Attention gays and obama worshipers

[mdk]

So you're creating yet another thread to talk about how we shouldn't be talking about this?

Its like watching a dog chase its own tail.

this thread asks if you libs will now shut up about it, apparently you won't.

Dude.....you've created thread after thread on the topic of gays and gay marriage. You clearly want to discuss it. Don't blame me for your obsession. Take some personal responsibility.

two threads
1. is gay marriage the most important issue
2. this one--------will you guys shut up now that you have won

We're allowed to celebrate just as much as you're allowed to pout.

sure, go for it, celebrate. have a group butt fucking party. enjoy your new social acceptance of your perversions.

Its our party and you can cry if want to.

 

[Redfish]

this thread asks if you libs will now shut up about it, apparently you won't.

Dude.....you've created thread after thread on the topic of gays and gay marriage. You clearly want to discuss it. Don't blame me for your obsession. Take some personal responsibility.

two threads
1. is gay marriage the most important issue
2. this one--------will you guys shut up now that you have won

We're allowed to celebrate just as much as you're allowed to pout.

sure, go for it, celebrate. have a group butt fucking party. enjoy your new social acceptance of your perversions.

Its our party and you can cry if want to.

enjoy it, run naked in the streets with a dildo up your ass and a dick in your mouth, you are FREE, you are MARRIED, you can do anything.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Dude.....you've created thread after thread on the topic of gays and gay marriage. You clearly want to discuss it. Don't blame me for your obsession. Take some personal responsibility.

two threads
1. is gay marriage the most important issue
2. this one--------will you guys shut up now that you have won

We're allowed to celebrate just as much as you're allowed to pout.

sure, go for it, celebrate. have a group butt fucking party. enjoy your new social acceptance of your perversions.

Its our party and you can cry if want to.

enjoy it, run naked in the streets with a dildo up your ass and a dick in your mouth, you are FREE, you are MARRIED, you can do anything.

The homos think it's "thimply fabulouth"

 

[Skylar]

two threads
1. is gay marriage the most important issue
2. this one--------will you guys shut up now that you have won

Four threads:

1. I find it very disturbing US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
2. Is gay marriage the most important issue in the USA US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
3. I am so tired of all the gay shit US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

and now this one:

4. Attention gays and obama worshipers US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

With you jumping in a participating in at least that many other threads on the topic. You clearly want to discuss it. Take some personal responsibility and stop blaming everyone else for your posts.

If you don't want to discuss it....don't.

 

[BlindBoo]

You won your two signature issues in the supreme court. You won and the country lost.

Now will you STFU about it so we can concentrate of the real problems facing this nation? Like 18 trillion in debt and radical muslims who want us all dead by beheading.

Absolutely not. The country most certainly won. Freedom and liberty rule the day.

LOL, thats funny. freedom and liberty were lost today. government mandates won and the country lost.

That's what the losers in 1964 said too.

you mean the democrats who tried to fillibuster the civil rights law? The KKK members with D behind their names? They were the losers you silly ass.

Yes the Southern Racist Democrats in 1962. Similar to today's losers, just different party.

 

[emilynghiem]

this thread asks if you libs will now shut up about it, apparently you won't.

Dude.....you've created thread after thread on the topic of gays and gay marriage. You clearly want to discuss it. Don't blame me for your obsession. Take some personal responsibility.

two threads
1. is gay marriage the most important issue
2. this one--------will you guys shut up now that you have won

We're allowed to celebrate just as much as you're allowed to pout.

sure, go for it, celebrate. have a group butt fucking party. enjoy your new social acceptance of your perversions.

Its our party and you can cry if want to.

Yes, you have the right to your beliefs and to practice them by your party just like any other religion.
Just because you have a political religion or secular belief that focuses on "Government"
as the your authority instead of "God" doesn't make it any less of a religion.

And just like Muslims Hindus or Christians.

You can have your beliefs but it is unconstitutional to mandate those for the rest of the nation.
People would have to "consent" or it's a violation of
"separation of church and state"
"right to choice"
"religious freedom"
"equal protection of the laws from
discrimination by creed"

mdk if you do not recognize and respect your beliefs
equally as any other person's beliefs, then if you abuse
party or govt to IMPOSE your beliefs and abridge the equal
exercise of others, you are guilty of contributing to
"conspiracy to violate equal civil rights' of others.

You can cry if you want to but it is still unconstitutional
to impose your beliefs on other people through govt.

 

[Redfish]

two threads
1. is gay marriage the most important issue
2. this one--------will you guys shut up now that you have won

Four threads:

1. I find it very disturbing US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
2. Is gay marriage the most important issue in the USA US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
3. I am so tired of all the gay shit US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

and now this one:

4. Attention gays and obama worshipers US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

With you jumping in a participating in at least that many other threads on the topic. You clearly want to discuss it. Take some personal responsibility and stop blaming everyone else for your posts.

If you don't want to discuss it....don't.

OK, 4.

BFD.

 

[Redfish]

You won your two signature issues in the supreme court. You won and the country lost.

Now will you STFU about it so we can concentrate of the real problems facing this nation? Like 18 trillion in debt and radical muslims who want us all dead by beheading.

Absolutely not. The country most certainly won. Freedom and liberty rule the day.

LOL, thats funny. freedom and liberty were lost today. government mandates won and the country lost.

That's what the losers in 1964 said too.

you mean the democrats who tried to fillibuster the civil rights law? The KKK members with D behind their names? They were the losers you silly ass.

Yes the Southern Racist Democrats in 1962. Similar to today's losers, just different party.

they were democrats and they were racists, and they were from southern states. Al Gore Sr, Robert KKK Byrd just to name two.

 

[BlindBoo]

ALL opposition to abolition, equal rights etc. came for the Democrat party.

Why did Northern Democrats vote in favor of the civil right Act of 1964 145 for and 9 against (94–6%) in the House, and 45 for and 1 against (98%–2%) in the Senate? Seems like a lot of Democrat support to me. Well except for the Southern Racist branch of the party.

it was a bi-partisan vote------that is a very good thing. It is also a fact that most of the NO votes came from democrats.

Glad you concede the point that not all the opposition came from Democrats. In fact Most of the support for the Bill came from Democrats. Just not the ones in the South.

 

[emilynghiem]

Hi Skylar and Redfish
And with or without these threads,
what is so hard about admitting that
BOTH beliefs for gay marriage or for traditional marriage only
are BOTH BELIEFS.

Christianity and Buddhism are BOTH belief systems,
BOTH equally protected by law, and nobody goes around
trying to sue that Buddhism should be equally recognized by law as Christianity or there is discrimination against Buddhists.

We don't change the wording or laws about religion
to "specifically include or defend" Buddhism as opposed to Christianity.

Religious freedom already applies to both.

Why can't laws on civil unions and contracts be neutral and apply to all situations?
If they did not mention gender at all, then it would be left to the people to recognize and practice the beliefs
of their choice as they should be.

if people and parties of different beliefs cannot learn to quit
bullying and abusing govt to push theirs over others,
maybe we will see a push to either ban political parties or separate them from govt
similar to keeping religion out of govt.

Maybe political parties should be recognized equally as religious organizations
and be required to set up their own programs for their own members and not mix with public policy and funding!!!

 

[Skylar]

Dude.....you've created thread after thread on the topic of gays and gay marriage. You clearly want to discuss it. Don't blame me for your obsession. Take some personal responsibility.

two threads
1. is gay marriage the most important issue
2. this one--------will you guys shut up now that you have won

We're allowed to celebrate just as much as you're allowed to pout.

sure, go for it, celebrate. have a group butt fucking party. enjoy your new social acceptance of your perversions.

Its our party and you can cry if want to.

Yes, you have the right to your beliefs and to practice them by your party just like any other religion.
Just because you have a political religion or secular belief that focuses on "Government"
as the your authority instead of "God" doesn't make it any less of a religion.

Um, yes. It does. You've literally described the difference between secular and non-secular. The text book definition of the differences between religious and non-religious foundation.

 

[BlindBoo]

but it is still unconstitutional
to impose your beliefs on other people through govt.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Religionists have no Constitutional authority to deny same sex couples the same rights and privileges as opposite sex ones.

 

[emilynghiem]

ALL opposition to abolition, equal rights etc. came for the Democrat party.

Why did Northern Democrats vote in favor of the civil right Act of 1964 145 for and 9 against (94–6%) in the House, and 45 for and 1 against (98%–2%) in the Senate? Seems like a lot of Democrat support to me. Well except for the Southern Racist branch of the party.

it was a bi-partisan vote------that is a very good thing. It is also a fact that most of the NO votes came from democrats.

Glad you concede the point that not all the opposition came from Democrats. In fact Most of the support for the Bill came from Democrats. Just not the ones in the South.

BlindBoo fast forward to the future.

All the Democrat mayors, the Democrat Congress rep, the Democrat State rep
who had jurisdiction over the National Historic District of Freedmen's Town
either actively initiated or passively approved millions in taxpayer money
abused to seize and demolish property, censor and evict the residents
to destroy not only Black Civil Rights history and national landmarks
but the community and deprive equal civil rights under the Constitution.

You can argue about the past and blame this or that on whichever party.
But if you look at Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee's district, and
the only nationally registered district of Freed Slave churches built
as an independent Freedmen's Town, this was destroyed by Democrat leaders.

Native Freedmen's Town descendant Gladys House has been working to fund
her own business plans for developing and restoring the district, and has gotten
NO support and NO funding from any Democrat leaders or candidates because
she is a Black Republican.

In order to keep their offices, Democrats have given millions of dollars to developers to seize and destroy
national Black history and to override and destroy the community and rights of residents.

And none of the Democrats, whether leaders or members can stand up against this
because of the political conflicts of interest with funding their candidates campaigns.

This partisan division is not helping our country, but costing us irreplaceable
Civil Rights of citizens and Civil Rights history and national landmarks.
While millions of dollars changes hands to invest in political campaigns against each other,
we are losing our national historic sites. There is no funding to save our history, only to destroy it.

Is this the legacy you think Democrats should leave?

 

[Eaglewings]

You won your two signature issues in the supreme court. You won and the country lost.

Now will you STFU about it so we can concentrate of the real problems facing this nation? Like 18 trillion in debt and radical muslims who want us all dead by beheading.

1. Gay Marriage
2. Obamacare
3. Trade Law
4. Fox news played over an hour of Obama speaking in a Black Church
5. Confederate Flag down in SC
6. Trump places rich foot in mouth

It has been a super week~

And since when has the Congress gotten anything done in the last 6 years



~

 

[Redfish]

Hi Skylar and Redfish
And with or without these threads,
what is so hard about admitting that
BOTH beliefs for gay marriage or for traditional marriage only
are BOTH BELIEFS.

Christianity and Buddhism are BOTH belief systems,
BOTH equally protected by law, and nobody goes around
trying to sue that Buddhism should be equally recognized by law as Christianity or there is discrimination against Buddhists.

We don't change the wording or laws about religion
to "specifically include or defend" Buddhism as opposed to Christianity.

Religious freedom already applies to both.

Why can't laws on civil unions and contracts be neutral and apply to all situations?
If they did not mention gender at all, then it would be left to the people to recognize and practice the beliefs
of their choice as they should be.

if people and parties of different beliefs cannot learn to quit
bullying and abusing govt to push theirs over others,
maybe we will see a push to either ban political parties or separate them from govt
similar to keeping religion out of govt.

Maybe political parties should be recognized equally as religious organizations
and be required to set up their own programs for their own members and not mix with public policy and funding!!!

I agree with you 100%. The problem is that the left is totally intolerant of any beliefs except theirs. All others are to be demonized, ridiculed, called racist or homophobic, and otherwise trashed.

they preach tolerance but practice bigotry.

 

[Redfish]

You won your two signature issues in the supreme court. You won and the country lost.

Now will you STFU about it so we can concentrate of the real problems facing this nation? Like 18 trillion in debt and radical muslims who want us all dead by beheading.

1. Gay Marriage
2. Obamacare
3. Trade Law
4. Fox news played over an hour of Obama speaking in a Black Church
5. Confederate Flag down in SC
6. Trump places rich foot in mouth

It has been a super week~

And since when has the Congress gotten anything done in the last 6 years



~

you are a very good talking point repeater. is your name polly parrot?

 

[emilynghiem]

two threads
1. is gay marriage the most important issue
2. this one--------will you guys shut up now that you have won

We're allowed to celebrate just as much as you're allowed to pout.

sure, go for it, celebrate. have a group butt fucking party. enjoy your new social acceptance of your perversions.

Its our party and you can cry if want to.

Yes, you have the right to your beliefs and to practice them by your party just like any other religion.
Just because you have a political religion or secular belief that focuses on "Government"
as the your authority instead of "God" doesn't make it any less of a religion.

Um, yes. It does. You've literally described the difference between secular and non-secular. The text book definition of the differences between religious and non-religious foundation.

Skylar
By your definition of what is a 'belief"
you would be discriminating on the basis of creed!

Skylar do you realize what you are saying.

You are saying that people whose beliefs fit the definition of "religion"
would be treated differently, from people whose beliefs are secular.

Can you see that this is discriminating?

So if someone's beliefs fit the textbook idea of "Christian religion"
then that person has "different rights" than someone
whose beliefs do not fit into an organized religion?

Only people who beliefs align with a certain group will get protected or treated differently?

Really?

How can all people of all beliefs be protected equally under "religious freedom"
if only CERTAIN beliefs count, and other people's beliefs do not?

How can people be protected equally
if you start including or excluding based on a list of which beliefs count?

 

[Nosmo King]

You won your two signature issues in the supreme court. You won and the country lost.

Now will you STFU about it so we can concentrate of the real problems facing this nation? Like 18 trillion in debt and radical muslims who want us all dead by beheading.

LOL...is this you starting another thread about gay marriage so you won't have to talk about gay marriage?

that issue is over, the SC has ruled. Time to move on. Can you do that?

You mean like anti abortionist have?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Bro you said your last gay thread was your last.

YOU need to stop

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

You won your two signature issues in the supreme court. You won and the country lost.

Now will you STFU about it so we can concentrate of the real problems facing this nation? Like 18 trillion in debt and radical muslims who want us all dead by beheading.

Maybe now YOU will STFU

What's to discuss... Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman. And obamaScare is a boondoggle designed to scuttle the US health insurance industry.

Its not like there's anything to debate.

SO all she needs to shut up is for you idiots to stop speaking lies that must be corrected.