- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,619
- 38,186
- 2,290
Do you agree that private citizens have a right to boycott Gay Marriage?
Like the Oregon baker did?
Yes, nobody should be forced into a gay marriage.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you agree that private citizens have a right to boycott Gay Marriage?
Like the Oregon baker did?
Show me that bill and I will condemn it.Why is it I think this wouldn't be a story if it was about an anti-boycotting bill protecting Islam or LGBFJB+?
Does this mean the poster is anti-Semitic?
Personally, I'm not huge fan of govt telling private industry about most things.
It's none of the govts business & if the state doesn't like what the business does, cancel the contracts.
Govt needs to stay in their lane & this goes both ways.
California & in particular San Fran are the leaders in rejecting businesses for political reasons.
San Francisco Forced to Admit It Needs Red States | The Gateway Pundit | by Margaret Flavin
In 2016, in a virtual signaling measure on a grand scale, the City of San Fransisco arrogantly proclaimed it didn’t need red states.www.thegatewaypundit.com
For gays or transgenders. Retard.You mean for black folks ?
You are so dishonest.For gays or transgenders. Retard.
He`s not confused, just stupid. You don`t need to be PC here.Nobody has to go to a gay marriage. You seem to be confused.
That is why everyone was ticked off when it came to light that Twitter was coordinating with the federal government to put democrat approved messages out before the last presidential election.We all make decisions on where we spend our money. That is our right.
But using state power is just wrong. The implications of this are Orwellian.
Oh, here we go. Another jew hating thread from Tommy.âItâs an onslaught right nowâ: film details US battle against anti-boycott bills
In a new documentary, film-maker Julia Bacha explores the rise of laws punishing Israel boycotts and the ramifications they might have in the futurewww.theguardian.com
Apparently there are 30 states introducing these bills. I think that on the whole these are bad things.
Its one thing not to join in with a boycott but its quite another to compel others not to take part.
Where does this end ? Sacked for going on a pro abortion march ?
In relation to the anti Palestine bills it says they are funded by the Israeli govt. Even Russia never went that far.
America allegedly values free speech but now it seems you can only protest about approved subjects.
Scary stuff.
From the state?? Uh, no.No one is saying that someone can't boycott who they want, just that there will be consequences.
Too bad. We have to give up this general notion that the government is there to dictate matters of conscience. Social engineering doesn't work.When the baker in Oregon wanted to boycott Gay Marriages, the libs literally crucified them and tried to put them out of business.