the rules. They do fin disclosuresIf someone else is footing the bill, they have to report the gift
Yes SCOTUS makes the rules but doesn’t apply them to themselves