Are conservatives smarter than liberals?

[SmedlyButler]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

I have seen a few studies that address this issue and the ones I've read reach the conclusion that people with liberal ideologies are smarter than those at the other end of the political scale. This article here describes one of these studies;

"The short answer: Kanazawa's paper shows that more-intelligent people are more likely to say they are liberal. They are also less likely to say they go to religious services. ... What's new in Kanazawa's paper is a provocative theory about why intelligence might correlate with liberalism. He argues that smarter people are more willing to espouse "evolutionarily novel" values--that is, values that did not exist in our ancestral environment, including weird ideas about, say, helping genetically unrelated strangers..."

"So are liberals smarter? Kanazawa quotes from two surveys that support the hypothesis that liberals are more intelligent. One is the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which is often called Add Health. The other is the General Social Survey (GSS). The Add Health study shows that the mean IQ of adolescents who identify themselves as "very liberal" is 106, compared with a mean IQ of 95 for those calling themselves "very conservative." The Add Health study is huge — more than 20,000 kids — and this difference is highly statistically significant."

These studies don't necessarily agree on why this measurable difference exists but it is clear from the ones that I've read that it does.

 

[BluesLegend]

When liberals have to LIE to trick their own base into supporting their policies, well there you have it.

Post the lies!

Ahahaha denial ^^^

 

[Bfgrn]

The individual issues are all too real: assaults on unions, public employees, women's rights, immigrants, the environment, health care, voting rights, food safety, pensions, prenatal care, science, public broadcasting, and on and on.

Unions are not under attack, they're archaic and counter-productive.

Public employees are not under attack, management of public employees which fails to hold them accountable, is rightly criticized, due to its destructive nature... see: Unions are archaic.

No one is attacking women's rights.... you're likely trying to argue that a right exists to murder another due to one's behavior having conceived the other, thus demanding a right to murder another, for whom you're solely responsible, as a means to avoid bearing responsibility for one's actions.

No one is attacking immigrants... you're likely trying to conflate legal immigration with the destructive ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. It's illegal for a host of sound reasons.

No one is advocating for destruction of the environment.

The only people known to have harmed healthcare in the US are those who are responsible for using DECEIT AND FRAUD as a means to INFLUENCE THE STUPID.

No one is contesting voter's rights... you're likely confusing voter's rights with the voter's responsibility to identify themselves through the use of a credible ID.

And so on... with each and every one of the other issues you noted.

"Labor is the United States. The men and women, who with their minds, their hearts and hands, create the wealth that is shared in this country—they are America."
President Dwight D. Eisenhower

LOL...you say unions are not under attack...then you attack unions.

Public employee are under attack as are unions...see Wisconsin and teachers

You hide behind 'legal' on immigration, then totally disregard the law on abortion.

Immigrants are being attacked...see Arizona S.B 1070 racial profiling law written by a white supremacist Republican.

The environment is being attacked...see US House bill H.R. 2250, a dangerous bill that allows mercury and other toxic air pollution to pour freely from thousands of the nation's worst air polluters. H.R. 2250 exempts industrial boilers (the on-site power plants at major industrial plants) and industrial waste incinerators from the Clean Air Act's pollution control requirements. It encourages companies to burn tires, plastics, used chemicals, spent solvents and other industrial wastes without doing anything to control the resulting toxic air pollution.

The deceit in our health care system is Wall Street investors who have created real death panels by punishing any insurance corporation that spends too much of premiums on treatments. And hospitals and doctors who rip off taxpayers.

Voter suppression by Republicans goes way beyond voter ID. It is about making voting a day long gauntlet with long lines and not enough polling places.


"We're going to crush labor as a political entity"
Grover Norquist - Republican economic guru and co-author of the GOP's 'Contract with America'

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

I have seen a few studies that address this issue and the ones I've read reach the conclusion that people with liberal ideologies are smarter than those at the other end of the political scale. This article here describes one of these studies;

"The short answer: Kanazawa's paper shows that more-intelligent people are more likely to say they are liberal. They are also less likely to say they go to religious services. ... What's new in Kanazawa's paper is a provocative theory about why intelligence might correlate with liberalism. He argues that smarter people are more willing to espouse "evolutionarily novel" values--that is, values that did not exist in our ancestral environment, including weird ideas about, say, helping genetically unrelated strangers..."

"So are liberals smarter? Kanazawa quotes from two surveys that support the hypothesis that liberals are more intelligent. One is the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which is often called Add Health. The other is the General Social Survey (GSS). The Add Health study shows that the mean IQ of adolescents who identify themselves as "very liberal" is 106, compared with a mean IQ of 95 for those calling themselves "very conservative." The Add Health study is huge — more than 20,000 kids — and this difference is highly statistically significant."

These studies don't necessarily agree on why this measurable difference exists but it is clear from the ones that I've read that it does.

They not only do not necessarily agree on 'why'... but they also do not offer any actual evidence sustaining their 'feelings'.

What your studies demonstrate is "Relativism" on PARADE!

 

[LoneLaugher]

Well.....

My brother is a very fiscally conservative.....Ayn Rand type of guy. He's an admitted asshole....just like me. But...he has real disdain for anyone who he perceives as being a "taker". Whereas I believe that all people desire to be productive....and some just can't seem to realize their desire, he believes that most people are worthless and only a very few want to contribute to society.

He's not stupid. But he's wrong.

 

[Bfgrn]

Go for it pea brain...you have a liberal right here ready to hammer you...

I'll be waiting....

LOL! You just couldn't help yourself could ya scout?

You've already failed... . Ya see, 'this' discussion isn't real time. Knowing how to run a search engine doesn't qualify as 'intelligence'.

Walking back the claim already, huh? Nice.

No....Bigfrn would simply use Google to find the answers.
If you cannot handle that, tough shit.

He wouldn't need google to answer civics questions. Why are you so mistrusting?

Oh Ok... Here's one for ya:

From where do Human Rights come and by what means are such sustained?

Knock yourselves out...

(Enjoy kids... )

Human rights, going back to the Magna Carta are the domain of government with the support of the citizenry.

 

[BluesLegend]

When liberals have to LIE to trick their own base into supporting their policies, well there you have it.

I think this posts says a lot about what I am talking about - neither party has a monopoly on honesty, not even a particularly strong record of honesty.

And yet here we see posters who scream about one party every day, but are simply incapable of screaming about the other. I don't see that as being particularly intelligent.

Oh please, not another 'the other side does it to' excuse. Look the left's lying has spiraled completely out of control, its like comparing a camp fire to a forest fire.

Now you may be intelligent but this post is just plain hyper-biased and is a display of someone not using all their gray matter.

Do you really want to go there, comparing the number of lies told by the lying left vs the right? You will lose that contest bad. For example I recently heard that if you like your plan or doctor you can keep them under Obamacare. Obama told us this like 20 times. In fact he said we can keep our doctor and our plan "period". Then he went on national tv and admitted he lied. He also said, for starters...

1. We would save up to $2,500 a year on health insurance premiums.
2. There's not a smidgeon of corruption at the IRS.
3. The keystone pipeline would hardly create any jobs.
4. The NSA is not abusing its power.
5. He claimed Benghazi was a terrorist attack from the beginning.
6. He didn't set a red line in Syria.

Left vs Right lies, bah I laugh in the left's general direction.

 

[BluesLegend]

When liberals have to LIE to trick their own base into supporting their policies, well there you have it.

1. Many weren't "tricked" in the way you think they were. Most democrats understood that taxes needed to be in the bill. But the American public hates taxes even though they like the services that the government provides. So to get the good things in the bill like pre-existing conditions covered and coverage for people all across this nation, it had to include taxes. So we knew it include taxes because that's what government programs require.

2. And what was the Republicans response to the health care debate? Oh right it was about death panels. So Republicans didn't lie? Okay....

3. Studies consistently show that Liberals are more educated than conservatives. As seen, conservatives don't have the capacity to defend their arguments in any rational way. So they insult thinking they win.

For instance, HereWeGoAgain made a policy argument that no one who doesn't pay taxes can vote. Other "stupid liberals" questioned the policy with fact situations that would arise from the policy, and we got called "stupid" or "idiots" for actual situations that would arise.

But see that's the issue with conservatives in general, they truly believe that situations are so simplistic that a simplified solution will solve the world ills. "no welfare and everyone will have jobs!" "No minimum wage and there will be more jobs!" No that's not how the world works. They don't have the intelligence to understand the complexity of the world we live in.

Now let ad hominem commence!

Liberal studies show liberals are more educated, got it. lol You people live out there in lala land. Meanwhile back in reality you got your asses handed to you in this election. My response to Obamacare was its unconstitutional so Democrats can go to hell! The left lied and cheated and bribed and threatened to get the votes that's how freaking popular it was and passing it destroyed the Democratic party. I'm actually okay with that last part.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Blues Legend is one of our most intelligent posters. Just brilliant. Such original thoughts, too!

 

[Two Thumbs]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

Socialism has failed in almost every country.

Africa is a socialist hellhole of starvation
S America, dear god, the issues there
The EU was in flames, literal flames.

But leftist still want it to come here while cons don't.

So you tell me. Is someone that can see the actual results of socialism, but still wants it, mentally ill?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

Socialism has failed in almost every country.

Africa is a socialist hellhole of starvation
S America, dear god, the issues there
The EU was in flames, literal flames.

But leftist still want it to come here while cons don't.

So you tell me. Is someone that can see the actual results of socialism, but still wants it, mentally ill?

Is this your best attempt?

 

[Two Thumbs]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

Socialism has failed in almost every country.

Africa is a socialist hellhole of starvation
S America, dear god, the issues there
The EU was in flames, literal flames.

But leftist still want it to come here while cons don't.

So you tell me. Is someone that can see the actual results of socialism, but still wants it, mentally ill?

Is this your best attempt?

It's a slam dunk.

leftist believe in the theory of socialism and ignore the actual real life results.

Proof?

"Is this your best attempt?"........ Lone Laugher

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The individual issues are all too real: assaults on unions, public employees, women's rights, immigrants, the environment, health care, voting rights, food safety, pensions, prenatal care, science, public broadcasting, and on and on.

Unions are not under attack, they're archaic and counter-productive.

Public employees are not under attack, management of public employees which fails to hold them accountable, is rightly criticized, due to its destructive nature... see: Unions are archaic.

No one is attacking women's rights.... you're likely trying to argue that a right exists to murder another due to one's behavior having conceived the other, thus demanding a right to murder another, for whom you're solely responsible, as a means to avoid bearing responsibility for one's actions.

No one is attacking immigrants... you're likely trying to conflate legal immigration with the destructive ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. It's illegal for a host of sound reasons.

No one is advocating for destruction of the environment.

The only people known to have harmed healthcare in the US are those who are responsible for using DECEIT AND FRAUD as a means to INFLUENCE THE STUPID.

No one is contesting voter's rights... you're likely confusing voter's rights with the voter's responsibility to identify themselves through the use of a credible ID.

And so on... with each and every one of the other issues you noted.

"Labor is the United States. The men and women, who with their minds, their hearts and hands, create the wealth that is shared in this country—they are America."
President Dwight D. Eisenhower

LOL...you say unions are not under attack...then you attack unions.

False. I noted that Unions are archaic, and counter-productive. And a Union does not equate to Labor, it equates to unaccountable labor which costs too much.

Public employee are under attack as are unions...see Wisconsin and teachers

You're conflating people who work for the public sector, which is to say "The Gubment" and those who are employed by the government, through public sector unions.

People are already represented through their Legislatures... there is no purpose for a union, beyond forcing the cost of public sector labor, beyond the means of the public to sustain the costs for such. Again... archaic and counter-productive.

You hide behind 'legal' on immigration, then totally disregard the law on abortion.

I don't hide behind anything. The laws regarding immigration rest upon objective reasoning and as such are there to defend the nation from infiltration of those harboring loyalties to Foreign Ideas, which are hostile to the Principles that define and otherwise sustain America. You know... people like YOU!

Laws enabling women to murder the children they conceive through their poor choices are set upon subjective reasoning, serve only to enable poor choices, thus result in the increase in the instances of individuals making poor choices and subsequently undermine the PURPOSE OF LAW, which is the service of JUSTICE.

Immigrants are being attacked...see Arizona S.B 1070 racial profiling law written by a white supremacist Republican.

You're a liar and as is SO OFTEN the case, an imbecile.

The environment is being attacked...

Yep... You're an imbecile. Just because someone recognizes that you idiots are using the law as a means to acquire power and is taking measures to reduce your power by making it harder for you to do so, does NOT mean that they're attacking the environment.

Again, you're an imbecile.

The deceit in our health care system is Wall Street investors who have created real death panels by punishing any insurance corporation that spends too much of premiums on treatments. And hospitals and doctors who rip off taxpayers.

Death panels? Or contracts which clearly specify the terms of coverage, and the specific cost, in terms of premiums for the servicing of those specific terms?

This in contrast to the EMPTY PROMISES of the Left 'that EVERYONE will be insured' despite the certainty that not everyone will be insured and that by JUST BEING A LEFTIST PLAN, that more people will be injured and die prematurely as a result of their having crippled a system which was the epitome of healthcare ON THE PLANET, before they started 'fixing' it.

Voter suppression by Republicans

There's no such thing.

"We're going to crush labor as a political entity"
Grover Norquist - Republican economic guru and co-author of the GOP's 'Contract with America'

Labor is not an entity... you're speaking of Norquists promise to shut down the means of the Left to USE 'LABOR'
as a means to undermine the security of the United States.

So... that brings me to noting and accepting your above concessions.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

Socialism has failed in almost every country.

Africa is a socialist hellhole of starvation
S America, dear god, the issues there
The EU was in flames, literal flames.

But leftist still want it to come here while cons don't.

So you tell me. Is someone that can see the actual results of socialism, but still wants it, mentally ill?

Is this your best attempt?

It's a slam dunk.

leftist believe in the theory of socialism and ignore the actual real life results.

Proof?

"Is this your best attempt?"........ Lone Laugher

Name the five most influential leftists in current American politics, please.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

Socialism has failed in almost every country.

Africa is a socialist hellhole of starvation
S America, dear god, the issues there
The EU was in flames, literal flames.

But leftist still want it to come here while cons don't.

So you tell me. Is someone that can see the actual results of socialism, but still wants it, mentally ill?

Is this your best attempt?

It's a slam dunk.

leftist believe in the theory of socialism and ignore the actual real life results.

Proof?

"Is this your best attempt?"........ Lone Laugher

Name the five most influential leftists in current American politics, please.

ok, I'll play

current; obama, pelosi, soros, adc, nbc, cbs

history; mao, stalin, marx, lenin, and that genocidal skank that pushed abortion

 

[LoneLaugher]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

Socialism has failed in almost every country.

Africa is a socialist hellhole of starvation
S America, dear god, the issues there
The EU was in flames, literal flames.

But leftist still want it to come here while cons don't.

So you tell me. Is someone that can see the actual results of socialism, but still wants it, mentally ill?

Is this your best attempt?

It's a slam dunk.

leftist believe in the theory of socialism and ignore the actual real life results.

Proof?

"Is this your best attempt?"........ Lone Laugher

Name the five most influential leftists in current American politics, please.

ok, I'll play

current; obama, pelosi, soros, adc, nbc, cbs

history; mao, stalin, marx, lenin, and that genocidal skank that pushed abortion

You lose already. Thanks for nothing.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Socialism has failed in almost every country.

Africa is a socialist hellhole of starvation
S America, dear god, the issues there
The EU was in flames, literal flames.

But leftist still want it to come here while cons don't.

So you tell me. Is someone that can see the actual results of socialism, but still wants it, mentally ill?

Is this your best attempt?

It's a slam dunk.

leftist believe in the theory of socialism and ignore the actual real life results.

Proof?

"Is this your best attempt?"........ Lone Laugher

Name the five most influential leftists in current American politics, please.

ok, I'll play

current; obama, pelosi, soros, adc, nbc, cbs

history; mao, stalin, marx, lenin, and that genocidal skank that pushed abortion

You lose already. Thanks for nothing.

Not really, with lumps like you the country loses, b/c you can't see what has happened in other countries is what your leaders want to have happen here.

but like we've been saying; leftist are mentally ill

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

LOL! You just couldn't help yourself could ya scout?

You've already failed... . Ya see, 'this' discussion isn't real time. Knowing how to run a search engine doesn't qualify as 'intelligence'.

Walking back the claim already, huh? Nice.

No....Bigfrn would simply use Google to find the answers.
If you cannot handle that, tough shit.

He wouldn't need google to answer civics questions. Why are you so mistrusting?

Oh Ok... Here's one for ya:

From where do Human Rights come and by what means are such sustained?

Knock yourselves out...

(Enjoy kids... )

Human rights, going back to the Magna Carta are the domain of government with the support of the citizenry.

So you're saying that Human Rights come from Government? And you are assuring us that this is true, because the Magna Carta said so... ?

ROFLMNAO!

Well folks, as I noted earlier, sound reasoning NEVER requires validation, but it is always nice where one's opponents provides for such.

FTR: The Magna Carta, in effect, recognized that God is the supreme authority and that the King is NOT God... .

Therefore, according to the Magna Carta: Human Rights... come from God and that the only true purpose of government is to defend the innocent from those who would usurp God's will, thus preclude humanity from exercising the gifts given to them, by God.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Agreed, I've always looked at conservatives as being animated by their paternal side, liberals animated by their maternal side.

"Pull yourself up by your bootstraps" vs. "here, let me help you".

What's best for a child, of course, is proper equilibrium between the two, carefully working together as mature, responsible adults.

.

Authoritative parenting and authoritarian parenting are two different things.

And they in concert with each other work well.
Like my Mom used to say...This is not a democracy. This is a benevolent dictatorship.
Our parents were not our friends. They were our parents. The boss. What they said went. No questions asked.
Disobey and pay the consequences for your actions. Do well and receive the just rewards.Carrot and stick.

Wow! You must be perfect.

Is there a problem with that style of parenting?
I used it with my kids. They are doing fine, thank you. No booze, no crime, no drugs, good grades, good work ethic, intelligent.
No. There is no "perfect"....There isn't even "really good"....The only reality is using a good parenting method and it is more than likely the kid(s) will turn out to be respectful productive citizens

No problem. It is how I was raised and how my kids were raised. You are not special. That's my point. Stop bragging about normal shit.

Please point out where I claimed I was "special"

 

[thereisnospoon]

While there are exceptions... the average Democrat is dumber than a bag of Hammers.

If this were a real time discussion, I'd launch into asking ANY of the in-house comrades BASIC questions regarding civics, business, US and world history, science and you'd find that very few if ANY of the contributors who advocate through Left-think would be able to correctly answer any of them, while most Americans would have no trouble answering most... .

Go for it pea brain...you have a liberal right here ready to hammer you...

I'll be waiting....

LOL! You just couldn't help yourself could ya scout?

You've already failed... . Ya see, 'this' discussion isn't real time. Knowing how to run a search engine doesn't qualify as 'intelligence'.

Walking back the claim already, huh? Nice.

No....Bigfrn would simply use Google to find the answers.
If you cannot handle that, tough shit.

He wouldn't need google to answer civics questions. Why are you so mistrusting?

Oh? And you are sure of this how?