pinqy
Gold Member
where was point B? The driver didn't know. The driver made a good faith effort to fulfill the contract, but was unable to, due solely to the passenger's inebriation and inability to communicate. The driver then chose to end the ride, as was his right. The passenger's assault was unprovoked and not self-defense.Obviously there was a legally binding verbal contract between the cab driver and the passenger to take him from point A to point B. Instead, he took him somewhere else in the middle of the night.Wait, telling someone to get out of your car is carrying them off by force or fraud? I'd love to hear that explanation.Wrong.He didn't perform the job he was hired to do. And he put a passenger in danger. And that is before he illegally assaulted his victim with a chemical weapon. That is felonious assault.
That driver should be in prison.
he threw a belligerent drunk out of his car -- which he had every right to do.
and then he protected himself from the belligerent drunk.... which he had every right to do.
The passenger was defending himself from a kidnapper.
he only used force when the guy punched him from the back seat.
you mean he should have let the drunk beat him?
Last edited: