Arrest made in David Dorn case.

Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.
I'll respect them more when they deserve more respect.

Get over it.
Free country. You’re a hypocrite so there is that.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.
I'll respect them more when they deserve more respect.

Get over it.
How does David Dorn not deserve respect t?
How did you get that out of my post?
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.
I'll respect them more when they deserve more respect.

Get over it.
Free country. You’re a hypocrite so there is that.
Your response makes no sense.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.
I'll respect them more when they deserve more respect.

Get over it.
Free country. You’re a hypocrite so there is that.
Your response makes no sense.
You may believe what you will. Blacks kill
Other blacks at alarming rates. Never once saw you on this board outraged by that. You also don’t understand that racism is there and you cannot force someone not to be racist. I am a Jew, I cannot force you not to be antisemitic(not saying you are) as that’s almost impossible. In a free country people are allowed to be prejudiced. Not the police however. But to say we have institutional racism is a cop out.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
For this case, yes. NOT irrelevant when he is basically given sainthood by the media and the likes of you. Do you even know what he did? Honest question.

Your virtue signaling will not work on me.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
For this case, yes. NOT irrelevant when he is basically given sainthood by the media and the likes of you. Do you even know what he did? Honest question.

Your virtue signaling will not work on me.

Yes I know what he did. Despite your thoughts otherwise it has been reported.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
For this case, yes. NOT irrelevant when he is basically given sainthood by the media and the likes of you. Do you even know what he did? Honest question.

Your virtue signaling will not work on me.

Yes I know what he did. Despite your thoughts otherwise it has been reported.
I just learned about it recently. I thought he had a drug past, not a violent criminal past. So what he did is "irrelevant". GOT IT! Saint George it is.

Thanks for your input.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
For this case, yes. NOT irrelevant when he is basically given sainthood by the media and the likes of you. Do you even know what he did? Honest question.

Your virtue signaling will not work on me.

Yes I know what he did. Despite your thoughts otherwise it has been reported.
I just learned about it recently. I thought he had a drug past, not a violent criminal past. So what he did is "irrelevant". GOT IT! Saint George it is.

Thanks for your input.

The officer had a pretty violent past also.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
For this case, yes. NOT irrelevant when he is basically given sainthood by the media and the likes of you. Do you even know what he did? Honest question.

Your virtue signaling will not work on me.

Yes I know what he did. Despite your thoughts otherwise it has been reported.
I just learned about it recently. I thought he had a drug past, not a violent criminal past. So what he did is "irrelevant". GOT IT! Saint George it is.

Thanks for your input.

The officer had a pretty violent past also.
Yes. He should have never been on the force. Shame on Klobuchar and on the police chief. But again, both can be true.

Chauvin = EVIL PERSON

Floyd = EVIL PERSON

Protesting poor policing = GREAT
Looting/Burning/Rioting = BAD
Floyd called a saint = BAD

I bet most of the protesters didn't know his past.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
For this case, yes. NOT irrelevant when he is basically given sainthood by the media and the likes of you. Do you even know what he did? Honest question.

Your virtue signaling will not work on me.

Yes I know what he did. Despite your thoughts otherwise it has been reported.
I just learned about it recently. I thought he had a drug past, not a violent criminal past. So what he did is "irrelevant". GOT IT! Saint George it is.

Thanks for your input.

The officer had a pretty violent past also.
Yes. He should have never been on the force. Shame on Klobuchar and on the police chief. But again, both can be true.

Chauvin = EVIL PERSON

Floyd = EVIL PERSON

Protesting poor policing = GREAT
Looting/Burning/Rioting = BAD
Floyd called a saint = BAD

I bet most of the protesters didn't know his past.

It's not actually about Floyd. You might note that most protesters use a long list of names.

The issue is the look on the cops face when he was told there was something wrong with Floyd and that he needed to get off of him.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
For this case, yes. NOT irrelevant when he is basically given sainthood by the media and the likes of you. Do you even know what he did? Honest question.

Your virtue signaling will not work on me.

Yes I know what he did. Despite your thoughts otherwise it has been reported.
I just learned about it recently. I thought he had a drug past, not a violent criminal past. So what he did is "irrelevant". GOT IT! Saint George it is.

Thanks for your input.

The officer had a pretty violent past also.
Yes. He should have never been on the force. Shame on Klobuchar and on the police chief. But again, both can be true.

Chauvin = EVIL PERSON

Floyd = EVIL PERSON

Protesting poor policing = GREAT
Looting/Burning/Rioting = BAD
Floyd called a saint = BAD

I bet most of the protesters didn't know his past.

It's not actually about Floyd. You might note that most protesters use a long list of names.

The issue is the look on the cops face when he was told there was something wrong with Floyd and that he needed to get off of him.
All true but it is also true that Floyd is no saint.
 
In the thread I started a few days ago I said that these protests are no longer about Floyd and probably never were. This is class warfare, pure and simple. Capitalists and capitalism are their real enemy and have been from the beginning. If you asked them today about Floyd they would say "Who?"

Floyd gets taken down and killed for maybe using a fake $20. Angelo Mozilo retires a millionaire after causing taxpayers to lose billions.

And?

Class does play a role in the protests. People are tired of getting beat down for a fraction of what others get away with.

So the answer is to destroy small businesses of innocent people who did NOT bilk people for billions?

If bankers can get away with it, all should be able to.

So your answer to criminal behavior is more criminal behavior perpetrated on even more victims. Is that what you're telling me?

Are we to have a fair and equal justice system or not? Are you saying we shouldn't? I'm saying we have to and there will be one, one way or the other. All get held accountable or we will get one where no one is.

Answer my question first. Your answer to criminal behavior is more criminal behavior perpetrated on even more victims. Is that what you're telling me?

Another question: If you have no qualms about making even more victims then why do you care about them at all? If you have no problem making a victim out of a small business owner then why do you give a shit for embezzlement victims?

I answered your questions. If some can get away with it, I support everyone getting away with it.

You responded to my question with another question. That's not an answer. So again: Your answer to criminal behavior is more criminal behavior perpetrated on even more victims. Is that what you're telling me? Yes or no?

If you want to take the side of law and order, I'll join you as long as those laws apply to everyone .

If the laws don't apply to everyone and you won't join me on the side of law and order for that reason then my taking the side of law and order is irrelevant. Ergo, the caveat "If you want to take the side of law and order..." is moot and pointless.

All you're doing is palming all the work of maintaining law and order off on myself and others. This suggests to me that you are not interested in law and order at all. Your interest is in hoping the rich become victims of lawlessness and you will make victims of the non-rich to see that happen.

It is a cheap, lazy and unprincipled position to take and smacks of animus and spite.
 
Thank you law enforcement! Hopefully more arrests will be forthcoming.

bout time the police were good for something.
Very disrespectful. 99% of the time the police are great. Media doesn’t cover it. They concentrate on the “bad cops”. Better ratings and sheep like you follow along.

3000 people enter a bank and complete a transaction on a single given day. One goes in and robs it. What is the media going to cover?
False conflation. Police save lives daily and arrest brutal criminals. Cover that.

They do. It's has to be pretty rare when a "brutal criminal" is arrested and it's not covered.
Not like this. That college kid that went on a killing spree and was caught...that barely got any air time. Meanwhile they refuse to give the backstory of George Floyd’s past and portray him as a saint.

His past is irrelevant. All you are wanting is to try and justify what the cops did.

Dismissed.
WRONG. Why do you assholes keep saying that.

#1) What the cops did was terrible and should be in jail for life.

#2) What he did in his past was terrible.

BOTH CAN BE TRUE!

What he did in the past is irrelevant.
For this case, yes. NOT irrelevant when he is basically given sainthood by the media and the likes of you. Do you even know what he did? Honest question.

Your virtue signaling will not work on me.

Yes I know what he did. Despite your thoughts otherwise it has been reported.
I just learned about it recently. I thought he had a drug past, not a violent criminal past. So what he did is "irrelevant". GOT IT! Saint George it is.

Thanks for your input.

The officer had a pretty violent past also.
Yes. He should have never been on the force. Shame on Klobuchar and on the police chief. But again, both can be true.

Chauvin = EVIL PERSON

Floyd = EVIL PERSON

Protesting poor policing = GREAT
Looting/Burning/Rioting = BAD
Floyd called a saint = BAD

I bet most of the protesters didn't know his past.

It's not actually about Floyd. You might note that most protesters use a long list of names.

The issue is the look on the cops face when he was told there was something wrong with Floyd and that he needed to get off of him.
All true but it is also true that Floyd is no saint.

So what? It's not about Floyd.
 
In the thread I started a few days ago I said that these protests are no longer about Floyd and probably never were. This is class warfare, pure and simple. Capitalists and capitalism are their real enemy and have been from the beginning. If you asked them today about Floyd they would say "Who?"

Floyd gets taken down and killed for maybe using a fake $20. Angelo Mozilo retires a millionaire after causing taxpayers to lose billions.

And?

Class does play a role in the protests. People are tired of getting beat down for a fraction of what others get away with.

So the answer is to destroy small businesses of innocent people who did NOT bilk people for billions?

If bankers can get away with it, all should be able to.

So your answer to criminal behavior is more criminal behavior perpetrated on even more victims. Is that what you're telling me?

Are we to have a fair and equal justice system or not? Are you saying we shouldn't? I'm saying we have to and there will be one, one way or the other. All get held accountable or we will get one where no one is.

Answer my question first. Your answer to criminal behavior is more criminal behavior perpetrated on even more victims. Is that what you're telling me?

Another question: If you have no qualms about making even more victims then why do you care about them at all? If you have no problem making a victim out of a small business owner then why do you give a shit for embezzlement victims?

I answered your questions. If some can get away with it, I support everyone getting away with it.

You responded to my question with another question. That's not an answer. So again: Your answer to criminal behavior is more criminal behavior perpetrated on even more victims. Is that what you're telling me? Yes or no?

If you want to take the side of law and order, I'll join you as long as those laws apply to everyone .

If the laws don't apply to everyone and you won't join me on the side of law and order for that reason then my taking the side of law and order is irrelevant. Ergo, the caveat "If you want to take the side of law and order..." is moot and pointless.

All you're doing is palming all the work of maintaining law and order off on myself and others. This suggests to me that you are not interested in law and order at all. Your interest is in hoping the rich become victims of lawlessness and you will make victims of the non-rich to see that happen.

It is a cheap, lazy and unprincipled position to take and smacks of animus and spite.

There is no law and order when there are some who can get away with breaking our laws while others can not.

Saying you are for "law and order" is meaningless.

Here is a good example. There are thousands hiring people illegally. How get arrested?

How does that compare to getting arrested for being here illegally?

Charge them all or none.
 

Forum List

Back
Top