Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it is what you'd think!!!!Sounds like you're jealous that they're getting a free ride.I am, I am angry that after fifty years the inner cities are still what they are!!!! Thanks to liberal minded dependencies. Makes me want to barf!!!!!I don't care about being rich. I've got more stuff than I have time to enjoy it. Nobody should be jazzed about the outright theft that these people perpetrate however. It's not jealousy, it's anger and disgust.It's because we believe in what the founders mapped out for us. You're just afraid of smarter people. You can't stand you're not them! Me, I'm proud of who I am, I don't have to be a rich person. Others do! Not my problem. But it affends the ba-jesus out of you!!! right?They benefit indirectly from public education since they're the 'job creators'. They benefit disproportionately from infrastructure and basically all the trappings of society. But we've already had this discussion many times before. I have to wonder why you are so pro-plutocracy. I'm sure you are no further up the social ladder than I am. Is your success based upon sucking up and that why you don't want to rock the boat?We all benefit from that. Just ask a former European Jew how much he benefits from having a military defense.
Even if the rich paid for all of the military, that would still be about an 80% cut in their taxes if we got rid of all the stuff they don't benefit from since they pay for the bulk of everything anyway. I'll bet they would take that deal any day of the week.
I only know one person that's 'on the dole'. She and her kids live with her dad and with his income and her stipend, they barely have two nickels to rub together. I can't say that her situation is anyone's fault but her's but at this point, there's really no way out. What would you do, let her and her kids starve?it is what you'd think!!!!Sounds like you're jealous that they're getting a free ride.I am, I am angry that after fifty years the inner cities are still what they are!!!! Thanks to liberal minded dependencies. Makes me want to barf!!!!!I don't care about being rich. I've got more stuff than I have time to enjoy it. Nobody should be jazzed about the outright theft that these people perpetrate however. It's not jealousy, it's anger and disgust.It's because we believe in what the founders mapped out for us. You're just afraid of smarter people. You can't stand you're not them! Me, I'm proud of who I am, I don't have to be a rich person. Others do! Not my problem. But it affends the ba-jesus out of you!!! right?They benefit indirectly from public education since they're the 'job creators'. They benefit disproportionately from infrastructure and basically all the trappings of society. But we've already had this discussion many times before. I have to wonder why you are so pro-plutocracy. I'm sure you are no further up the social ladder than I am. Is your success based upon sucking up and that why you don't want to rock the boat?
well it is an interesting situation. Not sure what to think, since I don't know the facts. Each situation is unique. If your position is there is nothing to do but give them money, I will disagree. Everyone in the country has opportunities, and how one deals with that opportunity dictates the next step. I had a sister-in-law on the dole and she finally left her lazy husband and got off of welfare. She had four kids too. She moved out west to the country, rented a trailer and became self sufficient without the government involved. It just depends on the want of the individual. So does this lady want to improve her quality of life, or is she merely happy with what she gets and the rubbing of two nickels isn't important.I only know one person that's 'on the dole'. She and her kids live with her dad and with his income and her stipend, they barely have two nickels to rub together. I can't say that her situation is anyone's fault but her's but at this point, there's really no way out. What would you do, let her and her kids starve?it is what you'd think!!!!Sounds like you're jealous that they're getting a free ride.I am, I am angry that after fifty years the inner cities are still what they are!!!! Thanks to liberal minded dependencies. Makes me want to barf!!!!!I don't care about being rich. I've got more stuff than I have time to enjoy it. Nobody should be jazzed about the outright theft that these people perpetrate however. It's not jealousy, it's anger and disgust.It's because we believe in what the founders mapped out for us. You're just afraid of smarter people. You can't stand you're not them! Me, I'm proud of who I am, I don't have to be a rich person. Others do! Not my problem. But it affends the ba-jesus out of you!!! right?
She was widowed at a young age and now she's uneducated and seemingly constantly on the verge of a nervous breakdown. I'm not sure you realize that a lot of the chronically unemployed/homeless have some sort of mental issue that would prevent them from living a normal life. Of course now, with our wonderful competitive economy, you don't have to have any real issues at all to be unemployed.well it is an interesting situation. Not sure what to think, since I don't know the facts. Each situation is unique. If your position is there is nothing to do but give them money, I will disagree. Everyone in the country has opportunities, and how one deals with that opportunity dictates the next step. I had a sister-in-law on the dole and she finally left her lazy husband and got off of welfare. She had four kids too. She moved out west to the country, rented a trailer and became self sufficient without the government involved. It just depends on the want of the individual. So does this lady want to improve her quality of life, or is she merely happy with what she gets and the rubbing of two nickels isn't important.I only know one person that's 'on the dole'. She and her kids live with her dad and with his income and her stipend, they barely have two nickels to rub together. I can't say that her situation is anyone's fault but her's but at this point, there's really no way out. What would you do, let her and her kids starve?it is what you'd think!!!!Sounds like you're jealous that they're getting a free ride.I am, I am angry that after fifty years the inner cities are still what they are!!!! Thanks to liberal minded dependencies. Makes me want to barf!!!!!I don't care about being rich. I've got more stuff than I have time to enjoy it. Nobody should be jazzed about the outright theft that these people perpetrate however. It's not jealousy, it's anger and disgust.
BTW, To say there is no way out is a liberal's cop out!!
and you can thank the left!!! You know how they are afraid of the christians of the country. God help letting them help the needy. LOL.She was widowed at a young age and now she's uneducated and seemingly constantly on the verge of a nervous breakdown. I'm not sure you realize that a lot of the chronically unemployed/homeless have some sort of mental issue that would prevent them from living a normal life. Of course now, with our wonderful competitive economy, you don't have to have any real issues at all to be unemployed.well it is an interesting situation. Not sure what to think, since I don't know the facts. Each situation is unique. If your position is there is nothing to do but give them money, I will disagree. Everyone in the country has opportunities, and how one deals with that opportunity dictates the next step. I had a sister-in-law on the dole and she finally left her lazy husband and got off of welfare. She had four kids too. She moved out west to the country, rented a trailer and became self sufficient without the government involved. It just depends on the want of the individual. So does this lady want to improve her quality of life, or is she merely happy with what she gets and the rubbing of two nickels isn't important.I only know one person that's 'on the dole'. She and her kids live with her dad and with his income and her stipend, they barely have two nickels to rub together. I can't say that her situation is anyone's fault but her's but at this point, there's really no way out. What would you do, let her and her kids starve?it is what you'd think!!!!Sounds like you're jealous that they're getting a free ride.I am, I am angry that after fifty years the inner cities are still what they are!!!! Thanks to liberal minded dependencies. Makes me want to barf!!!!!
BTW, To say there is no way out is a liberal's cop out!!
I am, I am angry that after fifty years the inner cities are still what they are!!!! Thanks to liberal minded dependencies. Makes me want to barf!!!!!I don't care about being rich. I've got more stuff than I have time to enjoy it. Nobody should be jazzed about the outright theft that these people perpetrate however. It's not jealousy, it's anger and disgust.It's because we believe in what the founders mapped out for us. You're just afraid of smarter people. You can't stand you're not them! Me, I'm proud of who I am, I don't have to be a rich person. Others do! Not my problem. But it affends the ba-jesus out of you!!! right?They benefit indirectly from public education since they're the 'job creators'. They benefit disproportionately from infrastructure and basically all the trappings of society. But we've already had this discussion many times before. I have to wonder why you are so pro-plutocracy. I'm sure you are no further up the social ladder than I am. Is your success based upon sucking up and that why you don't want to rock the boat?They have way more money, property and possessions to protect. Also, they benefit much more from the keeping-commerce-flowing aspects of military intervention.
We all benefit from that. Just ask a former European Jew how much he benefits from having a military defense.
Even if the rich paid for all of the military, that would still be about an 80% cut in their taxes if we got rid of all the stuff they don't benefit from since they pay for the bulk of everything anyway. I'll bet they would take that deal any day of the week.
The government already gives huge tax breaks to the churches. Yet churches can't offer enough help to eliminate the problem of the homeless. Didn't work during the great depression, wouldn't work now.and you can thank the left!!! You know how they are afraid of the christians of the country. God help letting them help the needy. LOL.She was widowed at a young age and now she's uneducated and seemingly constantly on the verge of a nervous breakdown. I'm not sure you realize that a lot of the chronically unemployed/homeless have some sort of mental issue that would prevent them from living a normal life. Of course now, with our wonderful competitive economy, you don't have to have any real issues at all to be unemployed.well it is an interesting situation. Not sure what to think, since I don't know the facts. Each situation is unique. If your position is there is nothing to do but give them money, I will disagree. Everyone in the country has opportunities, and how one deals with that opportunity dictates the next step. I had a sister-in-law on the dole and she finally left her lazy husband and got off of welfare. She had four kids too. She moved out west to the country, rented a trailer and became self sufficient without the government involved. It just depends on the want of the individual. So does this lady want to improve her quality of life, or is she merely happy with what she gets and the rubbing of two nickels isn't important.I only know one person that's 'on the dole'. She and her kids live with her dad and with his income and her stipend, they barely have two nickels to rub together. I can't say that her situation is anyone's fault but her's but at this point, there's really no way out. What would you do, let her and her kids starve?it is what you'd think!!!!Sounds like you're jealous that they're getting a free ride.
BTW, To say there is no way out is a liberal's cop out!!
I don't care about being rich. I've got more stuff than I have time to enjoy it. Nobody should be jazzed about the outright theft that these people perpetrate however. It's not jealousy, it's anger and disgust.It's because we believe in what the founders mapped out for us. You're just afraid of smarter people. You can't stand you're not them! Me, I'm proud of who I am, I don't have to be a rich person. Others do! Not my problem. But it affends the ba-jesus out of you!!! right?They benefit indirectly from public education since they're the 'job creators'. They benefit disproportionately from infrastructure and basically all the trappings of society. But we've already had this discussion many times before. I have to wonder why you are so pro-plutocracy. I'm sure you are no further up the social ladder than I am. Is your success based upon sucking up and that why you don't want to rock the boat?They have way more money, property and possessions to protect. Also, they benefit much more from the keeping-commerce-flowing aspects of military intervention.That's debatable as well. They don't benefit anymore than you do.
We all benefit from that. Just ask a former European Jew how much he benefits from having a military defense.
Even if the rich paid for all of the military, that would still be about an 80% cut in their taxes if we got rid of all the stuff they don't benefit from since they pay for the bulk of everything anyway. I'll bet they would take that deal any day of the week.
Why doesn't it have credibility? Be specific.Poor Billy000, still trying to start a thread that has credibility and failing once again.
Oh that's right. You never know what you're talking about.
I guess you didn't know that the rules changed toward churches. Why not go an lecture the left who pulled all of those irons out of the fire?The government already gives huge tax breaks to the churches. Yet churches can't offer enough help to eliminate the problem of the homeless. Didn't work during the great depression, wouldn't work now.and you can thank the left!!! You know how they are afraid of the christians of the country. God help letting them help the needy. LOL.She was widowed at a young age and now she's uneducated and seemingly constantly on the verge of a nervous breakdown. I'm not sure you realize that a lot of the chronically unemployed/homeless have some sort of mental issue that would prevent them from living a normal life. Of course now, with our wonderful competitive economy, you don't have to have any real issues at all to be unemployed.well it is an interesting situation. Not sure what to think, since I don't know the facts. Each situation is unique. If your position is there is nothing to do but give them money, I will disagree. Everyone in the country has opportunities, and how one deals with that opportunity dictates the next step. I had a sister-in-law on the dole and she finally left her lazy husband and got off of welfare. She had four kids too. She moved out west to the country, rented a trailer and became self sufficient without the government involved. It just depends on the want of the individual. So does this lady want to improve her quality of life, or is she merely happy with what she gets and the rubbing of two nickels isn't important.I only know one person that's 'on the dole'. She and her kids live with her dad and with his income and her stipend, they barely have two nickels to rub together. I can't say that her situation is anyone's fault but her's but at this point, there's really no way out. What would you do, let her and her kids starve?it is what you'd think!!!!
BTW, To say there is no way out is a liberal's cop out!!
I have no idea what you're talking about.I guess you didn't know that the rules changed toward churches. Why not go an lecture the left who pulled all of those irons out of the fire?The government already gives huge tax breaks to the churches. Yet churches can't offer enough help to eliminate the problem of the homeless. Didn't work during the great depression, wouldn't work now.and you can thank the left!!! You know how they are afraid of the christians of the country. God help letting them help the needy. LOL.She was widowed at a young age and now she's uneducated and seemingly constantly on the verge of a nervous breakdown. I'm not sure you realize that a lot of the chronically unemployed/homeless have some sort of mental issue that would prevent them from living a normal life. Of course now, with our wonderful competitive economy, you don't have to have any real issues at all to be unemployed.well it is an interesting situation. Not sure what to think, since I don't know the facts. Each situation is unique. If your position is there is nothing to do but give them money, I will disagree. Everyone in the country has opportunities, and how one deals with that opportunity dictates the next step. I had a sister-in-law on the dole and she finally left her lazy husband and got off of welfare. She had four kids too. She moved out west to the country, rented a trailer and became self sufficient without the government involved. It just depends on the want of the individual. So does this lady want to improve her quality of life, or is she merely happy with what she gets and the rubbing of two nickels isn't important.I only know one person that's 'on the dole'. She and her kids live with her dad and with his income and her stipend, they barely have two nickels to rub together. I can't say that her situation is anyone's fault but her's but at this point, there's really no way out. What would you do, let her and her kids starve?
BTW, To say there is no way out is a liberal's cop out!!
I don't care about being rich. I've got more stuff than I have time to enjoy it. Nobody should be jazzed about the outright theft that these people perpetrate however. It's not jealousy, it's anger and disgust.It's because we believe in what the founders mapped out for us. You're just afraid of smarter people. You can't stand you're not them! Me, I'm proud of who I am, I don't have to be a rich person. Others do! Not my problem. But it affends the ba-jesus out of you!!! right?They benefit indirectly from public education since they're the 'job creators'. They benefit disproportionately from infrastructure and basically all the trappings of society. But we've already had this discussion many times before. I have to wonder why you are so pro-plutocracy. I'm sure you are no further up the social ladder than I am. Is your success based upon sucking up and that why you don't want to rock the boat?They have way more money, property and possessions to protect. Also, they benefit much more from the keeping-commerce-flowing aspects of military intervention.
We all benefit from that. Just ask a former European Jew how much he benefits from having a military defense.
Even if the rich paid for all of the military, that would still be about an 80% cut in their taxes if we got rid of all the stuff they don't benefit from since they pay for the bulk of everything anyway. I'll bet they would take that deal any day of the week.
So rich people are thieves? What did they steal?
Ironically, most wealth redistribution in this country takes place through the tax code through things like the refundable Additional Child Tax Credit (which was passed by the Republican-controlled 105th congress, and expanded with the Bush Tax Cuts), which disproportionally goes to dark red states like Mississippi and Utah that have the fewest tax paying units per capita.
Perhaps instead of such cash handouts, a more strings-attached approach would be more helpful and fiscally responsible.
If you can't explain why it is illogical, don't bother claiming it is.Apparently they expect the government to pay for everything for them. Is it that they are too dumb to realize revenue pays for our military, public schools and highways etc.?
The newest republican tax cut proposal would add 440 billion to our national debt. More proof republicans don't give a shit about the issue
The Republican Party s top priority is to raise taxes on the poor. Literally.
A battle over taxes divides Democrats. More to come - The Washington Post
We have had threads started on twisted logic, convoluted logic, and tortured logic ...
We have now entered into a whole new realm ... NO logic.
Do you even know how much we spend on defense? Obviously not. How about the FBI? CIA? Highways? Other infrastructure that republicans refuse to pay for?Oh please. The rich don't use gov services? Are you kidding me? You really think private schools is the only services they don't benefit from?Apparently they expect the government to pay for everything for them. Is it that they are too dumb to realize revenue pays for our military, public schools and highways etc.?
The newest republican tax cut proposal would add 440 billion to our national debt. More proof republicans don't give a shit about the issue
The Republican Party s top priority is to raise taxes on the poor. Literally.
A battle over taxes divides Democrats. More to come - The Washington Post
To be a mooch you actually have to mooch something. The rich pay their taxes, so calling them "mooches" is pure slander.
Furthermore, the rich generally don't use government services. They put their children in private schools and they have their own private security.
Your claim is simply a bald faced lie.
Do the rich use welfare? Do they need Social Security? Aside from the courts and the military, is there any government service the rich benefit from?
I don't care about being rich. I've got more stuff than I have time to enjoy it. Nobody should be jazzed about the outright theft that these people perpetrate however. It's not jealousy, it's anger and disgust.It's because we believe in what the founders mapped out for us. You're just afraid of smarter people. You can't stand you're not them! Me, I'm proud of who I am, I don't have to be a rich person. Others do! Not my problem. But it affends the ba-jesus out of you!!! right?They benefit indirectly from public education since they're the 'job creators'. They benefit disproportionately from infrastructure and basically all the trappings of society. But we've already had this discussion many times before. I have to wonder why you are so pro-plutocracy. I'm sure you are no further up the social ladder than I am. Is your success based upon sucking up and that why you don't want to rock the boat?We all benefit from that. Just ask a former European Jew how much he benefits from having a military defense.
Even if the rich paid for all of the military, that would still be about an 80% cut in their taxes if we got rid of all the stuff they don't benefit from since they pay for the bulk of everything anyway. I'll bet they would take that deal any day of the week.
So rich people are thieves? What did they steal?
Jeezus, been living under a rock? Retirement funds, home equity, excessive credit fees and interest... Then in the corporate sector, upper management has been diverting the productivity gains that we all create into their own hands. But then, you already knew that.
Do you even know how much we spend on defense? Obviously not. How about the FBI? CIA? Highways? Other infrastructure that republicans refuse to pay for?Oh please. The rich don't use gov services? Are you kidding me? You really think private schools is the only services they don't benefit from?Apparently they expect the government to pay for everything for them. Is it that they are too dumb to realize revenue pays for our military, public schools and highways etc.?
The newest republican tax cut proposal would add 440 billion to our national debt. More proof republicans don't give a shit about the issue
The Republican Party s top priority is to raise taxes on the poor. Literally.
A battle over taxes divides Democrats. More to come - The Washington Post
To be a mooch you actually have to mooch something. The rich pay their taxes, so calling them "mooches" is pure slander.
Furthermore, the rich generally don't use government services. They put their children in private schools and they have their own private security.
Your claim is simply a bald faced lie.
Do the rich use welfare? Do they need Social Security? Aside from the courts and the military, is there any government service the rich benefit from?
The newest republican tax cut proposal would add 440 billion to our national debt. More proof republicans don't give a shit about the issueYou come across like a child. You have no argument so you pound your fists on the ground in a tantrum.You sorry-ass deluded fuck.Apparently they expect the government to pay for everything for them. Is it that they are too dumb to realize revenue pays for our military, public schools and highways etc.?
The newest republican tax cut proposal would add 440 billion to our national debt. More proof republicans don't give a shit about the issue
The Republican Party s top priority is to raise taxes on the poor. Literally.
A battle over taxes divides Democrats. More to come - The Washington Post
So, Republicans propose to give back to Americans $440 billion of their own earnings. Wow what a concept.
You don't give a shit about bloated, corrupt, inefficient, wasteful government do you?
Lol well without citing specific details it really isn't enough.If you can't explain why it is illogical, don't bother claiming it is.Apparently they expect the government to pay for everything for them. Is it that they are too dumb to realize revenue pays for our military, public schools and highways etc.?
The newest republican tax cut proposal would add 440 billion to our national debt. More proof republicans don't give a shit about the issue
The Republican Party s top priority is to raise taxes on the poor. Literally.
A battle over taxes divides Democrats. More to come - The Washington Post
We have had threads started on twisted logic, convoluted logic, and tortured logic ...
We have now entered into a whole new realm ... NO logic.
Well, actually, I can ...
You state something silly - and then try to back it up by leftist hit pieces, which use selective facts, to try to create a scenario that justifies its preconceived agenda. Your post - and its 'proof' - are nothing more than pedantic leftist propaganda, devoid of facts, and stripped of logic and reality.
Good enough? If not, I'll be glad to go further.
Lol well without citing specific details it really isn't enough.If you can't explain why it is illogical, don't bother claiming it is.Apparently they expect the government to pay for everything for them. Is it that they are too dumb to realize revenue pays for our military, public schools and highways etc.?
The newest republican tax cut proposal would add 440 billion to our national debt. More proof republicans don't give a shit about the issue
The Republican Party s top priority is to raise taxes on the poor. Literally.
A battle over taxes divides Democrats. More to come - The Washington Post
We have had threads started on twisted logic, convoluted logic, and tortured logic ...
We have now entered into a whole new realm ... NO logic.
Well, actually, I can ...
You state something silly - and then try to back it up by leftist hit pieces, which use selective facts, to try to create a scenario that justifies its preconceived agenda. Your post - and its 'proof' - are nothing more than pedantic leftist propaganda, devoid of facts, and stripped of logic and reality.
Good enough? If not, I'll be glad to go further.
