Is it ever acceptable to bomb a school or a hospital? (Poll)

Is it ever acceptable to bomb a school or a hospital?

  • Yes

    Votes: 12 54.5%
  • No

    Votes: 10 45.5%

  • Total voters
    22
So stay out of it, until it comes here, then you will have to chose.....
Yet Israel is dragging the US and the 'rules based order' into it. Just because you're smug about that doesn't mean it's not happening.
 
There are plenty of us Jews here, literally since colonial times. No terror attacks.
Palestinians and their supporters are not new, but the rise in their numbers is. How long until we see their evil nature?
It's about Israelis, isn't it? That's your other citizenship, or do you have three?
 
You have never been to Egypt, Kuwait or Iran. I understand why you defend the Zionists and trash the Arabs.... and Christianty. What's that you say about "jelly beans"? Justifications for land theft and killing the resistance no longer work. Your religion and ethnicity is not a valid reason for what the Israelis have done .
what does having visited Egypt,
Kuwait, or Iran have to do with
anything? I do not trash arabs or
Christianity. Jelly beans are a candy.
To what "justifications for land theft
and killing resistance" do you refer?
To what does "what the Israelis have
done" do you refer?
 
This discussion is not about me. Its about bombing schools and hospitals.

Hamas has extensive tunnels throughout Gaza, they don't need to put assets under schools or hospitals.

The alternative to bombing schools and hospitals is urban warfare. A better option.
'......they don't need to put assets under
schools or hospitals..." is not the
point. The point is---THEY DO. In
searching out the tunnels used
virtually exclusively for terrorism---the
issue is the entry points which are
located under schools, hospitals,
and mosques.
 
The answer is "NO". I don't care if the enemy had their headquarters there. The answer is still "NO".

US-made munitions used in Israeli strike on Gaza school that killed 22, experts say​



If you take out an entire area or city (Hiroshima or Nagasaki) there will be Hospitals or schools wiped out.

The respondent can do whatever to end the unprovoked aggression. If the enemy concedes they can avoid total wipeout. The enemy owns damages to themselves.

MOAB the crap out of them to WIN and end it. WAR is not a game to practice who can win the cleanest. Don’t risk our soldiers. Wipe theirs off the map.
 
Last edited:
If you take out an entire area or city (Hiroshima or Nagasaki) there will be Hospitals or schools wiped out.

The respondent can do whatever to end the unprovoked aggression. If the enemy concedes they can avoid total wipeout. The enemy owns damages to themselves.

MOAB the crap out of them to WIN and end it. WAR is not a game to practice who can win the cleanest. Don’t risk our soldiers. Wipe theirs off the map.
VERY WELL SAID.
 
Yet Israel is dragging the US and the 'rules based order' into it. Just because you're smug about that doesn't mean it's not happening.
You do understand Israel has nukes, right? You want Hamas to get them?

Born stupid?
 
'......they don't need to put assets under
schools or hospitals..." is not the
point. The point is---THEY DO. In
searching out the tunnels used
virtually exclusively for terrorism---the
issue is the entry points which are
located under schools, hospitals,
and mosques.
IMHO bombing entry points by bombing hospitals, schools, and mosques is barbaric.
A very flimsy excuse to murder innocents.
 
If you take out an entire area or city (Hiroshima or Nagasaki) there will be Hospitals or schools wiped out.
The respondent can do whatever to end the unprovoked aggression. If the enemy concedes they can avoid total wipeout. The enemy owns damages to themselves. MOAB the crap out of them to WIN and end it. WAR is not a game to practice who can win the cleanest. Don’t risk our soldiers. Wipe theirs off the map.
Fighting terrorists is different than fighting an entire country.

Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing hundreds of thousands prevented the need for an invasion and millions of deaths.

Your point that Hamas is widely supported in Gaza is well taken

What you fail to understand is that Hamas will never surrender and accept a peace deal that lets Israel exist.

Hamas doesn't care how many innocents are killed. So you are in favor of genocide, just kill them all, everyone in Gaza.
 
Fighting terrorists is different than fighting an entire country.

Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing hundreds of thousands prevented the need for an invasion and millions of deaths.

Plenty of arguments both ways there.

Atomic bombing of Japan was not necessary to end WWII. US gov't documents admit it - Geopolitical Economy Report


Your point that Hamas is widely supported in Gaza is well taken

What you fail to understand is that Hamas will never surrender and accept a peace deal that lets Israel exist.

Hamas doesn't care how many innocents are killed. So you are in favor of genocide, just kill them all, everyone in Gaza.

I've asked many times how does one define a win. Kill all 6 million Palestinians?
 
What you fail to understand is that Hamas will never surrender and accept a peace deal that lets Israel exist.
What you fail to understand is that, it is their choice. We can’t make it for them. And that, it is exactly this reason that their citizens will die.
 
Hamas doesn't care how many innocents are killed. So you are in favor of genocide, just kill them all, everyone in Gaza
EVERYONE who supports Hamas or has worked with Hamas. Everyone who knows where the hostages are or are keeping the hostages. Everyone who has given aid and comfort to the terrorists
 

Forum List

Back
Top