🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Benghazi - There is nothing there

There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Harry Truman had a sign on his desk that said "The Buck Stops Here." Obama has a sign on his desk that says "It's Bush's Fault."
And dumbasses blame the Republicans in Congress for performing their Constitutional duty of oversight.

And you hypocrites make a mountain out of a molehill and ignore the catastrophes.

Conservatives have a sign on their forehead that says "Democrats are responsible for everything bad that happens, even if it's an obvious conservative mistake.

Yo, you really do have a closed-mind, living in La-La-Land!!!

"GTP"
1democrat-full.jpg
 
There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Harry Truman had a sign on his desk that said "The Buck Stops Here." Obama has a sign on his desk that says "It's Bush's Fault."
And dumbasses blame the Republicans in Congress for performing their Constitutional duty of oversight.

And you hypocrites make a mountain out of a molehill and ignore the catastrophes.

Conservatives have a sign on their forehead that says "Democrats are responsible for everything bad that happens, even if it's an obvious conservative mistake.

Oh so you consider the deaths of four good men and her stupidity, carelessness and incompetence a mole hill??
Obviously you don't even consider 9/11 even a molehill....as you've not yet admitted that Bush was to blame, or made any comment condemning him. So why feign such concern over Benghazi? Hypocrite.

Guess we all see what kind of a biased uncaring Hitlery supporter you are.
And we can see what kind of biased uncaring conservative supporter you are.

A supporter who will overlook anything even death so you can vote for an incompetent for POTUS.

Bwahahaha....the only incompetent candidate is your party's buffoon, Trumpf. Even your own politicians have admitted so.
Carry on sheep.
Yes, lemming, carry on.
 
There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Harry Truman had a sign on his desk that said "The Buck Stops Here." Obama has a sign on his desk that says "It's Bush's Fault."
And dumbasses blame the Republicans in Congress for performing their Constitutional duty of oversight.

And you hypocrites make a mountain out of a molehill and ignore the catastrophes.

Conservatives have a sign on their forehead that says "Democrats are responsible for everything bad that happens, even if it's an obvious conservative mistake.

Yo, you really do have a closed-mind, living in La-La-Land!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 80856

And you live in Bubba-land with such an open mind? Bwahahaha!

gop_fearmongers_poster-r4961f12516ae4ffd9909d94a4e22cd9f_6z7_8byvr_324.jpg
 
There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Hillary Clinton said Ambassador Stevens was a good friend; however, he did not have her cell phone number or her email address. When Clinton was asked about the last time she spoke with Ambassador Stevens, she couldn't recall that it was the day he was sworn in. Shame!

The report detailed the mountain of evidence that proves the Clinton State Department knew full well that the annex in Benghazi was woefully unsecured and they did nothing to fix the problem. Benghazi was the birth-place of the revolution that over-turned the Libyan government. It was a hot bed of radical activity. It should have been the most secure place for American diplomats in Libya. Instead, it was a security disaster.

The report said the Benghazi mission made repeated requests for new agents in late 2011 and early 2012. After a series of attacks on international targets in the city, more requests were made. But “no additional resources were provided by Washington D.C. to fortify the compound after the first two attacks. No additional personnel were sent to secure the facility, despite repeated requests for security experts on the ground.”

The report, citing a cable from the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, suggests there simply were not sufficient resources in the unstable nation to send to properly protect Benghazi. In early August 2012, there were only 34 security staff at the embassy. By the end of the month there were only six.

l\Let’s not forget that one of Clinton’s closest advisers, Sidney Blumenthal, encouraged Clinton to “take credit” for the Libya “success”:

“This is an historic moment and you will be credited for realizing it,” he wrote August 22, 2011. “When Qaddafi is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation house. You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment.” Mrs. Clinton didn’t appear to respond to that message, either.

Libya was historic alright. And if Clinton should have been “credited” for it, than she should also shoulder the blame for the disaster it ended up being for the Benghazi four, as well as the continued debacle it is for the Libyan people and the entire region. Even President Obama has called the Libya aftermath the “greatest mistake” of his presidency.

And who saved the Americans at the Annex? It was Qaddfi's offcer militia.

For weeks, the White House Promoted the lie that the attack was because of a video, The Innocence of Muslims. Remember, it was only 56 days before the Presidential election, and Obama and the State Dept. placed politics above American lives.

Tell all that to the Republicans leading the witch hunt and continuing to hold hearings after not finding any blame. You all can't seem to accept facts.....even from your own party politicians....I think the problem lies in you, as 13 investigations have turned up NOTHING. Deal with it.

Hillary Clinton lied under oath, but according to FBI Director Comey, she's too unsophisticated and incompetent to undertand.
Well, she is a democrat so that's a given. She's not quite as stupid as the dude who thought Guam would tip over but close.

Isn't he her cousin?
 
There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Hillary Clinton said Ambassador Stevens was a good friend; however, he did not have her cell phone number or her email address. When Clinton was asked about the last time she spoke with Ambassador Stevens, she couldn't recall that it was the day he was sworn in. Shame!

The report detailed the mountain of evidence that proves the Clinton State Department knew full well that the annex in Benghazi was woefully unsecured and they did nothing to fix the problem. Benghazi was the birth-place of the revolution that over-turned the Libyan government. It was a hot bed of radical activity. It should have been the most secure place for American diplomats in Libya. Instead, it was a security disaster.

The report said the Benghazi mission made repeated requests for new agents in late 2011 and early 2012. After a series of attacks on international targets in the city, more requests were made. But “no additional resources were provided by Washington D.C. to fortify the compound after the first two attacks. No additional personnel were sent to secure the facility, despite repeated requests for security experts on the ground.”

The report, citing a cable from the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, suggests there simply were not sufficient resources in the unstable nation to send to properly protect Benghazi. In early August 2012, there were only 34 security staff at the embassy. By the end of the month there were only six.

l\Let’s not forget that one of Clinton’s closest advisers, Sidney Blumenthal, encouraged Clinton to “take credit” for the Libya “success”:

“This is an historic moment and you will be credited for realizing it,” he wrote August 22, 2011. “When Qaddafi is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation house. You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment.” Mrs. Clinton didn’t appear to respond to that message, either.

Libya was historic alright. And if Clinton should have been “credited” for it, than she should also shoulder the blame for the disaster it ended up being for the Benghazi four, as well as the continued debacle it is for the Libyan people and the entire region. Even President Obama has called the Libya aftermath the “greatest mistake” of his presidency.

And who saved the Americans at the Annex? It was Qaddfi's offcer militia.

For weeks, the White House Promoted the lie that the attack was because of a video, The Innocence of Muslims. Remember, it was only 56 days before the Presidential election, and Obama and the State Dept. placed politics above American lives.

Tell all that to the Republicans leading the witch hunt and continuing to hold hearings after not finding any blame. You all can't seem to accept facts.....even from your own party politicians....I think the problem lies in you, as 13 investigations have turned up NOTHING. Deal with it.

Hillary Clinton lied under oath, but according to FBI Director Comey, she's too unsophisticated and incompetent to undertand.
Well, she is a democrat so that's a given. She's not quite as stupid as the dude who thought Guam would tip over but close.

Isn't he her cousin?


Bwahahaha....aren't you all the ones who thought Palin was competent to be VP and maybe even President? She thought that Paul Revere warned the British.....you probably do too!
 
There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Hillary Clinton said Ambassador Stevens was a good friend; however, he did not have her cell phone number or her email address. When Clinton was asked about the last time she spoke with Ambassador Stevens, she couldn't recall that it was the day he was sworn in. Shame!

The report detailed the mountain of evidence that proves the Clinton State Department knew full well that the annex in Benghazi was woefully unsecured and they did nothing to fix the problem. Benghazi was the birth-place of the revolution that over-turned the Libyan government. It was a hot bed of radical activity. It should have been the most secure place for American diplomats in Libya. Instead, it was a security disaster.

The report said the Benghazi mission made repeated requests for new agents in late 2011 and early 2012. After a series of attacks on international targets in the city, more requests were made. But “no additional resources were provided by Washington D.C. to fortify the compound after the first two attacks. No additional personnel were sent to secure the facility, despite repeated requests for security experts on the ground.”

The report, citing a cable from the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, suggests there simply were not sufficient resources in the unstable nation to send to properly protect Benghazi. In early August 2012, there were only 34 security staff at the embassy. By the end of the month there were only six.

hem

l\Let’s not forget that one of Clinton’s closest advisers, Sidney Blumenthal, encouraged Clinton to “take credit” for the Libya “success”:

“This is an historic moment and you will be credited for realizing it,” he wrote August 22, 2011. “When Qaddafi is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation house. You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment.” Mrs. Clinton didn’t appear to respond to that message, either.

Libya was historic alright. And if Clinton should have been “credited” for it, than she should also shoulder the blame for the disaster it ended up being for the Benghazi four, as well as the continued debacle it is for the Libyan people and the entire region. Even President Obama has called the Libya aftermath the “greatest mistake” of his presidency.

And who saved the Americans at the Annex? It was Qaddfi's offcer militia.

For weeks, the White House Promoted the lie that the attack was because of a video, The Innocence of Muslims. Remember, it was only 56 days before the Presidential election, and Obama and the State Dept. placed politics above American lives.

Tell all that to the Republicans leading the witch hunt and continuing to hold hearings after not finding any blame. You all can't seem to accept facts.....even from your own party politicians....I think the problem lies in you, as 13 investigations have turned up NOTHING. Deal with it.

Hillary Clinton lied under oath, but according to FBI Director Comey, she's too unsophisticated and incompetent to undertand.
Well, she is a democrat so that's a given. She's not quite as stupid as the dude who thought Guam would tip over but close.

There are none as stupid as the Republicans who keep beating a dead horse and the idiots who support them.
Hillary Clinton said Ambassador Stevens was a good friend; however, he did not have her cell phone number or her email address. When Clinton was asked about the last time she spoke with Ambassador Stevens, she couldn't recall that it was the day he was sworn in. Shame!

The report detailed the mountain of evidence that proves the Clinton State Department knew full well that the annex in Benghazi was woefully unsecured and they did nothing to fix the problem. Benghazi was the birth-place of the revolution that over-turned the Libyan government. It was a hot bed of radical activity. It should have been the most secure place for American diplomats in Libya. Instead, it was a security disaster.

The report said the Benghazi mission made repeated requests for new agents in late 2011 and early 2012. After a series of attacks on international targets in the city, more requests were made. But “no additional resources were provided by Washington D.C. to fortify the compound after the first two attacks. No additional personnel were sent to secure the facility, despite repeated requests for security experts on the ground.”

The report, citing a cable from the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, suggests there simply were not sufficient resources in the unstable nation to send to properly protect Benghazi. In early August 2012, there were only 34 security staff at the embassy. By the end of the month there were only six.

l\Let’s not forget that one of Clinton’s closest advisers, Sidney Blumenthal, encouraged Clinton to “take credit” for the Libya “success”:

“This is an historic moment and you will be credited for realizing it,” he wrote August 22, 2011. “When Qaddafi is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation house. You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment.” Mrs. Clinton didn’t appear to respond to that message, either.

Libya was historic alright. And if Clinton should have been “credited” for it, than she should also shoulder the blame for the disaster it ended up being for the Benghazi four, as well as the continued debacle it is for the Libyan people and the entire region. Even President Obama has called the Libya aftermath the “greatest mistake” of his presidency.

And who saved the Americans at the Annex? It was Qaddfi's offcer militia.

For weeks, the White House Promoted the lie that the attack was because of a video, The Innocence of Muslims. Remember, it was only 56 days before the Presidential election, and Obama and the State Dept. placed politics above American lives.

Tell all that to the Republicans leading the witch hunt and continuing to hold hearings after not finding any blame. You all can't seem to accept facts.....even from your own party politicians....I think the problem lies in you, as 13 investigations have turned up NOTHING. Deal with it.

Hillary Clinton lied under oath, but according to FBI Director Comey, she's too unsophisticated and incompetent to undertand.
Well, she is a democrat so that's a given. She's not quite as stupid as the dude who thought Guam would tip over but close.

Isn't he her cousin?


Bwahahaha....aren't you all the ones who thought Palin was competent to be VP and maybe even President? She thought that Paul Revere warned the British.....you probably do too!

Do you think it was Paul Revere?
 
There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Harry Truman had a sign on his desk that said "The Buck Stops Here." Obama has a sign on his desk that says "It's Bush's Fault."
And dumbasses blame the Republicans in Congress for performing their Constitutional duty of oversight.

And you hypocrites make a mountain out of a molehill and ignore the catastrophes.

Conservatives have a sign on their forehead that says "Democrats are responsible for everything bad that happens, even if it's an obvious conservative mistake.

Yo, you really do have a closed-mind, living in La-La-Land!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 80856

And you live in Bubba-land with such an open mind? Bwahahaha!

gop_fearmongers_poster-r4961f12516ae4ffd9909d94a4e22cd9f_6z7_8byvr_324.jpg

Yo,
mymiddlefingerboner-01.jpg

"GTP"
 
Hillary Clinton said Ambassador Stevens was a good friend; however, he did not have her cell phone number or her email address. When Clinton was asked about the last time she spoke with Ambassador Stevens, she couldn't recall that it was the day he was sworn in. Shame!

The report detailed the mountain of evidence that proves the Clinton State Department knew full well that the annex in Benghazi was woefully unsecured and they did nothing to fix the problem. Benghazi was the birth-place of the revolution that over-turned the Libyan government. It was a hot bed of radical activity. It should have been the most secure place for American diplomats in Libya. Instead, it was a security disaster.

The report said the Benghazi mission made repeated requests for new agents in late 2011 and early 2012. After a series of attacks on international targets in the city, more requests were made. But “no additional resources were provided by Washington D.C. to fortify the compound after the first two attacks. No additional personnel were sent to secure the facility, despite repeated requests for security experts on the ground.”

The report, citing a cable from the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, suggests there simply were not sufficient resources in the unstable nation to send to properly protect Benghazi. In early August 2012, there were only 34 security staff at the embassy. By the end of the month there were only six.

l\Let’s not forget that one of Clinton’s closest advisers, Sidney Blumenthal, encouraged Clinton to “take credit” for the Libya “success”:

“This is an historic moment and you will be credited for realizing it,” he wrote August 22, 2011. “When Qaddafi is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation house. You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment.” Mrs. Clinton didn’t appear to respond to that message, either.

Libya was historic alright. And if Clinton should have been “credited” for it, than she should also shoulder the blame for the disaster it ended up being for the Benghazi four, as well as the continued debacle it is for the Libyan people and the entire region. Even President Obama has called the Libya aftermath the “greatest mistake” of his presidency.

And who saved the Americans at the Annex? It was Qaddfi's offcer militia.

For weeks, the White House Promoted the lie that the attack was because of a video, The Innocence of Muslims. Remember, it was only 56 days before the Presidential election, and Obama and the State Dept. placed politics above American lives.

Tell all that to the Republicans leading the witch hunt and continuing to hold hearings after not finding any blame. You all can't seem to accept facts.....even from your own party politicians....I think the problem lies in you, as 13 investigations have turned up NOTHING. Deal with it.

Hillary Clinton lied under oath, but according to FBI Director Comey, she's too unsophisticated and incompetent to undertand.
Well, she is a democrat so that's a given. She's not quite as stupid as the dude who thought Guam would tip over but close.

Isn't he her cousin?


Bwahahaha....aren't you all the ones who thought Palin was competent to be VP and maybe even President? She thought that Paul Revere warned the British.....you probably do too!
Palin was a successful Gov. Of a state. She would have made a better President than the scum you put in there.
 
The only sure thing at Benghazi are four dead men and an incompetent HItlery and her State Department.

According to two Republican led hearings, Hillary is free of blame...that's another sure thing.

The only sure thing about Benghazi is that "there is nothing there" but that doesn't stop the looneys from trying to find something.




Being incompetent isn't a crime so of course she committed no crime But both she and her State Department were grossly incompetent.

They had months of warnings. Warnings the Brits and Red Cross took seriously enough to pull their people out of the area. That's what our State Department should have done.

If they had done that, there would have been no Benghazi. Because they did nothing we have four dead men because of that nothing.

If you don't find that something to be concerned about then there is no hope for you at all.

What part of "no wrongdoing on the part of Hillary Clinton" do you not understand? All the other bullshit you hypocrites come up with doesn't matter, considering the crap you all are willing to ignore.


WASHINGTON — Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the House Select Committee on Benghazi issued its final report on Tuesday, finding no new evidence of culpability or wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton in the 2012 attacks in Libya that left four Americans dead.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0


George W Bush had warnings about 9/11 and totally ignored them. More than 3k people died. If you don't find that fact something to be concerned about, and much worse than Benghazi then there is no hope for any of you conservatives.

The threat warnings that George W. Bush’s White House received—and reportedly brushed off—prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks were more dire than previously known, Politico reported on Thursday. In a blockbuster account by Chris Whipple, based on interviews he did for a Showtime documentary, former chief of the CIA’s counterterrorism center Cofer Black and former CIA director George Tenet described how they spent the months leading up to 9/11 trying to warn the White House that a spectacular attack was imminent and that the country needed to take urgent action, but to no avail.
The Pre-9/11 Warnings Bush’s Team Ignored Were Way More Intense Than We Thought

Oh there was no wrongdoing. Incompetence isn't a crime but if Hitlery were in the private sector she would have lost her job long ago.
And Bush would be in jail, where he belongs.

Oh and thanks for the deflection to Bush and I know you realize the topic isn't Bush. Its incompetent Hitlery.

Actually the topic is "Benghazi, there is nothing there" - even though you conservatives want so much for something to be there.

And yeah, you hypocrites don't like it when your hypocrisy is shoved in your face. It's not that bad when 3000+ people die under Republican watch....but it's a catastrophic when 4 people died under Hillary Clinton.


Carry on sheep.

Yeah, nothing is going to change your hypocritical ass. Carry on, lemming.

The truth hurts doesn't it.

The op isn't about 9/11. But the whole thing was planned on Clinton's watch. So if you want to blame anyone besides the dirtbags flying the plane then Clinton and Bush deserve equal condemnation.

Carry on sheep.
 
There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Harry Truman had a sign on his desk that said "The Buck Stops Here." Obama has a sign on his desk that says "It's Bush's Fault."
And dumbasses blame the Republicans in Congress for performing their Constitutional duty of oversight.

And you hypocrites make a mountain out of a molehill and ignore the catastrophes.

Conservatives have a sign on their forehead that says "Democrats are responsible for everything bad that happens, even if it's an obvious conservative mistake.

Yo, you really do have a closed-mind, living in La-La-Land!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 80856

And you live in Bubba-land with such an open mind? Bwahahaha!

gop_fearmongers_poster-r4961f12516ae4ffd9909d94a4e22cd9f_6z7_8byvr_324.jpg

Yo,
View attachment 80860
"GTP"

Well, shove it up your ass.
 
Tell all that to the Republicans leading the witch hunt and continuing to hold hearings after not finding any blame. You all can't seem to accept facts.....even from your own party politicians....I think the problem lies in you, as 13 investigations have turned up NOTHING. Deal with it.

Hillary Clinton lied under oath, but according to FBI Director Comey, she's too unsophisticated and incompetent to undertand.
Well, she is a democrat so that's a given. She's not quite as stupid as the dude who thought Guam would tip over but close.

Isn't he her cousin?


Bwahahaha....aren't you all the ones who thought Palin was competent to be VP and maybe even President? She thought that Paul Revere warned the British.....you probably do too!
Palin was a successful Gov. Of a state. She would have made a better President than the scum you put in there.

Successful governors don't quit mid-term.....bwahahaha!

You only think she's smart because doofus Bush was so dumb.
 
According to two Republican led hearings, Hillary is free of blame...that's another sure thing.

The only sure thing about Benghazi is that "there is nothing there" but that doesn't stop the looneys from trying to find something.




Being incompetent isn't a crime so of course she committed no crime But both she and her State Department were grossly incompetent.

They had months of warnings. Warnings the Brits and Red Cross took seriously enough to pull their people out of the area. That's what our State Department should have done.

If they had done that, there would have been no Benghazi. Because they did nothing we have four dead men because of that nothing.

If you don't find that something to be concerned about then there is no hope for you at all.

What part of "no wrongdoing on the part of Hillary Clinton" do you not understand? All the other bullshit you hypocrites come up with doesn't matter, considering the crap you all are willing to ignore.


WASHINGTON — Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the House Select Committee on Benghazi issued its final report on Tuesday, finding no new evidence of culpability or wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton in the 2012 attacks in Libya that left four Americans dead.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0


George W Bush had warnings about 9/11 and totally ignored them. More than 3k people died. If you don't find that fact something to be concerned about, and much worse than Benghazi then there is no hope for any of you conservatives.

The threat warnings that George W. Bush’s White House received—and reportedly brushed off—prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks were more dire than previously known, Politico reported on Thursday. In a blockbuster account by Chris Whipple, based on interviews he did for a Showtime documentary, former chief of the CIA’s counterterrorism center Cofer Black and former CIA director George Tenet described how they spent the months leading up to 9/11 trying to warn the White House that a spectacular attack was imminent and that the country needed to take urgent action, but to no avail.
The Pre-9/11 Warnings Bush’s Team Ignored Were Way More Intense Than We Thought

Oh there was no wrongdoing. Incompetence isn't a crime but if Hitlery were in the private sector she would have lost her job long ago.
And Bush would be in jail, where he belongs.

Oh and thanks for the deflection to Bush and I know you realize the topic isn't Bush. Its incompetent Hitlery.

Actually the topic is "Benghazi, there is nothing there" - even though you conservatives want so much for something to be there.

And yeah, you hypocrites don't like it when your hypocrisy is shoved in your face. It's not that bad when 3000+ people die under Republican watch....but it's a catastrophic when 4 people died under Hillary Clinton.


Carry on sheep.

Yeah, nothing is going to change your hypocritical ass. Carry on, lemming.

The truth hurts doesn't it.
You wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in the ass.

The op isn't about 9/11. But the whole thing was planned on Clinton's watch. So if you want to blame anyone besides the dirtbags flying the plane then Clinton and Bush deserve equal condemnation.
It doesn't matter. We're talking the same type of occurrence. You just don't like it because it highlights your hypocrisy. There were far more embassy attacks under Bush then Obama...but I guess they are not as important as Benghazi? I wonder why? Because Hillary wasn't Sec of State?

Carry on sheep.

Carry on, lemming.[/QUOTE]
 

Nothing there? Remind me to swipe my memory of the dearth of evidence dug up against Hillary. Was there nothing to the e-mail scandal while we're white washing sh**?


While you're at it, be sure to swipe the memory of the dearth of evidence that doofus Bush destroyed millions of e-mails and the conservative lemming said nothing.....not to mention he ignored warnings about 9/11 and more than 3000 were killed....swipe that too....and be sure to swipe the evidence that Powell and Rice also had similar occurrences on e-mail.....hypocrite.


1 percenter.........bwahahaha....sure you are....:lol:
 
Last edited:
Being incompetent isn't a crime so of course she committed no crime But both she and her State Department were grossly incompetent.

They had months of warnings. Warnings the Brits and Red Cross took seriously enough to pull their people out of the area. That's what our State Department should have done.

If they had done that, there would have been no Benghazi. Because they did nothing we have four dead men because of that nothing.

If you don't find that something to be concerned about then there is no hope for you at all.

What part of "no wrongdoing on the part of Hillary Clinton" do you not understand? All the other bullshit you hypocrites come up with doesn't matter, considering the crap you all are willing to ignore.


WASHINGTON — Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the House Select Committee on Benghazi issued its final report on Tuesday, finding no new evidence of culpability or wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton in the 2012 attacks in Libya that left four Americans dead.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0


George W Bush had warnings about 9/11 and totally ignored them. More than 3k people died. If you don't find that fact something to be concerned about, and much worse than Benghazi then there is no hope for any of you conservatives.

The threat warnings that George W. Bush’s White House received—and reportedly brushed off—prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks were more dire than previously known, Politico reported on Thursday. In a blockbuster account by Chris Whipple, based on interviews he did for a Showtime documentary, former chief of the CIA’s counterterrorism center Cofer Black and former CIA director George Tenet described how they spent the months leading up to 9/11 trying to warn the White House that a spectacular attack was imminent and that the country needed to take urgent action, but to no avail.
The Pre-9/11 Warnings Bush’s Team Ignored Were Way More Intense Than We Thought

Oh there was no wrongdoing. Incompetence isn't a crime but if Hitlery were in the private sector she would have lost her job long ago.
And Bush would be in jail, where he belongs.

Oh and thanks for the deflection to Bush and I know you realize the topic isn't Bush. Its incompetent Hitlery.

Actually the topic is "Benghazi, there is nothing there" - even though you conservatives want so much for something to be there.

And yeah, you hypocrites don't like it when your hypocrisy is shoved in your face. It's not that bad when 3000+ people die under Republican watch....but it's a catastrophic when 4 people died under Hillary Clinton.


Carry on sheep.

Yeah, nothing is going to change your hypocritical ass. Carry on, lemming.

The truth hurts doesn't it.
You wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in the ass.

The op isn't about 9/11. But the whole thing was planned on Clinton's watch. So if you want to blame anyone besides the dirtbags flying the plane then Clinton and Bush deserve equal condemnation.
It doesn't matter. We're talking the same type of occurrence. You just don't like it because it highlights your hypocrisy. There were far more embassy attacks under Bush then Obama...but I guess they are not as important as Benghazi? I wonder why? Because Hillary wasn't Sec of State?

Carry on sheep.

Carry on, lemming.
[/QUOTE]

The truth does hurt even if a sheep like you won't admit it.

Carry on sheep.
 

Nothing there? Remind me to swipe my memory of the dearth of evidence dug up against Hillary. Was there nothing to the e-mail scandal while we're white washing sh**?


While you're at it, be sure to swipe the memory of the dearth of evidence that doofus Bush destroyed millions of e-mails and the conservative lemming said nothing.....not to mention he ignored warnings about 9/11 and more than 3000 were killed....swipe that too....and be sure to swipe the evidence that Powell and Rice also had similar occurrences on e-mail.....hypocrite.

Justifying someone's behavior with allegations against another doesn't make you an analyst. It makes you a political lemming.
 

Nothing there? Remind me to swipe my memory of the dearth of evidence dug up against Hillary. Was there nothing to the e-mail scandal while we're white washing sh**?


While you're at it, be sure to swipe the memory of the dearth of evidence that doofus Bush destroyed millions of e-mails and the conservative lemming said nothing.....not to mention he ignored warnings about 9/11 and more than 3000 were killed....swipe that too....and be sure to swipe the evidence that Powell and Rice also had similar occurrences on e-mail.....hypocrite.

Justifying someone's behavior with allegations against another doesn't make you an analyst. It makes you a political lemming.


Bwahahaha.....and feigning such concern over something your party has done over and over makes you a "hypocrite"!
 

Nothing there? Remind me to swipe my memory of the dearth of evidence dug up against Hillary. Was there nothing to the e-mail scandal while we're white washing sh**?


While you're at it, be sure to swipe the memory of the dearth of evidence that doofus Bush destroyed millions of e-mails and the conservative lemming said nothing.....not to mention he ignored warnings about 9/11 and more than 3000 were killed....swipe that too....and be sure to swipe the evidence that Powell and Rice also had similar occurrences on e-mail.....hypocrite.

Justifying someone's behavior with allegations against another doesn't make you an analyst. It makes you a political lemming.

Which Mertex is. The truth does hurt though and you can bet it will never be acknowledged by the sheep Mertex is. She/he/it will vote for Hitlery and completely ignore her incompetence and tell everyone what a great POTUS she will be.

What an idiot.
 
What part of "no wrongdoing on the part of Hillary Clinton" do you not understand? All the other bullshit you hypocrites come up with doesn't matter, considering the crap you all are willing to ignore.


WASHINGTON — Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the House Select Committee on Benghazi issued its final report on Tuesday, finding no new evidence of culpability or wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton in the 2012 attacks in Libya that left four Americans dead.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0


George W Bush had warnings about 9/11 and totally ignored them. More than 3k people died. If you don't find that fact something to be concerned about, and much worse than Benghazi then there is no hope for any of you conservatives.

The threat warnings that George W. Bush’s White House received—and reportedly brushed off—prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks were more dire than previously known, Politico reported on Thursday. In a blockbuster account by Chris Whipple, based on interviews he did for a Showtime documentary, former chief of the CIA’s counterterrorism center Cofer Black and former CIA director George Tenet described how they spent the months leading up to 9/11 trying to warn the White House that a spectacular attack was imminent and that the country needed to take urgent action, but to no avail.
The Pre-9/11 Warnings Bush’s Team Ignored Were Way More Intense Than We Thought

Oh there was no wrongdoing. Incompetence isn't a crime but if Hitlery were in the private sector she would have lost her job long ago.
And Bush would be in jail, where he belongs.

Oh and thanks for the deflection to Bush and I know you realize the topic isn't Bush. Its incompetent Hitlery.

Actually the topic is "Benghazi, there is nothing there" - even though you conservatives want so much for something to be there.

And yeah, you hypocrites don't like it when your hypocrisy is shoved in your face. It's not that bad when 3000+ people die under Republican watch....but it's a catastrophic when 4 people died under Hillary Clinton.


Carry on sheep.

Yeah, nothing is going to change your hypocritical ass. Carry on, lemming.

The truth hurts doesn't it.
You wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in the ass.

The op isn't about 9/11. But the whole thing was planned on Clinton's watch. So if you want to blame anyone besides the dirtbags flying the plane then Clinton and Bush deserve equal condemnation.
It doesn't matter. We're talking the same type of occurrence. You just don't like it because it highlights your hypocrisy. There were far more embassy attacks under Bush then Obama...but I guess they are not as important as Benghazi? I wonder why? Because Hillary wasn't Sec of State?

Carry on sheep.

Carry on, lemming.

The truth does hurt even if a sheep like you won't admit it.
Like I said, you wouldn't know truth if it bit you in the ass.

Carry on lemming.
 

Nothing there? Remind me to swipe my memory of the dearth of evidence dug up against Hillary. Was there nothing to the e-mail scandal while we're white washing sh**?


While you're at it, be sure to swipe the memory of the dearth of evidence that doofus Bush destroyed millions of e-mails and the conservative lemming said nothing.....not to mention he ignored warnings about 9/11 and more than 3000 were killed....swipe that too....and be sure to swipe the evidence that Powell and Rice also had similar occurrences on e-mail.....hypocrite.

Justifying someone's behavior with allegations against another doesn't make you an analyst. It makes you a political lemming.


Bwahahaha.....and feigning such concern over something your party has done over and over makes you a "hypocrite"!

Madam President my ass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top