Biden Wrong On Every Foreign Policy Decision Proven Right Again

[easyt65]

Unreliable source:

“Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.”

PJ Media - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

President Biden ending Bush’s failed, illegal war in Afghanistan was appropriate, warranted, and an example of sound, responsible foreign policy.

Questionable on right wing bias?

Bwuhahahaha......

When media reports that Houthi rebels storm a US embassy and take hostages how is there any 'right wing bias'?

Either revels stormed the embassy and took hostages or did not, snowflake. In this case they did ...

...but you cling to whatever excuse you need to try to disregard the fact that Biden's terrorist buddies just stormed a US embassy & took hostages.

 

[easyt65]

Unreliable source:

“Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.”

PJ Media - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

President Biden ending Bush’s failed, illegal war in Afghanistan was appropriate, warranted, and an example of sound, responsible foreign policy.

How about the Wall Street Journal telling you the terrorists Biden says aren't terrorists stormed the US Embassy compound and took hostages?

They too full of 'right wing bias'?

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

 

[P@triot]

Of course the negative experience is exactly why the blob didn't do it.

The “blob”? Suit pants wasn’t elected, sweetie.

As for President Trump, he absolutely would have done it, and would have done it right. He just didn’t have enough time. His presidency was cut short by whining snowflakes who would rather have “nice tweets” than prosperity because they are anti-American extremists

 

[pknopp]

The “blob”? Suit pants wasn’t elected, sweetie.

As for President Trump, he absolutely would have done it, and would have done it right. He just didn’t have enough time. His presidency was cut short by whining snowflakes who would rather have “nice tweets” than prosperity because they are anti-American extremists

He had four years.

 

[P@triot]

When media reports that Houthi rebels storm a US embassy and take hostages how is there any 'right wing bias'?

Well, I mean, look who you’re talking too. C_Clayton_Jones insists that the Snowden dumps, which exposed illegal mass-surveillance by the federal government, is “constitutional”. I shit you not.

Weird how the Snowden dumps made GLOBAL news when it only revealed the federal government was functioning “constitutional”!

 

[P@triot]

He had four years.

Wait…you think everything can be accomplished properly in 4 years? Seriously?

 

[pknopp]

Wait…you think everything can be accomplished properly in 4 years? Seriously?

Always with the excuses. Nixon did it, Trump couldn't? Always with the excuses.

 

[P@triot]

Always with the excuses. Nixon did it, Trump couldn't? Always with the excuses.

Again, you people sound insane. Did Nixon leave Vietnam victorious?!? Was Vietnam free and democratic? Seriously, you people are completely incapable of making a rational fucking comment. It's truly amazing.

 

[pknopp]

Again, you people sound insane.

I'm one person.

 

[Batcat]

NO argument with that.

Of course the negative experience is exactly why the blob didn't do it.

I don’t believe Trump would have left people behind. He realized he didn’t have time to withdraw correctly before the election so he held off. Had he been reelected he would have pulled out and done a good job of it.

 

[rightwinger]

I don’t believe Trump would have left people behind. He realized he didn’t have time to withdraw correctly before the election so he held off. Had he been reelected he would have pulled out and done a good job of it.

Trump would have had the same 2500 soldiers and an Afghan Army that refused to fight to protect us

It was Trump who made the deal with the Taliban

 

[pknopp]

Trump would have had the same 2500 soldiers and an Afghan Army that refused to fight to protect us

It was Trump who made the deal with the Taliban

What do you expect when you negotiate with "terrorists"?

 

[badbob85037]

Group Biden Removed From Terror List Storms U.S. Embassy in Yemen, Takes Hostages

pjmedia.com

Biden is going to get a lot of Americans killed....

As per biden's norm he don't give a shit about Americans or America. It's just a crying shame there are people in this nation can set back approving of his destruction of our nation.

 

[candycorn]

I don’t believe Trump would have left people behind. He realized he didn’t have time to withdraw correctly before the election so he held off. Had he been reelected he would have pulled out and done a good job of it.

He had 4 years... He didn't have time?

Cue the excuse parade!

 

[badbob85037]

Trump would have had the same 2500 soldiers and an Afghan Army that refused to fight to protect us

It was Trump who made the deal with the Taliban

It amazes me ones like you can stick up for this train wreak. I thank God I am nothing like you with only delusion your view of reality.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Especially silly is the OP this morning.

Trump wanted to get out of Afghanistan...he failed. Miserably.

Biden got it done. And suddenly it was the "wrong decision".

OMG..its like you know nothing. Biden pulled us out getting our troops and our allies killed----arming the terrorists that are spreading their rape murder around in the Middle east and now starting to export it to west. Biden got us deeper into the shit...

 

[P@triot]

I'm one person.

One person taking the position that millions of other insane people took.

 

[Batcat]

He had 4 years... He didn't have time?

Cue the excuse parade!

Trump spend much of his four years negotiating with the Taliban to insure a peaceful and effective withdrawal. If Trump had been reelected he would have run a successful mission to withdraw our citizens and those who we made promises to. It would not have a been rushed like Joe’s operation.

Joe would have done much better to take years to set up our withdrawal from Afghanistan then rush it like he did and turn it into a FUBAR operation. FUBAR is an old military term that perfectly describes Joe’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.

List of military slang terms - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

***snip***

FUBAR[edit]​

For other uses, see FUBAR (disambiguation).
Not to be confused with Foobar.

Look up FUBAR in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

FUBAR (Fucked Up Beyond All Repair), like SNAFU and SUSFU, dates from World War II. The Oxford English Dictionary lists Yank, the Army Weekly magazine (1944, 7 Jan. p. 8) as its earliest citation: "The FUBAR squadron. ‥ FUBAR? It means 'Fucked/Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition."[1]

Another version of FUBAR, said to have originated in the military, gives its meaning as "Fucked Up By Assholes in the Rear". This version has at least surface validity in that it is a common belief among enlisted men and women that most problems are created by the military brass (officers, especially those bearing the rank of general, from one to four stars). This version is also most likely to have had its origin in the U.S. Army, where the senior officers command from the rear, as opposed to a navy, where it is not uncommon for admirals to command a fleet from one of the ships at sea, and therefore susceptible to attacks and death by the enemy. Ditto as to air force generals, who do not fly and/or directly command airplanes or even squadrons or air wings. FUBAR had a resurgence in the American lexicon after the term was used in two popular movies: Tango and Cash (1989); and Saving Private Ryan (1998).[2]

This particular FUBAR acronym survived WWII and for a time, mainly in the 1970s, found its way into the lexicon of management consultants. Although the word “rear” is not normally used to describe the vantage point of senior corporate executives, their use of the term might have come about as the result of their frequent conclusions that the cause of corporate problems (inefficiencies and ineffectiveness causing poor profitability or a negative bottom line) rested not with rank and file workers, but rather with executives, particularly senior executives – the equivalent of senior military officers.[citation needed]

 

[candycorn]

Trump spend much of his four years negotiating with the Taliban to insure a peaceful and effective withdrawal. If Trump had been reelected he would have run a successful mission to withdraw our citizens and those who we made promises to. It would not have a been rushed like Joe’s operation.

Joe would have done much better to take years to set up our withdrawal from Afghanistan then rush it like he did and turn it into a FUBAR operation. FUBAR is an old military term that perfectly describes Joe’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.

List of military slang terms - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

***snip***

FUBAR[edit]​

For other uses, see FUBAR (disambiguation).
Not to be confused with Foobar.

Look up FUBAR in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

FUBAR (Fucked Up Beyond All Repair), like SNAFU and SUSFU, dates from World War II. The Oxford English Dictionary lists Yank, the Army Weekly magazine (1944, 7 Jan. p. 8) as its earliest citation: "The FUBAR squadron. ‥ FUBAR? It means 'Fucked/Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition."[1]

Another version of FUBAR, said to have originated in the military, gives its meaning as "Fucked Up By Assholes in the Rear". This version has at least surface validity in that it is a common belief among enlisted men and women that most problems are created by the military brass (officers, especially those bearing the rank of general, from one to four stars). This version is also most likely to have had its origin in the U.S. Army, where the senior officers command from the rear, as opposed to a navy, where it is not uncommon for admirals to command a fleet from one of the ships at sea, and therefore susceptible to attacks and death by the enemy. Ditto as to air force generals, who do not fly and/or directly command airplanes or even squadrons or air wings. FUBAR had a resurgence in the American lexicon after the term was used in two popular movies: Tango and Cash (1989); and Saving Private Ryan (1998).[2]

This particular FUBAR acronym survived WWII and for a time, mainly in the 1970s, found its way into the lexicon of management consultants. Although the word “rear” is not normally used to describe the vantage point of senior corporate executives, their use of the term might have come about as the result of their frequent conclusions that the cause of corporate problems (inefficiencies and ineffectiveness causing poor profitability or a negative bottom line) rested not with rank and file workers, but rather with executives, particularly senior executives – the equivalent of senior military officers.[citation needed]

As predicted...excuse parade.

After we invaded Europe in 1944, Germany fell in about one year. Are you honestly stating that withdrawing from Afghanistan would take 4X as long as ejecting and conquering Germany?

PS: Good to see he was negotiating with terrorists instead of...you know...the actual Afghan government.

FUBAR is right; Trump's mismanagement of Afghanistan was FUBAR.

 

[Batcat]

As predicted...excuse parade.

After we invaded Europe in 1944, Germany fell in about one year. Are you honestly stating that withdrawing from Afghanistan would take 4X as long as ejecting and conquering Germany?

PS: Good to see he was negotiating with terrorists instead of...you know...the actual Afghan government.

FUBAR is right; Trump's mismanagement of Afghanistan was FUBAR.

Trump didn’t manage the pull out from Afghanistan …Biden did.

Stop tying to blame Trump for Biden’s screw ups.

Top generals contradict Biden, say they urged him not to withdraw from Afghanistan

Gen. Frank McKenzie said that he recommended maintaining a small force of 2,500 troops in Afghanistan earlier this year.

www.politico.com