mamooth
Diamond Member
- Aug 17, 2012
- 34,870
- 18,081
So did part 3 glorify John Galt for killing billions of people by deliberately causing the collapse of civilization, all just because he wanted to make a philosophical point?
Normal humans define John Galt as a genocidal monster. Randians, OTOH, tend to look at him as a messiah figure. Apparently, any degree of killing is justifiable to a Randian, so long as it serves the glory of the cult.
Normal humans define John Galt as a genocidal monster. Randians, OTOH, tend to look at him as a messiah figure. Apparently, any degree of killing is justifiable to a Randian, so long as it serves the glory of the cult.