Biden Kicks Butt At North Carolina Rally Friday ............. = demonstrated fire in the belly

Biden Kicks Butt​


:laughing0301:

The only butt Joe has ever kicked has been his own on the way down in a pratfall as he tripped and fell over that sandbag. A mere 2000 supporters at his rally? Was this a school auditorium expected to be a low turnout or did it have tons of empty seats? Has Trump ever had as few as even 20,000 at any of his? Ten times as much. Meantime, 51 MILLION watched his total face plant on live TV Thursday night (25,000 times as many). And out of that 2,000, probably a significant fraction of them were just officials in the democrat party attending.

:mm:


 

Yeah....and everyone stopped talking about him stepping down.

Except they didn't.

You don't get it.

The guy is on a steep slope to an Alzehiemer's ward.

He might be serviceable for six months. But in a year, he's gone. Simply gone.
 
I suppose if you are really simple you might also be that stupid to believe a story which just coincidentally tries to plug irreparable damage alreay inflicted .
Hardly misinformation .
Just good old fashioned bull shit .
 
The Judge explained how Donald Trump is disqualified from retaking the White House under the 14th Amendment, why the former president is not immune from prosecution, and what a second Trump term would mean for the country (spoiler alert: it wouldn't be good).

Jordan Rubin: Judge, you’ve been thinking a lot lately about this 14th Amendment issue. Why is it so important to democracy, in your view?

J. Michael Luttig
: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment ... disqualifies any person who, having taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, thereafter engages in an insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution of the United States, disqualifying that person from holding high public office in the future, including the presidency.

So it’s more than just a proscription and disqualification for anti-democratic conduct by an individual, but, in this circumstance, it is that and it would apply in this instance to disqualify the former president from holding the presidency again, because of his effort, plan and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election, knowing that he had lost that election to then-candidate Joe Biden.

This is very, very important: Section 3 disqualifies one who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution of the United States, not an insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or the authority of the United States.

JR: What do you think of criticism that suggests it's wrong to keep Trump off the ballot using this process, as opposed to “letting the voters decide,” as a critic would say?

JML
: I have seen that criticism, if you will, of applying Section 3 to the former president. And it concerned me because it’s a legitimate question to be asked. But I’ve responded publicly to that concern by explaining that the disqualification that’s provided for under Section 3 is not itself anti-democratic at all.

Rather, it’s the conduct that can result in disqualification under the 14th Amendment that the Constitution says is anti-democratic. So there’s no question whatsoever that disqualification of an individual who satisfies the conditions of disqualification in Section 3 is not anti-democratic.

 

Forum List

Back
Top