Bragg’s Pursuit of Trump Violates the Sixth Amendment

[Lisa558]

Have you contacted Trump's legal team to let them know about this since they do not seem to agree with you?

They agree with me. There is no named underlying crime

 

[bodecea]

No he didn’t. He named a civil misdemeanor past the statute of limitations, tied to a future unspecified felony crime Trump intends to commit.

Knock-knock: You’re being arrested, Moonglow.
Moonglow: For what?
KK: You intend to commit a felony.
MG: What felony?
KK: Just something. We’re not saying. Now get to Court.

Nope....but nice try.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

They agree with me. There is no named underlying crime

There does not have to be, they know this....you on the other hand think you know more than actual lawyers and judges.

Did you even graduate high school?

 

[debbiedowner]

The next hearing is Dec 4th.

Not sure what that has to do with the 6th amendment.

His attorney's did not want the next hearing until January 2024 said by an attorney on ABC news last night.

 

[Lisa558]

View attachment 773396

It's in the indictment.

WW

I just told you don’t link. Tell me. You can’t because the felony isn’t even named. That falsifying records is a misdemeanor, and the time limit has already passed.

In this country, when you are charged with a felony, you have the constitutional right to know what it is. How else can you even prepare a defense?

The leftists have sunk so low that they are Ok with their political opponents being charged with unnamed felonies.

 

[WorldWatcher]

I just told you don’t link. Tell me. You can’t because the felony isn’t even named. That falsifying records is a misdemeanor, and the time limit has already passed.

In this country, when you are charged with a felony, you have the constitutional right to know what it is. How else can you even prepare a defense?

The leftists have sunk so low that they are Ok with their political opponents being charged with unnamed felonies.

Here I drew a big red box around it showing that a first degree commission of 175.10 is a felony.

The felony charge is right there in the indictment 175.10, it's not "unnamed".

WW

 

[Nostra]

View attachment 773396

It's in the indictment.

WW

That isn’t the underlying crime, Simp.

 

[WorldWatcher]

That isn’t the underlying crime, Simp.

I don't know what you mean by the underlying crime?

You mean the crime he was attempting to aid in or conceal that is the basis for the felony charge under 175.10?

W

 

[Nostra]

And that is what will happen during the next 7 months of discovery.

Do try and keep up.

So you think Bragg can wait seven months to come up with a crime to base this indictment on?

Moron.

 

[Nostra]

I don't know what you mean by the underlying crime?

You mean the crime he was attempting to aid in or conceal that is the basis for the felony charge under 175.10?

W

Yep. Bragg has not come up with one.

 

[Lisa558]

View attachment 773397


Here I drew a big red box around it showing that a first degree commission of 175.10 is a felony.

The felony charge is right there in the indictment 175.10, it's not "unnamed".

WW

Putting an expense for an NDA under “legal expenses” is not a felony. He’s claiming it’s a felony because it’s concealing a more serious crime, which he won’t name.

Let’s worry more about Biden stealing classified docs from the SCIF when he was a senator. Or go after the thug who tried to kill the garage attendant.

The lopsided justice here is why this is no longer America.

 

[Nostra]

View attachment 773397


Here I drew a big red box around it showing that a first degree commission of 175.10 is a felony.

The felony charge is right there in the indictment 175.10, it's not "unnamed".

WW

To be a felony it has to be done to conceal another crime.

 

[Winston]

I just told you don’t link. Tell me. You can’t because the felony isn’t even named. That falsifying records is a misdemeanor, and the time limit has already passed.

In this country, when you are charged with a felony, you have the constitutional right to know what it is. How else can you even prepare a defense?

The leftists have sunk so low that they are Ok with their political opponents being charged with unnamed felonies.

You are seriously confused. Trump is charged with falsifying business records, IN THE FIRST DEGREE. That is a felony. The crimes in which he had an intent to cover up are three.

1. Violation of state law, attempting to improperly influence an election
2. Avoiding taxes.
3. Violation of federal campaign laws, the one Cohen pled guilty to.

The felony upgrade to his misdemeanor charge does not have to involve a crime he was a party to, it only involves the "cover-up" of that crime. Number one is a long shot, number three is tenuous at best, but number two is dead on and will be the downfall of Trump.

As do the SOL argument, Trump's lawyers may attempt that defense but the state will argue that the SOL was tolled due to the time Trump was outside the state.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Yep. Bragg has not come up with one.

He didn't need to "come up with one". There is already a conviction, that was Cohen.

WW

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So you think Bragg can wait seven months to come up with a crime to base this indictment on?

Moron.

He already has that. Now Trump's legal team will get all that the DA has.

You really just are not very bright at all.

 

[OldFlame]

View attachment 773397


Here I drew a big red box around it showing that a first degree commission of 175.10 is a felony.

The felony charge is right there in the indictment 175.10, it's not "unnamed".

WW

From my understanding it's only a felony if it's done to hide the commission of another crime. If Bragg and those that are controlling him want to the world to see what a criminal Trump is, why wouldn't they just state what crime was trying to be hidden that caused these to be felonies? Why keep it a secret? Especially if you want public opinion on your side? And that's where the 'media' comes into play, they're so used to owning the 'media' and having their backing with every corrupt thing they do, they don't think they need to be transparent, that they can get away with limiting information to the public. One of these days that strategy is going to backfire on them, it may not be today, but it will happen eventually.

 

[Winston]

To be a felony it has to be done to conceal another crime.

Read the Statement of Facts so that you can quit looking like an idiot.

 

[Lisa558]

I don't know what you mean by the underlying crime?

You mean the crime he was attempting to aid in or conceal that is the basis for the felony charge under 175.10?

W

Yes. What crime was that? Having consensual sex with a floozy is not illegal. Neither is paying her for an NDA.

 

[WorldWatcher]

From my understanding it's only a felony if it's done to hide the commission of another crime.

Correct.

From my understanding it's only a felony if it's done to hide the commission of another crime. If Bragg and those that are controlling him want to the world to see what a criminal Trump is, why wouldn't they just state what crime was trying to be hidden that caused these to be felonies? Why keep it a secret? Especially if you want public opinion on your side? And that's where the 'media' comes into play, they're so used to owning the 'media' and having their backing with every corrupt thing they do, they don't think they need to be transparent, that they can get away with limiting information to the public. One of these days that strategy is going to backfire on them, it may not be today, but it will happen eventually.

They did, it's in the Statement of Facts submitted to the court yesterday.

WW

 

[OldFlame]

He didn't need to "come up with one". There is already a conviction, that was Cohen.

WW

So your assumption is these are felony charges against Trump because he was trying to cover the specific crime that Cohen was convicted of?