Black History Month

[Snookie]

Why won't people do some research? Most of this were invented by whites, east asians or somone else earlier. Not saying that blacks didn't invent. Let's give credit when it is due and be truthful.

Say what ever but at least I've spent time researching this subject.

Your avatar gives you away.

That is the height of your ability to debate. You're a joke. Honestly, that's how a 12 year old debates.

I've spent hundreds of hours researching this topic.

At stormfront?

 

[Snookie]

I heard Rush Talking about this guy today, I thought it'd be a good idea to put him in this thread. Amazing man...He's from Detroit



Ben Carson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well, if rush talked about him he must be an Uncle Tom, imo.

Looky there, another imbecile who was too stupid to read the book!

They all contain "Ragged Dick" propaganda. Read one and you've read them all.

 

[Pheonixops]

A message to the Black Militants: You're The Uncle Toms! - YouTube

I agree with much of what Mr. Steele said in that video. I would like to ask him the following:
What 'militants' is he referring to? The Black Panthers who were pretty proactive. The Black Muslims who were pretty proactive themselves? Or Martin Luther King Jr. who was in favor of government programs, reparations, and racial hiring quotas?

Like i said ealrier MLK would be horrified at the state of the black family in this county

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

Quotas? I don't think so

Really?

Myth #1: King wanted only equal rights, not special privileges and would have opposed affirmative action, quotas, reparations, and the other policies pursued by today’s civil rights leadership.

This is probably the most repeated myth about King. Writing on National Review Online, There Heritage Foundation’s Matthew Spalding wrote a piece entitled "Martin Luther King’s Conservative Mind," where he wrote, "An agenda that advocates quotas, counting by race and set-asides takes us away from King's vision."

The problem with this view is that King openly advocated quotas and racial set-asides. He wrote that the "Negro today is not struggling for some abstract, vague rights, but for concrete improvement in his way of life." When equal opportunity laws failed to achieve this, King looked for other ways. In his book Where Do We Go From Here, he suggested that "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis." To do this he expressed support for quotas. In a 1968 Playboy interview, he said, "If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas." King was more than just talk in this regard. Working through his Operation Breadbasket, King threatened boycotts of businesses that did not hire blacks in proportion to their population.

"King was even an early proponent of reparations. In his 1964 book, Why We Can’t Wait, he wrote,
No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries…Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. The ancient common law has always provided a remedy for the appropriation of a the labor of one human being by another. This law should be made to apply for American Negroes. The payment should be in the form of a massive program by the government of special, compensatory measures which could be regarded as a settlement in accordance with the accepted practice of common law."

"King of course was a great opponent of the free economy. In a speech in front of his staff in 1966 he said,

You can’t talk about solving the economic problem of the Negro without talking about billions of dollars. You can’t talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You’re really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry… Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism… There must be a better distribution of wealth (remember when a lot of conservatives and republicans had a hard on about that with Obama while singing the "praises" of MLK Jr.?) and maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism.

King called for "totally restructuring the system" in a way that was not capitalist or "the antithesis of communist." For more information on King’s economic views, see Lew Rockwell’s The Economics of Martin Luther King, Jr."

 

[Snookie]

I agree with much of what Mr. Steele said in that video. I would like to ask him the following:
What 'militants' is he referring to? The Black Panthers who were pretty proactive. The Black Muslims who were pretty proactive themselves? Or Martin Luther King Jr. who was in favor of government programs, reparations, and racial hiring quotas?

Like i said ealrier MLK would be horrified at the state of the black family in this county

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

Quotas? I don't think so

Really?

Myth #1: King wanted only equal rights, not special privileges and would have opposed affirmative action, quotas, reparations, and the other policies pursued by today’s civil rights leadership.

This is probably the most repeated myth about King. Writing on National Review Online, There Heritage Foundation’s Matthew Spalding wrote a piece entitled "Martin Luther King’s Conservative Mind," where he wrote, "An agenda that advocates quotas, counting by race and set-asides takes us away from King's vision."

The problem with this view is that King openly advocated quotas and racial set-asides. He wrote that the "Negro today is not struggling for some abstract, vague rights, but for concrete improvement in his way of life." When equal opportunity laws failed to achieve this, King looked for other ways. In his book Where Do We Go From Here, he suggested that "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis." To do this he expressed support for quotas. In a 1968 Playboy interview, he said, "If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas." King was more than just talk in this regard. Working through his Operation Breadbasket, King threatened boycotts of businesses that did not hire blacks in proportion to their population.

"King was even an early proponent of reparations. In his 1964 book, Why We Can’t Wait, he wrote,
No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries…Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. The ancient common law has always provided a remedy for the appropriation of a the labor of one human being by another. This law should be made to apply for American Negroes. The payment should be in the form of a massive program by the government of special, compensatory measures which could be regarded as a settlement in accordance with the accepted practice of common law."

"King of course was a great opponent of the free economy. In a speech in front of his staff in 1966 he said,

You can’t talk about solving the economic problem of the Negro without talking about billions of dollars. You can’t talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You’re really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry… Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism… There must be a better distribution of wealth (remember when a lot of conservatives and republicans had a hard on about that with Obama while singing the "praises" of MLK Jr.?) and maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism.

King called for "totally restructuring the system" in a way that was not capitalist or "the antithesis of communist." For more information on King’s economic views, see Lew Rockwell’s The Economics of Martin Luther King, Jr."

Right on! Well said!

 

[Pheonixops]

My kids are in elementary school, they get plenty of black history. I'd like to see more math, science, logic and reasoning taught in our schools but that's probably racist.

There is plenty of math, science, logic and reasoning in black history.

What month is designated White History Month?

November, LOL. Pretty much most of the months.

 

[Pheonixops]

I wish they'd just teach the truth. History! I want us to Teach black inventions, but make damn sure that we do so based on the facts or what they did to improve society. Do it fairly for whites too.

What's so hard to understand. Why smear the truth to make someone feel good? Is their history really so patheric that they can't be proud of it given straight????.

I agree.

 

[Pheonixops]

What do you think of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton?

One started out for all the right reasons and has stumbled and devolved like some people do. The other, in my opinion started out for all the wrong reasons stumbled on to some worthy causes and finally was honest with himself and finally went on to what he likes to do the most, entertainment. Like most people, they have their good points and bad points, they both kept and keep the conversation going, while they can be myopic and sometimes clownish with their focus they were brave enough at one time or another to "fight the good fight". God bless them, they did put their asses physically on the line.
I may not agree with some of their tactics and some of their issues, but i respect them for doing a whole lot more than me to fight for justice even though like us all, they have had their failings.

Bullshit.. Jessie Jackson way back might have been ok when he was with MLK now both are race hustlers who make money off the misery of others

I guess you want to disagree to agree with me!
Here's what I wrote about Jackson: "One started out for all the right reasons and has stumbled and devolved like some people do."

How are they making money off of the misery of others?

 

[Pheonixops]

Like i said ealrier MLK would be horrified at the state of the black family in this county




Quotas? I don't think so

Really?

Myth #1: King wanted only equal rights, not special privileges and would have opposed affirmative action, quotas, reparations, and the other policies pursued by today’s civil rights leadership.

This is probably the most repeated myth about King. Writing on National Review Online, There Heritage Foundation’s Matthew Spalding wrote a piece entitled "Martin Luther King’s Conservative Mind," where he wrote, "An agenda that advocates quotas, counting by race and set-asides takes us away from King's vision."

The problem with this view is that King openly advocated quotas and racial set-asides. He wrote that the "Negro today is not struggling for some abstract, vague rights, but for concrete improvement in his way of life." When equal opportunity laws failed to achieve this, King looked for other ways. In his book Where Do We Go From Here, he suggested that "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis." To do this he expressed support for quotas. In a 1968 Playboy interview, he said, "If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas." King was more than just talk in this regard. Working through his Operation Breadbasket, King threatened boycotts of businesses that did not hire blacks in proportion to their population.

"King was even an early proponent of reparations. In his 1964 book, Why We Can’t Wait, he wrote,
No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries…Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. The ancient common law has always provided a remedy for the appropriation of a the labor of one human being by another. This law should be made to apply for American Negroes. The payment should be in the form of a massive program by the government of special, compensatory measures which could be regarded as a settlement in accordance with the accepted practice of common law."

"King of course was a great opponent of the free economy. In a speech in front of his staff in 1966 he said,

You can’t talk about solving the economic problem of the Negro without talking about billions of dollars. You can’t talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You’re really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry… Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism… There must be a better distribution of wealth (remember when a lot of conservatives and republicans had a hard on about that with Obama while singing the "praises" of MLK Jr.?) and maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism.

King called for "totally restructuring the system" in a way that was not capitalist or "the antithesis of communist." For more information on King’s economic views, see Lew Rockwell’s The Economics of Martin Luther King, Jr."

Right on! Well said!

Thank you! I find it truly funny and ironic that some if not many of the republican and conservatives 'act' like they hold Martin Luther King in such high regard and make lofty claims about him but hate President Obama when he basically ran on Martin Luther King Jr.'s PLATFORM!!!!!!! Look at what I put in bold above.

So that means one or two things to me; those people are ignorant regarding Martin Luther King Jr. or they are disingenuous fake phoney frauds. That sho makes a new twist on those signs I saw that stated "Martin Luther King was a Republican".

 

[Jroc]

I agree with much of what Mr. Steele said in that video. I would like to ask him the following:
What 'militants' is he referring to? The Black Panthers who were pretty proactive. The Black Muslims who were pretty proactive themselves? Or Martin Luther King Jr. who was in favor of government programs, reparations, and racial hiring quotas?

Like i said ealrier MLK would be horrified at the state of the black family in this county

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

Quotas? I don't think so

Really?

Myth #1: King wanted only equal rights, not special privileges and would have opposed affirmative action, quotas, reparations, and the other policies pursued by today’s civil rights leadership.

This is probably the most repeated myth about King. Writing on National Review Online, There Heritage Foundation’s Matthew Spalding wrote a piece entitled "Martin Luther King’s Conservative Mind," where he wrote, "An agenda that advocates quotas, counting by race and set-asides takes us away from King's vision."

The problem with this view is that King openly advocated quotas and racial set-asides. He wrote that the "Negro today is not struggling for some abstract, vague rights, but for concrete improvement in his way of life." When equal opportunity laws failed to achieve this, King looked for other ways. In his book Where Do We Go From Here, he suggested that "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis." To do this he expressed support for quotas. In a 1968 Playboy interview, he said, "If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas." King was more than just talk in this regard. Working through his Operation Breadbasket, King threatened boycotts of businesses that did not hire blacks in proportion to their population.

"King was even an early proponent of reparations. In his 1964 book, Why We Can’t Wait, he wrote,
No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries…Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. The ancient common law has always provided a remedy for the appropriation of a the labor of one human being by another. This law should be made to apply for American Negroes. The payment should be in the form of a massive program by the government of special, compensatory measures which could be regarded as a settlement in accordance with the accepted practice of common law."

"King of course was a great opponent of the free economy. In a speech in front of his staff in 1966 he said,

You can’t talk about solving the economic problem of the Negro without talking about billions of dollars. You can’t talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You’re really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry… Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism… There must be a better distribution of wealth (remember when a lot of conservatives and republicans had a hard on about that with Obama while singing the "praises" of MLK Jr.?) and maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism.

King called for "totally restructuring the system" in a way that was not capitalist or "the antithesis of communist." For more information on King’s economic views, see Lew Rockwell’s The Economics of Martin Luther King, Jr."

Well.. You can quote what MLK might have wanted 45yrs ago, but that isn't today. The facts are todays problems are not yesterdays problems. Back then people were taught to work, If you hired a black person to work you knew he'd good be a worker...Today? Poor Blacks and poor whites for that matter all think they are owed something and that view is cultivated by the left. 75% of Black babies are born out of wedlock. Black people are killing black people in increasingly high numbers. Black babies are being aborted by the millions. Yeah this is a much different world we live in today.

 

[Pheonixops]

Like i said ealrier MLK would be horrified at the state of the black family in this county




Quotas? I don't think so

Really?

Myth #1: King wanted only equal rights, not special privileges and would have opposed affirmative action, quotas, reparations, and the other policies pursued by today’s civil rights leadership.

This is probably the most repeated myth about King. Writing on National Review Online, There Heritage Foundation’s Matthew Spalding wrote a piece entitled "Martin Luther King’s Conservative Mind," where he wrote, "An agenda that advocates quotas, counting by race and set-asides takes us away from King's vision."

The problem with this view is that King openly advocated quotas and racial set-asides. He wrote that the "Negro today is not struggling for some abstract, vague rights, but for concrete improvement in his way of life." When equal opportunity laws failed to achieve this, King looked for other ways. In his book Where Do We Go From Here, he suggested that "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis." To do this he expressed support for quotas. In a 1968 Playboy interview, he said, "If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas." King was more than just talk in this regard. Working through his Operation Breadbasket, King threatened boycotts of businesses that did not hire blacks in proportion to their population.

"King was even an early proponent of reparations. In his 1964 book, Why We Can’t Wait, he wrote,
No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries…Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. The ancient common law has always provided a remedy for the appropriation of a the labor of one human being by another. This law should be made to apply for American Negroes. The payment should be in the form of a massive program by the government of special, compensatory measures which could be regarded as a settlement in accordance with the accepted practice of common law."

"King of course was a great opponent of the free economy. In a speech in front of his staff in 1966 he said,

You can’t talk about solving the economic problem of the Negro without talking about billions of dollars. You can’t talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You’re really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry… Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism… There must be a better distribution of wealth (remember when a lot of conservatives and republicans had a hard on about that with Obama while singing the "praises" of MLK Jr.?) and maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism.

King called for "totally restructuring the system" in a way that was not capitalist or "the antithesis of communist." For more information on King’s economic views, see Lew Rockwell’s The Economics of Martin Luther King, Jr."

Well.. You can quote what MLK might have wanted 45yrs ago, but that isn't today. The facts are todays problems are not yesterdays problems. Back then people were taught to work, If you hired a black person to work you knew he'd good be a worker...Today? Poor Blacks and poor whites for that matter all think they are owed something and that view is cultivated by the left. 75% of Black babies are born out of wedlock. Black people are killing black people in increasingly high numbers. Black babies are being aborted by the millions. Yeah this is a much different world we live in today.

Thanks for the laugh!!!

What Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were you referring to when you refuted my assertion that he was in favor of quotas by saying: "
Quotas? I don't think so" ?

75% of "the Blacks" are not in poverty. If 1 million out of 15 million people are fuck ups, why do some people want to classify the other 14 million who aren't fuck ups as "the Blacks"?

 

[Pheonixops]

Hood-Winked « Black Men In America

 

[Jroc]

Really?

Myth #1: King wanted only equal rights, not special privileges and would have opposed affirmative action, quotas, reparations, and the other policies pursued by today’s civil rights leadership.

This is probably the most repeated myth about King. Writing on National Review Online, There Heritage Foundation’s Matthew Spalding wrote a piece entitled "Martin Luther King’s Conservative Mind," where he wrote, "An agenda that advocates quotas, counting by race and set-asides takes us away from King's vision."

The problem with this view is that King openly advocated quotas and racial set-asides. He wrote that the "Negro today is not struggling for some abstract, vague rights, but for concrete improvement in his way of life." When equal opportunity laws failed to achieve this, King looked for other ways. In his book Where Do We Go From Here, he suggested that "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis." To do this he expressed support for quotas. In a 1968 Playboy interview, he said, "If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas." King was more than just talk in this regard. Working through his Operation Breadbasket, King threatened boycotts of businesses that did not hire blacks in proportion to their population.

"King was even an early proponent of reparations. In his 1964 book, Why We Can’t Wait, he wrote,
No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries…Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. The ancient common law has always provided a remedy for the appropriation of a the labor of one human being by another. This law should be made to apply for American Negroes. The payment should be in the form of a massive program by the government of special, compensatory measures which could be regarded as a settlement in accordance with the accepted practice of common law."

"King of course was a great opponent of the free economy. In a speech in front of his staff in 1966 he said,

You can’t talk about solving the economic problem of the Negro without talking about billions of dollars. You can’t talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You’re really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry… Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism… There must be a better distribution of wealth (remember when a lot of conservatives and republicans had a hard on about that with Obama while singing the "praises" of MLK Jr.?) and maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism.

King called for "totally restructuring the system" in a way that was not capitalist or "the antithesis of communist." For more information on King’s economic views, see Lew Rockwell’s The Economics of Martin Luther King, Jr."

Well.. You can quote what MLK might have wanted 45yrs ago, but that isn't today. The facts are todays problems are not yesterdays problems. Back then people were taught to work, If you hired a black person to work you knew he'd good be a worker...Today? Poor Blacks and poor whites for that matter all think they are owed something and that view is cultivated by the left. 75% of Black babies are born out of wedlock. Black people are killing black people in increasingly high numbers. Black babies are being aborted by the millions. Yeah this is a much different world we live in today.

Thanks for the laugh!!!

What Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were you referring to when you refuted my assertion that he was in favor of quotas by saying: "
Quotas? I don't think so[/B" ?

75% of "the Blacks" are not in poverty. If 1 million out of 15 million people are fuck ups, why do some people want to classify the other 14 million who aren't fuck ups as "the Blacks"?

I said 75% out of wedlock birthrate amoung blacks get it straight.."Fuck ups" is your word.... I would say liberals are "fuck ups"..You're welcome

 

[ScienceRocks]

Well.. You can quote what MLK might have wanted 45yrs ago, but that isn't today. The facts are todays problems are not yesterdays problems. Back then people were taught to work, If you hired a black person to work you knew he'd good be a worker...Today? Poor Blacks and poor whites for that matter all think they are owed something and that view is cultivated by the left. 75% of Black babies are born out of wedlock. Black people are killing black people in increasingly high numbers. Black babies are being aborted by the millions. Yeah this is a much different world we live in today.

Thanks for the laugh!!!

What Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were you referring to when you refuted my assertion that he was in favor of quotas by saying: "
Quotas? I don't think so[/B" ?

75% of "the Blacks" are not in poverty. If 1 million out of 15 million people are fuck ups, why do some people want to classify the other 14 million who aren't fuck ups as "the Blacks"?

I said 75% out of wedlock birthrate amoung blacks get it straight.."Fuck ups" is your word.... I would say liberals are "fuck ups"..You're welcome

I'd think being a father would be a imporant part of a mans life. Sadly, it doesn't seem like blacks care about being there for their children. Why? It's sad.

 

[Jroc]

Thanks for the laugh!!!

What Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were you referring to when you refuted my assertion that he was in favor of quotas by saying: "
Quotas? I don't think so[/B" ?

75% of "the Blacks" are not in poverty. If 1 million out of 15 million people are fuck ups, why do some people want to classify the other 14 million who aren't fuck ups as "the Blacks"?

I said 75% out of wedlock birthrate amoung blacks get it straight.."Fuck ups" is your word.... I would say liberals are "fuck ups"..You're welcome

I'd think being a father would be a imporant part of a mans life. Sadly, it doesn't seem like blacks care about being there for their children. Why? It's sad.

Whites aren't much better in Detroit....Where I'm from

 

[Immanuel]

Thanks for the laugh!!!

What Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were you referring to when you refuted my assertion that he was in favor of quotas by saying: "
Quotas? I don't think so[/B" ?

75% of "the Blacks" are not in poverty. If 1 million out of 15 million people are fuck ups, why do some people want to classify the other 14 million who aren't fuck ups as "the Blacks"?

I said 75% out of wedlock birthrate amoung blacks get it straight.."Fuck ups" is your word.... I would say liberals are "fuck ups"..You're welcome

I'd think being a father would be a imporant part of a mans life. Sadly, it doesn't seem like blacks care about being there for their children. Why? It's sad.

Is that just another stereotype?

Might want to read the article Pheonixops posted in post number 171.

It was, in fact, a pretty decent article.

Immie

 

[tjvh]

More Black history should be taught in our schools. Their sweat, brains, and labor helped make this country great.

African American History Month 2013

Rather than Black history, maybe they should teach children the benefits of having family values and self reliance, rather than having Community organizers teaching people how to elicit the most money from Government Welfare programs.

 

[Jroc]

I said 75% out of wedlock birthrate amoung blacks get it straight.."Fuck ups" is your word.... I would say liberals are "fuck ups"..You're welcome

I'd think being a father would be a imporant part of a mans life. Sadly, it doesn't seem like blacks care about being there for their children. Why? It's sad.

Is that just another stereotype?

Might want to read the article Pheonixops posted in post number 171.

It was, in fact, a pretty decent article.

Immie

i read his opinion piece...


Children in single-parent families by race - Data Across States - KIDS COUNT Data Center

 

[Immanuel]

I'd think being a father would be a imporant part of a mans life. Sadly, it doesn't seem like blacks care about being there for their children. Why? It's sad.

Is that just another stereotype?

Might want to read the article Pheonixops posted in post number 171.

It was, in fact, a pretty decent article.

Immie

i read his opinion piece...


Children in single-parent families by race - Data Across States - KIDS COUNT Data Center

Glad you did read it. One of the points I took from the article was that those "statistics" have become self-fulfilling prophecies. If we as a country countinue to tell black people that they are not capable of sustaining familial relationships or that a majority of their males will end up in prison or that they are not smart enough to go to college, guess what that is what is going to happen.

Why concentrate on the negatives? Why NOT concentrate on the positives?

Immie

 

[S.J.]

72 Percent of African-American Children Born to Unwed Mothers - BV Black Spin

 

[KR811]

Thanks for the laugh!!!

What Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were you referring to when you refuted my assertion that he was in favor of quotas by saying: "
Quotas? I don't think so[/B" ?

75% of "the Blacks" are not in poverty. If 1 million out of 15 million people are fuck ups, why do some people want to classify the other 14 million who aren't fuck ups as "the Blacks"?

I said 75% out of wedlock birthrate amoung blacks get it straight.."Fuck ups" is your word.... I would say liberals are "fuck ups"..You're welcome

I'd think being a father would be a imporant part of a mans life. Sadly, it doesn't seem like blacks care about being there for their children. Why? It's sad.

You love it and you know it. You pretending to care. You couldn't even answer why.