Well let's hear it from the horse's mouth, by listening to offspring of the IslamoNazi Palestinians animals as to how they enjoyed the killing and theiving.
LOL, this drivel from a well known Hasbara site was posted in 2011 when the woman was 92, that would mean she was 10 years old in 1929; she probably never witnessed anything as young girls would have been kept indoors during a riot, but it's possible she may have heard exaggerated stories in the decades that followed, nevertheless hardly a reliable "witness" or source. FYI, I spoke to a veteran of el-Alemein a few years ago, he was in his nineties too and he was convinced that Germans used 150mm anti tank guns against him; I suggested 50mm (the standard german AT gun at the time), but he said definitely 150mm...memories are unreliable unless corroborated from other sources.
The Germans did use 150mm artillery in the direct fire mode against armor in times of emergency so he could very well be correct. Memory is indeed fallible, however certain things will remain solidly reliable up until the person dies. Traumatic events such as those being discussed are the very type of events that remain crystal clear in the memory banks.
I'm well aware of that, but without straying too far off topic, the chap I was speaking to was a tank gunner in the Sherwood Rangers Regiment, which I was researching at the time. After noting his account, I checked the Regimental diary to put his account in context. The regiment never got as far as the enemy artillery areas so never encountered emergency direct fire from german artillery; it never happened as he described. However the regiment, part of 10th Armoured Division, was attacked on the 24th October while holding Miteiriya Ridge, during which it suffered from an intense artillery barrage, which undoubtedly included 150mm shells alongside the more commonplace 105mm and assorted mortar rounds. After 60-70 years, his memories of the traumatic experience he may have had, closed up in a Crusader turret, may well have been skewed and conflated, with this or subsequent combats. Memories become unreliable the further away from the incident the person is in time, even for eye witnesses.
Returning to the 10 year old girl, who was probably never an eye witness to the events of 1929, nor would she have been traumatised at the time, but subsequent brutality or trauma she may have encountered from subsequent events, like the Zionist terrorism in the1940's or the 1948 Palestinian expulsions could easily create fantasies in her head conflated with stories she may have heard at other times. That's why any such account must be corroborated before it's given undue credence.
It also amuses me that anything filmed by Palestinians that may be detrimental to their image is considered "gospel truth" by the Hasbarists here, yet anything filmed by Palestinians detrimental to the Zionist regime is always glibly dismissed as "Pallywood".
During the battles of Alamein, there were multiple times that British armor made it to German artillery batteries. I don't know which regimental record you are reading but I have the German and British histories for most of the units involved and they ALL describe the chaotic nature of the battle. As regards the ten year old girl, I find your reasoning lacking, the fact is the terrorists like to show their kids what they are doing as it makes the perps feel good, and it serves as a warning to the youngsters to tow the line.
Pallywood productions are just that, productions. You can watch them rehearsing and frequently we get to see the documentary of the production as well! More to the point, when the Israel supporters here make the claim that a video is a pallywood production, they can back it up with photographic proof. Something that your side can't for the most part.
Had you bothered to read my post you would have found the name of the regiment in question and the Division to which it belonged.
Thank you for making my point for me, "they ALL describe the chaotic nature of the battle"; correct.
That's exactly why individual memories are suspect without corroboration from other sources and should never be taken at face value, especially as in this case, a one minute sound bite by a 90 year old during a protest or demonstration.
Same applies to "photographic proof"; video and photographs can be edited and or manipulated to create "Pallywood" and "Hasbara".
Yes, I did, and I own that particular regimental history. And it does describe a assault into a German artillery position. In fact it describes two of them, and the loss of at least one tank to direct fire. There were three tanks lost in total on that particular day, but only one can definitively be attributed to a arty hit. Chaos does not imply inability to remember significant acts. I was friends with Alexander Uhlig and up until the day he died he was able to accurately describe, in great detail, detail that was verifiable from both American and German sources, his Knights Cross action outside of Perrier on D +30.
That's why I have no problem believing the recollections of the woman in the video. As far as the pallywood silliness, I hate to break it to you but when they have multiple angles of them rehearsing, and film the production from "behind the scenes" that is impossible to fake. Inj a court of law there is a very old saying. Once a liar, always a liar. Which basically means if you discover that a person has perjured themselves under oath, they will ALWAYS do so if it benefits them, and even if it doesn't sometimes. Thus, they are no longer called as witnesses for ANYTHING.
The same go's for our pallywood producers. They have been caught lying so many times, that they are simply not to be used. They have zero credibility, and anyone who ignores that, likewise has no credibility. Your judgement is suspect.