Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What the hell is wrong with you.......mailing pipe bombs? Karjenski or whatever his name with lib------------kidnapping and executing governors? That was Bernie Bros fool--------Well maybe if the righties here would stop the extrajudicial killings of black people and stop mailing pipe bombs to people and trying to kidnap and execute governors, the lefties here would stop doing what you said...deal?Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
We try to but given the protests, riots, arson, looting, etc. that were happening this year, it's a little difficult.
Know what I mean?
Wouldn't you be a little nervous had it been we who were doing all that?
Damn you sound dumb.
I was being facetious to imitate that other idiot. Settle down, Francis.What the hell is wrong with you.......mailing pipe bombs? Karjenski or whatever his name with lib------------kidnapping and executing governors? That was Bernie Bros fool--------Well maybe if the righties here would stop the extrajudicial killings of black people and stop mailing pipe bombs to people and trying to kidnap and execute governors, the lefties here would stop doing what you said...deal?Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
We try to but given the protests, riots, arson, looting, etc. that were happening this year, it's a little difficult.
Know what I mean?
Wouldn't you be a little nervous had it been we who were doing all that?
Damn you sound dumb.
If black criminals would stop committing crimes, they wouldn't have to worry about cops shooting them ..
Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
Its NOT terrorism if the motive is unknown and nobody makes a claim. Look up the definition.I don't know what happened, I have no idea....this is just another posibility...
I quote:
"White hats located the bomb before it was placed in it's target detonation. Firefight ensued, bad actors killed. Bomb unsafe to handle in normal means. Controlled detonation with countdown and warning to minimize harm to populace."
In other words, it was a terror attack that was intercepted.
Then again, who knows what happened.
That was NOT a controlled detonation.
Nobody was killed....there WAS a warning.
When do you get warnings in terrorists attacks? again what do i know.
It was still a terrorist attack. Lots of people out of work, and lost businesses.
Agree, terrorist attacks aren't defined by loss of life - targeting property or infrastructure can still be a terrorist attack. A lot depends on motive.
Another message box similar to RV bombing. WTF?
Have the authorities found NO statement from this guy? That seems awfully odd. One would think that, if there was any motivation besides suicide, he wouldn't want people to miss it.Its NOT terrorism if the motive is unknown and nobody makes a claim. Look up the definition.I don't know what happened, I have no idea....this is just another posibility...
I quote:
"White hats located the bomb before it was placed in it's target detonation. Firefight ensued, bad actors killed. Bomb unsafe to handle in normal means. Controlled detonation with countdown and warning to minimize harm to populace."
In other words, it was a terror attack that was intercepted.
Then again, who knows what happened.
That was NOT a controlled detonation.
Nobody was killed....there WAS a warning.
When do you get warnings in terrorists attacks? again what do i know.
It was still a terrorist attack. Lots of people out of work, and lost businesses.
Agree, terrorist attacks aren't defined by loss of life - targeting property or infrastructure can still be a terrorist attack. A lot depends on motive.
A statement that has little to do with what I said since I'm not calling it terrrorism and, in fact, pointed out the bit about motive.
Have the authorities found NO statement from this guy? That seems awfully odd. One would think that, if there was any motivation besides suicide, he wouldn't want people to miss it.Its NOT terrorism if the motive is unknown and nobody makes a claim. Look up the definition.I don't know what happened, I have no idea....this is just another posibility...
I quote:
"White hats located the bomb before it was placed in it's target detonation. Firefight ensued, bad actors killed. Bomb unsafe to handle in normal means. Controlled detonation with countdown and warning to minimize harm to populace."
In other words, it was a terror attack that was intercepted.
Then again, who knows what happened.
That was NOT a controlled detonation.
Nobody was killed....there WAS a warning.
When do you get warnings in terrorists attacks? again what do i know.
It was still a terrorist attack. Lots of people out of work, and lost businesses.
Agree, terrorist attacks aren't defined by loss of life - targeting property or infrastructure can still be a terrorist attack. A lot depends on motive.
A statement that has little to do with what I said since I'm not calling it terrrorism and, in fact, pointed out the bit about motive.
Could be. And maybe my trying to make sense of the actions of someone who was clearly insane is an exercise in folly.Have the authorities found NO statement from this guy? That seems awfully odd. One would think that, if there was any motivation besides suicide, he wouldn't want people to miss it.Its NOT terrorism if the motive is unknown and nobody makes a claim. Look up the definition.I don't know what happened, I have no idea....this is just another posibility...
I quote:
"White hats located the bomb before it was placed in it's target detonation. Firefight ensued, bad actors killed. Bomb unsafe to handle in normal means. Controlled detonation with countdown and warning to minimize harm to populace."
In other words, it was a terror attack that was intercepted.
Then again, who knows what happened.
That was NOT a controlled detonation.
Nobody was killed....there WAS a warning.
When do you get warnings in terrorists attacks? again what do i know.
It was still a terrorist attack. Lots of people out of work, and lost businesses.
Agree, terrorist attacks aren't defined by loss of life - targeting property or infrastructure can still be a terrorist attack. A lot depends on motive.
A statement that has little to do with what I said since I'm not calling it terrrorism and, in fact, pointed out the bit about motive.
One avenue of investigation is 5G paranoia.
If this is true they already know why as the motive as wellJust announced.
Warner was indeed the bomber according to DNA.
Where have I said that? I seldom see you NOT attack the right in a stereotypical manner. You are an individual with your own beliefs, so are they.Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
I don't require and have never requested that you "bash" what I "hate". Period. It just gets old when ever I say something favorable to the left or critical of the right you have to come down snarky. Why don't you say something to the guy who seems to think we should ONLY extend feelings of commonality to the RIGHT? Eh?
Where have I said that? I seldom see you NOT attack the right in a stereotypical manner. You are an individual with your own beliefs, so are they.Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
I don't require and have never requested that you "bash" what I "hate". Period. It just gets old when ever I say something favorable to the left or critical of the right you have to come down snarky. Why don't you say something to the guy who seems to think we should ONLY extend feelings of commonality to the RIGHT? Eh?
Ive pissed off people on both sides to be sure.
Cause every once in awhile we find some way to get past the crap and talk.Where have I said that? I seldom see you NOT attack the right in a stereotypical manner. You are an individual with your own beliefs, so are they.Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
I don't require and have never requested that you "bash" what I "hate". Period. It just gets old when ever I say something favorable to the left or critical of the right you have to come down snarky. Why don't you say something to the guy who seems to think we should ONLY extend feelings of commonality to the RIGHT? Eh?
Ive pissed off people on both sides to be sure.
Then you just plain don't read my posts, so why do you even bother responding?
Then take note. The response I made here was simply to point out - apply those sentiments to the left as well as to the right and I have, multiple times pointed out that we have more in common then not, regardless of which side is attacked. I'm in another thread defending Bush for christ sake.Cause every once in awhile we find some way to get past the crap and talk.Where have I said that? I seldom see you NOT attack the right in a stereotypical manner. You are an individual with your own beliefs, so are they.Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
I don't require and have never requested that you "bash" what I "hate". Period. It just gets old when ever I say something favorable to the left or critical of the right you have to come down snarky. Why don't you say something to the guy who seems to think we should ONLY extend feelings of commonality to the RIGHT? Eh?
Ive pissed off people on both sides to be sure.
Then you just plain don't read my posts, so why do you even bother responding?
That Coyote is fun to talk to.
Take note, I know. "you trumptards" is like macro #2 for your replies.Then take note. The response I made here was simply to point out - apply those sentiments to the left as well as to the right and I have, multiple times pointed out that we have more in common then not, regardless of which side is attacked. I'm in another thread defending Bush for christ sake.Cause every once in awhile we find some way to get past the crap and talk.Where have I said that? I seldom see you NOT attack the right in a stereotypical manner. You are an individual with your own beliefs, so are they.Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
I don't require and have never requested that you "bash" what I "hate". Period. It just gets old when ever I say something favorable to the left or critical of the right you have to come down snarky. Why don't you say something to the guy who seems to think we should ONLY extend feelings of commonality to the RIGHT? Eh?
Ive pissed off people on both sides to be sure.
Then you just plain don't read my posts, so why do you even bother responding?
That Coyote is fun to talk to.
Early reports claimed the trail was leading out, and not incoming.Hmmmm, so first there is the explosion, and then as a result of that you get an EMP generated from the explosion ??? Isn't that sort of present in all explosions to some degree or does it have to be created that way ??? Yes we had the bomb explosion, but was the detonation enough to create a EMP as a result of the explosion ??EMP attacks are a REAL possibility --
"It’s not something many Americans think about: an Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP) attack on the nation’s electric grid. However, both peer competitors (Russia and China), and emerging threat countries, like North Korea and Iran, are perfecting this strategic weapon.
The White House is taking this potential threat seriously. On March 26, President Trump issued “Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses” in an effort to assess the risks of such an attack to critical U.S. infrastructure. Preliminary studies indicate that a catastrophic EMP event could cripple the U.S. economy and its military.
EMPs are pulses of energy that can be emitted from the blast of a nuclear weapon, portable devices like high power microwave weapons (HPMWs), or even certain natural phenomenon. These powerful pulses – when interacting with the Earth’s magnetic field – have the ability to damage electronic and electrical equipment such as computers, cell phones, transformers and transmission lines, as well as critical communications infrastructure. Even worse, the design of America’s electric grid means that damage to certain critical substations could cause cascading failures across the entire country.
While the threat of an electromagnetic pulse has been around since the first nuclear bomb (all nuclear denotations generate an EMP field), our heavy reliance on technology and the interconnectedness is unprecedented. The Commission to Assess the Threat from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack has warned since 2001 that essential U.S. infrastructure is at risk to an EMP event, stating that a high-altitude EMP (HEMP) attack would be “an existential threat to the survival of the United States and its allies.” An HEMP would likely involve the detonation of a nuclear weapon miles above the United States, where kinetic damage would be relatively harmless but the EMP effects would be at their most potent."
Trump Moves To Protect America From Electromagnetic Pulse Attack
An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) event - either through natural occurrence or deliberate attack - could cripple the U.S. electric grid and bring the economy to a halt. The White House is taking necessary steps to mitigate this threat.www.forbes.com
Did you miss the noticeable flash and missile trail before the explosion?
The following has a better video -- Nashville "Intentional" Explosion
Take note, I know. "you trumptards" is like macro #2 for your replies.Then take note. The response I made here was simply to point out - apply those sentiments to the left as well as to the right and I have, multiple times pointed out that we have more in common then not, regardless of which side is attacked. I'm in another thread defending Bush for christ sake.Cause every once in awhile we find some way to get past the crap and talk.Where have I said that? I seldom see you NOT attack the right in a stereotypical manner. You are an individual with your own beliefs, so are they.Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
I don't require and have never requested that you "bash" what I "hate". Period. It just gets old when ever I say something favorable to the left or critical of the right you have to come down snarky. Why don't you say something to the guy who seems to think we should ONLY extend feelings of commonality to the RIGHT? Eh?
Ive pissed off people on both sides to be sure.
Then you just plain don't read my posts, so why do you even bother responding?
That Coyote is fun to talk to.
Hard to talk to someone about individual views when you "Trump wash" any idea you don't like.
So literal.Take note, I know. "you trumptards" is like macro #2 for your replies.Then take note. The response I made here was simply to point out - apply those sentiments to the left as well as to the right and I have, multiple times pointed out that we have more in common then not, regardless of which side is attacked. I'm in another thread defending Bush for christ sake.Cause every once in awhile we find some way to get past the crap and talk.Where have I said that? I seldom see you NOT attack the right in a stereotypical manner. You are an individual with your own beliefs, so are they.Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
I don't require and have never requested that you "bash" what I "hate". Period. It just gets old when ever I say something favorable to the left or critical of the right you have to come down snarky. Why don't you say something to the guy who seems to think we should ONLY extend feelings of commonality to the RIGHT? Eh?
Ive pissed off people on both sides to be sure.
Then you just plain don't read my posts, so why do you even bother responding?
That Coyote is fun to talk to.
Hard to talk to someone about individual views when you "Trump wash" any idea you don't like.
I have to laugh. I was going to challenge you to prove your claim with a link...then I thought nah...you won't do it, so I ran a search on how many times I used "trumptard" - it came up with 3 times I did. All on one date, and in response to another "tard" comment. We ALL get frustrated at that shit. But but you're gonna call it "macro #2" for me, go figure.
It's not "literal", it's at least hit within the ball park.So literal.Take note, I know. "you trumptards" is like macro #2 for your replies.Then take note. The response I made here was simply to point out - apply those sentiments to the left as well as to the right and I have, multiple times pointed out that we have more in common then not, regardless of which side is attacked. I'm in another thread defending Bush for christ sake.Cause every once in awhile we find some way to get past the crap and talk.Where have I said that? I seldom see you NOT attack the right in a stereotypical manner. You are an individual with your own beliefs, so are they.Freak me out. Remark favorably for the right.Yea the leftists have no habits to change...both sides just troll the hell out of each other mocking whatever is said.Well, to be fair, i know you stupid hillbillies are just talking about civil war in an exercise in masturbation. But law enforcement has to take all threats seriously.You people are paranoid. Nobody wants to kill you people because frankly, you're not a threat.
Between you and me, we're only trolling you heathen leftists with all that talk about "civil war."
We're not really the "monsters" you make us out to be. We have wives, husbands, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, just like anyone else. We also have pets: Dogs, cats, fish, parrots, whatever.
The sooner you realize that everybody in this country basically wants the same things out of life, the sooner you realize that you're not really much different than we are.
How's that for a fuckin' "Kumbaya"?
But regardless, I guaranfuckingtee you that anyone comes breaking through my door at 3 AM will still get shot in the face.
I wish the rightists would apply that to the leftists here.
No "one" side is above it.
Any chance you will actually attack the one who starts the dialogue for a change instead of waiting until I make a remark even remotely favorable to the left? Or maybe I'm being unduly sensitive?
Ya, both sides engage in it. Did I say they DIDN'T?
Sometimes it's hard, especially in these times, to realize that more often than NOT we have more in common then we think if we can lose the tribalism that is consuming us. When Isamophobia was raging, one man, a muslim who ran and I think won a mayor position in a small town. He engaged his community by inviting people to dinner with his family. Everyone has those groups they are uncomfortable with, because they don't really know them and that causes fear or a need to persecute - with it's "fundies" or "liberals". And if you want to change minds about things, attacking them isn't very effective as a strategy, it just hardens defenses, rightfully so. Understanding, finding commonality, is a better first approach (if changing minds is the goal). I like what this man did as an example.
I try to talk about things in common a lot. It never ends well because I don't bash what you hate. How it comes across anyway.
And I bash the right for tribal stupid shit too.
And if the attacks, harden the defense, why are you always on the attack? Just a question.
I don't require and have never requested that you "bash" what I "hate". Period. It just gets old when ever I say something favorable to the left or critical of the right you have to come down snarky. Why don't you say something to the guy who seems to think we should ONLY extend feelings of commonality to the RIGHT? Eh?
Ive pissed off people on both sides to be sure.
Then you just plain don't read my posts, so why do you even bother responding?
That Coyote is fun to talk to.
Hard to talk to someone about individual views when you "Trump wash" any idea you don't like.
I have to laugh. I was going to challenge you to prove your claim with a link...then I thought nah...you won't do it, so I ran a search on how many times I used "trumptard" - it came up with 3 times I did. All on one date, and in response to another "tard" comment. We ALL get frustrated at that shit. But but you're gonna call it "macro #2" for me, go figure.
OK what ever you win.
Another message box similar to RV bombing. WTF?
Sounds like copy cats.
