Bernie's "Sarah Palin" moment. The interview we've all been waiting for.

[NightFox]

Sanders expressed uncertainty over facts, said he couldn't give a proper answer to a question because he didn't have all the relevant information, or simply stated, "I don't know."

"If Hillary [Clinton] gave answers like this to [an editorial] board, she would be crucified," tweeted Mark Halperin, the Bloomberg television host and co-author of "Game Change."

LOL, no shit... Bernie answered the questions honestly, if Hillary tried to do that she'd burst into flames and she'd be kicked out of the Liar, Liar Pants on Fire Club.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Bernie Sanders feeling media heat after new interview - CNNPolitics.com

Sanders expressed uncertainty over facts, said he couldn't give a proper answer to a question because he didn't have all the relevant information, or simply stated, "I don't know."

"If Hillary [Clinton] gave answers like this to [an editorial] board, she would be crucified," tweeted Mark Halperin, the Bloomberg television host and co-author of "Game Change."

Full Transcript with audio:

TRANSCRIPT: Bernie Sanders meets with News Editorial Board

The scary Bernie Sanders

Both conflicts produced accusations that Israel had inflicted an unacceptable death toll on Palestinians — despite having gone many extra miles to spare civilians whom Hamas had deliberately put in harm’s way.

Bernie Bombs in NYDN Editorial Meeting, Reveals Just How Substance-Free His Campaign Is

For all the attention that Donald Trump has gotten for his policy-free trainwreck of an editorial meeting with The Washington Post and later The New York Times, not much attention has been given to the fact that Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders gave an equally disastrous interview to the editorial board of the New York Daily News.

NYDN released its transcript of the editorial meeting late last night, and boy is it a doozy. The worst parts are below, but those with the time to spare should really read the whole thing. Suffice it say, it was more or less an hour-long exercise in the editors asking serious and well thought-out questions about policy, and Sanders revealing that he was in way, way over his head.

-------------------------------------

I've been saying it had to happen. And now Hillary has plenty of ammo for their next debate.

Check this out:

--------------------

Would there be a consumer bank? Where would the investing go?

Sanders: I’m not running JPMorgan Chase or Citibank.

Daily News: No. But you’d be breaking it up.

Sanders: That’s right. And that is their decision as to what they want to do and how they want to reconfigure themselves. That’s not my decision.

And on question after question, Sanders whiffed.

“It’s something I have not studied, honestly, the legal implications of that,” Sanders responded.

On foreign policy, we again see the pattern of Sanders speaking broadly about the issues that need to be fixed, but offering zero concrete answers on how to do so.

---------------
It's like he read my post and is repeating it.
------------------

I’m just telling you that I happen to believe…anybody help me out here, because I don’t remember the figures

“You’re asking me a very fair question, and if I had some paper in front of me, I would give you a better answer,” he said frankly.

Do you believe that he’s got the right policy there?”
Sanders’ response: “I don’t know the answer to that.”

• WOW!​

The media iasnt going to ask gotcha questions in an interview with Clinton.

 

[NightFox]

The media iasnt going to ask gotcha questions in an interview with Clinton.

Yeah why bother? it's not like she's going to answer them honestly anyways, stick to the softballs since with those she might accidentally give an honest answer.

 

[rdean]

It's one thing not knowing every answer. It's another not knowing any.

If you are going to fundamentally change the country, you better know what you are talking about.

Are you Republican. That's an answer I expect from them.

Maybe someone should have told your dear leader that, he had to be the most clueless MF to ever run for the office.

Why? Who knows what you are talking about?

You.

Just saying someone is clueless but not being able to say why is tarded and delusional. Don't you agree?

You're well aware of my criticism of your slime ball dear leader over the years, I'm not going to sit here and rehash the last 6 years. I know you're stupid, but playing dumb isn't becoming.

Cliff notes would work.

 

[rdean]

I don't know why Sanders stumbled during that interview....HOWEVER, in fairness to Sanders, he has long advocated for the re-enactment of a modernized Glass-Steagall Act that IS a conduit to breaking up big banks from investments to savings entities.

So we can't get investment money. And that helps the country how?

And what is too big to fail? Is it a dollar amount? And how much is that dollar amount.

 

[rdean]

Sanders expressed uncertainty over facts, said he couldn't give a proper answer to a question because he didn't have all the relevant information, or simply stated, "I don't know."

"If Hillary [Clinton] gave answers like this to [an editorial] board, she would be crucified," tweeted Mark Halperin, the Bloomberg television host and co-author of "Game Change."

LOL, no shit... Bernie answered the questions honestly, if Hillary tried to do that she'd burst into flames and she'd be kicked out of the Liar, Liar Pants on Fire Club.

"I don't know" is very honest. But it's not an answer I could trust.

 

[RDD_1210]

Your Hillary obsession is fascinating. What do you like about her so much?

 

[nat4900]

So we can't get investment money. And that helps the country how?

Come on, you're smarter than that.....Of course I clearly stated INVESTMENT banks would still be there for them to gamble like any casino....but now, they would have to do it with their OWN investors, instead of folks who thought they had a savings account that was, instead, gambled away and only the FDIC protected the savers.

 

[OKTexas]

Maybe someone should have told your dear leader that, he had to be the most clueless MF to ever run for the office.

Why? Who knows what you are talking about?

You.

Just saying someone is clueless but not being able to say why is tarded and delusional. Don't you agree?

You're well aware of my criticism of your slime ball dear leader over the years, I'm not going to sit here and rehash the last 6 years. I know you're stupid, but playing dumb isn't becoming.

Cliff notes would work.

Sure, feel free to review my 18,000+ posts.

 

[amrchaos]

Good questions!

Try answering them yourself in 15 minutes!

Help with too big too fail.

Was use torfer to companies in which allowing to fail/file bankruptcy is too dangerous for the long term prospects of our economy to allow.

Also any company that performs soo many services for our economy that its failure will lead to systematic harm to our economy.