Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[Moonglow]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.

Is that why people yell about how the US is stealing their income through taxes?

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power

why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.

I have none and you have no economist supporting you.

So far all you have cited is Sanders who is a massive fool

Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is economic bigotry that is superior to Your bigotry.

I have no bigotry and capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment

you appeal to ignorance of that economic concept; why is that?

It is not an economic concept it is a claim you and others pulled out of thin air

 

[Pilot1]

The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.

Ultimately enforced by the barrel of a government GUN. That's why they want ours.

 

[danielpalos]

it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.

No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power

why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.

It is not a general power.

it must be, it says so, Expressly.

It does not and it is not

Providing for the general welfare must be a general power.

 

[danielpalos]

why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.

I have none and you have no economist supporting you.

So far all you have cited is Sanders who is a massive fool

Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is economic bigotry that is superior to Your bigotry.

I have no bigotry and capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment

you appeal to ignorance of that economic concept; why is that?

It is not an economic concept it is a claim you and others pulled out of thin air

the right wing simply makes up their rejection through simple bigotry.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power

why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.

It is not a general power.

it must be, it says so, Expressly.

It does not and it is not

Providing for the general welfare must be a general power.

Individual welfare is not general welfare.

 

[Erinwltr]

I figured the democrook agenda out 25 years ago...

When were the blinders even on?


.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I have none and you have no economist supporting you.

So far all you have cited is Sanders who is a massive fool

Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is economic bigotry that is superior to Your bigotry.

I have no bigotry and capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment

you appeal to ignorance of that economic concept; why is that?

It is not an economic concept it is a claim you and others pulled out of thin air

the right wing simply makes up their rejection through simple bigotry.

No you simply make up false claims with no basis in fact and they are rejected with no need for evidence.


Your constant repetition of bigotry is proof you are wrong as you can only label and not present intelligent arguments

 

[Pilot1]

I hope De Blasio (Warren Wilhelm) succeeds, and the rich, Virtue Signaling hypocrites of New York City have their wealth, and income stolen by government and given to others. Then, maybe they will wake up to the Totalitarian Oppression that is the new Democrat Party.

 

[danielpalos]

why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.

It is not a general power.

it must be, it says so, Expressly.

It does not and it is not

Providing for the general welfare must be a general power.

Individual welfare is not general welfare.

The general welfare must be comprehensive and cover individuals.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is economic bigotry that is superior to Your bigotry.

I have no bigotry and capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment

you appeal to ignorance of that economic concept; why is that?

It is not an economic concept it is a claim you and others pulled out of thin air

the right wing simply makes up their rejection through simple bigotry.

No you simply make up false claims with no basis in fact and they are rejected with no need for evidence.


Your constant repetition of bigotry is proof you are wrong as you can only label and not present intelligent arguments

i already looked up the concept of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. It is an economic concept anyone who is discussing economics should understand.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

New York is emptying out of money as it fills with imported poverty.

At some point the conversation will have to shift. It will be New York doesn't have money because the people in Connecticut or New Jersey have OUR money. Let's go take it from them.

I am surprised at how lockstep the Democrat rhetoric is with the thought processes of criminals. The criminal isn't stealing your wallet. It's his wallet. He's only taking what is rightfully his. The car thief isn't stealing your car. He's taking his car back. Democrats say the same thing. That bank account, that car, that home is in the wrong hands. Go take it.

Yep....how long before we're playing Cowboys and Liberals?

That's racist... lol

 

[PoliticalChic]

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Is Capitalism Moral?

1.” Many people believe that free market capitalism is selfish, even immoral. They say it's about greed, about a hunger for money and power; that it helps the rich and hurts the poor. They're wrong. The free market is not only economically superior, it is morally superior to any other way of organizing economic behavior. Here's why.

2. The free market calls for voluntary actions between individuals. There's no coercion.


3. People accuse the free market of not being moral because they say it's a zero-sum game, like poker, where if you win, it means that I have to lose. But the free market is not a zero-sum game. It's a positive sum game. You do something good for me, such as give me that steak and I'll do something good for you -- give you twenty dollars. I'm better off because I valued the steak more than I valued the $20 and the grocer is better off because he valued the $20 more than he valued the steak. We both win.

4.Ironically, it's the government, not the free market, that creates zero-sum games in our economy. If you use the government to get a food stamp, a farm subsidy or a business bail out, you will benefit -- but at the expense of your fellow citizens.

Isn't it more moral to require that people serve their fellow man in order to have a claim on what he produces rather than not serve others and still have a claim?

5.But, a lot of people ask, what about giant corporations? Don't they have too much power over our lives? Not in a free market. Because in a free market We, the People, decide the fate of companies who want our business.

Free market capitalism will punish a corporation that does not satisfy customers or fails to use resources efficiently. Businesses, big and small, that wish to prosper are held accountable by the people who vote with their dollars. And, again, it's the government that can undo this.

6….. government bailout essentially meant to them: "You don't have to be accountable to customers and stock holders.' No matter how inferior your product is and no matter how inefficient you are, we'll keep you in business by taking your fellow man's money. When government interferes in this way, it takes the power away from the people and rewards companies that couldn't compete successfully in the marketplace. That may work out very well for politicians, big unions and corporate officers, but it seldom does for the tax payer. That's why a free market system can only work if there is limited government. Limited government means you and I decide which businesses survive.


7. That's the America that our Founding Fathers envisioned -- a limited government that has only a few specifically mentioned -- or enumerated -- powers that are listed in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It's this brilliant, limited-government notion that produced the wealthiest nation in history. In a free market, the ambition and the voluntary effort of citizens, not the government, drives the economy. That is: people, to the best of their ability, shaping their own destiny.”

 

[mudwhistle]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.

Is that why people yell about how the US is stealing their income through taxes?

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

 

[Moonglow]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.

Is that why people yell about how the US is stealing their income through taxes?

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

There were income taxes in the US before FDR duh...

 

[PoliticalChic]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

This is every Democrat going back to FDR

FDR....hated successful businessmen because he was a failure at that endeavor.

 

[Moonglow]

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Is Capitalism Moral?

1.” Many people believe that free market capitalism is selfish, even immoral. They say it's about greed, about a hunger for money and power; that it helps the rich and hurts the poor. They're wrong. The free market is not only economically superior, it is morally superior to any other way of organizing economic behavior. Here's why.

2. The free market calls for voluntary actions between individuals. There's no coercion.


3. People accuse the free market of not being moral because they say it's a zero-sum game, like poker, where if you win, it means that I have to lose. But the free market is not a zero-sum game. It's a positive sum game. You do something good for me, such as give me that steak and I'll do something good for you -- give you twenty dollars. I'm better off because I valued the steak more than I valued the $20 and the grocer is better off because he valued the $20 more than he valued the steak. We both win.

4.Ironically, it's the government, not the free market, that creates zero-sum games in our economy. If you use the government to get a food stamp, a farm subsidy or a business bail out, you will benefit -- but at the expense of your fellow citizens.

Isn't it more moral to require that people serve their fellow man in order to have a claim on what he produces rather than not serve others and still have a claim?

5.But, a lot of people ask, what about giant corporations? Don't they have too much power over our lives? Not in a free market. Because in a free market We, the People, decide the fate of companies who want our business.

Free market capitalism will punish a corporation that does not satisfy customers or fails to use resources efficiently. Businesses, big and small, that wish to prosper are held accountable by the people who vote with their dollars. And, again, it's the government that can undo this.

6….. government bailout essentially meant to them: "You don't have to be accountable to customers and stock holders.' No matter how inferior your product is and no matter how inefficient you are, we'll keep you in business by taking your fellow man's money. When government interferes in this way, it takes the power away from the people and rewards companies that couldn't compete successfully in the marketplace. That may work out very well for politicians, big unions and corporate officers, but it seldom does for the tax payer. That's why a free market system can only work if there is limited government. Limited government means you and I decide which businesses survive.


7. That's the America that our Founding Fathers envisioned -- a limited government that has only a few specifically mentioned -- or enumerated -- powers that are listed in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It's this brilliant, limited-government notion that produced the wealthiest nation in history. In a free market, the ambition and the voluntary effort of citizens, not the government, drives the economy. That is: people, to the best of their ability, shaping their own destiny.”

Evidently you missed out on US history where men died trying to not be coerced into unjust positions at work..

 

[Moonglow]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

This is every Democrat going back to FDR

FDR....hated successful businessmen because he was a failure at that endeavor.

He was a lawyer and was successful in his trade..including the wealth and position of his family he never did without.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Because when you have something I want and I have something you want and we trade then both have gotten something we want.

It also benefits because it has reduced himan poverty more than any other idea.

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.”

But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

404 Not Found

http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2007_05_Imprimis.pdf

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

Economic Professor this week