At stake, not JUST the oval office.....

[nat4900]

For myself, as a progressive democrat, the prospect of a republican in the oval office is disconcerting, but ultimately it would be a relatively short term for such a GOP presidency.

What is REALLY at stake, however, is the prospect of THREE supreme court judges being appointed in the next couple of years. With the current "stalemate" of the SC 4 to 4 decisions, the possible appointment of 3 new justices may shift the balance to a 6 to 3 majority of more progressive judgments for decades to come.

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals and progressives will be destroyed once and for all after we pack the court with conservative justices and get back to Constitution based law.

 

[GHook93]

Exactly and with the absolutely ridiculous ruling yesterday by the SCOTUS allowing Unions to collect fees from workers who decide to NOT join the union is baffling. Ginsburg has been an utter disgrace ever since she has been appointed. Sotomayor and Kagan were so unqualified it is criminal.

Yes this election means a lot. If Trump wins it means he will get to appoint a conservative replacement of Scalia and save us from liberal reign of terror. The. Hopefully Ginsburg crocks and we can replace her with someone who respects the constitution and loves this country.

 

[nat4900]

Liberals and progressives will be destroyed once and for all after we pack the court with conservative justices and get back to Constitution based law.

Nitwit, you HAVE HAD a conservative majority for many, many years already....How has that worked out.......LOL

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals and progressives will be destroyed once and for all after we pack the court with conservative justices and get back to Constitution based law.

Nitwit, you HAVE HAD a conservative majority for many, many years already....How has that worked out.......LOL

Oh please don't pretend to be a moron you know damn well there's a moderate on the court and iffy justices like John Roberts. Don't worry about it, with 2-3 more conservatives on the court you people are finished. The liberal filth will be eradicated.

 

[Iceweasel]

Liberals and progressives will be destroyed once and for all after we pack the court with conservative justices and get back to Constitution based law.

Nitwit, you HAVE HAD a conservative majority for many, many years already....How has that worked out.......LOL

Do you even know what a judge is?

 

[hadit]

Sad that we have to worry about ideological bias on the Supreme Court, and people cheering for it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Exactly and with the absolutely ridiculous ruling yesterday by the SCOTUS allowing Unions to collect fees from workers who decide to NOT join the union is baffling. Ginsburg has been an utter disgrace ever since she has been appointed. Sotomayor and Kagan were so unqualified it is criminal.

Yes this election means a lot. If Trump wins it means he will get to appoint a conservative replacement of Scalia and save us from liberal reign of terror. The. Hopefully Ginsburg crocks and we can replace her with someone who respects the constitution and loves this country.

Kagan only got the appointment after she called the White House to ask, "How's my favorite Foreign student doing"

 

[nat4900]

Bottom line is this.....the next president will appoint 2 to 3 justices. If Clinton gets in, you know that the SC will turn to more liberal and progressive decisions....If (highly unlikely) Trump gets in, conservatives should keep in mind that Trump's stance of abortion rights, gay/lesbian rights and dislike for Citizen United, will probably ALSO have the SC to be less biased toward right wing causes.......Scalia's reign of terror is over.

 

[bendog]

Exactly and with the absolutely ridiculous ruling yesterday by the SCOTUS allowing Unions to collect fees from workers who decide to NOT join the union is baffling. Ginsburg has been an utter disgrace ever since she has been appointed. Sotomayor and Kagan were so unqualified it is criminal.

Yes this election means a lot. If Trump wins it means he will get to appoint a conservative replacement of Scalia and save us from liberal reign of terror. The. Hopefully Ginsburg crocks and we can replace her with someone who respects the constitution and loves this country.

Have you googled who Trump's sister is? If not, you should. LOL

 

[nat4900]

Do you even know what a judge is?

Someone who likes to be called, "your honor" a lot and has a penchant for black robes????? LOL

(weasel is an imbecile)

 

[nat4900]

Kagan only got the appointment after she called the White House to ask, "How's my favorite Foreign student doing"

Yet another "birther" who moronically hasn't given up being stupid. Good luck !!

 

[nat4900]

Shall we also chat about how the senate majority will shift to democrats?

 

[Avatar4321]

Liberals and progressives will be destroyed once and for all after we pack the court with conservative justices and get back to Constitution based law.

That only works if we elect a constitutionalist president. If we elect a rino from ny...

 

[Avatar4321]

What do you call a lawyer with an IQ under 50?

Your honor

 

[Two Thumbs]

For myself, as a progressive democrat, the prospect of a republican in the oval office is disconcerting, but ultimately it would be a relatively short term for such a GOP presidency.

What is REALLY at stake, however, is the prospect of THREE supreme court judges being appointed in the next couple of years. With the current "stalemate" of the SC 4 to 4 decisions, the possible appointment of 3 new justices may shift the balance to a 6 to 3 majority of more progressive judgments for decades to come.

so you are stoked at the idea of the Constitution being completely ignored to the point lawyers no longer have to lie to get bills passed them.

fdr wanted to enlarge the scotus to he could do the same thing.

 

[bripat9643]

Liberals and progressives will be destroyed once and for all after we pack the court with conservative justices and get back to Constitution based law.

Nitwit, you HAVE HAD a conservative majority for many, many years already....How has that worked out.......LOL

Kennedy is no conservative, douche bag.

 

[nat4900]

so you are stoked at the idea of the Constitution being completely ignored to the point lawyers no longer have to lie to get bills passed them.

fdr wanted to enlarge the scotus to he could do the same thing.

I sincerely have NO idea of what you're babbling about....

 

[nat4900]

Kennedy is no conservative, douche bag.

The usual moronic response.......ONLY ultra-conservatives would call Kennedy "liberal," but he's really center-right.
Would ANY liberal justice have ever voted to appoint Bush.???

 

[bripat9643]

Kennedy is no conservative, douche bag.

The usual moronic response.......ONLY ultra-conservatives would call Kennedy "liberal," but he's really center-right.
Would ANY liberal justice have ever voted to appoint Bush.???

Horseshit. He has vote about 50% of the time with the conservative side of the court and 50% with the douche bag side of the court. He's not a conservative.