Assault Weapons Ban would be unconstitutional. "A State Militia must be maintained and well regulated"

[danielpalos]

Not at all. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well.

Since "regulate" means protect, facilitate, and keep regular, then I agree completely.

Unfortunately for you and those of your point of view; the law already covers and preempts your special pleading.

Besides, this is what it refers to: control or supervise (something, especially a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations.

no it does not mean control by the government
Tyrants love idiots like you

In right-wing fantasy, you are Always Right. Besides, it is right-wingers who make the best Russian tools.

In the real world, this is a controlling law of Government:

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Why did George Washington allow the whiskey rebellers to keep their firearms?

Because they promised to change their right wing ways.

moron just going to be a moron

Says the right winger with no moral of true witness bearing. Not enough morals to go around on the Right-Wing?

 

[justinacolmena]

No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.

The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And that is as wrong as anyone can get.
I tell you what you do go to someone who is using their second amendment right and you armed with only your first amendment right and see who comes out on top?

Criminals of the People get Infringed all the time.

but you dodged my dare

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Not at all. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well.

Since "regulate" means protect, facilitate, and keep regular, then I agree completely.

Unfortunately for you and those of your point of view; the law already covers and preempts your special pleading.

Besides, this is what it refers to: control or supervise (something, especially a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations.

no it does not mean control by the government
Tyrants love idiots like you

In right-wing fantasy, you are Always Right. Besides, it is right-wingers who make the best Russian tools.

In the real world, this is a controlling law of Government:

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Why did George Washington allow the whiskey rebellers to keep their firearms?

Because they promised to change their right wing ways.

moron just going to be a moron

Says the right winger with no moral of true witness bearing. Not enough morals to go around on the Right-Wing?

says the antiright's fascist

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Your point?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

The militia has to handle gun-grabbing idiots like you as domestic enemies.

Only the "lazy" unorganized militia complains about gun controls laws.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

you're an ill-informed idiot out of his league maybe you should stick with making tacos in Mexico

Says the guy fresh off the boat from Unitary government Europe. Where is your immigration visa from the native Americans?

If you knew anything bout who was here first you wouldn't sound like an idiot

It wasn't Unitary government Europeans.

well it sure in hell isn't you Mexicans or Indians

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.

The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

the idiot thinks the people are the state
The state doesn't have a protected second amendment right.
It doesn't need one.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

you're misinformed Mexican

You are even more misinformed, Unitary government European.

you're the one that has been proven misinformed countless times

 

[danielpalos]

No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.

The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.

 

[danielpalos]

And that is as wrong as anyone can get.
I tell you what you do go to someone who is using their second amendment right and you armed with only your first amendment right and see who comes out on top?

Criminals of the People get Infringed all the time.

but you dodged my dare

Try that before a judge. Daredevil.

 

[danielpalos]

Not at all. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well.

Since "regulate" means protect, facilitate, and keep regular, then I agree completely.

Unfortunately for you and those of your point of view; the law already covers and preempts your special pleading.

Besides, this is what it refers to: control or supervise (something, especially a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations.

no it does not mean control by the government
Tyrants love idiots like you

In right-wing fantasy, you are Always Right. Besides, it is right-wingers who make the best Russian tools.

In the real world, this is a controlling law of Government:

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Why did George Washington allow the whiskey rebellers to keep their firearms?

Because they promised to change their right wing ways.

moron just going to be a moron

Says the right winger with no moral of true witness bearing. Not enough morals to go around on the Right-Wing?

says the antiright's fascist

Says a business as usual, false witness bearing right winger.

 

[danielpalos]

well it sure in hell isn't you Mexicans or Indians

lol. It is you right wingers, even less.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.

The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

the idiot thinks the people are the state
The state doesn't have a protected second amendment right.
It doesn't need one.

Says an illiterate right winger.

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We have a republic that protects the rights of the individual that prevent's a democracy from depriving them of their individual rights.

Nothing to do with our Second Amendment.

well if that is the case you tried to cancel the second amendment right
FUCKING MORON

 

[danielpalos]

you're misinformed Mexican

You are even more misinformed, Unitary government European.

you're the one that has been proven misinformed countless times

Maybe in Right-Wing fantasy where you are Always Right.

 

[danielpalos]

We have a republic that protects the rights of the individual that prevent's a democracy from depriving them of their individual rights.

Nothing to do with our Second Amendment.

well if that is the case you tried to cancel the second amendment right
FUCKING MORON

Only fantastical right wingers say that. Smarty pants.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

well it sure in hell isn't you Mexicans or Indians

lol. It is you right wingers, even less.

MM short for moron Mexican
So tell me MM what in the fuck does right wing have to do with who was in America first?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

you're misinformed Mexican

You are even more misinformed, Unitary government European.

you're the one that has been proven misinformed countless times

Maybe in Right-Wing fantasy where you are Always Right.

no MM every post you have made is up for all to see.
You're getting your ass handed to you.

 

[danielpalos]

well it sure in hell isn't you Mexicans or Indians

lol. It is you right wingers, even less.

MM short for moron Mexican
So tell me MM what in the fuck does right wing have to do with who was in America first?

not y'all, that is for sure.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We have a republic that protects the rights of the individual that prevent's a democracy from depriving them of their individual rights.

Nothing to do with our Second Amendment.

well if that is the case you tried to cancel the second amendment right
FUCKING MORON

Only fantastical right wingers say that. Smarty pants.

No you said it you antrights fascist

 

[bigrebnc1775]

well it sure in hell isn't you Mexicans or Indians

lol. It is you right wingers, even less.

MM short for moron Mexican
So tell me MM what in the fuck does right wing have to do with who was in America first?

not y'all, that is for sure.

I am of Asian ancestry