Boycott Israel

[Hollie]

More of Israel's old terrorist propaganda campaign.

More of your hurt feelings on public display.

 

[Hollie]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel has its terrorists tour campuses.

 

[Hollie]

Israel has its terrorists tour campuses.

Link?

The article was not about Israelis.

Might I suggest you pay attention?

 

[Hollie]

Not at all surprising that the SJP Islamic terrorist front group is closely aligned with various Islamic terrorist franchises.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Oooooo, terrorists.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Tinmore is a coward who cannot answer a simple question.

 

[Hollie]

Oooooo, terrorists.

You’re actually deriding your own politico-religious ideology.

And, don’t you feel the least bit foolish with dumping same same cut and paste nonsense across multiple threads?

When Moslems commit crimes / acts of terrorism in furtherance of what they call their “religion”, it’s appropriate to assign the “Islamic terrorism” label to those acts.

 

[Hollie]

 

[Sixties Fan]

Linoy Ashram competes in the hoop event of the rhythmic gymnastics individual final at the 2019 European Games in Minsk on June 23, 2019. (Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV / AFP)

Rhythmic gymnast Linoy Ashram snags two golds at European Games

 

[Sixties Fan]

“Blood Connection,” a November 2018 article by Amir Shuan published in Yediot Ahronot shockingly revealed extensive relationships between the BDS movement and terrorists. While the BDS movement claims to be fighting for “social justice” there are many links between the movement and mass violence.

The article quotes Dr. Shai Har-Zvi, a former Israeli intelligence officer: “Traditionally, the BDS movement tries to present itself everywhere as a non-violent movement, but we have discovered many connections of various organizations in the movement to terror…"

"One of the main things we discovered is the laundering of the activities via civil society organizations and the downplaying of past activities and involvement in terror. The civil society organizations are essentially providing the perfect cover for the [BDS] activities.”

Some examples:

• Abdul-latif Ghaith, the chairperson and co-founder of Addameer, a radical Palestinian organization which is active in BDS, and involved in lawfare against Israel and in accusing Israel of war crimes was a member of the murdeours Popular Front for the Liberation of Palesitine (PFLP)’s policy bureau.

• Addameer board member Yaqoub Oudeh is a terrorist convicted of murdering Israelis,

• Another board member, Mahmoud Jaddah, was convicted of throwing grenades at Israelis.

NGO Monitor recently warned that “more than half of Addameer’s current and former employees, as well as lawyers that work for Addameer, have links to the PFLP.”

• Al-Haq is one of the leaders of the BDS campaign.
• The general director of Al-Haq, Shawan Jabarin was a senior member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and maintains ties with activists in the organization.

(full article online)

Standing with BDS is standing with terror

 

[P F Tinmore]

“Blood Connection,” a November 2018 article by Amir Shuan published in Yediot Ahronot shockingly revealed extensive relationships between the BDS movement and terrorists. While the BDS movement claims to be fighting for “social justice” there are many links between the movement and mass violence.

The article quotes Dr. Shai Har-Zvi, a former Israeli intelligence officer: “Traditionally, the BDS movement tries to present itself everywhere as a non-violent movement, but we have discovered many connections of various organizations in the movement to terror…"

"One of the main things we discovered is the laundering of the activities via civil society organizations and the downplaying of past activities and involvement in terror. The civil society organizations are essentially providing the perfect cover for the [BDS] activities.”

Some examples:

• Abdul-latif Ghaith, the chairperson and co-founder of Addameer, a radical Palestinian organization which is active in BDS, and involved in lawfare against Israel and in accusing Israel of war crimes was a member of the murdeours Popular Front for the Liberation of Palesitine (PFLP)’s policy bureau.

• Addameer board member Yaqoub Oudeh is a terrorist convicted of murdering Israelis,

• Another board member, Mahmoud Jaddah, was convicted of throwing grenades at Israelis.

NGO Monitor recently warned that “more than half of Addameer’s current and former employees, as well as lawyers that work for Addameer, have links to the PFLP.”

• Al-Haq is one of the leaders of the BDS campaign.
• The general director of Al-Haq, Shawan Jabarin was a senior member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and maintains ties with activists in the organization.

(full article online)

Standing with BDS is standing with terror

Why don't they ever mention Israel's terrorism and violence against the Palestinians?

 

[Hollie]

“Blood Connection,” a November 2018 article by Amir Shuan published in Yediot Ahronot shockingly revealed extensive relationships between the BDS movement and terrorists. While the BDS movement claims to be fighting for “social justice” there are many links between the movement and mass violence.

The article quotes Dr. Shai Har-Zvi, a former Israeli intelligence officer: “Traditionally, the BDS movement tries to present itself everywhere as a non-violent movement, but we have discovered many connections of various organizations in the movement to terror…"

"One of the main things we discovered is the laundering of the activities via civil society organizations and the downplaying of past activities and involvement in terror. The civil society organizations are essentially providing the perfect cover for the [BDS] activities.”

Some examples:

• Abdul-latif Ghaith, the chairperson and co-founder of Addameer, a radical Palestinian organization which is active in BDS, and involved in lawfare against Israel and in accusing Israel of war crimes was a member of the murdeours Popular Front for the Liberation of Palesitine (PFLP)’s policy bureau.

• Addameer board member Yaqoub Oudeh is a terrorist convicted of murdering Israelis,

• Another board member, Mahmoud Jaddah, was convicted of throwing grenades at Israelis.

NGO Monitor recently warned that “more than half of Addameer’s current and former employees, as well as lawyers that work for Addameer, have links to the PFLP.”

• Al-Haq is one of the leaders of the BDS campaign.
• The general director of Al-Haq, Shawan Jabarin was a senior member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and maintains ties with activists in the organization.

(full article online)

Standing with BDS is standing with terror

Why don't they ever mention Israel's terrorism and violence against the Palestinians?

Shirley, you have a YouTube video. Something from PressTV?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is a question in the format of the (which came first) Chicken or the Egg.

Why don't they ever mention Israel's terrorism and violence against the Palestinians?

(COMMENT)

Which came first: Arab Palestinian Violence → or → Israeli containment and separation (safe distance) from the Criminal Arab Palestinians.

We could bounce this around for centuries, and still not get a resolution.

The one thing we do know is that the Israeli Blockade of the Gaza Strip did not go up until well after the 2005 Unilaterial withdraw from the Gaza Strip.

2005: Arafat was succeeded by Mahmoud Abbas as President of the Palestinian Authority in January 2005. The Israeli Disengagement Plan took effect. This involved dismantling settlements in Gaza and four settlements in the northern part of the West Bank, but expanding the remaining settlements in the West Bank.

2006: Hamas won parliamentary elections in the West Bank and Gaza and was democratically elected as the government of the Palestinian Authority. This caused a six-year (and, despite attempts at securing peace by neutral parties, effectively ongoing) civil war between the two Palestinian parties, Fatah and Hamas. As a result of the unrest and deposition of the Fatah party, Israel and Egypt enforced a land and naval blockade of the Gaza strip.

2007: Trilateral Israeli-Palestinian-American summit with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and President Abbas ended with no significant progress. The summit was attended by numerous Arab countries.

2009: Ceasefire was officially declared between Israel and the Hamas administration in Gaza, although skirmishes occur frequently. Blockade Established.

2011: The UN declined the Palestine Authority membership as a fully sovereign state. It enjoys an 'observer' status in the UN.​

Time Line Courtesy of Historyplex historical events or narrate incidents in history.
​

The Israeli's had withdrawn from the Gaza Strip and still the Arab Palestinain were not satisfied. They became a danger to Israeli citizens and the territorial integrity of Israel. Boom, the Blockade - Arab Palestinians driven.

SECTION V : NEUTRAL MERCHANT VESSELS AND CIVIL AIRCRAFT
Neutral merchant vessels
67. Merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States may not be attacked unless they:

(a) are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning
they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture;
(b) engage in belligerent acts on behalf of the enemy;
(c) act as auxiliaries to the enemy s armed forces;
(d) are incorporated into or assist the enemy s intelligence system;
(e) sail under convoy of enemy warships or military aircraft; or
(f) otherwise make an effective contribution to the enemy s military action, e.g., by carrying military materials, and it is not feasible for the attacking forces to first place passengers and crew in a place of safety. Unless circumstances do not permit, they are to be given a warning, so that they can re-route, off-load, or take other precautions.​

68. Any attack on these vessels is subject to the basic rules in paragraphs 38-46.​

SECTION II : METHODS OF WARFARE
Blockade
93. A blockade shall be declared and notified to all belligerents and neutral States.
94. The declaration shall specify the commencement, duration, location, and extent of the blockade and the period
within which vessels of neutral States may leave the blockaded coastline.
95. A blockade must be effective. The question whether a blockade is effective is a question of fact.
96. The force maintaining the blockade may be stationed at a distance determined by military requirements.
97. A blockade may be enforced and maintained by a combination of legitimate methods and means of warfare
provided this combination does not result in acts inconsistent with the rules set out in this document.
98. Merchant vessels believed on reasonable grounds to be breaching a blockade may be captured. Merchant
vessels which, after prior warning, clearly resist capture may be attacked.
99. A blockade must not bar access to the ports and coasts of neutral States.
100. A blockade must be applied impartially to the vessels of all States.
101. The cessation, temporary lifting, re-establishment, extension or other alteration of a blockade must be declared
and notified as in paragraphs 93 and 94.
102. The declaration or establishment of a blockade is prohibited if:

(a) it has the sole purpose of starving the civilian population or denying it other objects essential for its survival; or
(b) the damage to the civilian population is, or may be expected to be, excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from the blockade.​

103. If the civilian population of the blockaded territory is inadequately provided with food and other objects essential for its survival, the blockading party must provide for free passage of such foodstuffs and other essential supplies,
subject to:

(a) the right to prescribe the technical arrangements, including search, under which such passage is permitted; and
(b) the condition that the distribution of such supplies shall be made under the local supervision of a Protecting Power or a humanitarian organization which offers guarantees of impartiality, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross.​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is a question in the format of the (which came first) Chicken or the Egg.

Why don't they ever mention Israel's terrorism and violence against the Palestinians?

(COMMENT)

Which came first: Arab Palestinian Violence → or → Israeli containment and separation (safe distance) from the Criminal Arab Palestinians.

We could bounce this around for centuries, and still not get a resolution.

The one thing we do know is that the Israeli Blockade of the Gaza Strip did not go up until well after the 2005 Unilaterial withdraw from the Gaza Strip.

2005: Arafat was succeeded by Mahmoud Abbas as President of the Palestinian Authority in January 2005. The Israeli Disengagement Plan took effect. This involved dismantling settlements in Gaza and four settlements in the northern part of the West Bank, but expanding the remaining settlements in the West Bank.

2006: Hamas won parliamentary elections in the West Bank and Gaza and was democratically elected as the government of the Palestinian Authority. This caused a six-year (and, despite attempts at securing peace by neutral parties, effectively ongoing) civil war between the two Palestinian parties, Fatah and Hamas. As a result of the unrest and deposition of the Fatah party, Israel and Egypt enforced a land and naval blockade of the Gaza strip.

2007: Trilateral Israeli-Palestinian-American summit with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and President Abbas ended with no significant progress. The summit was attended by numerous Arab countries.

2009: Ceasefire was officially declared between Israel and the Hamas administration in Gaza, although skirmishes occur frequently. Blockade Established.

2011: The UN declined the Palestine Authority membership as a fully sovereign state. It enjoys an 'observer' status in the UN.​

View attachment 267042
Time Line Courtesy of Historyplex historical events or narrate incidents in history.
​

The Israeli's had withdrawn from the Gaza Strip and still the Arab Palestinain were not satisfied. They became a danger to Israeli citizens and the territorial integrity of Israel. Boom, the Blockade - Arab Palestinians driven.

SECTION V : NEUTRAL MERCHANT VESSELS AND CIVIL AIRCRAFT
Neutral merchant vessels
67. Merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States may not be attacked unless they:

(a) are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning
they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture;
(b) engage in belligerent acts on behalf of the enemy;
(c) act as auxiliaries to the enemy s armed forces;
(d) are incorporated into or assist the enemy s intelligence system;
(e) sail under convoy of enemy warships or military aircraft; or
(f) otherwise make an effective contribution to the enemy s military action, e.g., by carrying military materials, and it is not feasible for the attacking forces to first place passengers and crew in a place of safety. Unless circumstances do not permit, they are to be given a warning, so that they can re-route, off-load, or take other precautions.​

68. Any attack on these vessels is subject to the basic rules in paragraphs 38-46.​

SECTION II : METHODS OF WARFARE
Blockade
93. A blockade shall be declared and notified to all belligerents and neutral States.
94. The declaration shall specify the commencement, duration, location, and extent of the blockade and the period
within which vessels of neutral States may leave the blockaded coastline.
95. A blockade must be effective. The question whether a blockade is effective is a question of fact.
96. The force maintaining the blockade may be stationed at a distance determined by military requirements.
97. A blockade may be enforced and maintained by a combination of legitimate methods and means of warfare
provided this combination does not result in acts inconsistent with the rules set out in this document.
98. Merchant vessels believed on reasonable grounds to be breaching a blockade may be captured. Merchant
vessels which, after prior warning, clearly resist capture may be attacked.
99. A blockade must not bar access to the ports and coasts of neutral States.
100. A blockade must be applied impartially to the vessels of all States.
101. The cessation, temporary lifting, re-establishment, extension or other alteration of a blockade must be declared
and notified as in paragraphs 93 and 94.
102. The declaration or establishment of a blockade is prohibited if:

(a) it has the sole purpose of starving the civilian population or denying it other objects essential for its survival; or
(b) the damage to the civilian population is, or may be expected to be, excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from the blockade.​

103. If the civilian population of the blockaded territory is inadequately provided with food and other objects essential for its survival, the blockading party must provide for free passage of such foodstuffs and other essential supplies,
subject to:

(a) the right to prescribe the technical arrangements, including search, under which such passage is permitted; and
(b) the condition that the distribution of such supplies shall be made under the local supervision of a Protecting Power or a humanitarian organization which offers guarantees of impartiality, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross.​

Most Respectfully,
R

It all started when the Palestinians went to Europe and attacked the Zionists after WWI.

Oh wait...

 

[Hollie]

RE: Boycott Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is a question in the format of the (which came first) Chicken or the Egg.

Why don't they ever mention Israel's terrorism and violence against the Palestinians?

(COMMENT)

Which came first: Arab Palestinian Violence → or → Israeli containment and separation (safe distance) from the Criminal Arab Palestinians.

We could bounce this around for centuries, and still not get a resolution.

The one thing we do know is that the Israeli Blockade of the Gaza Strip did not go up until well after the 2005 Unilaterial withdraw from the Gaza Strip.

2005: Arafat was succeeded by Mahmoud Abbas as President of the Palestinian Authority in January 2005. The Israeli Disengagement Plan took effect. This involved dismantling settlements in Gaza and four settlements in the northern part of the West Bank, but expanding the remaining settlements in the West Bank.

2006: Hamas won parliamentary elections in the West Bank and Gaza and was democratically elected as the government of the Palestinian Authority. This caused a six-year (and, despite attempts at securing peace by neutral parties, effectively ongoing) civil war between the two Palestinian parties, Fatah and Hamas. As a result of the unrest and deposition of the Fatah party, Israel and Egypt enforced a land and naval blockade of the Gaza strip.

2007: Trilateral Israeli-Palestinian-American summit with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and President Abbas ended with no significant progress. The summit was attended by numerous Arab countries.

2009: Ceasefire was officially declared between Israel and the Hamas administration in Gaza, although skirmishes occur frequently. Blockade Established.

2011: The UN declined the Palestine Authority membership as a fully sovereign state. It enjoys an 'observer' status in the UN.​

View attachment 267042
Time Line Courtesy of Historyplex historical events or narrate incidents in history.
​

The Israeli's had withdrawn from the Gaza Strip and still the Arab Palestinain were not satisfied. They became a danger to Israeli citizens and the territorial integrity of Israel. Boom, the Blockade - Arab Palestinians driven.

SECTION V : NEUTRAL MERCHANT VESSELS AND CIVIL AIRCRAFT
Neutral merchant vessels
67. Merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States may not be attacked unless they:

(a) are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning
they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture;
(b) engage in belligerent acts on behalf of the enemy;
(c) act as auxiliaries to the enemy s armed forces;
(d) are incorporated into or assist the enemy s intelligence system;
(e) sail under convoy of enemy warships or military aircraft; or
(f) otherwise make an effective contribution to the enemy s military action, e.g., by carrying military materials, and it is not feasible for the attacking forces to first place passengers and crew in a place of safety. Unless circumstances do not permit, they are to be given a warning, so that they can re-route, off-load, or take other precautions.​

68. Any attack on these vessels is subject to the basic rules in paragraphs 38-46.​

SECTION II : METHODS OF WARFARE
Blockade
93. A blockade shall be declared and notified to all belligerents and neutral States.
94. The declaration shall specify the commencement, duration, location, and extent of the blockade and the period
within which vessels of neutral States may leave the blockaded coastline.
95. A blockade must be effective. The question whether a blockade is effective is a question of fact.
96. The force maintaining the blockade may be stationed at a distance determined by military requirements.
97. A blockade may be enforced and maintained by a combination of legitimate methods and means of warfare
provided this combination does not result in acts inconsistent with the rules set out in this document.
98. Merchant vessels believed on reasonable grounds to be breaching a blockade may be captured. Merchant
vessels which, after prior warning, clearly resist capture may be attacked.
99. A blockade must not bar access to the ports and coasts of neutral States.
100. A blockade must be applied impartially to the vessels of all States.
101. The cessation, temporary lifting, re-establishment, extension or other alteration of a blockade must be declared
and notified as in paragraphs 93 and 94.
102. The declaration or establishment of a blockade is prohibited if:

(a) it has the sole purpose of starving the civilian population or denying it other objects essential for its survival; or
(b) the damage to the civilian population is, or may be expected to be, excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from the blockade.​

103. If the civilian population of the blockaded territory is inadequately provided with food and other objects essential for its survival, the blockading party must provide for free passage of such foodstuffs and other essential supplies,
subject to:

(a) the right to prescribe the technical arrangements, including search, under which such passage is permitted; and
(b) the condition that the distribution of such supplies shall be made under the local supervision of a Protecting Power or a humanitarian organization which offers guarantees of impartiality, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross.​

Most Respectfully,
R

It all started when the Palestinians went to Europe and attacked the Zionists after WWI.

Oh wait...

That’s strange. It was the Islamics who made the geographic area of Pal’istan a zip code of the Turkish Islamist caliphate and brought their quaint customs (dhinmmitude) with them.

Oh wait....

 

[LA RAM FAN]

“Blood Connection,” a November 2018 article by Amir Shuan published in Yediot Ahronot shockingly revealed extensive relationships between the BDS movement and terrorists. While the BDS movement claims to be fighting for “social justice” there are many links between the movement and mass violence.

The article quotes Dr. Shai Har-Zvi, a former Israeli intelligence officer: “Traditionally, the BDS movement tries to present itself everywhere as a non-violent movement, but we have discovered many connections of various organizations in the movement to terror…"

"One of the main things we discovered is the laundering of the activities via civil society organizations and the downplaying of past activities and involvement in terror. The civil society organizations are essentially providing the perfect cover for the [BDS] activities.”

Some examples:

• Abdul-latif Ghaith, the chairperson and co-founder of Addameer, a radical Palestinian organization which is active in BDS, and involved in lawfare against Israel and in accusing Israel of war crimes was a member of the murdeours Popular Front for the Liberation of Palesitine (PFLP)’s policy bureau.

• Addameer board member Yaqoub Oudeh is a terrorist convicted of murdering Israelis,

• Another board member, Mahmoud Jaddah, was convicted of throwing grenades at Israelis.

NGO Monitor recently warned that “more than half of Addameer’s current and former employees, as well as lawyers that work for Addameer, have links to the PFLP.”

• Al-Haq is one of the leaders of the BDS campaign.
• The general director of Al-Haq, Shawan Jabarin was a senior member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and maintains ties with activists in the organization.

(full article online)

Standing with BDS is standing with terror

Why don't they ever mention Israel's terrorism and violence against the Palestinians?

Because their zionist handlers would stop paying them big bucks if they stopped trolling and stopped evading the evidence and acknowledged it,thats why.

 

[Sixties Fan]

It’s not that these groups have anything against Jews per se. They simply feared that hosting a Jew would make them a target for anti-Israel protesters.

Zimler isn’t Israeli, has no relatives or investments in Israel and doesn’t write about Israel. His latest book is set in the Holy Land 2,000 years ago, but its storyline is Christian rather than Jewish (it’s called The Gospel According to Lazarus). So he wouldn’t seem an obvious target, given BDS apologists’ repeated claim that anti-Zionism isn’t anti-Semitic.

Unfortunately, much of the anti-Israel crowd hasn’t gotten that memo. See, for instance, the German courts which ruled that torching a German synagogue wasn’t a hate crime, but an understandable anti-Israel protest. Or the student organizations which demanded that a South African university expel all Jewish students to show its pro-Palestinian bona fides. Or the Norwegian attorney general who ruled that “F*** Jews” isn’t hate speech, but an expression of “dissatisfaction with [Israel’s] policies,” although the speaker never mentioned Israel. Or the dyke marches that banned Jews from holding Jewish pride flags because they remind some people of Israeli flags. And so forth.

(full article online)

When human rights become acceptable collateral damage