Bevin: Same-Sex Marriage Will Lead To Parent-Child Marriage

[hazlnut]

Bevin: Same-Sex Marriage Will Lead To Parent-Child Marriage | Right Wing Watch


Sen. Mitch McConnell’s Tea Party-aligned primary challenger Matt Bevin jumped on the ruling and criticized McConnell over his ties to the judge:

I'm deeply disappointed in Judge Heyburn's decision to overturn Kentucky's right to determine the definition of marriage within its own borders. This type of judicial activism hurts America's democratic process.

It is no surprise that Judge Heyburn was Mitch McConnell's general counsel and McConnell recommended him for the federal bench. Kentucky deserves better.
Yesterday on The Janet Mefferd Show, Bevin continued to rail against “judicial activism” and told the anti-gay talk show host that he would be a strong opponent of marriage equality in the Senate.

“Where do you draw the line?” Bevin asked. “If it’s all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage — because at the end of the day a lot of this ends up being taxes and who can visit who in the hospital and there’s other repressions and things that come with it — so a person may want to define themselves as being married to one of their children so that they can then in fact pass on certain things to that child financially and otherwise. Where do you draw the line?”

 

[Andylusion]

Bevin: Same-Sex Marriage Will Lead To Parent-Child Marriage | Right Wing Watch


Sen. Mitch McConnell’s Tea Party-aligned primary challenger Matt Bevin jumped on the ruling and criticized McConnell over his ties to the judge:

I'm deeply disappointed in Judge Heyburn's decision to overturn Kentucky's right to determine the definition of marriage within its own borders. This type of judicial activism hurts America's democratic process.

It is no surprise that Judge Heyburn was Mitch McConnell's general counsel and McConnell recommended him for the federal bench. Kentucky deserves better.
Yesterday on The Janet Mefferd Show, Bevin continued to rail against “judicial activism” and told the anti-gay talk show host that he would be a strong opponent of marriage equality in the Senate.

“Where do you draw the line?” Bevin asked. “If it’s all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage — because at the end of the day a lot of this ends up being taxes and who can visit who in the hospital and there’s other repressions and things that come with it — so a person may want to define themselves as being married to one of their children so that they can then in fact pass on certain things to that child financially and otherwise. Where do you draw the line?”

The title of the thread is mis-leading. You either intentionally, or accidentally imply that the Tea Party Candidate is in favor of parents marrying children, when in fact he's against that, and changing the definition of marriage.

 

[Howey]

The title of the thread is mis-leading. You either intentionally, or accidentally imply that the Tea Party Candidate is in favor of parents marrying children, when in fact he's against that, and changing the definition of marriage.

No, it isn't. Nowhere in that title does the OP say anything about support, and in fact, the teabagger specifically implies exactly what the OP states.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I hope not...On the other hand if you're adult = you should have the right to marry other adults!

 

[Andylusion]

The title of the thread is mis-leading. You either intentionally, or accidentally imply that the Tea Party Candidate is in favor of parents marrying children, when in fact he's against that, and changing the definition of marriage.

No, it isn't. Nowhere in that title does the OP say anything about support, and in fact, the teabagger specifically implies exactly what the OP states.

Ok..... I don't know how you think that. He's saying if you can just redefine marriage to mean whatever you want, then you could redefine it as a parent marrying a child. He's not in favor of redefining marriage, which he makes clear. He's pointing out what the logical conclusion of that would be, which... he's against.

So.... Not sure where you are getting that from.

 

[Katzndogz]

In a degenerate culture like this one, anything is possible.

 

[Moonglow]

I am sure that makes one film director happy happy.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Matt Bevin suffers cognitive dysfunctionalism.

The issue is consent of adults. Children can't consent.

 

[NightFox]

In a degenerate culture like this one, anything is possible.

Yeah but it makes things more interesting....

"Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!
Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...
Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave!
Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria! " -- Ghost Busters

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Bevin: Same-Sex Marriage Will Lead To Parent-Child Marriage | Right Wing Watch


Sen. Mitch McConnell’s Tea Party-aligned primary challenger Matt Bevin jumped on the ruling and criticized McConnell over his ties to the judge:

I'm deeply disappointed in Judge Heyburn's decision to overturn Kentucky's right to determine the definition of marriage within its own borders. This type of judicial activism hurts America's democratic process.

It is no surprise that Judge Heyburn was Mitch McConnell's general counsel and McConnell recommended him for the federal bench. Kentucky deserves better.
Yesterday on The Janet Mefferd Show, Bevin continued to rail against “judicial activism” and told the anti-gay talk show host that he would be a strong opponent of marriage equality in the Senate.

“Where do you draw the line?” Bevin asked. “If it’s all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage — because at the end of the day a lot of this ends up being taxes and who can visit who in the hospital and there’s other repressions and things that come with it — so a person may want to define themselves as being married to one of their children so that they can then in fact pass on certain things to that child financially and otherwise. Where do you draw the line?”

Another ignorant, desperate rightwing demagogue.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The title of the thread is mis-leading. You either intentionally, or accidentally imply that the Tea Party Candidate is in favor of parents marrying children, when in fact he's against that, and changing the definition of marriage.

No, it isn't. Nowhere in that title does the OP say anything about support, and in fact, the teabagger specifically implies exactly what the OP states.

Ok..... I don't know how you think that. He's saying if you can just redefine marriage to mean whatever you want, then you could redefine it as a parent marrying a child. He's not in favor of redefining marriage, which he makes clear. He's pointing out what the logical conclusion of that would be, which... he's against.

So.... Not sure where you are getting that from.

Which is both ignorant and wrong.

No one is seeking to "redefine" marriage; same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage as it exists now, nothing needs to be "changed."

 

[Howey]

The title of the thread is mis-leading. You either intentionally, or accidentally imply that the Tea Party Candidate is in favor of parents marrying children, when in fact he's against that, and changing the definition of marriage.

No, it isn't. Nowhere in that title does the OP say anything about support, and in fact, the teabagger specifically implies exactly what the OP states.

Ok..... I don't know how you think that. He's saying if you can just redefine marriage to mean whatever you want, then you could redefine it as a parent marrying a child. He's not in favor of redefining marriage, which he makes clear. He's pointing out what the logical conclusion of that would be, which... he's against.

So.... Not sure where you are getting that from.

I didn't "think" anything. I read it.

“Where do you draw the line?” Bevin asked. “If it’s all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage — because at the end of the day a lot of this ends up being taxes and who can visit who in the hospital and there’s other repressions and things that come with it — so a person may want to define themselves as being married to one of their children so that they can then in fact pass on certain things to that child financially and otherwise...

Take out the gobbledygook and what do you have?

If it’s all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage o a person may want to define themselves as being married to one of their children

 

[Uncensored2008]

The title of the thread is mis-leading. You either intentionally, or accidentally imply that the Tea Party Candidate is in favor of parents marrying children, when in fact he's against that, and changing the definition of marriage.

Oh, Haznonuts is a dishonest pile of shit, another little Goebbels from DailyKOS.

The left is without integrity, so nothing they post can be trusted.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Matt Bevin suffers cognitive dysfunctionalism.

The issue is consent of adults. Children can't consent.

Consent is a legal term and can be changed......arab countries have young people marry all the time, but our judeo-christain culture led by these rws like me oppose changing it, but democrats like nambla do want consent changed...you just need one or two wacko judges in this country

 

[Uncensored2008]

I hope not...On the other hand if you're adult = you should have the right to marry other adults!

Right now, brothers and sisters cannot marry. Fathers and daughters cannot.

But incest is the new gay.

In the 60's, the move was for acceptance of homosexual. In the 90's, the move was for normalization of homosexuals. Now, the open promotion of homosexuality is everywhere.

Incest is following the same pastern - we currently are in the acceptance stage, with Hollywood showing nice portrayals of healthy incest for us all, so that we can learn that incest is just another choice.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I hope not...On the other hand if you're adult = you should have the right to marry other adults!

Right now, brothers and sisters cannot marry. Fathers and daughters cannot.

But incest is the new gay.

In the 60's, the move was for acceptance of homosexual. In the 90's, the move was for normalization of homosexuals. Now, the open promotion of homosexuality is everywhere.

Incest is following the same pastern - we currently are in the acceptance stage, with Hollywood showing nice portrayals of healthy incest for us all, so that we can learn that incest is just another choice.

Incest as a choice has been around a while. Who do you think Cain and Able were sleeping with, the sheep?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Incest as a choice has been around a while. Who do you think Cain and Able were sleeping with, the sheep?

I don't think metaphors have sex.

Every act that can be thought of has happened before.

Civilization is the establishment of constraints on those acts that harm society. As the constraints fail, civilization crumbles, as ours is.

We are witnessing the decline of Western civilization. You celebrate, because you yearn for a return to the natural state of brutal rulers who impose their will by force. Our little experiment in government by the people is coming to a close. You relish the fact that you will be able to lick the boots of your master as a means of gaining stature, rather than having to actually produce something of worth.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Incest as a choice has been around a while. Who do you think Cain and Able were sleeping with, the sheep?

I don't think metaphors have sex.

Every act that can be thought of has happened before.

Civilization is the establishment of constraints on those acts that harm society. As the constraints fail, civilization crumbles, as ours is.

We are witnessing the decline of Western civilization. You celebrate, because you yearn for a return to the natural state of brutal rulers who impose their will by force. Our little experiment in government by the people is coming to a close. You relish the fact that you will be able to lick the boots of your master as a means of gaining stature, rather than having to actually produce something of worth.

Plato used to bitch about how rotten the kids were and it was all going to hell. Moving on...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Plato used to bitch about how rotten the kids were and it was going to hell. Moving on...

And Greece did fall.

Great civilizations rise, but people hate above all else the responsibility for their own lives, and sooner or later run back to the comfort of chains and whips in the hands of those who will relieve them of thinking.

The left will gladly suffer any degradation in exchange for someone else to blame their plight upon.

 

[Howey]

I hope not...On the other hand if you're adult = you should have the right to marry other adults!

Right now, brothers and sisters cannot marry. Fathers and daughters cannot.

But incest is the new gay.

In the 60's, the move was for acceptance of homosexual. In the 90's, the move was for normalization of homosexuals. Now, the open promotion of homosexuality is everywhere.

Incest is following the same pastern - we currently are in the acceptance stage, with Hollywood showing nice portrayals of healthy incest for us all, so that we can learn that incest is just another choice.

Well.





Damn it all to Hell!










You figured us out!

​

dumbfuck