Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're full of shit straight out that Air Force court-martial office with your political "wings."Gun rights are NOT a right wing thing at all.
The right wing always buys the government, so always relies on corrupting the police and military.
Gun rights is always a populist thing of the left.
ONLY right wingers want gun control, so they can control the population by force and intimidation.
There is no definition of 'weapons of war' in the Constitution. You just made that up.Which is to say the gun rights of everyday ordinary citizen and very limited access to the modern weapons of war.
Nope that term has been around forever. Let me know where can buy a fully automatic assault rifle without any special licenses and fees! How about a .50 cal. saw? Think we all have access to those?
The Air Force isn't authorized to go on strike there.It would be much better if all citizens had those weapons instead of a mercenary military that openly lies and murders.
It is the mercenary government we should disarm, not average citizens.
It is the mercenary government that uses these arms to commit murder the most.
You're full of shit straight out that Air Force court-martial office with your political "wings."Gun rights are NOT a right wing thing at all.
The right wing always buys the government, so always relies on corrupting the police and military.
Gun rights is always a populist thing of the left.
ONLY right wingers want gun control, so they can control the population by force and intimidation.
Trump is a populist. Not a leftist.
It is the RIGHT of the people to keep and bear Arms -- that is, to possess and carry firearms and other weapons -- which SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
The Air Force isn't authorized to go on strike there.It would be much better if all citizens had those weapons instead of a mercenary military that openly lies and murders.
It is the mercenary government we should disarm, not average citizens.
It is the mercenary government that uses these arms to commit murder the most.
not unless I give the ok for my groupAny governor can call and organize the unorganized militia at any time. Read your constitution.once again the unorganized militia is not connected with the organized militiaHow did you reach your conclusion? Our Second Amendment is clearly about what is necessary to the security of a free State not Individual Liberty or natural rights.Except a "well regulated militia" means that you have to allow the public to keep arms so that they have regular exposure to their use and handling.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
Tyrants are only removed by force because they control the militaryNot Individuals of the People who are unconnected with the Militia. Congress has the power to impeach and remove even the chief magistrate of the Union.So who removes a tyrant when they control the military?Where do you get your right wing propaganda and rhetoric?The unorganized militia is NOT owned or in anyway governed by the state.
It is mainly for personal home defense, in a time and place where there were no police and lots of threats.
When the state calls up from the unorganized militia, for a posse as an example, that is then the Organized Militia.
When ever any government calls up people for mandatory duty, that is organized militia.
The unorganized militia when when individuals protect their home by themselves.
And since the meaning of "regulating" in Founders terminology means to facilitate, then the governor of Michigan would be helping the unorganized militia by making them more regular. I am sure they would not mind being given a few machine guns.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
you're an ill-informed idiot out of his league maybe you should stick with making tacos in MexicoOnly the "lazy" unorganized militia complains about gun controls laws.The militia has to handle gun-grabbing idiots like you as domestic enemies.Your point?
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
when the tyrant is governor of a state you remove them by forceYour point?once again the unorganized militia is not connected with the organized militiaHow did you reach your conclusion? Our Second Amendment is clearly about what is necessary to the security of a free State not Individual Liberty or natural rights.Except a "well regulated militia" means that you have to allow the public to keep arms so that they have regular exposure to their use and handling.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Why did George Washington allow the whiskey rebellers to keep their firearms?In right-wing fantasy, you are Always Right. Besides, it is right-wingers who make the best Russian tools.no it does not mean control by the governmentUnfortunately for you and those of your point of view; the law already covers and preempts your special pleading.Since "regulate" means protect, facilitate, and keep regular, then I agree completely.Not at all. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well.
Besides, this is what it refers to: control or supervise (something, especially a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations.
Tyrants love idiots like you
In the real world, this is a controlling law of Government:
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
we have a first because of the secondYou have a First Amendment; gun lovers simply prefer to be Rebels without a Cause.Not Individuals of the People who are unconnected with the Militia. Congress has the power to impeach and remove even the chief magistrate of the Union.So who removes a tyrant when they control the military?Where do you get your right wing propaganda and rhetoric?The unorganized militia is NOT owned or in anyway governed by the state.
It is mainly for personal home defense, in a time and place where there were no police and lots of threats.
When the state calls up from the unorganized militia, for a posse as an example, that is then the Organized Militia.
When ever any government calls up people for mandatory duty, that is organized militia.
The unorganized militia when when individuals protect their home by themselves.
And since the meaning of "regulating" in Founders terminology means to facilitate, then the governor of Michigan would be helping the unorganized militia by making them more regular. I am sure they would not mind being given a few machine guns.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Wrong.
Individual are superior to any body of government.
Not only are inherent individual rights the only legal basis for government, but all governments (in a democratic republic), are always created by the people. The people can not create that which is superior to them.
Doesn't matter if they are connected or unconnected with the organized militia, because as you keep pointing out, the People and the Militia are one in the same.
Congress does not have any power.
If the military goes corrupt, there is nothing congress will be able to do about it.
But the reality is that Congress is likely the most corrupt of all.
For example, it is congress that started every single illegal war the US has been in, which is about all of them since the War of 1812.
Aww, shucks. You're telling me City Hall will allow us to keep the firearms the Feds are grabbing from us? How benevolent and kind of them!Gun control means you do not trust average people and want to control them.
That is not a democracy but an elite dictatorship.
cpoa.org
That's right. You just have to shut up and hold your peace under omertà wherever guns are banned.we have a first because of the second
Wrong.we have a first because of the secondYou have a First Amendment; gun lovers simply prefer to be Rebels without a Cause.Not Individuals of the People who are unconnected with the Militia. Congress has the power to impeach and remove even the chief magistrate of the Union.So who removes a tyrant when they control the military?Where do you get your right wing propaganda and rhetoric?The unorganized militia is NOT owned or in anyway governed by the state.
It is mainly for personal home defense, in a time and place where there were no police and lots of threats.
When the state calls up from the unorganized militia, for a posse as an example, that is then the Organized Militia.
When ever any government calls up people for mandatory duty, that is organized militia.
The unorganized militia when when individuals protect their home by themselves.
And since the meaning of "regulating" in Founders terminology means to facilitate, then the governor of Michigan would be helping the unorganized militia by making them more regular. I am sure they would not mind being given a few machine guns.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Wrong.
Individual are superior to any body of government.
Not only are inherent individual rights the only legal basis for government, but all governments (in a democratic republic), are always created by the people. The people can not create that which is superior to them.
Doesn't matter if they are connected or unconnected with the organized militia, because as you keep pointing out, the People and the Militia are one in the same.
Congress does not have any power.
If the military goes corrupt, there is nothing congress will be able to do about it.
But the reality is that Congress is likely the most corrupt of all.
For example, it is congress that started every single illegal war the US has been in, which is about all of them since the War of 1812.
Guns to back it up, or nothing we say counts for shit, you stupid asshole.It’s the First Amendment that keeps us free, not the Second Amendment.
This is a lie.No, lefties want central government control of everything and they are supporting Marxist principles. They are anti-American.The only ones being disingenuous are right wingers. Our Second Amendment is clearly about what is necessary to the security of a free State.
That's the Democrat shadow goverment that rules through the labor union and City Hall. They're even worse than the feds when it comes to gun rights.Liberals have fought for decades in the courts at the ballot box to defend the rights and protected liberties of citizens from the hateful, authoritarian right.
Sure, when required by the security of our free States.Unquestionably an absolute right pertaining to each and every individual.
Not at all. There are no Individual or Singular terms in our Second Amendment; the security of a free State is collective and plural.They are not that separate, if that is what you mean. Context matters. The first clause is clearly about what is necessary to the security of a free State. It is the End, not the Means.I just proved to you that there can be two separate thoughts separated by a comma in one sentence which is the issue that was being discussed in that line in the 2nd amendment that you Marxists would like to re-define so you can confiscate guns from law abiding citizens. You keep avoiding the fact you got your ass handed to you. You fuckers are so desperate you want to pick on a fucking comma......So what. You have no valid rebuttal, regardless of how many thoughts are in one sentence. All you have is nothing but diversion which is usually considered a fallacy.
One end does not imply there are not other goals as well.
Nor does it matter, because the means is supposed to be no federal gun laws. Period.
We have a form of democracy. Abolish your worthless and alleged and fake news, wars on crime, drugs, and terror so no tyrants will apply.Tyrants are only removed by force because they control the militaryNot Individuals of the People who are unconnected with the Militia. Congress has the power to impeach and remove even the chief magistrate of the Union.So who removes a tyrant when they control the military?Where do you get your right wing propaganda and rhetoric?The unorganized militia is NOT owned or in anyway governed by the state.
It is mainly for personal home defense, in a time and place where there were no police and lots of threats.
When the state calls up from the unorganized militia, for a posse as an example, that is then the Organized Militia.
When ever any government calls up people for mandatory duty, that is organized militia.
The unorganized militia when when individuals protect their home by themselves.
And since the meaning of "regulating" in Founders terminology means to facilitate, then the governor of Michigan would be helping the unorganized militia by making them more regular. I am sure they would not mind being given a few machine guns.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
