danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,121
Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful. No wonder people vote inclusive blue instead of exclusive red.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Assault Weapons Ban would be unconstitutional. "A State Militia must be maintained and well regulated"
- Thread starter 52ndStreet
- Start date
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,122
You only think that because you are illiterate, right winger.No you said it you antrights fascistOnly fantastical right wingers say that. Smarty pants.well if that is the case you tried to cancel the second amendment rightNothing to do with our Second Amendment.We have a republic that protects the rights of the individual that prevent's a democracy from depriving them of their individual rights.
FUCKING MORON
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,123
Why so bigoted, right winger? You study under political chic?I am of Asian ancestrynot y'all, that is for sure.MM short for moron Mexicanlol. It is you right wingers, even less.well it sure in hell isn't you Mexicans or Indians
So tell me MM what in the fuck does right wing have to do with who was in America first?
no in your own words you show yourself to be an antirights fascistYou only think that because you are illiterate, right winger.No you said it you antrights fascistOnly fantastical right wingers say that. Smarty pants.well if that is the case you tried to cancel the second amendment rightNothing to do with our Second Amendment.We have a republic that protects the rights of the individual that prevent's a democracy from depriving them of their individual rights.
FUCKING MORON
MM so you're a racist and an antirights fascist?Why so bigoted, right winger? You study under political chic?I am of Asian ancestrynot y'all, that is for sure.MM short for moron Mexicanlol. It is you right wingers, even less.well it sure in hell isn't you Mexicans or Indians
So tell me MM what in the fuck does right wing have to do with who was in America first?
says the antirights fascistIsn't right wing fantasy wonderful. No wonder people vote inclusive blue instead of exclusive red.no MM every post you have made is up for all to see.Maybe in Right-Wing fantasy where you are Always Right.you're the one that has been proven misinformed countless timesYou are even more misinformed, Unitary government European.you're misinformed Mexican
You're getting your ass handed to you.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,128
Because it is clearly outlined in our federal Constitution.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
but isn't the second amendment delegated to the United States by the Constitution?A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,130
It is about the security of our free States not individual liberty. It says so in the first clause.but isn't the second amendment delegated to the United States by the Constitution?A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
so congress needs to start handing out automatic weapons, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedBecause it is clearly outlined in our federal Constitution.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,132
Insist on getting organized.so congress needs to start handing out automatic weapons, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedBecause it is clearly outlined in our federal Constitution.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
To the militia mobile!
it's an individual protected rightIt is about the security of our free States not individual liberty. It says so in the first clause.but isn't the second amendment delegated to the United States by the Constitution?A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
The second clause states the directive
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
we are organized under the unorganized militiaInsist on getting organized.so congress needs to start handing out automatic weapons, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedBecause it is clearly outlined in our federal Constitution.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
To the militia mobile!
WE ARE COMING FOR YOU ANTIRIGHTS FASCIST
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,135
That can't be true; otherwise, even criminals of the People could rob banks and the police would not be able to arrest them.it's an individual protected rightIt is about the security of our free States not individual liberty. It says so in the first clause.but isn't the second amendment delegated to the United States by the Constitution?A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
The second clause states the directive
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
the right of (even) the (criminals of the) people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,136
Not if I get into the organized militia and qualify for the heavy weapons section.we are organized under the unorganized militiaInsist on getting organized.so congress needs to start handing out automatic weapons, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedBecause it is clearly outlined in our federal Constitution.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
To the militia mobile!
WE ARE COMING FOR YOU ANTIRIGHTS FASCIST
that's what it saysThat can't be true; otherwise, even criminals of the People could rob banks and the police would not be able to arrest them.it's an individual protected rightIt is about the security of our free States not individual liberty. It says so in the first clause.but isn't the second amendment delegated to the United States by the Constitution?A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
The second clause states the directive
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
the right of (even) the (criminals of the) people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
OH that's right showing how illiterate you truly are
Robbing a bank is a crime, theft is a crime you antirights fascist
lol now that's funnyNot if I get into the organized militia and qualify for the heavy weapons section.we are organized under the unorganized militiaInsist on getting organized.so congress needs to start handing out automatic weapons, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedBecause it is clearly outlined in our federal Constitution.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
To the militia mobile!
WE ARE COMING FOR YOU ANTIRIGHTS FASCIST
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,139
lol. In other words, no right to keep and bear Arms for the Unorganized militia.that's what it saysThat can't be true; otherwise, even criminals of the People could rob banks and the police would not be able to arrest them.it's an individual protected rightIt is about the security of our free States not individual liberty. It says so in the first clause.but isn't the second amendment delegated to the United States by the Constitution?A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
The second clause states the directive
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
the right of (even) the (criminals of the) people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
OH that's right showing how illiterate you truly are
Robbing a bank is a crime, theft is a crime you antirights fascist
the people are the unorganized militialol. In other words, no right to keep and bear Arms for the Unorganized militia.that's what it saysThat can't be true; otherwise, even criminals of the People could rob banks and the police would not be able to arrest them.it's an individual protected rightIt is about the security of our free States not individual liberty. It says so in the first clause.but isn't the second amendment delegated to the United States by the Constitution?A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
The second clause states the directive
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
the right of (even) the (criminals of the) people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
OH that's right showing how illiterate you truly are
Robbing a bank is a crime, theft is a crime you antirights fascist
Similar threads
- Replies
- 80
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 30
- Views
- 463
- Replies
- 128
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 109
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 102
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8513
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 484
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-