Beer, Cigarettes & Marijuana -- What's the difference?

The federal government wants to regulate your sugar and salt intake. Marijuana is certainly a reasonable substance to regulate by that standard. Your weak arguments about marijuana not killing you it was the fall or the car crash is laughable. Sort of like saying the heart attack killed you, not the excess weigh, smoking, lack of exercise and so on. They are called contributing factors folks.

The premise of the thread is false. It is also interesting to see how unmellow you stoners are when it comes to discussing this issue. It is illegal for good reason. Take your energy and passion using it to end cigarette use and limit alcohol use. That would be far more helpful and productive.

I suggest you read what you post and revise it.
1. The federal government did not ban sugar or salt. Buy as much as you want at the market and stuff yourself.
2. MJ is not regulated (as is alcohol); MJ is a schedule I drug.
3. A queston is not a premise.
4. As a non-stoner, you also seem to be unmellow.
5. List the good reasons for it being 'illegal'.
 
the govt does not have the constitutional powers to make alcohol, cigarettes or marijuana illegal....what they have done, is unconstitutional....they used back door methods to make marijuana illegal....they said it was still legal, but you had to buy a tax stamp to distribute it, then when doctors applied for the tax stamp to prescribe it, the gvt had no tax stamps to purchase....they never printed any....they killed marijuana's legality, over night.

the companies like cocacola and Hearst Paper and the alcohol industry lobbied hard to ban it because marijuana was competition to them....hemp paper, what the original bible text was printed on, was huge competition for Hearst, who owned newspapers and magazines and had just bought huge tracks of forest and a paper company....

On top of this, there was racism....the religious said that marijuana made mexican men rape white women....

HEMP, marijuana, was required BY LAW for every plantation in the south to grow...the colonies needed the rope made from it, to operate their new vessels they were building....Jefferson owned sever Hemp plantations.

Please watch the History Channel's, "History of illegal Drugs" documentary.

You've pretty-much encapsulated everything that's (already) in this thread, so it wouldn't hurt for you to digest something-else; The Shafer Report, when Dick Nixon (the DEA's "Daddy") was first-shown his War On Drugs was a waste o' time & money!!
 
Of course they are. You don't see many people clamoring for Nicotine-less smokes, do you?

Here's how I see the difference:

Alcohol is addictive to the point that addicts are in danger of dying during withdrawal. It impairs the senses and judgment and kills brains cells. It also destroys the liver. You can overdose on alcohol.

Cigarettes are highly addictive and highly carcinogenic to virtually every tissue in the body. Even if you avoid cancer, they destroy lung tissue and your odds of getting COPD are high, which is a progressively fatal condition that will have you in the hospital several times a year for COPD exacerbation until it contributes to your death in some manner or the other.

Pot is not physiologically addictive, impairs the senses and alters judgment. You can't overdose on it, but the long term effects on the body are not well studied/known. There is some evidence to suggest it might trigger schizophrenia in persons who are habitual users who are predispositioned to it.
That's some bullshit-study that (typically) shows-up at the BBC-website.

:rolleyes:

They are just reporting the results of a scientific study (n = 523 this time as opposed to 10 on the last study).

Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizoph... [Br J Psychiatry. 2005] - PubMed result

I'd be inclined to wave it off too, except I just got off a rotation where a patient who was a chronic MJ smoker started to manifest psychosis and other s/s of schizophrenia. I am not sure what the final conclusion was.
Gee.....how 'bout the fact schizophrenia TYPICALLY shows-up when people are IN their teens??!!!

:rolleyes:
 
THC is not physically addictive.

BULLSHIT


Period. Repeated clinical studies have established that fact.

Then their subjects didn't smoke as much dope as me. I had to quit once, and I had mild anxiety for like two weeks. A debillitating symptom. LOL


Having quit cigarettes before, I'd say cigarrettes 10 times worse to withdraw from
 



That study was conducted with a sample of 10 patients. This is not a misprint.
Bullous lung disease due to marijuana

HII SW, TAM JDC, THOMPSON BR, NAUGHTON MT. Respirology 2008; 13: 122-127 Background and objective: 

In contrast to the well-described effects of tobacco smoking upon pulmonary emphysema, with ∼15% of smokers being affected at the age of 65 years, the effects of marijuana smoking are rarely reported and poorly understood. Methods: 

We report a series of 10 patients (mean age 41 ± 9 years, eight male, two female), who presented over a period of 12 months to our respiratory unit with new respiratory symptoms, and who admitted to regular chronic marijuana smoking (>1 year continuously). Symptoms on presentation were dyspnoea (n = 4), pneumothorax (n = 4) and chest infection (n = 2). Results: 

Would suck to be one of them.



It would suck to be you, yet you don't see me wanting to ban your favorite things.
 
That's some bullshit-study that (typically) shows-up at the BBC-website.

:rolleyes:

They are just reporting the results of a scientific study (n = 523 this time as opposed to 10 on the last study).

Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizoph... [Br J Psychiatry. 2005] - PubMed result

I'd be inclined to wave it off too, except I just got off a rotation where a patient who was a chronic MJ smoker started to manifest psychosis and other s/s of schizophrenia. I am not sure what the final conclusion was.
Gee.....how 'bout the fact schizophrenia TYPICALLY shows-up when people are IN their teens??!!!

:rolleyes:

That's not true. Schizophrenia typically manifests between 18-35 years of age. In that spectrum, it onsets earlier in men and later in women. I believe the mean is somewhere in the early-to-mid twenties and the current theory is that the cause of Schizophrenia is some sort of mishap when the brain undergoes it's last re-wiring. The incidence of schizophrenia is 1% for men, women, blacks, whites, etc and has been at that number for as long as anyone has recorded it. It's a relatively rare problem, but for people who are schizophrenic, it means they will never have a "normal" life.

Like I said, MJ hasn't been fully studied for people just to wave off any adverse effects it has.
 
The federal government wants to regulate your sugar and salt intake. Marijuana is certainly a reasonable substance to regulate by that standard. Your weak arguments about marijuana not killing you it was the fall or the car crash is laughable. Sort of like saying the heart attack killed you, not the excess weigh, smoking, lack of exercise and so on. They are called contributing factors folks.

The premise of the thread is false. It is also interesting to see how unmellow you stoners are when it comes to discussing this issue. It is illegal for good reason. Take your energy and passion using it to end cigarette use and limit alcohol use. That would be far more helpful and productive.

I suggest you read what you post and revise it.
1. The federal government did not ban sugar or salt. Buy as much as you want at the market and stuff yourself.
2. MJ is not regulated (as is alcohol); MJ is a schedule I drug.
3. A queston is not a premise.
4. As a non-stoner, you also seem to be unmellow.
5. List the good reasons for it being 'illegal'.

I never said sugar or salt was banned. You read okay? Marijuana certainly is regulated, just what is a schedule drug, if not regulated? The question was phrased in a premise format. You don't have the slightest idea of my disposition. There are many good reasons, go find them yourself, don't waste my time. If you were open to change I might have a different approach with you. That the best you got?
 
It seems to me that lots of people want to justify their addiction to marijuana by saying it's harmless, or less harmful than alcohol or cigarettes. Simply put, lie to yourselves if you must - take whatever drug you feel inclined to.... but.... don't affect me and mine. I'm sick and tired of my family being impacted by the selfish stupidity of others. You want to affect your brain, body and kill yourselves. Absolutely fine and dandy. Just don't kill someone else while your doing it. Thanks.

Since your drug of choice is alcohol how are you any better? Have you ever driven after drinking any alcohol? Then you have put society in as much danger, if not more, than a pot smoker.

I drink about three times a year, if that. And by 'drink', I mean I have a couple - never get get hammered.

I have never, in my life, gotten into the drivers seat of any car. I don't drink - not even one - if I'm driving. I know only too well what happens when people drink and drive, thanks. Personally, I'd like to see the death penalty for any driver who kills someone whilst under the influence of drink or drugs.
 
It seems to me that lots of people want to justify their addiction to marijuana by saying it's harmless, or less harmful than alcohol or cigarettes. Simply put, lie to yourselves if you must - take whatever drug you feel inclined to.... but.... don't affect me and mine. I'm sick and tired of my family being impacted by the selfish stupidity of others. You want to affect your brain, body and kill yourselves. Absolutely fine and dandy. Just don't kill someone else while your doing it. Thanks.

Since your drug of choice is alcohol how are you any better? Have you ever driven after drinking any alcohol? Then you have put society in as much danger, if not more, than a pot smoker.

I drink about three times a year, if that. And by 'drink', I mean I have a couple - never get get hammered.

What the fuck do you do then?


I have never, in my life, gotten into the drivers seat of any car.

THANK SWEET LORD JESUS. There's no telling how many lives you've saved already. Keep it up!

Personally, I'd like to see the death penalty for any driver who kills someone whilst under the influence of drink or drugs.

Because when people kill out of negligence - they should be put down like dogs

When corporations kill out of negligence - we should buy more of their products to help them out.
 
If you want to get down to "facts" on this subject, none of the three things mentioned are any good for you the way MOST people actually use them. To see them go on and on about the burden they bear from the laws is quite immature and selfish as near as I can see.

Your handle is 'saveliberty' - what a fucking hypocrite you are. What you mean is "save MY liberty and FUCK everyone else's"

Your liberty to function at a diminished capacity while driving or at work? To have health related issues from its use that I get to pay for? The crime that is commited in the name of a "harmless" drug? You over stepped your liberty pal.
 
Last edited:
Since your drug of choice is alcohol how are you any better? Have you ever driven after drinking any alcohol? Then you have put society in as much danger, if not more, than a pot smoker.

I drink about three times a year, if that. And by 'drink', I mean I have a couple - never get get hammered.

What the fuck do you do then?


I have never, in my life, gotten into the drivers seat of any car.

THANK SWEET LORD JESUS. There's no telling how many lives you've saved already. Keep it up!

Personally, I'd like to see the death penalty for any driver who kills someone whilst under the influence of drink or drugs.

Because when people kill out of negligence - they should be put down like dogs

When corporations kill out of negligence - we should buy more of their products to help them out.

I am happy with my life, I don't need to 'escape' from reality with drink or drugs.

Driving under the influence is not 'negligence', it is premeditated murder. They are aware of the risk to others and choose to do it anyway. So, yep, they should be put down.... I would care more about a dog than someone who kills an innocent person by driving under the influence.

Like you and your hysteria about BP, I guess it takes personal experience to understand what it is like to have someone you care for die by the stupid selfishness of another.
 
They are just reporting the results of a scientific study (n = 523 this time as opposed to 10 on the last study).

Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizoph... [Br J Psychiatry. 2005] - PubMed result

I'd be inclined to wave it off too, except I just got off a rotation where a patient who was a chronic MJ smoker started to manifest psychosis and other s/s of schizophrenia. I am not sure what the final conclusion was.
Gee.....how 'bout the fact schizophrenia TYPICALLY shows-up when people are IN their teens??!!!

:rolleyes:

That's not true. Schizophrenia typically manifests between 18-35 years of age.
Pardon me!!

I had no idea 18 & 19 didn't qualify as "teens".

:rolleyes:
 
I drink about three times a year, if that. And by 'drink', I mean I have a couple - never get get hammered.

I have never, in my life, gotten into the drivers seat of any car. I don't drink - not even one - if I'm driving. I know only too well what happens when people drink and drive, thanks. Personally, I'd like to see the death penalty for any driver who kills someone whilst under the influence of drink or drugs.

Fair enough. The buzz on the board led me to believe you liked to drink frequently. I am not judgmental about that, as I like to drink. Frequently.

As I said, your drug of choice is alcohol, whether you use it frequently or infrequently.
 
ONe reason, idiots in the general public who just believe all the propaganda about marijuana, and are too dumb to realize or notice the truth.

Legalize it already, what a boom to a bad economy. INstead of money going to criminals and the black market, can go to businesses that can hire people. Taxes collected on it would help local governments who are in fiscal trouble. Instead of heavily armed gangs threatening national parks, it can be grown legally without the dangers associated with criminals.
 
Pardon me!!

I had no idea 18 & 19 didn't qualify as "teens".

:rolleyes:

Pardon you. You selectively omitted all of my other information I posted, especially about the mean age of onset.

Schizophrenia at 18 or 19 would be considered a very early onset.
 
Why are two of the above legal but the one isn't?
- 75000 die a year from alcohol related incidents.
- 0 die a year from Marijuana related incidents.
Why the hell can you drink as much alcohol as you want in America but a person can't smoke a joint without worrying about doing jail time? Simple question, please answer to the point.

Get your facts straight and then maybe we can talk. No one died from a marijuana related incident? Really? Link please.

Like you have a fucking clue what facts are. In your mind whatever you already believe is facts
 
I drink about three times a year, if that. And by 'drink', I mean I have a couple - never get get hammered.

What the fuck do you do then?




THANK SWEET LORD JESUS. There's no telling how many lives you've saved already. Keep it up!

Personally, I'd like to see the death penalty for any driver who kills someone whilst under the influence of drink or drugs.

Because when people kill out of negligence - they should be put down like dogs

When corporations kill out of negligence - we should buy more of their products to help them out.

I am happy with my life, I don't need to 'escape' from reality with drink or drugs.

Driving under the influence is not 'negligence', it is premeditated murder. They are aware of the risk to others and choose to do it anyway. So, yep, they should be put down....
....Especially if they're alcoholics, right??

Then, we could keep regressing....and, start burning epileptics, at the stake (again), for being possessed!!!

What a wonderful, little World it'd be, if we could exterm...er, eliminate ALL sick-people!!! (...The-sooner-the-better!!)

:rolleyes:
 
I drink about three times a year, if that. And by 'drink', I mean I have a couple - never get get hammered.

I have never, in my life, gotten into the drivers seat of any car. I don't drink - not even one - if I'm driving. I know only too well what happens when people drink and drive, thanks. Personally, I'd like to see the death penalty for any driver who kills someone whilst under the influence of drink or drugs.

Fair enough. The buzz on the board led me to believe you liked to drink frequently. I am not judgmental about that, as I like to drink. Frequently.

As I said, your drug of choice is alcohol, whether you use it frequently or infrequently.

Because I joke about alcohol, that means I drink regularly? How stupid. I go months without drinking. I did drugs exactly once in my like - didn't like it so ain't doing it.
 
Because I joke about alcohol, that means I drink regularly? How stupid.

Well, typically, humor is grounded in reality. When people frequently joke about being in bars and drinking, it typically means they do so on a more frequent basis. I would say joking about drinking a lot when you hardly drink at all makes you more of a lame poser.

I go months without drinking. I did drugs exactly once in my like - didn't like it so ain't doing it.

Good for you. The healthy lifestyle.
 

Forum List

Back
Top