2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,235
- 52,459
Yes....gun grabbers will never be happy with the gun laws they get.....just look at Australia.....they want more gun tracking...of law abiding gun owners. As the article points out....they have a huge gun smuggling problem...
And the gun grabbers in Australia lie as much as the gun grabbers in the States do....
Australian Gun Grab Goes to the Next Level - The Truth About Guns
by recommending a new electronic database that contains information on all firearms owners as well attempting to track the life of all firearms and associated parts . . .
A report by the Law, Crime and Community Safety Council recommended that the new National Firearms Interface (NIF) be implemented and administered by government agency, CrimTrac. Crimtrac is also responsible for management and tracking of data on violent criminals and paedophiles. Apparently, law abiding firearms owners (“LAFO’s”) in Australia who have to pass a criminal background check, are on the same level as those two categories of subhuman.
Already, it’s not difficult to see why this is yet another colossal waste of time and money. But hey, it’s government and should we be surprised?
With sprawling coast lines, a small population and large freight traffic, Australia is a smuggler’s paradise. When you can get 220 Glocks in the post, criminals are making guns at home, guns are coming in through the post with ease, the AFP admit they have no idea how many illegal firearms are being smuggled into Australia and Australian Customs’ history of institutionalised and individual corruption, it’s not hard to see why.
Further, this new database is on top of the firearms registries already in place in Australia, which are essentially a taxpayer funded blackhole for no proven benefit, a security risk, and whose running costs are believed to be between $80-100 million a year. In a laughable attempt to sell the new database, the ABC’s Fact Check (not worth the name) deliberately tried to misquote Senator Bridget McKenzie and claim that stolen guns represented the majority of illegal firearms in Australia. Kind of inconvenient, when the Senate Inquiry unanimously found this to be completely untrue.
And the gun grabbers in Australia lie as much as the gun grabbers in the States do....
Australian Gun Grab Goes to the Next Level - The Truth About Guns
by recommending a new electronic database that contains information on all firearms owners as well attempting to track the life of all firearms and associated parts . . .
A report by the Law, Crime and Community Safety Council recommended that the new National Firearms Interface (NIF) be implemented and administered by government agency, CrimTrac. Crimtrac is also responsible for management and tracking of data on violent criminals and paedophiles. Apparently, law abiding firearms owners (“LAFO’s”) in Australia who have to pass a criminal background check, are on the same level as those two categories of subhuman.
Already, it’s not difficult to see why this is yet another colossal waste of time and money. But hey, it’s government and should we be surprised?
With sprawling coast lines, a small population and large freight traffic, Australia is a smuggler’s paradise. When you can get 220 Glocks in the post, criminals are making guns at home, guns are coming in through the post with ease, the AFP admit they have no idea how many illegal firearms are being smuggled into Australia and Australian Customs’ history of institutionalised and individual corruption, it’s not hard to see why.
Further, this new database is on top of the firearms registries already in place in Australia, which are essentially a taxpayer funded blackhole for no proven benefit, a security risk, and whose running costs are believed to be between $80-100 million a year. In a laughable attempt to sell the new database, the ABC’s Fact Check (not worth the name) deliberately tried to misquote Senator Bridget McKenzie and claim that stolen guns represented the majority of illegal firearms in Australia. Kind of inconvenient, when the Senate Inquiry unanimously found this to be completely untrue.