Bevin: Same-Sex Marriage Will Lead To Parent-Child Marriage | Right Wing Watch
Sen. Mitch McConnells Tea Party-aligned primary challenger Matt Bevin jumped on the ruling and criticized McConnell over his ties to the judge:
I'm deeply disappointed in Judge Heyburn's decision to overturn Kentucky's right to determine the definition of marriage within its own borders. This type of judicial activism hurts America's democratic process.
It is no surprise that Judge Heyburn was Mitch McConnell's general counsel and McConnell recommended him for the federal bench. Kentucky deserves better.
Yesterday on The Janet Mefferd Show, Bevin continued to rail against judicial activism and told the anti-gay talk show host that he would be a strong opponent of marriage equality in the Senate.
Where do you draw the line? Bevin asked. If its all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage because at the end of the day a lot of this ends up being taxes and who can visit who in the hospital and theres other repressions and things that come with it so a person may want to define themselves as being married to one of their children so that they can then in fact pass on certain things to that child financially and otherwise. Where do you draw the line?
Sen. Mitch McConnells Tea Party-aligned primary challenger Matt Bevin jumped on the ruling and criticized McConnell over his ties to the judge:
I'm deeply disappointed in Judge Heyburn's decision to overturn Kentucky's right to determine the definition of marriage within its own borders. This type of judicial activism hurts America's democratic process.
It is no surprise that Judge Heyburn was Mitch McConnell's general counsel and McConnell recommended him for the federal bench. Kentucky deserves better.
Yesterday on The Janet Mefferd Show, Bevin continued to rail against judicial activism and told the anti-gay talk show host that he would be a strong opponent of marriage equality in the Senate.
Where do you draw the line? Bevin asked. If its all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage because at the end of the day a lot of this ends up being taxes and who can visit who in the hospital and theres other repressions and things that come with it so a person may want to define themselves as being married to one of their children so that they can then in fact pass on certain things to that child financially and otherwise. Where do you draw the line?