🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Best Picture winner "Moonlight" was a commercial flop

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,366
280
IMDB says it cost $5 million and grossed $20 mill so it made money but a $20M gross is lousy. Why did it win? More black privilege and pervert privilege AKA affirmative action.

Moonlight (2016) - IMDb
 
Moonlight was about black queers. It was the politically correct choice. I would have been surprised if this piece of homo pro-child abuse piece of shit was not the winner.
 
Lazy cracker OP never accomplished anything and blames blacks because he's a total failure. All he ever does is whine.

In this case, he's whining - not because the film did or did not deserve the award, but only because the actors are black.
 
Never saw the movie but it sounds like something Liberals would love. Not only is the guy black but he's gay too. Now if he was transgender, we'd have the trifecta.
 
Has anyone noticed how crappy the movies are of late coming out of Hollywood. Even 'Arrival' and 'Interstellar' were disappointments. Hollywood sure knows how to start movies but they damned sure don't know how to finish them.
 
Never saw the movie but it sounds like something Liberals would love. Not only is the guy black but he's gay too. Now if he was transgender, we'd have the trifecta.
Ohhh. Disabled! That would have been the trifecta.
 
How much a film costs or profits is not the basis for being awarded an Oscar.

It's not THE basis but it's a big factor. But not here. The libs had to give the oscar to a movie about black fags no matter what. THINK
No, it isn't. The only factor is how many voters in the industry vote for it. They got the most votes. No EC votes over there. One person, one vote situation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top