Are the anti-science zealots accepting anthropogenic climate change yet?

The remnant of hardcore ideologue in denial of science can pleasure themselves with their dogma, but, as a practical matter, the reality of anthropogenic clime change is being confronted by responsible people:

The regulatory review, which will be done by theFinancial Stability Oversight Council, will examine whether banks and other lending institutions are properly assessing the risks to financial stability. [Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen] chairs the committee, which includes Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other financial regulators.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is a federal program to coordinate federal research and investments in understanding the forces shaping the global environment, both human and natural, and their impacts on society. USGCRP facilitates collaboration and cooperation across its 13 federal member agencies to advance understanding of the changing Earth system and maximize efficiencies in federal global change research.
The US is a hotbed of climate science denial when compared with other countries, with international polling finding a significant number of Americans do not believe human-driven climate change is occurring.
A total of 13% of Americans polled in a 23-country survey conducted by the YouGov-Cambridge Globalism Project agreed with the statement that the climate is changing “but human activity is not responsible at all”. A further 5% said the climate was not changing.
Only Saudi Arabia (16%) and Indonesia (18%) had a higher proportion of people doubtful of manmade climate change.
 
Last edited:
The remnant of hardcore ideologue in denial of science can pleasure themselves with their dogma, but, as a practical matter, the reality of anthropogenic clime change is being confronted by responsible people:

The regulatory review, which will be done by theFinancial Stability Oversight Council, will examine whether banks and other lending institutions are properly assessing the risks to financial stability. [Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen] chairs the committee, which includes Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other financial regulators.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is a federal program to coordinate federal research and investments in understanding the forces shaping the global environment, both human and natural, and their impacts on society. USGCRP facilitates collaboration and cooperation across its 13 federal member agencies to advance understanding of the changing Earth system and maximize efficiencies in federal global change research.
Panic porn isn't science.
 
The remnant of hardcore ideologue in denial of science can pleasure themselves with their dogma, but, as a practical matter, the reality of anthropogenic clime change is being confronted by responsible people:

The regulatory review, which will be done by theFinancial Stability Oversight Council, will examine whether banks and other lending institutions are properly assessing the risks to financial stability. [Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen] chairs the committee, which includes Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other financial regulators.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is a federal program to coordinate federal research and investments in understanding the forces shaping the global environment, both human and natural, and their impacts on society. USGCRP facilitates collaboration and cooperation across its 13 federal member agencies to advance understanding of the changing Earth system and maximize efficiencies in federal global change research.
Panic porn isn't science.
It's mind boggling how they can ignore their own senses and buy into gloom and doom scenarios which their own senses tell them do not exist.
 
Why is it that people who are so illiterate in science are always the ones who accuse other of being illiterate in science?
We know this as "projection"....It is most pronounced in those who are lacking in self-awareness. which covers the lion's share of the political left.

The Bible addresses this ... "It's the thief who cries 'thief' first" ... human behavior well known since antiquity ... the political right isn't immune from humanity, they do the same thing ...
 
The resolution of the ideologues vs the climatologists squabble over who had a better grasp of climate was always silly.

"I don’t know about you guys, but I think climate change is...

'BULLSHIT!’

...‘By the way, it is!"

[Sen. Ron Johnson mouths to Republican luncheon that climate change is ‘bullsh—’]

Knowledge respects reality. Ignorance must have reality forced upon it. When ignorance is sustained by ideological dogma, it's a bitch to overcome, particularly in especially resistant cases.

The predictions are being validated. The theoretical is becoming blatant. The forecasts are being realized. Denial is becoming an increasingly costly ideological self-indulgence - agricultural failures, wildfires, flooding, soaring energy costs, droughts, mass starvation, relentless human migrations, etc., etc., etc.


By midcentury, if greenhouse gas emissions are not significantly curtailed, the coldest and warmest daily temperatures are expected to increase by at least 5 degrees F in most areas by mid-century rising to 10 degrees F by late century. The National Climate Assessment estimates 20-30 more days over 90 degrees F in most areas by mid-century. A recent study projects that the annual number of days with a heat index above 100 degrees F will double, and days with a heat index above 105 degrees F will triple, nationwide, when compared to the end of the 20th century.
Extreme heat can increase the risk of other types of disasters. Heat can exacerbate drought, and hot dry conditions can in turn create wildfire conditions. In cities, buildings roads and infrastructure can be heated to 50 to 90 degrees hotter than the air while natural surfaces remain closer to air temperatures. The heat island effect is most intense during the day, but the slow release of heat from the infrastructure overnight (or an atmospheric heat island) can keep cities much hotter than surrounding areas. Rising temperatures across the country poses a threat to people, ecosystems and the economy...
An early summer heatwave across the western United States broke all-time records in multiple states, with temperatures above 100 degrees Fahrenheit for days on end in some places. This event marked yet another climate extreme for residents of a region already suffering through a devastating drought and with memories of last year’s horrific wildfire season likely still fresh on people’s minds.
Truth not only endures. It has an irresistible way of imposing itself upon even the most willfully obtuse:

Expect Americans to demand their elected representatives confront reality.

Some may be a bit slow, but eventually, everybody will get it, one way or another.


View attachment 511009
"If there is one thing that really burns my ass, it's
CLIMATE CHANGE!"



1626274984319.png
 
Why is it that people who are so illiterate in science are always the ones who accuse other of being illiterate in science?
We know this as "projection"....It is most pronounced in those who are lacking in self-awareness. which covers the lion's share of the political left.

The Bible addresses this ... "It's the thief who cries 'thief' first" ... human behavior well known since antiquity ... the political right isn't immune from humanity, they do the same thing ...
Politics makes people go bat shit crazy.
 
The remnant of hardcore ideologue in denial of science can pleasure themselves with their dogma, but, as a practical matter, the reality of anthropogenic clime change is being confronted by responsible people:

The regulatory review, which will be done by theFinancial Stability Oversight Council, will examine whether banks and other lending institutions are properly assessing the risks to financial stability. [Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen] chairs the committee, which includes Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other financial regulators.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is a federal program to coordinate federal research and investments in understanding the forces shaping the global environment, both human and natural, and their impacts on society. USGCRP facilitates collaboration and cooperation across its 13 federal member agencies to advance understanding of the changing Earth system and maximize efficiencies in federal global change research.
The US is a hotbed of climate science denial when compared with other countries, with international polling finding a significant number of Americans do not believe human-driven climate change is occurring.
A total of 13% of Americans polled in a 23-country survey conducted by the YouGov-Cambridge Globalism Project agreed with the statement that the climate is changing “but human activity is not responsible at all”. A further 5% said the climate was not changing.
Only Saudi Arabia (16%) and Indonesia (18%) had a higher proportion of people doubtful of manmade climate change.

Other countries buy into the cradle to grave crap too.

Your appeal to that simply says that the U.S. is the one thing keeping us from making some seriously stupid decisions.
 
The remnant of hardcore ideologue in denial of science can pleasure themselves with their dogma, but, as a practical matter, the reality of anthropogenic clime change is being confronted by responsible people:

The regulatory review, which will be done by theFinancial Stability Oversight Council, will examine whether banks and other lending institutions are properly assessing the risks to financial stability. [Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen] chairs the committee, which includes Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other financial regulators.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is a federal program to coordinate federal research and investments in understanding the forces shaping the global environment, both human and natural, and their impacts on society. USGCRP facilitates collaboration and cooperation across its 13 federal member agencies to advance understanding of the changing Earth system and maximize efficiencies in federal global change research.
The US is a hotbed of climate science denial when compared with other countries, with international polling finding a significant number of Americans do not believe human-driven climate change is occurring.
A total of 13% of Americans polled in a 23-country survey conducted by the YouGov-Cambridge Globalism Project agreed with the statement that the climate is changing “but human activity is not responsible at all”. A further 5% said the climate was not changing.
Only Saudi Arabia (16%) and Indonesia (18%) had a higher proportion of people doubtful of manmade climate change.

Other countries buy into the cradle to grave crap too.

Your appeal to that simply says that the U.S. is the one thing keeping us from making some seriously stupid decisions.
They actually don't. At least not according to their Paris accord pledges anyway. It's all greenwashing to appease the environazis.
 

Other countries buy into the cradle to grave crap too.

Your appeal to that simply says that the U.S. is the one thing keeping us from making some seriously stupid decisions.
The United Sates, along with Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, are the hotbeds of science denialism, but that does not mean that the fringe element of dogmatic ideologues, impervious to the ever-mounting evidence, is anything more than that.

Whether all the world's scientific institutions, academies, and societies are corrupt or are all ignorant regarding the science, - either way duping virtually all the nations on earth who have ratified the Paris Agreement - is a comprehensive paranoia, indeed.
 

Other countries buy into the cradle to grave crap too.

Your appeal to that simply says that the U.S. is the one thing keeping us from making some seriously stupid decisions.
The United Sates, along with Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, are the hotbeds of science denialism, but that does not mean that the fringe element of dogmatic ideologues, impervious to the ever-mounting evidence, is anything more than that.

Whether all the world's scientific institutions, academies, and societies are corrupt or are all ignorant regarding the science, - either way duping virtually all the nations on earth who have ratified the Paris Agreement - is a comprehensive paranoia, indeed.
What part of there is no science to deny don't you understand?

Here is some science on the subject. Do you have any science like this?

 

Other countries buy into the cradle to grave crap too.

Your appeal to that simply says that the U.S. is the one thing keeping us from making some seriously stupid decisions.
The United Sates, along with Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, are the hotbeds of science denialism, but that does not mean that the fringe element of dogmatic ideologues, impervious to the ever-mounting evidence, is anything more than that.

Whether all the world's scientific institutions, academies, and societies are corrupt or are all ignorant regarding the science, - either way duping virtually all the nations on earth who have ratified the Paris Agreement - is a comprehensive paranoia, indeed.
The Paris accord is a joke. Did you even read it?
 

Other countries buy into the cradle to grave crap too.

Your appeal to that simply says that the U.S. is the one thing keeping us from making some seriously stupid decisions.
The United Sates, along with Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, are the hotbeds of science denialism, but that does not mean that the fringe element of dogmatic ideologues, impervious to the ever-mounting evidence, is anything more than that.

Whether all the world's scientific institutions, academies, and societies are corrupt or are all ignorant regarding the science, - either way duping virtually all the nations on earth who have ratified the Paris Agreement - is a comprehensive paranoia, indeed.
Seriously dude, you are exactly like the sheep in Animal Farm. Did you ever read that book?

You'll be chanting something else just as soon as they tell you what to chant and it will probably even be exactly the opposite of what you are chanting now.
 
stooge: a person who serves merely to support or assist others, particularly in doing unpleasant work.
 
Inevitably, ineluctably, the taboo is being vanquished and the science accepted.

When Representative John Curtis quietly approached fellow Republicans to invite them to discuss climate change at a clandestine meeting in his home state of Utah, he hoped a half dozen members might attend.

Soon the guest list blew past expectations as lawmakers heard about the gathering and asked to be included. For two days in February, 24 Republicans gathered in a ballroom of the Grand America Hotel in Salt Lake City where they brainstormed ways to get their party to engage on a planetary problem it has ignored for decades.
“Some came with the promise of being anonymous. It’s terrible that Republicans can’t even go talk about it without being embarrassed,” Mr. Curtis said in an interview.
Screen Shot 2020-03-17 at 11.17.06 AM.png
"The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese
in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive."
For four years underTrump, even uttering the phrase “climate change” was verboten for many Republicans. His administration scrubbed the words from federal websites, tried to censor testimony to Congress and mocked the science linking rising fossil fuel emissions to a warming planet.
Now, many in the Republican Party are coming to terms with what polls have been saying for years: independents, suburban voters and especially young Republicans are worried about climate change and want the government to take action.
“There is a recognition within the G.O.P. that if the party is going to be competitive in national elections, in purple states and purple districts, there needs to be some type of credible position on climate change” said George David Banks, a former adviser to Trump...
 
View attachment 512691

Coincidence? I think not.
Your impotence in contriving a credible refutation of science may well induce you to lash out in ad hominem desperation.

I cite the consensus of reputable folks, and that upsets you.
The experiment that was performed on back radiation and peer reviewed is the ONLY science that has been done to date on the subject. Let me know when your supposedly credible sources do some actual science.

Cause right now.... YOU are the science denying zealot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top