Biden Best Choice for Democrats..2016

[Lumpy 1]

He's seems to have earned the Democrat trust and loyalty and he's far more qualified than Hillary...

------------------------------------


Since when has a sitting vice president been relegated to the second string of candidates in the race for the White House?

Yet that's what seems to be happening as Hillary Clinton soaks up all the 2016 speculation, leaving Vice President Biden to quietly lay the groundwork for his own possible bid, should he choose to make one. As if to offer a gentle reminder that he is still very much interested in becoming the 2016 Democratic nominee, the vice president has scheduled a major political event next month in Iowa -- where presidential hopefuls must clear the first hurdle, the Iowa caucuses.

Modern history shows every sitting, able-bodied vice president vying for an open seat entered the presidential race as a leading candidate, and went on to become his party’s presidential nominee. From Richard Nixon in 1960 all the way to Al Gore in 2000, sitting vice presidents have enjoyed an evident advantage in seeking the nomination -- though in that period, only George H.W. Bush went on to win the presidency itself in that race. Nixon won on his second attempt, in 1968.

Read more: What about Joe? In Hillary's shadow, Biden takes steps toward possible 2016 bid | Fox News

 

[NightFox]

He's seems to have earned the Democrat trust and loyalty and he's far more qualified than Hillary...

------------------------------------


Since when has a sitting vice president been relegated to the second string of candidates in the race for the White House?

Yet that's what seems to be happening as Hillary Clinton soaks up all the 2016 speculation, leaving Vice President Biden to quietly lay the groundwork for his own possible bid, should he choose to make one. As if to offer a gentle reminder that he is still very much interested in becoming the 2016 Democratic nominee, the vice president has scheduled a major political event next month in Iowa -- where presidential hopefuls must clear the first hurdle, the Iowa caucuses.

Modern history shows every sitting, able-bodied vice president vying for an open seat entered the presidential race as a leading candidate, and went on to become his party’s presidential nominee. From Richard Nixon in 1960 all the way to Al Gore in 2000, sitting vice presidents have enjoyed an evident advantage in seeking the nomination -- though in that period, only George H.W. Bush went on to win the presidency itself in that race. Nixon won on his second attempt, in 1968.

Read more: What about Joe? In Hillary's shadow, Biden takes steps toward possible 2016 bid | Fox News

Not quite sure the Democratic Party base is going to see things that way Lumpy, apparently they actually want to win the White House again in 2016 and while Joe Biden seems to be nice fellow, he puts his foot in his mouth more often the George W. Bush did (quite an accomplishment).

 

[francoHFW]

Impossible. lol

 

[georgephillip]

"Why you shouldn’t underestimate Elizabeth Warren

"But, a new Quinnipiac poll proves why Warren would be formidable in 2016 if she decided to run. Using a feeling thermometer — 0 meaning you feel totally cold about a politician, 100 meaning you feel warmly (aka) strong favorably toward a pol — Quinnipiac tested the majority of major national figures.

"Warren finished third — behind only New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (53.1 degrees) and Hillary Clinton (52.1 degrees). She finished ahead of, among others, President Obama, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Vice President Joe Biden."

How about Ralph Nader as Attorney General?

Why you shouldn?t underestimate Elizabeth Warren

 

[Claudette]

I agree. One would think a sitting VP would be a good candidate for POTUS.

As for Hillary? She should be everyone last choice for POTUS.

 

[Sallow]

I agree. One would think a sitting VP would be a good candidate for POTUS.

As for Hillary? She should be everyone last choice for POTUS.

Don't vote for her then.

And you shouldn't be telling others how to vote.

 

[NightFox]

How about Ralph Nader as Attorney General?

How about Ralph Nader as President? he's orders of magnitude more principled and intelligent than anybody else the Democratic Party is likely to offer up, of course there's the fact that Nader loathes both the major parties to contend with.

 

[Sallow]

How about Ralph Nader as Attorney General?

How about Ralph Nader as President? he's orders of magnitude more principled and intelligent than anybody else the Democratic Party is likely to offer up, of course there's the fact that Nader loathes both the major parties to contend with.

He's tried a few times..no luck.

 

[NightFox]

How about Ralph Nader as Attorney General?

How about Ralph Nader as President? he's orders of magnitude more principled and intelligent than anybody else the Democratic Party is likely to offer up, of course there's the fact that Nader loathes both the major parties to contend with.

He's tried a few times..no luck.

No kiddin', really? he's never run under the banner of either major party and the only time he ran in the Democratic Primaries he was a write in candidate.

I may have many philosophical differences with Mr. Nader but IMHO the man is way too principled and rational to have any association with either of the corrupt, lying incompetent major parties.

 

[georgephillip]

How about Ralph Nader as Attorney General?

How about Ralph Nader as President? he's orders of magnitude more principled and intelligent than anybody else the Democratic Party is likely to offer up, of course there's the fact that Nader loathes both the major parties to contend with.

Ralph's age would probably work against him as a presidential contender, and he's spent decades accusing Democrats of serving the same 1% of voters as Republicans. IMHO, any authentic Hope or Change will start by convincing millions of US voters to stop "choosing" between Republican OR Democrat when selecting their Representatives and Senators. FLUSH a hundred incumbents of both parties from the US Congress in November of 2014, and Elizabeth Warren would not have to say so many nice things about the Clintons and Obama and their Wall Street benefactors.

 

[Claudette]

I agree. One would think a sitting VP would be a good candidate for POTUS.

As for Hillary? She should be everyone last choice for POTUS.

Don't vote for her then.

And you shouldn't be telling others how to vote.

I wouldn't vote for Hil if she were the only candidate.

As for telling others how to vote? Never would. Vote for whom you please.

Grow ups Shallow.

 

[FA_Q2]

I agree. One would think a sitting VP would be a good candidate for POTUS.

As for Hillary? She should be everyone last choice for POTUS.

Don't vote for her then.

And you shouldn't be telling others how to vote.

BWHAHAHAHAHA

Don’t tell others how to vote. How many topics have been started here by the democrats telling republicans who was their ONLY chance or who they should nominate. The republicans have been told by the left that they need to put Christie or Huntsman in the nomination a dozen times. You telling other people to not comment on how they should vote is the epic of hypocrisy.


To the OP – don’t be ridiculous. Biden has no chance. His base would not put him there and there is NO way anyone on the right would endorse him. I don’t think he can bring the middle in so what does he really do other than give the republicans the best chance that they have had in years?

 

[Nova78]

Biden Best Choice for Democrats..2016

 

[Lumpy 1]

Impossible. lol

Turning your back on Biden..Wow

 

[Lumpy 1]

He's seems to have earned the Democrat trust and loyalty and he's far more qualified than Hillary...

------------------------------------


Since when has a sitting vice president been relegated to the second string of candidates in the race for the White House?

Yet that's what seems to be happening as Hillary Clinton soaks up all the 2016 speculation, leaving Vice President Biden to quietly lay the groundwork for his own possible bid, should he choose to make one. As if to offer a gentle reminder that he is still very much interested in becoming the 2016 Democratic nominee, the vice president has scheduled a major political event next month in Iowa -- where presidential hopefuls must clear the first hurdle, the Iowa caucuses.

Modern history shows every sitting, able-bodied vice president vying for an open seat entered the presidential race as a leading candidate, and went on to become his party’s presidential nominee. From Richard Nixon in 1960 all the way to Al Gore in 2000, sitting vice presidents have enjoyed an evident advantage in seeking the nomination -- though in that period, only George H.W. Bush went on to win the presidency itself in that race. Nixon won on his second attempt, in 1968.

Read more: What about Joe? In Hillary's shadow, Biden takes steps toward possible 2016 bid | Fox News

Not quite sure the Democratic Party base is going to see things that way Lumpy, apparently they actually want to win the White House again in 2016 and while Joe Biden seems to be nice fellow, he puts his foot in his mouth more often the George W. Bush did (quite an accomplishment).

.. most everything you've said I agree with but don't be too hasty. When you compare Biden to Clinton she's been found with her foot in her mouth, caught in lies, found to be corrupt, directly responsible for the loss of American patriots lives far more often than Biden. Could you be saying Democrats would prefer the least ethical candidate possible?...

 

[NightFox]

He's seems to have earned the Democrat trust and loyalty and he's far more qualified than Hillary...

------------------------------------


Since when has a sitting vice president been relegated to the second string of candidates in the race for the White House?

Yet that's what seems to be happening as Hillary Clinton soaks up all the 2016 speculation, leaving Vice President Biden to quietly lay the groundwork for his own possible bid, should he choose to make one. As if to offer a gentle reminder that he is still very much interested in becoming the 2016 Democratic nominee, the vice president has scheduled a major political event next month in Iowa -- where presidential hopefuls must clear the first hurdle, the Iowa caucuses.

Modern history shows every sitting, able-bodied vice president vying for an open seat entered the presidential race as a leading candidate, and went on to become his party’s presidential nominee. From Richard Nixon in 1960 all the way to Al Gore in 2000, sitting vice presidents have enjoyed an evident advantage in seeking the nomination -- though in that period, only George H.W. Bush went on to win the presidency itself in that race. Nixon won on his second attempt, in 1968.

Read more: What about Joe? In Hillary's shadow, Biden takes steps toward possible 2016 bid | Fox News

Not quite sure the Democratic Party base is going to see things that way Lumpy, apparently they actually want to win the White House again in 2016 and while Joe Biden seems to be nice fellow, he puts his foot in his mouth more often the George W. Bush did (quite an accomplishment).

.. most everything you've said I agree with but don't be too hasty. When you compare Biden to Clinton she's been found with her foot in her mouth, caught in lies, found to be corrupt, directly responsible for the loss of American patriots lives far more often than Biden. Could you be saying Democrats would prefer the least ethical candidate possible?...

Honestly Lumpy, I think nominating Clinton would be just as big a mistake for the Democrats as nominating Biden, she's not the female version of Bill like the Democrats seem to think she is.

That being said I don't really care who they nominate or who gets elected since it's SSDD.

 

[Wildman]

And you shouldn't be telling others how to vote.

just another dimowit telling a person they have no FIRST AMDT. rights.

oooooh !! when are you dimowits going to decide what you are, are you democRATS or democRATics ??