AveMarica
Platinum Member
- Aug 16, 2023
- 563
- 282
- 498
What pork? Be specific, I'm curious what is in this bill that makes you prefer to not increase protection of the border./——/ Get your fu*king pork out of the bill.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What pork? Be specific, I'm curious what is in this bill that makes you prefer to not increase protection of the border./——/ Get your fu*king pork out of the bill.
What in the bill needs to be eliminated, where it makes you prefer not to improve border security?That’s a great idea.
And there’s other crap in the bill (evidently) that needs to get eliminated, too.
the only plan the USA needs is enforce US immigration lawsThey need to regroup and find a better plan. Johnson wants the two sides to get serious about immigration.
![]()
Speaker wants Mayorkas impeachment ‘as soon as possible’; Senate border deal likely DOA in House
House Speaker Mike Johnson intends to deal a swift blow to the Biden administration’s unwillingness to enact more stringent border policies by moving to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas “as soon as possible.”www.washingtontimes.com
![]()
BIden and the Dems dealing with the border
MAGA has lost this battle behind closed doors. The border deal is a done deal.
Proof positive that the Republicans have no honest desire to do anything about illegal immigration. Why would they? Keeping immigration as a crisis red meat for their base.
This is false, border patrol has been begging for more resources for years. It was important to you until it became a political tool.
They enforce the law every day, you fucking moron.
Ask Mitch and Mitt.Give me the names of people he ordered to vote against it.
It doesn’t improve border securityWhat in the bill needs to be eliminated, where it makes you prefer not to improve border security?
So, you don’t know. Just say that.Ask Mitch and Mitt.
/——/ Stop playing stupid. $110 for Ukraine.What pork? Be specific, I'm curious what is in this bill that makes you prefer to not increase protection of the border.
CULT.
After months and years of complaining about the border, now that a deal is on the table, the MAGA repubs don't want to see anything. They want the border to be a issue for their nominee named trump. This is going to blow up in their faces. Their bowing to trump on their knees is going too far. The blame for the mess on the border is now in their laps.
Before he reads the Bill, he is already calling it dead. Why? Because the Cult Leader told him to.CULT.
Since when did you shitlibs GAF about anyone reading any bills?Before he reads the Bill, he is already calling it dead. Why? Because the Cult Leader told him to.
After months and years of complaining about the border, now that a deal is on the table, the MAGA repubs don't want to see anything. They want the border to be a issue for their nominee named trump. This is going to blow up in their faces. Their bowing to trump on their knees is going too far. The blame for the mess on the border is now in their laps.
Nothing that has been released about the Senate deal says anything about a path to citizenshipYou obviously have selective reading issues.
Maybe you can show us what proposed Senate bill you’ve been looking at?