Assad is an enemy of Isil, but not the West’s ally

[irosie91]

Maybe they should put this picture on that Euro bill. More appropriate.

Why so eager to falesly blame the Syrian President?

Stop being a shmuck and come down to earth.

U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200 000 - WSJ

WORLD NEWS
U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200,000

Syria Deaths Hits New High In 2014

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/world/middleeast/syrian-civil-war-2014-deadliest-so-far.html?_r=0

The figures from the monitoring group, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, put the total number of dead.

United Nations News Centre - More than 191 000 people killed in Syria with no end in sight UN

In a third report on Syria carried out on behalf of the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR), data specialists identified 191,369 people killed between March 2011 and the end of April 2014.

You said Assad massacred 200.000 and I asked for evidence. Now you come up with UN estimations about the casualties in the Syrian "civil" war based on SOHR numbers. Where is even one of that sources saying that Assad massacred them?
Why are you warping the actualities?

Info:
What the heck is SOHR?
"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) founded in May 2006 is an information office opposed to the Government of Syria. Rami Abdulrahman's UK based SOHR has been cited by virtually every western news outlet since the beginning of the uprising."
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

So what are you claiming, that the numbers are wrong, or that Assad ISN'T killing his own people using the army? If it's the latter you are delusional.

he is saying he does not care-----the filth and stink of baathism is more important----

 

[Roudy]

Here's your "hero", you should be proud::

Syria s sickening massacre Mothers shot as they cradled babies and newlyweds executed side-by-side Daily Mail Online

Mothers shot as they cradled their babies, newlyweds executed side-by-side

• Human Rights Watch claims Syrian forces slaughtered 248 people in May
• They included unarmed civilians, women and children, a report reveals
• The details have been compiled from accounts from witnesses
• Syrian government said it only killed terrorists but 'mistakes possible'

Published: 12:02 EST, 16 September 2013 | Updated: 07:04 EST, 17 September 2013

Mothers and children, their bodies piled on top of each other, some still covering the baby they had died trying to protect.

Newlyweds executed side by side, and entire families slaughtered as they huddled together for protection, only to be shot, their corpses stacked high and then torched.

Details of a massacre, possibly one of the deadliest since the start of the conflict in Syria, have been released in a report released today by Human Rights Watch.

It claims Syrian forces brutally slaughtered 248 people in the coastal towns of al-Bayda and Baniyas in May.

The evidence is based on interviews with 15 al-Bayda residents and 5 from Baniyas

The chilling accounts are detailed in the 68-page report, 'No One’s Left’: Summary Executions by Syrian Forces in al-Bayda and Baniyas' and are based on interviews with 15 al-Bayda residents and 5 from Baniyas.

The details have been compiled from accounts given by people who saw or heard the forces detain and then execute their relatives. It lists 167 people killed in al-Bayda and 81 in Baniyas.

The report concludes that the overwhelming majority were executed after military clashes ended and opposition fighters had retreated.

It also warns that the actual number of fatalities is probably even higher, particularly in Baniyas, but that the area is difficult to access and account for the dead.

On the morning of May 2, Syrian government forces and pro-government militias clashed with opposition fighters in al-Bayda, a town of about 7,000 residents 10 kilometres from the coastal city of Baniyas.

The area is considered a Sunni antigovernment enclave within the largely Alawite and pro-government Tartous governorate.

Witnesses said that after the local opposition fighters retreated, at about 1pm, government and pro-government forces entered the town and searched the houses.

Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that the forces who entered the two towns were a mix of regular government troops, members of the National Defense Force, a paramilitary group organised earlier in the year by the government from pro-government militias; and armed pro-government residents of neighboring villages

Three local residents who found the bodies after the forces had left al-Bayda, said that they executed all the members of one of the branches of the Bayasi family who were in their homes on May 2 – at least nine men, three women, and fourteen children –with the exception of a 3-year-old girl who they said was wounded by three bullets but survived.

One of the first responders to find the Bayasi bodies described how he found them: 'I was busy helping the surviving residents leave the town when the fiancé of one the Bayasi women asked me to go with him to check on her.

'We went to the house of Mustafa Ali Bayasi. We entered. We saw no one in the first room. As we entered further into the house, we got to a room where we found so many corpses. Mothers and children piled on top of each other.

'One mother was still covering her son. I thought he may have survived but as I turned her over, I saw that he had been also shot. My friend’s fiancé was also killed. We closed the windows of the house because we did not want any wild animals to come in.'

In Ras al-Nabe` residents also told Human Rights Watch that they located the bodies of entire families, including children, who were killed together.

Come on. Twenty people talk some shit and you call this evidence. This is the traditional way of western "evidence" gathering!

"WESTERM EVIDENCE GATHERING" captain blei?????

No.

oh gee a typo confused captain blei. Captain blei----you referred to
"WESTERN EVIDENCE GATHERING" in what seemed to me to be a
cynical manner. I do not know what is specifically characteristic of "western"
evidence gathering. Since you used the term---you know what you meant by it.
Can you explain?

Drum up some people, give them the screenplay, pay them off.

I think that applies best to your cause. Portraying a brutal genocidal dictator who is responsible for killing over 200,000 of his own people, as one of the good guys.

 

[Roudy]

The notion that the only reason that the Islamist militias emerged in Syria is because we created a vacuum by not adequately arming the secular rebels is laughable nonsense. Syria has long had its own Sunni fundamentalist underground. In 1982, when then President Hafez al-Assad perpetrated the Hama massacre, it was in an effort to wipe out those Syrian Islamists. So, yes, there are cultural roots for pluralism in Syria, a country with many Christians and secular (mostly Shiite) Muslims, but there’s also the opposite. Don't kid yourself.

Just look at who was funding the "good" rebels Qatar and Saudi Arabia Sunni fundamentalist monarchies that oppose democratic, pluralistic politics in their own countries.

Christians in Syria overwhelmingly support the Government and are members of the armed forces, especially the officer corps. That should tell Christians around the world who they should support. If the rebels succeed, it will mean the end of Christians in Syria.

So what you're saying is all these Arab nations have this fundamentalist element that will eventually take over, and the best option is to continue having these brutal iron fisted dictators to keep the Islamic animals in check?

Yes.

Gravity ---PUHLEEEEZE-----nasty, brutish, dictators are a problem------
no matter what happens------falafel and shish kebob etc etc ---will never die----
we have the recipes

King David was a dictator.

But I thought King David never even existed, and if he did he was a Muslim Palestinian? Also, can you compare something a little older? Going back only 3000 years ago is too recent.

 

[irosie91]

The notion that the only reason that the Islamist militias emerged in Syria is because we created a vacuum by not adequately arming the secular rebels is laughable nonsense. Syria has long had its own Sunni fundamentalist underground. In 1982, when then President Hafez al-Assad perpetrated the Hama massacre, it was in an effort to wipe out those Syrian Islamists. So, yes, there are cultural roots for pluralism in Syria, a country with many Christians and secular (mostly Shiite) Muslims, but there’s also the opposite. Don't kid yourself.

Just look at who was funding the "good" rebels Qatar and Saudi Arabia Sunni fundamentalist monarchies that oppose democratic, pluralistic politics in their own countries.

Christians in Syria overwhelmingly support the Government and are members of the armed forces, especially the officer corps. That should tell Christians around the world who they should support. If the rebels succeed, it will mean the end of Christians in Syria.

So what you're saying is all these Arab nations have this fundamentalist element that will eventually take over, and the best option is to continue having these brutal iron fisted dictators to keep the Islamic animals in check?

Yes.

Gravity ---PUHLEEEEZE-----nasty, brutish, dictators are a problem------
no matter what happens------falafel and shish kebob etc etc ---will never die----
we have the recipes

King David was a dictator.

But I thought King David never even existed, and if he did he was a Muslim Palestinian? Also, can you compare something a little older? Going back only 3000 years ago is too recent.

nobody is clear on the personality of King David----his Arabic was not at all
like the Arabic spoken in Arabia----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken
in Egypt----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken in Iraq-------and----it did
not even have an alphabet making record keeping very difficult

 

[irosie91]

Come on. Twenty people talk some shit and you call this evidence. This is the traditional way of western "evidence" gathering!

"WESTERM EVIDENCE GATHERING" captain blei?????

No.

oh gee a typo confused captain blei. Captain blei----you referred to
"WESTERN EVIDENCE GATHERING" in what seemed to me to be a
cynical manner. I do not know what is specifically characteristic of "western"
evidence gathering. Since you used the term---you know what you meant by it.
Can you explain?

Drum up some people, give them the screenplay, pay them off.

I think that applies best to your cause. Portraying a brutal genocidal dictator who is responsible for killing over 200,000 of his own people, as one of the good guys.

for a Baathist dictator-----what is 200,000, more or less?

 

[RandomVariable]

The notion that the only reason that the Islamist militias emerged in Syria is because we created a vacuum by not adequately arming the secular rebels is laughable nonsense. Syria has long had its own Sunni fundamentalist underground. In 1982, when then President Hafez al-Assad perpetrated the Hama massacre, it was in an effort to wipe out those Syrian Islamists. So, yes, there are cultural roots for pluralism in Syria, a country with many Christians and secular (mostly Shiite) Muslims, but there’s also the opposite. Don't kid yourself.

Just look at who was funding the "good" rebels Qatar and Saudi Arabia Sunni fundamentalist monarchies that oppose democratic, pluralistic politics in their own countries.

Christians in Syria overwhelmingly support the Government and are members of the armed forces, especially the officer corps. That should tell Christians around the world who they should support. If the rebels succeed, it will mean the end of Christians in Syria.

So what you're saying is all these Arab nations have this fundamentalist element that will eventually take over, and the best option is to continue having these brutal iron fisted dictators to keep the Islamic animals in check?

Yes.

Gravity ---PUHLEEEEZE-----nasty, brutish, dictators are a problem------
no matter what happens------falafel and shish kebob etc etc ---will never die----
we have the recipes

King David was a dictator.

Actually----he demanded very little------he was busy with his family matters

We are referring to two different King David's apparently. And that does not negate the fact he was indeed a dictator.

 

[RandomVariable]

So what you're saying is all these Arab nations have this fundamentalist element that will eventually take over, and the best option is to continue having these brutal iron fisted dictators to keep the Islamic animals in check?

Yes.

Gravity ---PUHLEEEEZE-----nasty, brutish, dictators are a problem------
no matter what happens------falafel and shish kebob etc etc ---will never die----
we have the recipes

King David was a dictator.

But I thought King David never even existed, and if he did he was a Muslim Palestinian? Also, can you compare something a little older? Going back only 3000 years ago is too recent.

nobody is clear on the personality of King David----his Arabic was not at all
like the Arabic spoken in Arabia----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken
in Egypt----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken in Iraq-------and----it did
not even have an alphabet making record keeping very difficult

Not going to correct him on the Muslim part?

 

[irosie91]

Yes.

Gravity ---PUHLEEEEZE-----nasty, brutish, dictators are a problem------
no matter what happens------falafel and shish kebob etc etc ---will never die----
we have the recipes

King David was a dictator.

But I thought King David never even existed, and if he did he was a Muslim Palestinian? Also, can you compare something a little older? Going back only 3000 years ago is too recent.

nobody is clear on the personality of King David----his Arabic was not at all
like the Arabic spoken in Arabia----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken
in Egypt----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken in Iraq-------and----it did
not even have an alphabet making record keeping very difficult

Not going to correct him on the Muslim part?

what muslim part? falafel is probably greek

 

[irosie91]

So what you're saying is all these Arab nations have this fundamentalist element that will eventually take over, and the best option is to continue having these brutal iron fisted dictators to keep the Islamic animals in check?

Yes.

Gravity ---PUHLEEEEZE-----nasty, brutish, dictators are a problem------
no matter what happens------falafel and shish kebob etc etc ---will never die----
we have the recipes

King David was a dictator.

Actually----he demanded very little------he was busy with his family matters

We are referring to two different King David's apparently. And that does not negate the fact he was indeed a dictator.

what did he dictate?

 

[aris2chat]

Maybe they should put this picture on that Euro bill. More appropriate.

Why so eager to falesly blame the Syrian President?

Stop being a shmuck and come down to earth.

U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200 000 - WSJ

WORLD NEWS
U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200,000

Syria Deaths Hits New High In 2014

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/world/middleeast/syrian-civil-war-2014-deadliest-so-far.html?_r=0

The figures from the monitoring group, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, put the total number of dead.

United Nations News Centre - More than 191 000 people killed in Syria with no end in sight UN

In a third report on Syria carried out on behalf of the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR), data specialists identified 191,369 people killed between March 2011 and the end of April 2014.

You said Assad massacred 200.000 and I asked for evidence. Now you come up with UN estimations about the casualties in the Syrian "civil" war based on SOHR numbers. Where is even one of that sources saying that Assad massacred them?
Why are you warping the actualities?

Info:
What the heck is SOHR?
"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) founded in May 2006 is an information office opposed to the Government of Syria. Rami Abdulrahman's UK based SOHR has been cited by virtually every western news outlet since the beginning of the uprising."
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

confirmed dead now is oer 210,000
this article is from 6 mos ago
More Syrians have died in 3 years of war than Americans in every war since WW2 - Vox

There are no barrel bombs Assad s Syria facts - Channel 4 News

Syria rebels call for help against Assad as death toll rises - 12 News

Syrian government forces killing hundreds of civilians in air strikes as world watches Isis - Middle East - World - The Independent

Assad s government still kills way more civilians than ISIS - Business Insider

 

[irosie91]

Maybe they should put this picture on that Euro bill. More appropriate.

Why so eager to falesly blame the Syrian President?

Stop being a shmuck and come down to earth.

U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200 000 - WSJ

WORLD NEWS
U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200,000

Syria Deaths Hits New High In 2014

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/world/middleeast/syrian-civil-war-2014-deadliest-so-far.html?_r=0

The figures from the monitoring group, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, put the total number of dead.

United Nations News Centre - More than 191 000 people killed in Syria with no end in sight UN

In a third report on Syria carried out on behalf of the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR), data specialists identified 191,369 people killed between March 2011 and the end of April 2014.

You said Assad massacred 200.000 and I asked for evidence. Now you come up with UN estimations about the casualties in the Syrian "civil" war based on SOHR numbers. Where is even one of that sources saying that Assad massacred them?
Why are you warping the actualities?

Info:
What the heck is SOHR?
"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) founded in May 2006 is an information office opposed to the Government of Syria. Rami Abdulrahman's UK based SOHR has been cited by virtually every western news outlet since the beginning of the uprising."
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

confirmed dead now is oer 210,000
this article is from 6 mos ago
More Syrians have died in 3 years of war than Americans in every war since WW2 - Vox

captain Blei likes him anyway

 

[Roudy]

Read what I wrote again moron, you are simply repeating what I said. Hezbollah is a mortal enemy of ISIS because they are Shiite, of course, but they practice the same Islamist supremacist expansionist ideology. By claiming that Hezbollah does not oppress or kill Lebanese Christians, it is you that is proving your ignorance, moron.

Yeah right. Hezbollah does not practice supremacist expansionist "ideology" you clown. Where have they "expanded to"? You are confusing them with Israel. Hezbollah merely defends its home base in the south of Lebanon and south Beirut from expansionist Jews of Israel and expansionist Sunnis like Al Nousra, ISIS etc.



"In Hezbollah stronghold, Lebanese Christians find respect, stability

In a Christian home in a Shiite suburb of Beirut, images of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah share mantel and wall space with the Virgin Mary."

In Hezbollah stronghold Lebanese Christians find respect stability - CSMonitor.com

Lebanese Christians Gun Up Against ISIS
"RAS BAALBEK, Lebanon—Rifaat Nasrallah sits impatiently on a sofa in his home in the small village of Ras Baalbek sipping coffee and chain smoking Marlboro Lights. A handgun casually stuck in the waistband of his jeans, he says he’s only in town briefly; these days he’s been spending more and more time in the hills just outside his living room window, where he commands an all-Christian militia that he credits for keeping Islamist militants in neighboring Syria at bay.

In the doorway above him hangs a needlepoint portrait of the Virgin Mary, while on the mantle sits a framed photograph of the founder of the Shiite militant group Hezbollah, with whom he shares a last name.....One of Nasrallah’s deputies, a man asked to only be identified as George, argues that Hezbollah is a natural ally for the country’s Christians. “It’s not about religion anymore,” he says. “We are sharing a common enemy now—ISIS is trying to kill both of us.”

Lebanese Christians Gun Up Against ISIS - The Daily Beast

"An Overwhelming Majority of Lebanon’s Christians Believe Hizbullah Protects Their Country"

"A recent poll by the Beirut Center for Research and Information (BCRI) found that two thirds (62.6%) of Lebanese Christians feel that, contrary to its vilification by members of the NATO alliance, Hizbullah has in fact protected their country from its most determined enemies—Israel, IS (known locally as Da‘ash), and Wahhabi-style terrorist groups linked to the Syria-Iraq conflagration."

An Overwhelming Majority of Lebanon s Christians Believe Hizbullah Protects Their Country CounterPunch Tells the Facts Names the Names

Hezbollah is the proxy army of Iran's supremacist Islamists expanding their influence into other nations. They already conquered Lebanon, now they are working on Yemen. This is your beloved Hezbollah that Assad supports:

Hezbollah was largely formed with the aid of the Ayatollah Khomeini's followers in the early eighties in order to spread Islamic revolution and follows a distinct version of Islamic Shia ideology ("Willayat Al-Faqih") developed by the Ayatollah Khomeini, leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran.

Hezbollah (as well as the political/religious leaders of Iran) believe that the destruction of Israel will bring about the "reappearance of the Imam (the Shiite Islamic Messiah)". These issues exist independently of Israeli treatment of Palestinians or even the existence of the State of Israel.

Hebollah rules in concert with Christians, Sunnis, Druze and other sects and parties in Lebanon. Hezbollah has not conquered Lebanon you silly goose. As far as Iran it seems that rather than attacking anyone, Iran was and is being attacked, sanctioned, their ally Syria is being attacked etc. You don't read the news?

As far as Israel is concerned, it's not my concern or germane to this thread. But if I may comment, many pro-Israeli posters here deny the existence of the Palestinians as a people, much less contemplate the future existence of a Palestine for non-Jews. In fact, many if not most propose the destruction of Palestine through the ethnic cleansing (or genocide) of the non-Jews from Eretz Israel as they call it. Is that much different from what you claim Hezbollah is doing?

Yes. You're not even close. That's why Hezbollah threatened armed conflict when UN wanted to bring them to court for the assassination of Lebanon's president. And Assad the mass murderer backed them up.

Ethnic cleansing blah blah blah. You keep accusing Jews of things Muslims are guilty of, convert. Ethnic cleanising is what Palestinian animals did in Lebanon when they brutally murdered tens of thousands of Christians. Another fact you refuse to admit.

It was a civil war, that's what happens in civil wars unfortunately. The Palestinians were no more "animals" as you call them in your Nazi manner, than any other group in the civil war, including the Israelis who invaded in 1982, in the middle of the war.

Aw boo hoo. The Palestinians and their terrorist leader Arafat who had recently invaded Lebanon from Jordan, had NO CHOICE but to both start a civil war with the Christians, and be the party that ended up killing them the most.

Those poor poor Palestinians, they always have no choice but to commit ethnic cleansing and kill.

I hope you learned how you, who falsely claims to be a "Christian" support people who have committed the worst atrocities against Christians. But you don't want it to stop there, the good Christian in you wants these same animals to rule over the holy land.

You can come out of the closet now, Achmed Haniyeh.

 

[Roudy]

So what you're saying is all these Arab nations have this fundamentalist element that will eventually take over, and the best option is to continue having these brutal iron fisted dictators to keep the Islamic animals in check?

Yes.

Gravity ---PUHLEEEEZE-----nasty, brutish, dictators are a problem------
no matter what happens------falafel and shish kebob etc etc ---will never die----
we have the recipes

King David was a dictator.

Actually----he demanded very little------he was busy with his family matters

We are referring to two different King David's apparently. And that does not negate the fact he was indeed a dictator.

All kings, queens, popes, have ruled with absolute power. Did you just learn this? What grade are you in? Have you graduated from elementary school?

 

[Roudy]

Maybe they should put this picture on that Euro bill. More appropriate.

Why so eager to falesly blame the Syrian President?

Stop being a shmuck and come down to earth.

U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200 000 - WSJ

WORLD NEWS
U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200,000

Syria Deaths Hits New High In 2014

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/world/middleeast/syrian-civil-war-2014-deadliest-so-far.html?_r=0

The figures from the monitoring group, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, put the total number of dead.

United Nations News Centre - More than 191 000 people killed in Syria with no end in sight UN

In a third report on Syria carried out on behalf of the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR), data specialists identified 191,369 people killed between March 2011 and the end of April 2014.

You said Assad massacred 200.000 and I asked for evidence. Now you come up with UN estimations about the casualties in the Syrian "civil" war based on SOHR numbers. Where is even one of that sources saying that Assad massacred them?
Why are you warping the actualities?

Info:
What the heck is SOHR?
"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) founded in May 2006 is an information office opposed to the Government of Syria. Rami Abdulrahman's UK based SOHR has been cited by virtually every western news outlet since the beginning of the uprising."
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

confirmed dead now is oer 210,000
this article is from 6 mos ago
More Syrians have died in 3 years of war than Americans in every war since WW2 - Vox

captain Blei likes him anyway

There's more to captain błah blah liking Assad and whitewashing his genocidal behavior than being just a "conscientious German". It goes without saying.

 

[RandomVariable]

Gravity ---PUHLEEEEZE-----nasty, brutish, dictators are a problem------
no matter what happens------falafel and shish kebob etc etc ---will never die----
we have the recipes

King David was a dictator.

But I thought King David never even existed, and if he did he was a Muslim Palestinian? Also, can you compare something a little older? Going back only 3000 years ago is too recent.

nobody is clear on the personality of King David----his Arabic was not at all
like the Arabic spoken in Arabia----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken
in Egypt----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken in Iraq-------and----it did
not even have an alphabet making record keeping very difficult

Not going to correct him on the Muslim part?

what muslim part? falafel is probably greek

Roudy wrote, "But I thought King David never even existed, and if he did he was a Muslim Palestinian?"

 

[Roudy]

King David was a dictator.

But I thought King David never even existed, and if he did he was a Muslim Palestinian? Also, can you compare something a little older? Going back only 3000 years ago is too recent.

nobody is clear on the personality of King David----his Arabic was not at all
like the Arabic spoken in Arabia----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken
in Egypt----which is nothing like the Arabic spoken in Iraq-------and----it did
not even have an alphabet making record keeping very difficult

Not going to correct him on the Muslim part?

what muslim part? falafel is probably greek

Roudy wrote, "But I thought King David never even existed, and if he did he was a Muslim Palestinian?"

Yeah, didn't you know? David, Moses, Solomon, Jesus these are all Palestinian Muslim prophets who were Muslim and didn't even know it.

 

[irosie91]

Why so eager to falesly blame the Syrian President?

Stop being a shmuck and come down to earth.

U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200 000 - WSJ

WORLD NEWS
U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200,000

Syria Deaths Hits New High In 2014

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/world/middleeast/syrian-civil-war-2014-deadliest-so-far.html?_r=0

The figures from the monitoring group, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, put the total number of dead.

United Nations News Centre - More than 191 000 people killed in Syria with no end in sight UN

In a third report on Syria carried out on behalf of the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR), data specialists identified 191,369 people killed between March 2011 and the end of April 2014.

You said Assad massacred 200.000 and I asked for evidence. Now you come up with UN estimations about the casualties in the Syrian "civil" war based on SOHR numbers. Where is even one of that sources saying that Assad massacred them?
Why are you warping the actualities?

Info:
What the heck is SOHR?
"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) founded in May 2006 is an information office opposed to the Government of Syria. Rami Abdulrahman's UK based SOHR has been cited by virtually every western news outlet since the beginning of the uprising."
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

confirmed dead now is oer 210,000
this article is from 6 mos ago
More Syrians have died in 3 years of war than Americans in every war since WW2 - Vox

captain Blei likes him anyway

There's more to captain błah blah liking Assad and whitewashing his genocidal behavior than being just a "conscientious German". It goes without saying.

Captain blei is german? I did not know.

 

[Roudy]

Stop being a shmuck and come down to earth.

U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200 000 - WSJ

WORLD NEWS
U.N. Says Syria Deaths Near 200,000

Syria Deaths Hits New High In 2014

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/world/middleeast/syrian-civil-war-2014-deadliest-so-far.html?_r=0

The figures from the monitoring group, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, put the total number of dead.

United Nations News Centre - More than 191 000 people killed in Syria with no end in sight UN

In a third report on Syria carried out on behalf of the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR), data specialists identified 191,369 people killed between March 2011 and the end of April 2014.

You said Assad massacred 200.000 and I asked for evidence. Now you come up with UN estimations about the casualties in the Syrian "civil" war based on SOHR numbers. Where is even one of that sources saying that Assad massacred them?
Why are you warping the actualities?

Info:
What the heck is SOHR?
"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) founded in May 2006 is an information office opposed to the Government of Syria. Rami Abdulrahman's UK based SOHR has been cited by virtually every western news outlet since the beginning of the uprising."
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

confirmed dead now is oer 210,000
this article is from 6 mos ago
More Syrians have died in 3 years of war than Americans in every war since WW2 - Vox

captain Blei likes him anyway

There's more to captain błah blah liking Assad and whitewashing his genocidal behavior than being just a "conscientious German". It goes without saying.

Captain blei is german? I did not know.

He could be German shiite immigrant from Syria. Who knows.

He isn't such a bad guy if he can control his Assad fetish and the whack job conspiracy theories.

 

[Bleipriester]

Come on. Twenty people talk some shit and you call this evidence. This is the traditional way of western "evidence" gathering!

"WESTERM EVIDENCE GATHERING" captain blei?????

No.

oh gee a typo confused captain blei. Captain blei----you referred to
"WESTERN EVIDENCE GATHERING" in what seemed to me to be a
cynical manner. I do not know what is specifically characteristic of "western"
evidence gathering. Since you used the term---you know what you meant by it.
Can you explain?

Drum up some people, give them the screenplay, pay them off.

right captain blei-----the BAATHIST WAY-----baksheesh with some
threats ----and a few significant "kus achtahs" thrown in.

Where is evidence for claims the UN makes simply based on statements?
This are propaganda tales only.

 

[irosie91]

You said Assad massacred 200.000 and I asked for evidence. Now you come up with UN estimations about the casualties in the Syrian "civil" war based on SOHR numbers. Where is even one of that sources saying that Assad massacred them?
Why are you warping the actualities?

Info:
What the heck is SOHR?
"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) founded in May 2006 is an information office opposed to the Government of Syria. Rami Abdulrahman's UK based SOHR has been cited by virtually every western news outlet since the beginning of the uprising."
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

confirmed dead now is oer 210,000
this article is from 6 mos ago
More Syrians have died in 3 years of war than Americans in every war since WW2 - Vox

captain Blei likes him anyway

There's more to captain błah blah liking Assad and whitewashing his genocidal behavior than being just a "conscientious German". It goes without saying.

Captain blei is german? I did not know.

He could be German shiite immigrant from Syria. Who knows.

that's actually what I thought-----uhm... an alawite like his fave king. There are
lots of arab and Turkish immigrants in Germany. Some of them are getting very
anxious because Germany does not like them