WorldWatcher
Gold Member
1st protects freedom of an individual's religion/deeply held beliefs, association (& in the Klein's case, the right NOT to associate), and speech.
How'd that work out for Piggie Park Enterprise?
>>>>
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1st protects freedom of an individual's religion/deeply held beliefs, association (& in the Klein's case, the right NOT to associate), and speech.
Race can be objectively tested. If a Black male claims to be black, there are ways to prove they are.
National Origin: ancestry.com commercial simply proved they, and your relative didn't have the complete story, that's what affairs do. That affair could have happened generations ago, and no one might ever know
Unlikely... I know my side of the family got off the boat from Germany, and my Bro in Law got off the boat from Poland. But no German or Polish in this crackpot test.
Your examples of Religion are laughable, but that's what delusional thinkers do, don't they?, in your expert opinion.
Not at all... religion is a matter of self definition more than anything else. First 20 years of my life, I was Catholic. Last 30+ I've been an atheist. I made those determinations, not anyone else. But the law says I can't be denied service, even if I walk into a bakery with a "Jesus Never Existed" T-Shirt.
No, you are definitely deflecting. And I have shown how membership in a religious organization can be objectively determined.
Belonging to a religious organization is not objective proof about someones religious beliefs and you don't have to be associated with a religouis organization to have religious beliefs.
Therefore belonging to a religious organization is not an objective test of religious beliefs.
>>>>
1st protects freedom of an individual's religion/deeply held beliefs, association (& in the Klein's case, the right NOT to associate), and speech.Belonging to a religious organization is not objective proof about someones religious beliefs and you don't have to be associated with a religouis organization to have religious beliefs.
Therefore belonging to a religious organization is not an objective test of religious beliefs.
>>>>
I love a happy ending.When there is no actual harm.
The issue is they didn't want these people to BE customers. and no, the customer is not always right.
When you scream Bible shit at one's mother, that's actual harm, which is what Mr. Wifebeater did.
But good news, everyone... They finally closed and gave up!
Family Bakery Closes After Left-Wing Bullies Finally Get Their Pound Of Cake
It's about equality before the law and in business transactions.1st protects freedom of an individual's religion/deeply held beliefs, association (& in the Klein's case, the right NOT to associate), and speech.Belonging to a religious organization is not objective proof about someones religious beliefs and you don't have to be associated with a religouis organization to have religious beliefs.
Therefore belonging to a religious organization is not an objective test of religious beliefs.
>>>>
Isn't this what this is all about? Control of belief?
I love a happy ending.When there is no actual harm.
The issue is they didn't want these people to BE customers. and no, the customer is not always right.
When you scream Bible shit at one's mother, that's actual harm, which is what Mr. Wifebeater did.
But good news, everyone... They finally closed and gave up!
Family Bakery Closes After Left-Wing Bullies Finally Get Their Pound Of Cake
Their fag-hating Go Fund Me will get them by for a time. And may they never run a business open to the public ever again as they are unworthy.I love a happy ending.When there is no actual harm.
The issue is they didn't want these people to BE customers. and no, the customer is not always right.
When you scream Bible shit at one's mother, that's actual harm, which is what Mr. Wifebeater did.
But good news, everyone... They finally closed and gave up!
Family Bakery Closes After Left-Wing Bullies Finally Get Their Pound Of Cake
Unemployment and food stamps, heaven to a lib!
1st protects freedom of an individual's religion/deeply held beliefs, association (& in the Klein's case, the right NOT to associate), and speech.
Reading problems. Affairs can change the family tree. Not too many people record them, aye?
If you were Catholic, you had documents. If you renounced it, I doubt you'd sue as though you were one, aye?
Reading problems. Affairs can change the family tree. Not too many people record them, aye?
If you were Catholic, you had documents. If you renounced it, I doubt you'd sue as though you were one, aye?
Yeah, but you see, my German ancestors might have been fucking around.. but they were still fucking other Germans... That's the point. It's a scam. So national origin is essentially subjective, more subjective than sexual orientation.
If someone told me, "We don't serve Catholics here", damned right I'd sue the fuckers.
Of course they would Joe, they would only fuck a superior race, right?
And you were there taking notes perhaps?
It is proof that one believes.
Sorry bloke, it would work as an objective test for most.
Got any for sexual orientation yet?
It is the $100,000 cake question.
Of course they would Joe, they would only fuck a superior race, right?
And you were there taking notes perhaps?
are you just babbling here? You do realize that until 1925, my family was in Germany and there was nothing but Germans for hundreds of miles in any direction. In fact, the only divide they worried about was they didn't get along with the Lutherans on the other side of the Lahn River.
Now, this might come as a surprise to an American that we all have to kind of get along with other races, religions, ethnicities, and so on. It's why you need a public accommodation law to protect everyone's right and access to goods and services and to maintain civil society.
The Kleins were being assholes. That's why they don't have a business anymore. Now, you might say, "Well you have a right to be an asshole." Quite right. You do. Your business does not.
It is proof that one believes.
Sorry bloke, it would work as an objective test for most.
Got any for sexual orientation yet?
It is the $100,000 cake question.
1. Sorry, nope. Not a test of beliefs.
2. How'd that claim of religious belief work out for Piggie Park?
3. No need for a test of sexual orientation, the violation of the law is based on the reason business owner refused service. Not whether the customers was actually in that class. If I'm a Christian and the business owner thinks I'm Jewish and refuses service based on being Jewish - he (or she) is in violation of the law even though I'm not Jewish. I don't have to prove my "Jewishness".
>>>>
When there is no actual harm.
The issue is they didn't want these people to BE customers. and no, the customer is not always right.
When you scream Bible shit at one's mother, that's actual harm, which is what Mr. Wifebeater did.
But good news, everyone... They finally closed and gave up!
Family Bakery Closes After Left-Wing Bullies Finally Get Their Pound Of Cake
I love a happy ending.When there is no actual harm.
The issue is they didn't want these people to BE customers. and no, the customer is not always right.
When you scream Bible shit at one's mother, that's actual harm, which is what Mr. Wifebeater did.
But good news, everyone... They finally closed and gave up!
Family Bakery Closes After Left-Wing Bullies Finally Get Their Pound Of Cake
Their fag-hating Go Fund Me will get them by for a time. And may they never run a business open to the public ever again as they are unworthy.I love a happy ending.When there is no actual harm.
The issue is they didn't want these people to BE customers. and no, the customer is not always right.
When you scream Bible shit at one's mother, that's actual harm, which is what Mr. Wifebeater did.
But good news, everyone... They finally closed and gave up!
Family Bakery Closes After Left-Wing Bullies Finally Get Their Pound Of Cake
Unemployment and food stamps, heaven to a lib!
It is proof that one believes.
Sorry bloke, it would work as an objective test for most.
Got any for sexual orientation yet?
It is the $100,000 cake question.
1. Sorry, nope. Not a test of beliefs.
>>>>
All your stating is that a law exists, whether it is just or not is simply insane. As stated before it will be challenged and, in my opinion be tossed out.
The theory that the ends justifies the means is delusional and rarely turns out well.
And yes, someone claiming that he was discriminated against, based on his religion can, most often produce evidence that can be examined on a objective basis and pass the test.