iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
- 1,600
You said I lost my moral high road. This was off a very brief statement to make such a broad assertation. It's, usually done to paint the other side as evil or wrong.I never said a thing about your morality. Or are you saying I am not usually direct? No one has ever told me that one before.What does, leaving them water and being humane have to do with them coming here illegally? Of course I would help them if needed so the slam on my morality is a bullshit extreme emotional ploy to portray me as evil, you good.We don't share the same morality so please stop pushing everything to an extreme stance.Yea, but what about...Well ... if you support “sanctuary” designations for this and for firearms you have no right to complain about the same for immigrants.
In any event, there's a huge difference between wanting your legal business to reopen vs coming here illegally and demanding the same rights.
Feel free to try that in any other country.
No difference. You are choosing to break a law because you personally feel it is wrong. No different than sanctuary cities or people who leave water for migrants in tbe desert.
And...keep in mind. Opening up business too soon runs a risk of another surge in the epidemic so, arguably you are putting people’s lives at risk by selectively choosing to break this law.
You pretty much lost your moral high road over sanctuary cities.
No, probably not. I do not have a problem with people leaving water for illegal immigrants in the desert. I have no idea where you stand on it, what laws you consider just or unjust, constitutional or unconstitutional.
But when people argue that sanctuary cities for illegal immigrant but support same for guns and Covid...they have lost their legitimacy, in my view to criticize by choosing a cafeteria model.
Gets old.
Oh for Gods sakes. First you take an indirect slam at my morality. So I carefuly, so as not to make wrong assumptions about you, state that that I do not know where you are on these issues, and you still go off.
The leaving them water comment was in relation to case that was in the news last year.
Man who faces 20 years in prison for ‘giving migrants food and water’ sees case end in mistrial
Conference in July will decide how to proceed after hung jury fails to determine ‘humanitarian’ geography teacher’s guiltwww.independent.co.uk
Extending 'Zero Tolerance' To People Who Help Migrants Along The Border
Scott Warren of the humanitarian group 'No More Deaths' faces three felony counts for harboring migrants. The number of U.S. citizens arrested for harboring is on the rise.www.npr.org
And asking you to stop attacking my morality is not going off.
You've seen me go off. That wasn't it.
You have a bad habit of extremifying everything.
Again...you are taking it all wrong. I didn’t attack your morality. I said I don’t know so as to AVOID setting you off on another round of “you are making assumptions about me”.
Honestly debating with you consistently takes this bizarro personal turn I don’t encounter elsewhere.
You state - we don’t share the same morality (whatever that means)
I state - I won’t make assumptions about your morality.
Now, I did post articles about tbe law being broken. What are your thoughts on that?
You seem to keep saying things you say you never said. But to me this questions morality. You like to read into what I say yet you hate it done to you.
Yea convos with you get pretty frustrating.