Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://tinyurl.com/38yzau
Mullin seems to think we need to draw down in hope we wont Break the military.
damn cut an runner!
Joint Chiefs Nominee Notes Toll on Military, Need to Plan for Iraq Drawdown
By William Branigin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 1, 2007; Page A02
Adm. Michael G. Mullen, President Bush's nominee to head the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Senate panel yesterday that the war in Iraq is taking a heavy toll on the U.S. military, warning that American forces are "not unbreakable" and stressing the need to "plan for an eventual drawdown" of troops.
Appearing in a confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Mullen, 60, acknowledged that the increase in U.S. forces cannot continue past April 2008 under the military's current force structure. He also cautioned that Iraqi political reconciliation is not keeping pace with security improvements.
"There is no purely military solution in Iraq," said Adm. Michael Mullen, tapped to lead Joint Chiefs of Staff.
http://tinyurl.com/38yzau
There are very big consequinces to staying just to stay.
"There is no purely military solution in Iraq," said Adm. Michael Mullen, tapped to lead Joint Chiefs of Staff.
http://tinyurl.com/38yzau
Here is a question for all young and middle aged Democrats. If your not in the military, when are you signing up?
Thats not true, the believe in it, they just don't believe anyone of their "station" should have to stoop to it.
Why? Since when did military service represent a political ideology?
I guess then that only Republicans should be allowed to serve in the military then. Funny, I don't remember seeing this question on any enlistment forms:
"To what political party do you belong?" There are many reasons why a Republican can believe in the war and yet not serve....physical disability comes to mind. Specific to this board....many of the pro-military, pro war folks who post here have already served.
It is obvious to me that every time a poster starts a thread like this the discussion that follows only further divides the participating parties. If we follow in this vein, we will be proposing that every time a Dem/lib gets pregnant they immediately get an abortion or that every Dem/lib should give their income to some poverty stricken family/person.
Already provided a link to a series of polls that prove your claim is hogwash ( since your using polls to make the 70 percent claim) Americans believe we should NOT abandon Iraq, they believe we should ensure the Government there is able to stand on its own two feet and they DO NOT support a rapid pull out any time in the near future. Further they believe IF we leave the job unfinished Iraq will become controlled by AQ. But hey do not let pesky little facts and the TRUTH get in the way of a good liberal lie.
Some poll results for you. And since I know you can not read and chew gum at the same time. The polls were NOT conducted by the GOP, they just compiled the data from said polls in one easy chart.
http://www.gop.com/images/July_Iraq_Poll.pdf
This stubborn fool has done exactly that. what have you done for this country lately?
You REALLY need to learn to comprehend your english language. You claimed 70 percent ( now 63) want us OUT of Iraq, NOT one of your polls in this link say that at all. But hey don't let facts get in the way of one of your usual lies.
It's called "committment". I can see where one could disagree with the wothiness of fighting a war in Iraq in the first place...
I dont know why they would not sign up if they believed it was truely a war American absolutely needed to fight for its safety?
There is no other legitimate reason for America to wage war.
If you support this war you have to realise the military is having a hard time filling its ranks.
I would think they would follow their beliefs?
why dont they?
This admin has very few sons and daughters in the war , it is a very unsusual situation.
How misleading!
Mullin didn't express that at all. He does caution that there does need to be a PLAN for eventual drawdown and that the US military is not unbreakable."
A plan for an eventual drawdown? Are you fucking crazy man? Do you know what kind of signal that would send the enemy? If they thought that we would EVER leave Iraq, they would just hide in their caves till we left! We gotta stay there, forever, unless you want to send the wrong signal to the enemy.
And BTW
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Why aren't more young Republicans signing up?
Amazing. Three pages, and no right winger has even attempted to answer the question posed. You've all either asked a separate question, or you've made fun of the question.
Well since you won't answer it, I will
THEY ARE ALL SNIVELING LITTLE PUSSIES, WILLING TO STAND UP FOR NOTHING, UNLESS ITS SENDING OTHERS OFF TO DIE
Oh yeah, and they have blood soaked underwear.
Here is a question for all young and middle aged Democrats. If your not in the military, when are you signing up?
