Birmingham cop beaten unconcious w own gun; says he was scared to shoot; bystanders just take pics

[bucs90]

Beaten Detective Was Afraid to Use Force Officer.com

Congrats libs. This cop stopped a reckless driver. Guy gets out of car...attacks cop. TAKES COPS GUN. Beats the cop unconcious with the gun. The dirt bag then....with the cops gun....decides not to kill him.

Bystanders took photos of the unconcious bloody cop rather than help.

Cop said he was "afraid of the consequences in media if he had shot.him."

DISGUSTING.

Libs....your fault.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

He should have air holed the son of a bitch

 

[Sunni Man]

Shooting the criminal would have been racist. ....

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Shooting the criminal would have been racist. ....

LOL Everything is racist now days...better be called a racist than pistol whipped

 

[Preacher]

Yep. Who the fuck beats the shit out of a cop simply for a reckless driving ticket!? So now you get to go to prison for what? Attempted murder of a peace officer?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Blacks can't accept that some of there people are violent. So they have to blame the cops for doing their jobs and now we get this.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Bystanders took photos of the unconcious bloody cop rather than help.

There are countless videos on the Internet of cops brutalizing people who didn't deserve it. Why are they surprised the general public doesn't want to interfere to help them when it happens to them? As I've said before, it's the police and the politicians who have created this hostility towards law enforcement.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Put cameras on police = problem solved

 

[Pogo]

Beaten Detective Was Afraid to Use Force Officer.com

Congrats libs. This cop stopped a reckless driver. Guy gets out of car...attacks cop. TAKES COPS GUN. Beats the cop unconcious with the gun. The dirt bag then....with the cops gun....decides not to kill him.

Bystanders took photos of the unconcious bloody cop rather than help.

Cop said he was "afraid of the consequences in media if he had shot.him."

DISGUSTING.

Libs....your fault.

Yuh huh. Last week I dropped a dish on the floor and broke it. Your fault.

Loser.

 

[Auld Phart]

Put cameras on police = problem solved

Yup...

Just like traffic cams stopped speeders and people going thru red lights.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Put cameras on police = problem solved

Yup...

Just like traffic cams stopped speeders and people going thru red lights.

Please think before you post.

 

[danielpalos]

Beaten Detective Was Afraid to Use Force Officer.com

Congrats libs. This cop stopped a reckless driver. Guy gets out of car...attacks cop. TAKES COPS GUN. Beats the cop unconcious with the gun. The dirt bag then....with the cops gun....decides not to kill him.

Bystanders took photos of the unconcious bloody cop rather than help.

Cop said he was "afraid of the consequences in media if he had shot.him."

DISGUSTING.

Libs....your fault.

I make a motion to "blame the Judicature" for not improving our aqueducts and roads with gun lovers who refuse to muster for posse duty whenever necessary.

 

[Auld Phart]

Put cameras on police = problem solved

Yup...

Just like traffic cams stopped speeders and people going thru red lights.

Please think before you post.

I do.

Do you?

Cameras can be turned on and off, or blocked.


they may help with the problem, but they won't solve the problem

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Bystanders took photos of the unconcious bloody cop rather than help.

There are countless videos on the Internet of cops brutalizing people who didn't deserve it. Why are they surprised the general public doesn't want to interfere to help them when it happens to them? As I've said before, it's the police and the politicians who have created this hostility towards law enforcement.

So according to you it's OK for people to do and abet the very thing they oppose?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Put cameras on police = problem solved

Yup...

Just like traffic cams stopped speeders and people going thru red lights.

Please think before you post.

I do.

Do you?

Cameras can be turned on and off, or blocked.


they may help with the problem, but they won't solve the problem

If an officer turns off a camera right before a shooting, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Put cameras on police, and they no longer have to worry about pulling the trigger because if they truly are justified the video will show it.

 

[Auld Phart]

Put cameras on police = problem solved

Yup...

Just like traffic cams stopped speeders and people going thru red lights.

Please think before you post.

I do.

Do you?

Cameras can be turned on and off, or blocked.


they may help with the problem, but they won't solve the problem

If an officer turns off a camera right before a shooting, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Put cameras on police, and they no longer have to worry about pulling the trigger because if they truly are justified the video will show it.

, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Circumstantial evidence, at best.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Put cameras on police = problem solved

Yup...

Just like traffic cams stopped speeders and people going thru red lights.

Please think before you post.

I do.

Do you?

Cameras can be turned on and off, or blocked.


they may help with the problem, but they won't solve the problem

If an officer turns off a camera right before a shooting, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Put cameras on police, and they no longer have to worry about pulling the trigger because if they truly are justified the video will show it.

, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Circumstantial evidence, at best.

Pretty damn good circumstantial evidence. People are convicted on circumstantial evidence all the time.

 

[Auld Phart]

Yup...

Just like traffic cams stopped speeders and people going thru red lights.

Please think before you post.

I do.

Do you?

Cameras can be turned on and off, or blocked.


they may help with the problem, but they won't solve the problem

If an officer turns off a camera right before a shooting, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Put cameras on police, and they no longer have to worry about pulling the trigger because if they truly are justified the video will show it.

, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Circumstantial evidence, at best.

Pretty damn good circumstantial evidence. People are convicted on circumstantial evidence all the time.

any decent lawyer would get it laughed out of court

 

[TheOldSchool]

Please think before you post.

I do.

Do you?

Cameras can be turned on and off, or blocked.


they may help with the problem, but they won't solve the problem

If an officer turns off a camera right before a shooting, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Put cameras on police, and they no longer have to worry about pulling the trigger because if they truly are justified the video will show it.

, it should serve as evidence against the officer.

Circumstantial evidence, at best.

Pretty damn good circumstantial evidence. People are convicted on circumstantial evidence all the time.

any decent lawyer would get it laughed out of court

Not if wearing the cameras was a legal requirement for police.

 

[Sonny Clark]

Why is it that we only get to hear the cop's side of every story? Why doesn't the news media give both sides of a story like this? I read nothing that would indicate any truth to the cop's story. What I read was that a cop got his ass beat by a person that was possibly drunk. It's the cop's story that he feared being news headlines, and he did make headlines after all. This sounds to me like a cop that got his ass beat, and using the excuse that he feared publicity if he acted as a cop and arrested the possibly drunk person. Guess what, he made headlines anyway. If there were witnesses, which is obvious by the photo that there were witnesses, then the cop would've had proof to back his action had he shot to kill. Something doesn't add up with the cops story.

He called for back-up, which gives him verification of a possible incident. Therefore, if he had shot the possible drunk, he would've walked with no charges. Something just doesn't read right in the story. There must be more to it than what's in the article.