Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's what it comes down to, what she wants - not upholding the oath she swore to with her hand on...wait for it...a BIBLE!She doesnt want
Like its been said...the oath she swore to was marriage between a man and a woman. It would be completely different if Gay marriage was already in place, and she got in there, then decided "hey Im not going to do this".
Gay marriage is legal in the United States. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the supreme court’s decision doesn’t change that fact. A clerk of court’s job is to issue licenses based upon the law. When Ms. Davis accepted her position she knew what her responsibilities would entail. She accepted the duty knowing the nature of the US court system and that laws change.Whether Kim Davis agrees or not, it is part of her job. If she can not perform her duties because of her moral objection, then it is then her place to step down.
Are you supporting Kim Davis for her faith and for defending the laws of Kentucky? For any who are not aware of who Kim Davis is, she is the clerk who was put in jail for refusing to issue a marriage license to a same sex couple. In the State of Kentucky marriage is between a man and a woman. Are you supporting Kim Davis for standing up for her faith in Jesus Christ? Yes or no?
Kim Davis is a law breaking redneck hypocritical racist who should be recalled and set out to pasture in some field piled with horse shit, with Huckabee by her side.
That's what it comes down to, what she wants - not upholding the oath she swore to with her hand on...wait for it...a BIBLE!She doesnt want
Like its been said...the oath she swore to was marriage between a man and a woman. It would be completely different if Gay marriage was already in place, and she got in there, then decided "hey Im not going to do this".
Gay marriage is legal in the United States. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the supreme court’s decision doesn’t change that fact. A clerk of court’s job is to issue licenses based upon the law. When Ms. Davis accepted her position she knew what her responsibilities would entail. She accepted the duty knowing the nature of the US court system and that laws change.Whether Kim Davis agrees or not, it is part of her job. If she can not perform her duties because of her moral objection, then it is then her place to step down.
That's what it comes down to, what she wants - not upholding the oath she swore to with her hand on...wait for it...a BIBLE!She doesnt want
Like its been said...the oath she swore to was marriage between a man and a woman. It would be completely different if Gay marriage was already in place, and she got in there, then decided "hey Im not going to do this".
Gay marriage is legal in the United States. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the supreme court’s decision doesn’t change that fact. A clerk of court’s job is to issue licenses based upon the law. When Ms. Davis accepted her position she knew what her responsibilities would entail. She accepted the duty knowing the nature of the US court system and that laws change.Whether Kim Davis agrees or not, it is part of her job. If she can not perform her duties because of her moral objection, then it is then her place to step down.
The best comment to date concerning this issue. This isn't rocket science....you got issues with your job, step down, put a period behind it and keep it movin'. ESPECIALLY WHEN THE VERY PEOPLE YOU REFUSE TO SERVE, PAY YOUR FUCKIN SALARY TOO.
If you don't like America, leave it and go found a religious stateAre you supporting Kim Davis for her faith and for defending the laws of Kentucky?
Preemption
The preemption doctrine derives from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution which states that the "Constitution and the laws of the United States...shall be the supreme law of the land...anything in the constitutions or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This means of course, that any federal law--even a regulation of a federal agency--trumps any conflicting state law.
If you don't like America, leave it and go found a religious stateAre you supporting Kim Davis for her faith and for defending the laws of Kentucky?
Preemption
The preemption doctrine derives from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution which states that the "Constitution and the laws of the United States...shall be the supreme law of the land...anything in the constitutions or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This means of course, that any federal law--even a regulation of a federal agency--trumps any conflicting state law.
Wrong, Dante. The Constitution protects Kim Davis's rights to her faith and to defend her faith. She was elected to do that job and took an oath to do it as it was at that time - marriage is between a man and a woman. She has upheld that oath. She was released from jail because her rights were violated. I thank God she stood up for her rights as a Christian. She did the right thing.
What a bunch of BS.
If you thumpers are gonna believe in your bible, then you should also support polygamy, incest, murder.
But no.
You believe in Davis and her bastard kids, multiple marriages and adultery.
You're a bunch of hypocrites who pick and choose whatever supports your agenda of hate and fear.
What a bunch of BS.
If you thumpers are gonna believe in your bible, then you should also support polygamy, incest, murder.
But no.
You believe in Davis and her bastard kids, multiple marriages and adultery.
You're a bunch of hypocrites who pick and choose whatever supports your agenda of hate and fear.
Lunch counter religious faith is almost always a cover for hypocrisy and bigotry
If you don't like America, leave it and go found a religious stateAre you supporting Kim Davis for her faith and for defending the laws of Kentucky?
Preemption
The preemption doctrine derives from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution which states that the "Constitution and the laws of the United States...shall be the supreme law of the land...anything in the constitutions or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This means of course, that any federal law--even a regulation of a federal agency--trumps any conflicting state law.
Wrong, Dante. The Constitution protects Kim Davis's rights to her faith and to defend her faith. She was elected to do that job and took an oath to do it as it was at that time - marriage is between a man and a woman. She has upheld that oath. She was released from jail because her rights were violated. I thank God she stood up for her rights as a Christian. She did the right thing.
What a bunch of BS.
If you thumpers are gonna believe in your bible, then you should also support polygamy, incest, murder.
But no.
You believe in Davis and her bastard kids, multiple marriages and adultery.
You're a bunch of hypocrites who pick and choose whatever supports your agenda of hate and fear.
Lunch counter religious faith is almost always a cover for hypocrisy and bigotry
Its also a cover for their work to get sharia law enacted across the US.
If you don't like America, leave it and go found a religious stateAre you supporting Kim Davis for her faith and for defending the laws of Kentucky?
Preemption
The preemption doctrine derives from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution which states that the "Constitution and the laws of the United States...shall be the supreme law of the land...anything in the constitutions or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This means of course, that any federal law--even a regulation of a federal agency--trumps any conflicting state law.
Wrong, Dante. The Constitution protects Kim Davis's rights to her faith and to defend her faith. She was elected to do that job and took an oath to do it as it was at that time - marriage is between a man and a woman. She has upheld that oath. She was released from jail because her rights were violated. I thank God she stood up for her rights as a Christian. She did the right thing.
omfg! Jeremiah , You are soooo wrong on WHY she was released. Read the court order you silly fool.
Also, she has asked the state for a reasonable accommodation, which cannot by the rules hamper the employer. The state will be sued if they do not force her to do the job she swore an oath to do. She needs an act of the legislature for this. Try and keep up with the facts
You're also dead wrong on what exactly the US Constitution says
Why, because Christians don't curse?
I think it is pretty obvious Kim's co - worker isn't a Christian. If indeed this person sits next to Kim Davis.
If you don't like America, leave it and go found a religious stateAre you supporting Kim Davis for her faith and for defending the laws of Kentucky?
Preemption
The preemption doctrine derives from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution which states that the "Constitution and the laws of the United States...shall be the supreme law of the land...anything in the constitutions or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This means of course, that any federal law--even a regulation of a federal agency--trumps any conflicting state law.
Wrong, Dante. The Constitution protects Kim Davis's rights to her faith and to defend her faith. She was elected to do that job and took an oath to do it as it was at that time - marriage is between a man and a woman. She has upheld that oath. She was released from jail because her rights were violated. I thank God she stood up for her rights as a Christian. She did the right thing.
omfg! Jeremiah , You are soooo wrong on WHY she was released. Read the court order you silly fool.
Also, she has asked the state for a reasonable accommodation, which cannot by the rules hamper the employer. The state will be sued if they do not force her to do the job she swore an oath to do. She needs an act of the legislature for this. Try and keep up with the facts
You're also dead wrong on what exactly the US Constitution says
Am I wrong that the Supreme Court had no right to vote on the redefining of marriage - permitting same sex marriages to become legal in America? Yes or no?
If you don't like America, leave it and go found a religious stateAre you supporting Kim Davis for her faith and for defending the laws of Kentucky?
Preemption
The preemption doctrine derives from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution which states that the "Constitution and the laws of the United States...shall be the supreme law of the land...anything in the constitutions or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This means of course, that any federal law--even a regulation of a federal agency--trumps any conflicting state law.
Wrong, Dante. The Constitution protects Kim Davis's rights to her faith and to defend her faith. She was elected to do that job and took an oath to do it as it was at that time - marriage is between a man and a woman. She has upheld that oath. She was released from jail because her rights were violated. I thank God she stood up for her rights as a Christian. She did the right thing.
omfg! Jeremiah , You are soooo wrong on WHY she was released. Read the court order you silly fool.
Also, she has asked the state for a reasonable accommodation, which cannot by the rules hamper the employer. The state will be sued if they do not force her to do the job she swore an oath to do. She needs an act of the legislature for this. Try and keep up with the facts
You're also dead wrong on what exactly the US Constitution says
Am I wrong that the Supreme Court had no right to vote on the redefining of marriage - permitting same sex marriages to become legal in America? Yes or no?
Right?
The Supreme Court was asked to hear a case of rights and liberties being violated. It is their job
There is separation of church and state in the US, so church doctrine cannot over rule the law of the land. As it should be.If you don't like America, leave it and go found a religious state
Preemption
The preemption doctrine derives from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution which states that the "Constitution and the laws of the United States...shall be the supreme law of the land...anything in the constitutions or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This means of course, that any federal law--even a regulation of a federal agency--trumps any conflicting state law.
Wrong, Dante. The Constitution protects Kim Davis's rights to her faith and to defend her faith. She was elected to do that job and took an oath to do it as it was at that time - marriage is between a man and a woman. She has upheld that oath. She was released from jail because her rights were violated. I thank God she stood up for her rights as a Christian. She did the right thing.
omfg! Jeremiah , You are soooo wrong on WHY she was released. Read the court order you silly fool.
Also, she has asked the state for a reasonable accommodation, which cannot by the rules hamper the employer. The state will be sued if they do not force her to do the job she swore an oath to do. She needs an act of the legislature for this. Try and keep up with the facts
You're also dead wrong on what exactly the US Constitution says
Am I wrong that the Supreme Court had no right to vote on the redefining of marriage - permitting same sex marriages to become legal in America? Yes or no?
Right?
The Supreme Court was asked to hear a case of rights and liberties being violated. It is their job
Dante', it is not the job of the Supreme Court to redefine marriage nor is it their right. What they did was wrong. They had no right to do it.
A person who rejects God's plan for marriage - See Genesis 1:26,27 - God created a woman for man. Not a man for man. God created a man and a woman and said that they were to be fruitful and multiply - a man and a man cannot produce a child, a woman and a woman cannot produce a child. What's next? Marrying a man to a boy? Or marrying a horse to a man? Where does this perverse wickedness end?
No man has a right to defy God's plan of marriage and the founding fathers' agreement with the Word of God - marriage being between a man and a woman (would any of them have disagreed? No, I do not believe so) as our nation was a nation dedicated to the God of the Bible. Would it not be reasonable to understand then that the intent from the beginning was always - marriage is between one man and one woman? As I said, No man has the "right" to marry another man according to how our laws in America were established, nor do they have the liberty to defy those laws by using the Supreme Court to redefine marriage in order to accommodate their wickedness.
