Zone1 Belief in God drops to 81 percent

[ding]

your lost bing ... the example is of trajectory - returning to point of origin without changing direction.

By orbiting another object...

 

[ding]

in your case where is your example of a straight line (anywhere in the universe) otherwise as is throughout the spherical universe so would be the finite angles of trajectory that would return the shrapnel back to its origin at the same time without changing direction in a vacuum and reconstitute the grande to its original shape - if not insideout - the boomerang theory. cyclical bb.

This....

does not equal...


this...

 

[BreezeWood]

This....

View attachment 673657


does not equal...


this...

View attachment 673658

Once fired a bullet does not return to the barrel.

grow up bing, your assertion was wrong - without changing direction ... the basis of the boomerang theory. no it is not the example of the dynamics of the moment after singularity.

your "example" is inaccurate for the matter involved - as would be required, their trajectory ... the errant example shows a finite angle of trajectory whether deliberate or not - as they do not perceive a straight line you obviously do not understand - does not exist.

just the initial detonation of the grande would be instructional in relation to the above diagram - neither of which would or does dispels the cyclical bb.

 

[ding]

View attachment 674167

grow up bing, your assertion was wrong - without changing direction ... the basis of the boomerang theory. no it is not the example of the dynamics of the moment after singularity.

your "example" is inaccurate for the matter involved - as would be required, their trajectory ... the errant example shows a finite angle of trajectory whether deliberate or not - as they do not perceive a straight line you obviously do not understand - does not exist.

just the initial detonation of the grande would be instructional in relation to the above diagram - neither of which would or does dispels the cyclical bb.

There's no credible science that exists to back up what you are alleging. You can't link to any credible site that discusses this. It's as made up as your so-called religion of antiquity.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I made no wager, where did you get that?

You regurgitated Pascal's wager. Did you think you made it up?

 

[Redfish]

You regurgitated Pascal's wager. Did you think you made it up?

its truth no matter who say it. Bottom line-------I do not care what you believe or where you end up.