JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
Rik is quite a clever clogs, as my mother would use to say about some of the John Birchers that attended our services.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rik is quite a clever clogs, as my mother would use to say about some of the John Birchers that attended our services.
HUH? my post was to bripat, not you and he didn't say expand marriage rights he said "Marriage is a union between people of the opposite sex. No amount of propaganda or verbal legerdemain can change that." Look again. For some reason he wanted to change that... that being the last sentence... which was marriage being a union between people of the opposite sex. Are you familiar with english?How does expanding marriage rights make me a hetero hater? Am I stopping heterosexual couples from getting married by allowing gay couples to get married? What a stupid argument.Why would you want to change marriage being a union between people of the opposite sex? What are you some kind of hetero hater? But yeah happy marriage... I suppose for jerks that's an oxymoron.How many times does this failed argument have to refuted? interracial marriage bans prohibited a black person from marrying a white person. But nobody was kept from marrying, because everybody could still marry someone of their same race, right?Right handed people used to make left-handed people comply or be punished....under shady religious grounds too.St. Patrick's Day occurs every March 17th. That doesn't mean that the Irish are launching a thought control agenda.
But once upon a time, they might have been. Back when there were regularly signs that said, "Irish need not apply."
Do you know that once upon a time, children were not allowed to use their dominant left hand when learning to write? Something changed that.
Sounds like an agenda to me.
It wasn't an agenda. It was an issue of how a leftie dealt with his parents. Homosexuals can tailor their relationship with their own parents as they best see fit, same too with their friends. Forcing me to comply, often under penalty of law, makes me their enemy. If left-handers forced me to comply with their agenda, and used law-fare to do so, they'd be my enemy too,.
But let me add to your analogy. Are right-handed people trying to keep left-handed people from legally marrying? No? What do you think left-handed people would do, if the right-handed majority was telling them that they were perverted and they should not be allowed legal marriage? Do you think left-handed people would just be quiet...or would they have an "agenda" too?
I missed this last paragraph somehow.
No one has ever kept homosexuals from marrying. Rock Hudson was married. Dr. Sally Ride was married. Meridth Baxter-Birney was married.
The term "gay marriage" is an oxymoron. Marriage is a union between people of the opposite sex. No amount of propaganda or verbal legerdemain can change that.
My mistake. The quote notification on the new layout notifies you even if your post was not directly being quoted, so in a rush I assumed you were responding to me and making the argument that changing marriage to include gay-couples made me a hetero-hater. Obviously that was not the case, sorry.HUH? my post was to bripat, not you and he didn't say expand marriage rights he said "Marriage is a union between people of the opposite sex. No amount of propaganda or verbal legerdemain can change that." Look again. For some reason he wanted to change that... that being the last sentence... which was marriage being a union between people of the opposite sex. Are you familiar with english?How does expanding marriage rights make me a hetero hater? Am I stopping heterosexual couples from getting married by allowing gay couples to get married? What a stupid argument.Why would you want to change marriage being a union between people of the opposite sex? What are you some kind of hetero hater? But yeah happy marriage... I suppose for jerks that's an oxymoron.How many times does this failed argument have to refuted? interracial marriage bans prohibited a black person from marrying a white person. But nobody was kept from marrying, because everybody could still marry someone of their same race, right?Right handed people used to make left-handed people comply or be punished....under shady religious grounds too.St. Patrick's Day occurs every March 17th. That doesn't mean that the Irish are launching a thought control agenda.
But once upon a time, they might have been. Back when there were regularly signs that said, "Irish need not apply."
Do you know that once upon a time, children were not allowed to use their dominant left hand when learning to write? Something changed that.
Sounds like an agenda to me.
It wasn't an agenda. It was an issue of how a leftie dealt with his parents. Homosexuals can tailor their relationship with their own parents as they best see fit, same too with their friends. Forcing me to comply, often under penalty of law, makes me their enemy. If left-handers forced me to comply with their agenda, and used law-fare to do so, they'd be my enemy too,.
But let me add to your analogy. Are right-handed people trying to keep left-handed people from legally marrying? No? What do you think left-handed people would do, if the right-handed majority was telling them that they were perverted and they should not be allowed legal marriage? Do you think left-handed people would just be quiet...or would they have an "agenda" too?
I missed this last paragraph somehow.
No one has ever kept homosexuals from marrying. Rock Hudson was married. Dr. Sally Ride was married. Meridth Baxter-Birney was married.
The term "gay marriage" is an oxymoron. Marriage is a union between people of the opposite sex. No amount of propaganda or verbal legerdemain can change that.
Certainly true when it comes to childrens' civil rights.Here's my gay marriage conversation:
It's fucked up and wrong. The end.
Here's my gay marriage conversation:
It's fucked up and wrong. The end.
Yeah cause lemons and oranges can't both be fruits there's only room on this lemon phobic planet for orange fruit.We should call Oranges, Lemons.
Lemons sell for more and everything has the same rights.
I should not suffer the price of oranges when I sell them, the are equal to lemons.
Why would anyone care, I make more money for Oranges, even though you thought you bought Lemons.
They are both citrus so it's only equal to call oranges, lemons.
Don't have one then. Simple solution.Here's my gay marriage conversation:
It's fucked up and wrong. The end.
His point was that you cannot call people who do gay sex "father/mother" "husband/wife". For they are not and will never be. States have a right to incentivized father/mother husband/wife. And this right is theirs for the sake of children's welfare. Children have a right to have father/mother be incentivized and the only legal couple who may raise them. Children's rights trump any alleged "gay rights" when it comes to marriage.Yeah cause lemons and oranges can't both be fruits there's only room on this lemon phobic planet for orange fruit.We should call Oranges, Lemons.
Lemons sell for more and everything has the same rights.
I should not suffer the price of oranges when I sell them, the are equal to lemons.
Why would anyone care, I make more money for Oranges, even though you thought you bought Lemons.
They are both citrus so it's only equal to call oranges, lemons.
Parents can be male or female, adoptive or genetic. Marriage is not a requirement for being a parent.His point was that you cannot call people who do gay sex "father/mother" "husband/wife". For they are not and will never be. States have a right to incentivized father/mother husband/wife. And this right is theirs for the sake of children's welfare. Children have a right to have father/mother be incentivized and the only legal couple who may raise them. Children's rights trump any alleged "gay rights" when it comes to marriage.Yeah cause lemons and oranges can't both be fruits there's only room on this lemon phobic planet for orange fruit.We should call Oranges, Lemons.
Lemons sell for more and everything has the same rights.
I should not suffer the price of oranges when I sell them, the are equal to lemons.
Why would anyone care, I make more money for Oranges, even though you thought you bought Lemons.
They are both citrus so it's only equal to call oranges, lemons.
wait you are trying to use the civil right argument for kids, but disagree that the gays rights have no standing?Certainly true when it comes to childrens' civil rights.Here's my gay marriage conversation:
It's fucked up and wrong. The end.
there is no law stating a child must have a Father and a mother. You are making things upHis point was that you cannot call people who do gay sex "father/mother" "husband/wife". For they are not and will never be. States have a right to incentivized father/mother husband/wife. And this right is theirs for the sake of children's welfare. Children have a right to have father/mother be incentivized and the only legal couple who may raise them. Children's rights trump any alleged "gay rights" when it comes to marriage.Yeah cause lemons and oranges can't both be fruits there's only room on this lemon phobic planet for orange fruit.We should call Oranges, Lemons.
Lemons sell for more and everything has the same rights.
I should not suffer the price of oranges when I sell them, the are equal to lemons.
Why would anyone care, I make more money for Oranges, even though you thought you bought Lemons.
They are both citrus so it's only equal to call oranges, lemons.
His point was that you cannot call people who do gay sex "father/mother" "husband/wife". For they are not and will never be. States have a right to incentivized father/mother husband/wife. And this right is theirs for the sake of children's welfare. Children have a right to have father/mother be incentivized and the only legal couple who may raise them. Children's rights trump any alleged "gay rights" when it comes to marriage.Yeah cause lemons and oranges can't both be fruits there's only room on this lemon phobic planet for orange fruit.We should call Oranges, Lemons.
Lemons sell for more and everything has the same rights.
I should not suffer the price of oranges when I sell them, the are equal to lemons.
Why would anyone care, I make more money for Oranges, even though you thought you bought Lemons.
They are both citrus so it's only equal to call oranges, lemons.
My opinion is based on truth not mans satan inspired lies. Your opinion is nothing but a hollow lie. LIAR!!!!Not false. Nothing but a choice.
And that is why your personal opinion is dismissed by those of us who actually have studied the evidence.
Nope, by the idiot lefty commie liars, liar.You are: by the entire far right.