Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup. Bragg has to know there’s there there. His goal is to tie Trump up with this during election season, and make enough independents unwilling to vote for a man under indictment, when they fully don’t understand there is no credibility to the charges.Correct and fat Alvin is going to stall that as long as he can (or as close to the election as he can). Defense lawyers have a right to know any and all charges with evidence against their client in order to prepare a defense or file for dismissal.
No because if he's going to site a second crime for the first chage, it must be listed what that crime is or the first supposed crime doesn't count for anything.
There isn’t one.What is the underlying crime he allegedly was trying to cover up?
What is the underlying crime he allegedly was trying to cover up?
There isn’t one.
Bragg has charged Trump with falsifying business records (a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations) and the “intent to commit a future more serious crime” (the unarmed felony).''
The 34 counts all are one harmless misdemeanor, if that. There’s nothing else there except the mention of a “serious crime” that remains unnamed. Violation of Trump’s 6th Amendment rights.A text search of the documents from yesterday does not show the quote “intent to commit a future more serious crime”.
The phrase "Intent to commit" shows up zero times in the Statement of Facts submitted to the court.
The phrase "Intent to commit" shows up 34 times in the Indictment submitted to the court. In each case they are in structure of one of the 34 charges.
The structure is along these lines: "The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization."
Notice that in each usage of "intent to commit" the context is in reference to a date in the past and the intent to commit the crime at that point in time.
Glad to help in understanding the context of what was actually written.
WW
Read it ..See post # 14.
Read it ..
I accept your admission Bragg has no underlying crime.
The 34 counts all are one harmless misdemeanor, if that. There’s nothing else there except the mention of a “serious crime” that remains unnamed. Violation of Trump’s 6th Amendment rights.
The 34 counts all are one harmless misdemeanor, if that. There’s nothing else there except the mention of a “serious crime” that remains unnamed. Violation of Trump’s 6th Amendment rights.
The challenge is that the judge and jury are very anti-Trump.Trump is represented by excellent lawyers.
So what IS the felony violation? Don’t link me to Bragg’s gobblygook….just tell me. Or don’t you know?The indictment list the felony violations that Trump committed, the Statement of Facts submitted to the court outline the other crimes that Trump is charged with attempting to aid through concealment.
WW
They did, his lawyer's didn't want to go to trial until January 2024. LOLDamn, I wonder why Trump's lawyers did not think of this
They did, his lawyer's didn't want to go to trial until January 2024. LOL
No, your lack of an underlying statute is showing, Simp.Your lack of education is showing again.
So what IS the felony violation? Don’t link me to Bragg’s gobblygook….just tell me. Or don’t you know?
Seems upon doing a little research each state may just have their interpretation of speedy trial. Just checking out a few states and many are different for a felony.Bragg has charged Trump with falsifying business records (a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations) and the “intent to commit a future more serious crime” (the unarmed felony).
Trump has a right to know what this unnamed future crime he intends to commit is. Otherwise, the Democrats could arrest me, and every Trump voter, on the grounds that we intend to commit a felony in the future.
The case against Trump is unconstitutional and should be tossed. Bragg should be disbarred for using the power of his office, along with his personal hate for a citizen, to violate that citizen’s Sixth Amendment Rights. And Biden should be insisting on that, instead of that evil smile when asked about it.
Sixth Amendment
www.law.cornell.edu
No it doesn't ....Bragg has charged Trump with falsifying business records (a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations) and the “intent to commit a future more serious crime” (the unarmed felony).
Trump has a right to know what this unnamed future crime he intends to commit is. Otherwise, the Democrats could arrest me, and every Trump voter, on the grounds that we intend to commit a felony in the future.
The case against Trump is unconstitutional and should be tossed. Bragg should be disbarred for using the power of his office, along with his personal hate for a citizen, to violate that citizen’s Sixth Amendment Rights. And Biden should be insisting on that, instead of that evil smile when asked about it.
Sixth Amendment
No, your lack of an underlying statute is showing, Simp.
Constitution says you have to be told the crime you are accused of.
