Armed Patriots In Idaho Protect Library From Fascist Books

This is a very sad thread..I do not think that the crazies have thought this through.
It is statistically probable that a lot of these kids they are protecting will be Gay. Perhaps reading these books may help them understand their sexuality better.
It may also help their classmates understand them better.
That empathy thing.
And lead to a happier and more contented society.Which is what normal folk want.
These protectors seem to be the worst kind of fascists. Dictating to everyone.
Their starting point is that Gays are bad. That is not acceptable in a modern caring society.


Sooooo.....alllowing under age children to read about other underage children engaging in sex acts with each other and adults is helping them to understand their sexuality and not grooming them?

That is what you believe?
 
Sooooo.....alllowing under age children to read about other underage children engaging in sex acts with each other and adults is helping them to understand their sexuality and not grooming them?

That is what you believe?
Parents would decide what is age appropriate not gun toting imbeciles. Kids develop at different ages and brighter kids require more challenging books than stupid kids.
When I was 11 I was reading I Claudius. It would have been too muh for other kids my age.
 
Parents would decide what is age appropriate not gun toting imbeciles. Kids develop at different ages and brighter kids require more challenging books than stupid kids.
When I was 11 I was reading I Claudius. It would have been too muh for other kids my age.


So....again......the books mentioned before actually depicted children having sex with other children and adults....those books are okay with you? The public should pay for those books to be in libraries both public and in schools?

Be brave, answer the question.....
 
Cool story.


1662311729852.png


My post was in response to this photo....you dumb ass.......
 
Its funny how folks like you think removing the word "N*ggr" from a Mark Twain book somehow means Mark Twain himself was removed...

It's almost like according to you folks, there is no Mark Twain if there is no N-word....funny that is what you think represents Mark Twain.....
It doesn't "represent" Mark Twain, but there is no question, the N-word IS crucial to some of Twain's work, most especially Huckleberry Finn. Also Tom Sawyer. If you don't know why, I would suspect you didn't read these books, or understand them. There is a reason Mark Twain is perhaps the greatest American writer, and by a long way.

Censors always, always take the best and most important part of any book right out; I learned that decades ago. I never read abridged books, and sometimes I get quite an education just FINDING an unabridged classic, which has been published bowdlerized so often and so long that few people even realize it's not all there. Robinson Crusoe is the most dramatic example I know; he shipwrecked after being sent from Brazil by a consortium of plantation owners to find slaves and bring them back. The government of Brazil had a monopoly on slaves and it made them too expensive. Who knows that? Hardly anyone, now. Only the middle part of that story is now published. But that whole first segment turns out to be fascinating and important -- and, like Huck Finn, surprisingly sympathetic. No, never read a copy of Huck Finn that leaves out the N-word, I'd say!!
 
Me….no, leftists pushing those books for kids…..several threads on these books and the school boards allowing them in schools and leftists running local libraries who also stock those books
Ok, so do you have a link showing books like that being pushed on children?
 
Ok, so do you have a link showing books like that being pushed on children?


I have shown video clips of parents reading those exact books to school boards from their children's school libraries.......in various threads here on U.S.messageboard...
 
Parents would decide what is age appropriate not gun toting imbeciles. Kids develop at different ages and brighter kids require more challenging books than stupid kids.
When I was 11 I was reading I Claudius. It would have been too muh for other kids my age.
You are right, inner city blacks who shoot up young children should not be having children read in appropriate books.
 
So....again......the books mentioned before actually depicted children having sex with other children and adults....those books are okay with you? The public should pay for those books to be in libraries both public and in schools?

Be brave, answer the question.....
...and again, the books mentioned covered a variety of topics from climate change to the occult--most were any that were deemed as 'Gay'. Some were what you would call, erroneously, CRT.

I posted the list, I bet you've not read one of them. But you got opinions..oh boy, you got opinions..fed straight to you by your handlers. If you have not read a book..you cannot judge it. Period.
 
I have shown video clips of parents reading those exact books to school boards from their children's school libraries.......in various threads here on U.S.messageboard...
However..again..this thread is not about schools...it is about a public library where not one of those books is carried..what do you think about THAT, eh?
 
Last edited:
If there were really free society it would not be with its public libraries keeping books from those grown-up people wanting to read those.
 
Benjamin Franklin disagrees....



Conservatives are so devoid of actual policies that are popular and offer real solutions -- they have consistently resorted to scraping the barrel to manfufacture fake culture war bullshit.... and now, they are so desperate that now, they are attacking libraries...fucking libraries....
Good grief, you're nothing but a living talking point.

Should public libraries give children access to porn?
 

Forum List

Back
Top